Machiavellian Politics and the Exploitation of America's Conservative Christians
joelp printable version print page     Bookmark and Share
Thu Dec 22, 2005 at 02:04:28 PM EST

One of the principle themes of my painting, "American Fundamentalists (Christ's Entry into Washington in 2008)" is that there are THREE forms of "fundamentalism" at work in the current American cultural/political climate: political, economic and religious. Although I was taken to task at a panel in Columbus, Ohio by a political historian who insisted that only religious extremism can be defined as "fundamentalist," (he insisted that political and economic "absolutism" was the correct terminology otherwise, and even the audience in attendance groaned over this linguistic splitting-of-hairs), nothing has changed my views about the current marriages of convenience forged by these three sometimes opposing movements. A recent article by Seymour Hersh in The New Yorker (12/5/05) entitled "Up In The Air" reminds me that, although the American Religious Right might think it's running things, in fact it TOO is being used in an age-old Machiavellian power play by the political ruling elite.

16th Century Florentine Niccolò Machialvelli is clear on the use of religion (or more precisely, public piety) to further political goals: act pious in public, but act the opposite in reality:

"That the show of religion was helpful to the politician, but the reality of it hurtful and pernicious."

Machiavelli not only stressed the need to deceive the public with religious rhetoric, but cautioned that not doing so would lead to ruin:

"One prince [Ferdinand of Aragon] of the present time, whom it is not well to name, never preaches anything else but peace and good faith, and to both he is most hostile, and either, if he had kept it, would have deprived him of reputation and kingdom many a time."

Why quote a 16th Century Italian in America's 21st Century? Because many of the current American Political Fundamentalist movement (known as NeoCons, since they are extremists more than actual conservatives) are students and followers of Machiavellian political tactics. Grover Norquist (president of Americans for Tax Reform , who has compared taxation to the Holocaust) and Ralph Reed (former head of the Christian Coalition, Bush political operative, lobbyist with ties to Jack Abramoff, and now current candidate for political office in Virginia) studied with Machiavellian scholar Leo Strauss in Chicago in the 1980's. Together they formed a college Conservative Republican club, which spread to many campuses across the country, seeding many in the current far-right political movement.

Even without direct Machiavelli references, it is painfully obvious that the architects of today's political agenda (including Karl Rove, Tom Delay and Dick Cheney) follow many of not most of Machiavelli's advice (I even remember hearing an interview with a childhood friend of Rove's, who recounted a conversation with an adult Karl where he stated that he was not personally, in fact, a believer in God or religion, but attended church to keep up appearances). These gentlemen are not the first names conjured up when we think of the Christian Right, but that's why they have their cheerleader-in-chief, who proved he can comfortably perform the public piety role. George W. Bush is a true believer in the black/white, good/evil, determinist view of the universe (like all good fundamentalists of any stripe). Hersh writes:

"After the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the former official said, he was told Bush felt that God put me here" to deal with the war on terror. The President's belief was fortified by the Republican sweep in the 2002 congressional; elections; Bush saw the victory as a purposeful message from God that "He's the man," the former official said. Publicly, Bush depicted his reelection as a referendum on the war; privately, he spoke of it as another manifestation of divine purpose."

Just because he believed that God helped him win does not keep immoral political operatives behind him from doing "whatever it takes" to gain these victory  (for fundamentalists, the ends ALWAYS justify the means, because they are right and you are wrong, evil and in fact the devil). But in a twist on the master's original teachings, these Machiavellians have created a faux-prince to keep public face, whereas they are the actual "princes":

"(The former defense official) said that the President had become more detached, leaving more issues to Karl Rove and Vice President Cheney. "They keep him in the gray world of religious idealism, where he wants to be anyway."

It's an old adage that the best salesman is someone who actually believes his own pitch, even if it is false. In fusing America's greatest contribution to world economics and politics - the science of sales and public relations - with Machiavellian teachings of the immoral requirements of leadership, America's Christians are being used to prop up classic greed and power. George W. Bush proved in the doomed reelection campaign of his father that he could "get out the Christian vote," which earned him the 2000 slot. He also proved, through his simplistic world view, that he could be trusted to stay on message and do what he was told. The perceived political power of today's American Religious Right is for public face only; the few executive orders, bureaucratic appointees and judicial nominations don't change the NeoCon's overriding (and overreaching) actions to consolidate political, economic and military power. Using religion, and the religious, is just par for the course.

