Theocrat of the Week
Frederick Clarkson printable version print page     Bookmark and Share
Mon Dec 24, 2007 at 05:45:15 PM EST
Our Distinguished Panel of Judges has been overwhelmed of late. What with the surge of aspirants for Theocrat of the Week, I cannot blame them.  (Who can choose from day-to-day, (let alone week-to-week) between even Huckabee and Romney?) What's more, they (the members of Our Distinguished Panel of Judges, that is) sometimes find themselves baffled by the paradoxes of the means and ends of theocracy itself, and can become quite lost in mystical contemplation of same. But then they sometimes suddenly find themselves rudely awakened.  And who better to rudely awaken them than Richard Mellon Scaife?
Sometimes it is only in the tawdriest episodes that we come to recognize theocratic greatness -- as we have seen in such recent honorees as Sen. David Vitter (R-LA) and Richard Roberts (son of Oral). Indeed, theocrats all recognize the need to control the views and behavior of others in order to gain conformity to doctrine. To accomplish this requires power in its many and myriad forms. They understand that this is what is of transcendent import -- not their own beliefs or behavior.

Back in the 70s, many of theocratic bent and their allies in neoconservatism recognized that the so called mainline Protestant churches were apostatic roaders, heretics, and even feminists.  They had been among the leading institutions that tarnished the glorious war against Godless Communism in Vietnam.

Richard Mellon Scaife, heir to a vast family fortune and in control of several family related foundations, became one of the principal financiers of the instutions of the conservative movement in and Beyond the Beltway, most famously the Heritage Foundation. Later, he was among the founding funders of the Institute on Religion and Democracy, and has continued to provide large grants over the years.

His largess has contributed signficantly to the errosion of the influence of the mainline churches over the past two decades and, as IRD critic John Dorhauer has pointed out -- has driven and exaccerbated divisive internal battles. This in turn, contributed to members, tired of the conflicts, or alternatively, whipped-up into theocratic frenzies, taking leave.  Sometimes whole congregations departed.  Theocrats of all sorts and of all nations rejoiced!

That is why, in the view of Our Distinguished Panel of Judges, it is fitting that Richard Mellon Scaife be recognized as our Theocrat of the Week. He has not only made the world safer for theocracy but he has acheived all this while similtaneously indulging in various violations of the Ten Commandments as a serial adulterer. Our Distinguished Panel of Judges seek not to pass judgement here, but to note how remarkable are the lives of The Great Ones of Our Time. Let us consult The Washington Post's understated report on the divorce of Mr. Scaife, which it describes as a "fabulously tawdry and surpassingly vicious spectacle...".

Remember him? The cantankerous, reclusive 75-year-old billionaire who's spent a sizable chunk of his inherited fortune bankrolling conservative causes and trying to kneecap Democrats? He's best known for funding efforts to smear then-President Bill Clinton but more quietly he's given in excess of $300 million to right-leaning activists, watchdogs and think tanks. Atop his list of favorite donees: the family-values-focused Heritage Foundation which has published papers with titles such as "Restoring a Culture of Marriage."

The culture of his own marriage is apparently past restoring. With the legal fight still in the weigh-in phase, the story of Scaife v. Scaife already includes a dog-snatching, an assault, a night in jail and that divorce court perennial, allegations of adultery.

At some point in late 2005, Ritchie [Mrs. Richard Mellon Scaife] started having suspicions about her husband and hired a private investigator named Keith Scannell, a specialist in high-end surveillance for insurance companies. In December of that year, Scannell followed Richard Scaife to nearby North Huntingdon, home of Doug's Motel, a place where the TVs are bolted to the furniture and rooms can be rented in three-hour increments, for $28. (It's now under new management and renamed the Huntingdon Inn. Head east on Route 8, then east on Route 30.) There, according to Scannell, Scaife spent a few hours with Tammy Sue Vasco.

Why a billionaire would shack up at Doug's Motel, of all places, is a mystery. Ditto his choice of companions. Vasco is a tall, blond 43-year-old mother who in 1993 was busted in a sting operation after showing up at a Sheraton hotel and offering to have sex with an undercover cop for $225, the Post-Gazette reported.

