Some excerpts from Mitchell's article:

Conventional wisdom--on the right and on the left--in a rare show of agreement, believes that the Christian Right is the political face of a movement that is quintessentially biblical. The Christian Right equals Christians who are biblical literalists or fundamentalists who wish to reshape American culture and political life in the biblical image.3 Whatever else the Christian Right is, surely it is steeped in the Bible, and in a particular, literalistic reading of the Bible. Thus, Austin Cline, on atheism.about.com writes: "In effect, then, nothing has really changed [since the 1920s]. The complaints are basically the same. The rhetoric is basically the same. The proposed solution is basically the same: the Bible, the Bible, and more of the Bible. Little has changed in all of this because the fundamentalists have changed so little themselves."4

But is this actually true? [     ]

My thesis is that what makes the Christian Right biblical is not a literalistic hermeneutic so much as a mode of argumentation by reference to a deliberately selective set of biblical passages, annexed to the predetermined cause through a variety of exegetical moves, which are usually unexplained because they depend upon prior agreement of the ends of interpretation. And I have shown examples where there is a lot less biblical study going on than one might expect. The Christian Right represents biblical interpretation in a conjunction of two selective circles: of what are the key issues in the political realm and what are the central passages in the biblical record. It represents an odd alignment of each. The canonical delineation is striking--a focus on the Old Testament, with special prominence given to Judges and 1 and 2 Chronicles, as well as to Genesis and Leviticus; and in the New Testament, to selected moralizing passages of the Pauline letters and Revelation. It is easy to see then what is missing: the prophets of Israel and the teachings of Jesus (the Gospels). Along with them go concern with social/political issues such as economic inequality, peace-making, love and forgiveness, and critique of religious hypocrisy (just to choose a few!).

The key to this selectivity is the wholesale adoption by the Christian Right of one strand of biblical thinking, apocalyptic. And apocalyptic is indisputably in the Bible, though it is not everywhere in the Bible, or necessarily quintessentially biblical. [   ]

By self-definition, the "Christian Right" is a movement that seeks to remake the political order in America in the biblical image. It seems fair to ask both those who honor it and those who repudiate it to examine, with a critical eye, whether or not it is really a biblically literalist movement.