But the pendulum can be locked to the right for only so long - to quote Machiavelli, "although crimes may win an empire, they do not win glory."

Joel tours the US with his 8x14 foot painting, speaking on "American Fundamentalism and the Threat to Democracy and Freedom of Faith."




Display:
You seem to be suggesting that fundamentalists are being used by the neocons, but it could just as easily be argued that the fundys are controlling the neocons. Actually, it's a moot point since most fundamentalists are neocons as well. They believe in American empire and wealth consolidation as much as they believe in executing gays and making Christianity the state religion. In fact, religious conservatives were the main promoters of social darwinism in the last century. They're still doing it. They'll just never use that term today.

by Dave on Thu Dec 22, 2005 at 09:34:38 PM EST

Neoconservatives, neocons, are a very specific tendency within the right.  They have a thirty-year history, a network of organizations and publications, and several documents that express their (mainly foreign policy) positions.  They are not part of the religious right, though they have allied with it, and have particularly strong links with the denomination-splitting Institute for Religion and Democracy.

Talk to Action has recently featured a number of useful, analytical posts that help sort out different tendencies within the religious right.  

Don't take things in the other direction by making up a new meaning for the term 'neocon'.  Grover Norquist and Ralph Reed are not neocons.  Jeane Kirkpatrick, Richard Perle, and William Kristol are.  Not everyone with any connection whatsoever to Leo Strass is a neoconservative.

If you'd like links to articles that discuss the neoconservatives, I'll be happy to provide some. But please, please respect the existing meaning of a term that has decades of standing. Left-liberal Michael Harrington coined the word as a mildly mocking name for the group, in the mid-1970s when 'conservative' was not a fashionable thing to be at all, and when most of the participants were still Democrats.

by Nell on Fri Dec 23, 2005 at 01:20:59 AM EST

Point taken, although Cheney and Rumsfeld definately walk the line. Sure, the "NeoCons" specifically refer to Wolfowitz, Perle, Pfief and their lot, authors of the Project for New american Century, etc (a group with a military approach to solving all problems, which DOES sound like Bush, Chaney, Runsfeld, et al). But at some point, just like my use of the word "fundamentlist" to describe an apporach more than one narrow movement, I am avoiding the other "F" word (fascist) to describe the political/corporate cabal currently running the show, though at some point I suppose we all need to start calling a spade a spade. They are all "Neo" Conservatives in that they may use the term, but in true 1984 doublespeak, are acting as free-market anarchists and extremists.

I'm open to a new term for the lot, which would include their users enablers (who happen to be the very NeoCons you single out). As you imply, it's getting very difficult to tell who's using who vs. who's getting used, but there's plenty to go around, and the American Religious Right is deeply embedded (and in bed) with this mess.This just makes these entanglements very complicated and interesting to unravel. At the end of the day, it just seems to me that the big winners are the corporatists and one-party government guys - American culture and mass media will ultimately defeat the moral police (note Dover, and the general dismissal of the "War on Christmas"). To misquote Cheney (sort of), the American Fundamentalist movement is in the last throes.

by joelp on Fri Dec 23, 2005 at 02:30:29 PM EST
Parent

I appreciate the research you've done to identify the characters in your painting.

by Mainstream Baptist on Fri Dec 23, 2005 at 09:39:07 PM EST
Parent

This is not hair-splitting like the distinction between fundamentalism and absolutism (though I have some sympathy with the man who raised that point).  

I understand the problems that lead you to want to avoid the term 'fascist' -- both definitional problems of the term itself and the reaction it tends to provoke among readers.

But 'neoconservative' is not a solution to that problem; it only makes things worse because it's much less accurate.  Correctly used, 'neoconservative' denotes only one strand of the rightists now in power.