Social Register material she is not, but Vasco and Scaife seemed to have a relationship that went beyond the purely professional. The two usually met each other twice a week, for months, at the motel, says an employee of the motel. Scaife would show up in a chauffeured car, dressed in a suit, wearing cuff links, always bearing flowers. Vasco would be waiting in same room every time, Room 5 on the ground floor, facing the parking lot, said the employee. Mr. Dick, as he was known at the motel, would stay for two hours or so, then get back in the car, which had been waiting, and leave.

Yes, this is the man who made the renewal movement possible; the man without whom right wing American Angelicans might never have gotten to know and to accept Archbishop Peter Akinola of Nigeria as their spiritual leader.  This is the man whose largess made possible the career of the late IRD leader Diane Knippers -- who once famously declared that rather than celebrating the 50th anniversary of the National Council of Churches, that they should be holding a funeral. Our Distintuished Panel of Judges got a kick out of the way that her 2001-2004 strategic plan for IRD titled: Reforming America's Churches Project called the NCC "the Religious Left." Scaife, who specifically helped to fund the project, has certainly gotten his money's worth -- dividing these pseudo Christian obstacles to various business and political empires against themselves, using the defense of traditional marriage as what the liberals call a "wedge issue."

That Scaife himself has come out of all this politically unscathed and able, like Senator David Vitter (R-LA) and others, able to carry on the necessary theocratic works of our time, is a considerable acheivement over and above a lifetime of theocratic accomplishments. This is why Richard Mellon Scaife stands head and shoulders above the field for Theocrat of the Week.

UPDATE:  Word has reached Our Distinguished Panel of Judges (via Newsweek) that Scaife has met privately with former president Bill Clinton (aka Satan himself, to some) and reportedly emerged not only with a peace treaty, but a "mutual admiration society."




Display:
Some paint, some sculpt. Dry sarcasm is your art form.

by Bruce Wilson on Tue Dec 25, 2007 at 01:18:38 PM EST
What I am going for in Theocrat of the Week is a little healthy satire. I will no doubt dip into any number of eddies of humor along the way.

by Frederick Clarkson on Wed Dec 26, 2007 at 02:48:35 AM EST
Parent


Can we get any more idiotic that this article (and this subject). Have we become so scared and full of hatred that we choose to pick on persons who support religion, yet do not lead perfect lives?  It is so much easier to take the road of "no faith", which then means we can't be subject to moral values (which those of faith try to live by). Since there is no God, we have nothing to be scared of in the after-life. That allows us to do whatever we want in this life, as there is no consequences...
We can then poke, prod and make fun of those who do believe; we can ridicule them for their sins, since we have nothing and no one to behold too...
If you choose not to be a believer, that's fine... I won't ridicule you; make fun of you at your expense; tell you how stupid or pathetic you are for not being one of faith...
Yet you choose to attack others for their beliefs, even though they have done nothing to you personally to provoke such hatred; and then you wonder why those of faith get so angry... You call religion evil, and continue to say religion is the cause of war and mass murder (even though the acts you speak of were done hundreds of years ago; by those who didn't fully understand the true meaning of faith and compassion). Yet our recent mass murderers; Stalin, Hitler, Mao - Athiests who killed a hundred million people, receive no ridicule because of their "lack of religious belief"... Isn't it nice how some choose to quickly point out any fault by a religious figure, and then blame religion as the cause... Yet those who commit outrageous acts; acts that would certainly be pounced upon by non-believers; are "dismissed" of any non-religious causation; since, of course, religion can be faulty, but non-religion can't be an issue.

by Hollywood297 on Fri Dec 28, 2007 at 04:24:58 PM EST
What do you know of my beliefs, or lack thereof, and what evidence do you have for your assertions? When have I ever called religion evil?

How do you know that Richard Mellon Scaife is, in fact, religious?  Did I make any criticism of him based on his alleged faith?  

Do you actually support the purposes of this site, or did you register just to call me "idiotic;" "scared and full of hatred;" and by implication, immoral and hypocritical? (If its the latter, you lied when you checked off the little box saying that you do support the purposes of this site.)

