Dobson does not pass up the chance to expresses his admiration for how that paragon of moral virtue, Rush Limbaugh, reported the issue. But, curiously, he fails even to mention the Republican leadership or Dennis Hastert by name until the final couple of minutes of the broadcast. Would he finally address the failings of the Republican leadership that left the page boys unprotected from a sexual predator in their midst? Nope. Not one word about it. Even when he says it is not his place to become involved in the "political matter" (hah!) of whether Dennis Hastert should resign, he neglects to even mention why the Speaker's position is under fire. Ignore it, and maybe it will go away.

[ James Dobson ]

....."There was a, uh, comment by a blogger this morning who said
'Dobson has been ominously silent about this'.

Well, I haven't been quiet, I just, uh, have not been willing to
do about a hundred interviews and, uh, just to go running all over the
country tryin' to keep up with what the media wants me to do. But, uh,
we have, uh, made it very clear, we issued a press statement about what,
uh, what Congressman Foley did. And, uh, what he did is why he resigned
as soon as the revelations became known and, uh, it was appropriate that
he, uh resign. That should have been the end of the story....

You know, I'm getting hit from all over the place and, uh, uh,
somebody's goin' to have to tell me what in the wide world this
indiscretion by a, uh, member of congress has to do with Evangelical
Christians and and in my case especially me ? What in the world
is the connection there and yet the media is trying to link us
together somehow and that is the spin."

[ Dobson later goes on to play a clip from CNN, of Randy Cohen ]

"Here is a, uh, short sound bite, uh, from an interchange that took
place between John Roberts and Randy Cohen, uh, this was, again, on CNN and Randy Cohen is with  the New York Times and he was fairly
salivating with glee over this moral failure. Uh, Rush
Limbaugh provided this soundbite, and, uh, uh, it is so typical
of the things that are being said being said um, that really,
essentially, call us all hypocrites and I thought that we oughta let all
of our listeners hear. This is just a short interchange here, and this
occurred on CNN just a few nights ago: "It delights me, I think if your a
person who can't enjoy the downfall of a hypocrite then you have no
zest for life. Remember, Foley's the person who castigated President
Clinton, very vigorously, for having a consensual affair with someone
quite a bit older. It is strikingly delight to see a hypocrite fall"

"It's delightful to watch a hypocrite fall." -  Is there any doubt, Tom,
that, uh, this man is ecstatic over a tragedy that's occured in
the Congress ?

[ Tom Minnery ]

"No doubt in my mind. I'm surprised he's willing to
say that on Television. Um, what he's really delighting in
is what he hopes is the downfall of the Republican Party, which as
everybody knows has us, those who are trying to live good moral lives,
as the base. They're trying to show all of us by extension, as
hypocrites here.

[ Dobson ]

Yeah, you know they love to do that.

[ Dobson goes on to quote a recent op ed by Paul Krugman ]

"...It will be interesting, by the way, to see how doctor Dobson, who
declared of Bill Clinton that "no man has ever done more to debase the
presidency" ( Dobson interjects - "I stand by that statement" ), how Dobson responds to the Foley scandal. Does the failure of Republican leaders to do anything about a sexual predator in their midst outrage him as much as a Democratic president's consensual sexual affair ?"

Well, in fact, uh, it does outrage me Mr. Krugman. We condemn the Foley
affair categorically and we also believe that what Mr. Clinton did was
one of the most wicked and reprehensible things ever done by a president
in power....

[ Dobson goes on to talk about the Lewinsky Affair, and Clinton's
impeachment ]

...As it turns out Mr. Foley has had illicit sex with no one that we
know of, and the whole thing turned out to be, uh, what some people are
saying was a sort of a joke by the boy and, uh,  some of the other pages
but, uh, somehow it has diminished my personal integrity and put me on
the editorial pages of the new York Times and, uh, this is just a small
example of why the media is distrusted by the American people,
most of its best known spokesmen are deeply resentful of Christians and
consider us to be, uh, judgmental hypocrites.

[ Tom Minnery ]

Here's what  Mr. Krugman is trying to do. He wants you to vindicate
yourself by dumping on the entire Republican Party and if you are not
willing to do that then he sees you as the biggest of all hypocrites
because you will not. They see this only in political terms, not in the
terms of illicit sex, not in terms of the, uh,  evil of somebody going
after a young person with salacious emails, they turn it immediately to
the party and they do that only because we're now a month before a very
important election."

[ Dobson, later ]

What the liberal media and some Democrats are trying to do in, uh, the
way they played this story in the last five days is to suppress the
turnout on, uh, November the 7th. What they really want to deal is
convince everybody that all of Washington is wicked and evil and there
is no sense in your, uh, even voting because one's as wicked as the
other and to impugn again the character of those who are trying to live
a righteous life even if, uh, imperfectly and none of is perfect, none
of us can, uh, claim to have any perfection - If we did we wouldn't need
a savior. And, uh, so I'm not in any way belittling that when it occurs.
But there is a difference between those who believe in right and wrong
and those that don't. And so what the media is trying to do is paralyze
the values voters because they, uh, two years ago in 2004 they didn't
see it coming, they didn't know the values voters were gonna to come out
in great numbers and they were shocked when it happened, and
they've been determined ever since then to see that it didn't happen
again and this is part of that effort.

[ Tom Minnery ]

You know, uh, we have, uh, been consistent here. You condemned in no
uncertain terms what Congressman Foley did. I remember back in the 90's when, uh, Representative Barney Frank, an open homosexual, was accused of and admitted to having a homosexual prostitute operate out of his own townhouse, if I get that story straight. We objected to that, the
Democrats wanted to move on. Way back in the early 80's it was
Representative Gerry Studds who had sex with an underage, uh, homosexual sex [ Dobson interjects - "he had sex with a teenager" ] and he wasn't bounced out of the House, he didn't resign, he was elected to six more terms, he was given a censure but that was all. The Democrats, uh, weren't so eager then to force that guy to resign, only now when it's a Republican. And, y'know, we're just pointing out the vast hypocrisy here.

[ Dobson continues talking about Gerry Studds' affair, moderator sums up
discussion so far, then Dobson and Minnery begin discussion concerning
the timing of the release of the story on the Foley emails ]

[ Tom Minnery ]

"You know what I fear is happening - and I don't know how to assess this
I fear that we're in a society in which you will he held to the
standards which you claim."

Related story: Liars For Jesus

[ excerpt ]

Would self professed spokespersons, in the name of Christianity and whose words are routinely broadcast to millions around the United States and the globe, attend public events in honor of, and present awards to, politicians who have derived financial profit from a regime of forced abortion and sexual slavery ? Well, yes. Might the leader of a major world religion have conspired to cover up the sexual molestation of thousands of children ? The answer, again, is yes.

So, it is no great stretch to suppose that Christian historical revisionists might - in the words of author Chris Rodda - "Lie For Jesus"....

Other related stories :

See Scandals, and Reed and Abramoff

On the Catholic side of scandal and hypocrisy - Amid GOP Pederasty Scandal, Child Molestation Coverup Allegations Hound Pope Benedict XVl

Also, I'd highly recommend everything written by Talk To Action contributors moiv ( on reproductive rights and the Christian right ) and Jonathan Hutson ( our top hypocrisy skewerer )

Digg
del.icio.us
Newsvine
Reddit
stumbleupon
Facebook