You've taken on the task, as an artist and a speaker, of communicating the connections and tensions within the networks behind this administration.  That's hard enough, so please don't add to your difficulties by using words in ways that will confuse.

by Nell on Tue Dec 27, 2005 at 01:56:45 AM EST
Parent

Having just re-read my comment, I want to apologize for the somewhat hectoring tone.  It's late; tomorrow I'll be back with a constructive suggestion or two for the word we're looking for.  Don't let that stop anyone in the meantime...

by Nell on Tue Dec 27, 2005 at 02:11:02 AM EST
Parent



Help me understand why Norquist does not classify as a neo-conservative.

by Mainstream Baptist on Fri Dec 23, 2005 at 09:36:34 PM EST
Parent
MB, the wikipedia entry for neconservatism is one starting point, and provides an answer in its opening sentence:

[Neoconservatives] are mainly characterized by their relatively interventionist and hawkish views on foreign policy, and their lack of support for the "small government" principles and restrictions on social spending, when compared with other American conservatives such as traditional or paleoconservatives.

Another good intro is 'Neocon 101' from the Christian Science Monitor in 2003.

Norquist is a straight-ahead movement conservative.  He is not an intellectual, but an operative, a political 'mechanic' who came out of the college Republicans.  His ideological stance on tax cuts and "small government" is 100% for purposes of building the Republican Party's grip on power.  He has clashed with the neoconservatives over his outreach to Muslims (the wikipedia entry for Norquist covers this).  He also has relatively little focus or impact on foreign policy.

by Nell on Tue Dec 27, 2005 at 01:18:33 AM EST
Parent





WWW Talk To Action


Cognitive Dissonance & Dominionism Denial
There is new research on why people are averse to hearing or learning about the views of ideological opponents. Based on evaluation of five......
By Frederick Clarkson (374 comments)
Will the Air Force Do Anything To Rein In Its Dynamic Duo of Gay-Bashing, Misogynistic Bloggers?
"I always get nervous when I see female pastors/chaplains. Here is why everyone should as well: "First, women are not called to be pastors,......
By Chris Rodda (195 comments)
The Legacy of Big Oil
The media is ablaze with the upcoming publication of David Grann's book, Killers of the Flower Moon. The shocking non fiction account of the......
By wilkyjr (110 comments)
Gimme That Old Time Dominionism Denial
Over the years, I have written a great deal here and in other venues about the explicitly theocratic movement called dominionism -- which has......
By Frederick Clarkson (101 comments)
History Advisor to Members of Congress Completely Twists Jefferson's Words to Support Muslim Ban
Pseudo-historian David Barton, best known for his misquoting of our country's founders to promote the notion that America was founded as a Christian nation,......
By Chris Rodda (113 comments)
"Christian Fighter Pilot" Calls First Lesbian Air Force Academy Commandant a Liar
In a new post on his "Christian Fighter Pilot" blog titled "BGen Kristin Goodwin and the USAFA Honor Code," Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Jonathan......
By Chris Rodda (144 comments)
Catholic Right Leader Unapologetic about Call for 'Death to Liberal Professors' -- UPDATED
Today, Donald Trump appointed C-FAM Executive Vice President Lisa Correnti to the US Delegation To UN Commission On Status Of Women. (C-FAM is a......
By Frederick Clarkson (126 comments)
Controlling Information
     Yesterday I listened to Russ Limbaugh.  Rush advised listeners it would be best that they not listen to CNN,MSNBC, ABC, CBS and......
By wilkyjr (118 comments)
Is Bannon Fifth-Columning the Pope?
In December 2016 I wrote about how White House chief strategist Steve Bannon, who likes to flash his Catholic credentials when it comes to......
By Frank Cocozzelli (250 comments)
Ross Douthat's Hackery on the Seemingly Incongruous Alliance of Bannon & Burke
Conservative Catholic writer Ross Douthat has dissembled again. This time, in a February 15, 2017 New York Times op-ed titled The Trump Era's Catholic......
By Frank Cocozzelli (64 comments)
`So-Called Patriots' Attack The Rule Of Law
Every so often, right-wing commentator Pat Buchanan lurches out of the far-right fever swamp where he has resided for the past 50 years to......
By Rob Boston (161 comments)
Bad Faith from Focus on the Family
Here is one from the archives, Feb 12, 2011, that serves as a reminder of how deeply disingenuous people can be. Appeals to seek......
By Frederick Clarkson (176 comments)
The Legacy of George Wallace
"One need not accept any of those views to agree that they had appealed to real concerns of real people, not to mindless, unreasoning......
By wilkyjr (70 comments)
Betsy DeVos's Mudsill View of Public Education
My Talk to Action colleague Rachel Tabachnick has been doing yeoman's work in explaining Betsy DeVos's long-term strategy for decimating universal public education. If......
By Frank Cocozzelli (80 comments)
Prince and DeVos Families at Intersection of Radical Free Market Privatizers and Religious Right
This post from 2011 surfaces important information about President-Elect Trump's nominee for Secretary of Education, Betsy DeVos. -- FC Erik Prince, Brother of Betsy......
By Rachel Tabachnick (218 comments)