Oh yeah, and do you frequently register for blog sites to issue calumnies under assumed names? And if so, what kind of person does that make you?

by Frederick Clarkson on Fri Dec 28, 2007 at 07:36:13 PM EST
Parent

It is safe to say, by the use of the "bias" Washington Post article, that you were upholding their belief (as well as your "panel of judges") of wrongdoing by Mr. Scaife. You brought up the fact that Mr. Scaife supports (by large grants), religious organizations, and then conveniently tied the two together... As if someone who supports religion should be above making mistakes (or should, atleast be ridiculed by doing so).
I don't "support" any site I view... I only respond to what I read... Whether it be your article, or any comments that follow. If you choose to ridicule someone, you should expect a response... Is the "purpose" of this site to make fun of religious people; or of religion itself? Or is it to provoke thought and discussion?  I assumed it was the latter... and therefore, you got my response...
So... that should tell you what kind of person I am... I'm the kind that will commend you if I agree with you, or challenge you if I don't... The article on its face is hateful towards religion; as if all who believe should be above ever "indulging in various violations of the ten commandments"... If my assertion that you are not a person of faith is wrong, then by all means I do apologize... But I can only reach this conclusion based on the context of what you write... And as far as I can see, this article does nothing more than make jest of a religious supporter who may have made a bad error in judgement (as we all do; but apparently making fun of non-religious figures for doing so just isn't good reading).

by Hollywood297 on Fri Dec 28, 2007 at 10:26:18 PM EST
Parent
that you are a liar and a troll. You signed up for this site under false pretenses. We make it very clear that when you check off the little box, you are indicating that you have read and agree with the site's stated purposes and agree to abide by the site guidelines.

As for Mr. Scaife, he bankrolls an organization that is not so much religious as one that seeks to pit people of faith from ancient traditions against one another for political gain. One of their tools is inflaming people over matters of the defintion of marriage.  Seems only reasonable to me to point out that the patron of said organization is unable to live up to the kinds of orthodoxies they push so hard on others.

Meanwhile, you claimed (among other things) that I view religion as "evil" -- based on your own fetid imagination, and no more.

We have written a great deal on this site about IRD and the troubles it foments. Much of this writing has been done by Christian ministers -- John Dorhauer, Andrew Weaver and Steve Martin. Clearly they are not writing from an antireligious bias.  

So next time -- it won't be here -- you join a site, try reading the terms of service before you sign up; and read around a bit before you attack the "idiocy" of a site owner.

by Frederick Clarkson on Fri Dec 28, 2007 at 11:03:43 PM EST
Parent






WWW Talk To Action


Cognitive Dissonance & Dominionism Denial
There is new research on why people are averse to hearing or learning about the views of ideological opponents. Based on evaluation of five......
By Frederick Clarkson (374 comments)
Will the Air Force Do Anything To Rein In Its Dynamic Duo of Gay-Bashing, Misogynistic Bloggers?
"I always get nervous when I see female pastors/chaplains. Here is why everyone should as well: "First, women are not called to be pastors,......
By Chris Rodda (195 comments)
The Legacy of Big Oil
The media is ablaze with the upcoming publication of David Grann's book, Killers of the Flower Moon. The shocking non fiction account of the......
By wilkyjr (110 comments)
Gimme That Old Time Dominionism Denial
Over the years, I have written a great deal here and in other venues about the explicitly theocratic movement called dominionism -- which has......
By Frederick Clarkson (101 comments)
History Advisor to Members of Congress Completely Twists Jefferson's Words to Support Muslim Ban
Pseudo-historian David Barton, best known for his misquoting of our country's founders to promote the notion that America was founded as a Christian nation,......
By Chris Rodda (113 comments)
"Christian Fighter Pilot" Calls First Lesbian Air Force Academy Commandant a Liar
In a new post on his "Christian Fighter Pilot" blog titled "BGen Kristin Goodwin and the USAFA Honor Code," Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Jonathan......
By Chris Rodda (144 comments)
Catholic Right Leader Unapologetic about Call for 'Death to Liberal Professors' -- UPDATED
Today, Donald Trump appointed C-FAM Executive Vice President Lisa Correnti to the US Delegation To UN Commission On Status Of Women. (C-FAM is a......
By Frederick Clarkson (126 comments)
Controlling Information
     Yesterday I listened to Russ Limbaugh.  Rush advised listeners it would be best that they not listen to CNN,MSNBC, ABC, CBS and......
By wilkyjr (118 comments)
Is Bannon Fifth-Columning the Pope?
In December 2016 I wrote about how White House chief strategist Steve Bannon, who likes to flash his Catholic credentials when it comes to......
By Frank Cocozzelli (250 comments)
Ross Douthat's Hackery on the Seemingly Incongruous Alliance of Bannon & Burke
Conservative Catholic writer Ross Douthat has dissembled again. This time, in a February 15, 2017 New York Times op-ed titled The Trump Era's Catholic......
By Frank Cocozzelli (64 comments)
`So-Called Patriots' Attack The Rule Of Law
Every so often, right-wing commentator Pat Buchanan lurches out of the far-right fever swamp where he has resided for the past 50 years to......
By Rob Boston (161 comments)
Bad Faith from Focus on the Family
Here is one from the archives, Feb 12, 2011, that serves as a reminder of how deeply disingenuous people can be. Appeals to seek......
By Frederick Clarkson (176 comments)
The Legacy of George Wallace
"One need not accept any of those views to agree that they had appealed to real concerns of real people, not to mindless, unreasoning......
By wilkyjr (70 comments)
Betsy DeVos's Mudsill View of Public Education
My Talk to Action colleague Rachel Tabachnick has been doing yeoman's work in explaining Betsy DeVos's long-term strategy for decimating universal public education. If......
By Frank Cocozzelli (80 comments)
Prince and DeVos Families at Intersection of Radical Free Market Privatizers and Religious Right
This post from 2011 surfaces important information about President-Elect Trump's nominee for Secretary of Education, Betsy DeVos. -- FC Erik Prince, Brother of Betsy......
By Rachel Tabachnick (218 comments)

Respect for Others? or Political Correctness?
The term "political correctness" as used by Conservatives and Republicans has often puzzled me: what exactly do they mean by it? After reading Chip Berlin's piece here-- http://www.talk2action.org/story/2016/7/21/04356/9417 I thought about what he explained......
MTOLincoln (253 comments)
Fear
What I'm feeling now is fear.  I swear that it seems my nightmares are coming true with this new "president".  I'm also frustrated because so many people are not connecting all the dots! I've......
ArchaeoBob (107 comments)
"America - love it or LEAVE!"
I've been hearing that and similar sentiments fairly frequently in the last few days - far FAR more often than ever before.  Hearing about "consequences for burning the flag (actions) from Trump is chilling!......
ArchaeoBob (211 comments)
"Faked!" Meme
Keep your eyes and ears open for a possible move to try to discredit the people openly opposing Trump and the bigots, especially people who have experienced terrorism from the "Right"  (Christian Terrorism is......
ArchaeoBob (165 comments)
More aggressive proselytizing
My wife told me today of an experience she had this last week, where she was proselytized by a McDonald's employee while in the store. ......
ArchaeoBob (163 comments)
See if you recognize names on this list
This comes from the local newspaper, which was conservative before and took a hard right turn after it was sold. Hint: Sarah Palin's name is on it!  (It's also connected to Trump.) ......
ArchaeoBob (169 comments)
Unions: A Labor Day Discussion
This is a revision of an article which I posted on my personal board and also on Dailykos. I had an interesting discussion on a discussion board concerning Unions. I tried to piece it......
Xulon (156 comments)
Extremely obnoxious protesters at WitchsFest NYC: connected to NAR?
In July of this year, some extremely loud, obnoxious Christian-identified protesters showed up at WitchsFest, an annual Pagan street fair here in NYC.  Here's an account of the protest by Pagan writer Heather Greene......
Diane Vera (130 comments)
Capitalism and the Attack on the Imago Dei
I joined this site today, having been linked here by Crooksandliars' Blog Roundup. I thought I'd put up something I put up previously on my Wordpress blog and also at the DailyKos. As will......
Xulon (329 comments)
History of attitudes towards poverty and the churches.
Jesus is said to have stated that "The Poor will always be with you" and some Christians have used that to refuse to try to help the poor, because "they will always be with......
ArchaeoBob (148 comments)
Alternate economy medical treatment
Dogemperor wrote several times about the alternate economy structure that dominionists have built.  Well, it's actually made the news.  Pretty good article, although it doesn't get into how bad people could be (have been)......
ArchaeoBob (90 comments)
Evidence violence is more common than believed
Think I've been making things up about experiencing Christian Terrorism or exaggerating, or that it was an isolated incident?  I suggest you read this article (linked below in body), which is about our great......
ArchaeoBob (214 comments)

More Diaries...




All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments, posts, stories, and all other content are owned by the authors. Everything else © 2005 Talk to Action, LLC.