Respect for Others? or Political Correctness?
The term "political correctness" as used by Conservatives and Republicans has often puzzled me: what exactly do they mean by it? After reading Chip Berlin's piece here-- http://www.talk2action.org/story/2016/7/21/04356/9417 I thought about what he explained......
MTOLincoln (253 comments)
Fear
What I'm feeling now is fear.  I swear that it seems my nightmares are coming true with this new "president".  I'm also frustrated because so many people are not connecting all the dots! I've......
ArchaeoBob (107 comments)
"America - love it or LEAVE!"
I've been hearing that and similar sentiments fairly frequently in the last few days - far FAR more often than ever before.  Hearing about "consequences for burning the flag (actions) from Trump is chilling!......
ArchaeoBob (211 comments)
"Faked!" Meme
Keep your eyes and ears open for a possible move to try to discredit the people openly opposing Trump and the bigots, especially people who have experienced terrorism from the "Right"  (Christian Terrorism is......
ArchaeoBob (165 comments)
More aggressive proselytizing
My wife told me today of an experience she had this last week, where she was proselytized by a McDonald's employee while in the store. ......
ArchaeoBob (163 comments)
See if you recognize names on this list
This comes from the local newspaper, which was conservative before and took a hard right turn after it was sold. Hint: Sarah Palin's name is on it!  (It's also connected to Trump.) ......
ArchaeoBob (169 comments)
Unions: A Labor Day Discussion
This is a revision of an article which I posted on my personal board and also on Dailykos. I had an interesting discussion on a discussion board concerning Unions. I tried to piece it......
Xulon (156 comments)
Extremely obnoxious protesters at WitchsFest NYC: connected to NAR?
In July of this year, some extremely loud, obnoxious Christian-identified protesters showed up at WitchsFest, an annual Pagan street fair here in NYC.  Here's an account of the protest by Pagan writer Heather Greene......
Diane Vera (130 comments)
Capitalism and the Attack on the Imago Dei
I joined this site today, having been linked here by Crooksandliars' Blog Roundup. I thought I'd put up something I put up previously on my Wordpress blog and also at the DailyKos. As will......
Xulon (330 comments)
History of attitudes towards poverty and the churches.
Jesus is said to have stated that "The Poor will always be with you" and some Christians have used that to refuse to try to help the poor, because "they will always be with......
ArchaeoBob (148 comments)
Alternate economy medical treatment
Dogemperor wrote several times about the alternate economy structure that dominionists have built.  Well, it's actually made the news.  Pretty good article, although it doesn't get into how bad people could be (have been)......
ArchaeoBob (90 comments)
Evidence violence is more common than believed
Think I've been making things up about experiencing Christian Terrorism or exaggerating, or that it was an isolated incident?  I suggest you read this article (linked below in body), which is about our great......
ArchaeoBob (214 comments)

More Diaries...




All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments, posts, stories, and all other content are owned by the authors. Everything else © 2005 Talk to Action, LLC.