Well, beyond gaining some foundational knowledge by reading some basic books about the religious right, there are fortunately, some handy online glossaries to help us sort out definitions and to guide us in matters of correct useage. Each of these are works in progress, but taken together, they provide us with the tools we need to begin to construct the necessary vocabulary. The blog and resource site Religious Right Watch has a glossary and discussions of some basic terms central to any serious discussion of the Religious Right, and includes helpful links to Wikipedia and authoratative online sources. For example, a definition of religious right:
Religious Right A broad, varied collection of political movements of religious and social conservatives arising in the 1970's, and overwhelmingly American and Christian to the point of rendering the descriptions "Religious Right" and "Christian Right" effectively synonymous. (See: "Christian Right.") <christian_right.htm> However, the Religious Right can be said to exist comparatively weakly in nations other than the United States, including Canada and the United Kingdom, and to include individuals and movements informed by Judaism, Islam, Mormonism, and other faith traditions besides Christianity. In the United States, it is closely associated with the Republican Party. The vast majority of members of the Christian Right insist that the United States was founded as a Christian nation. (see AU.org Is America a 'Christian Nation'?") Political Research Associates, a Somerville, Massachusetts-based think tank that studies rightwing movements, has a glossary of terms that are used in the course of studying the broad, multifaceted right, including the religious right. Here are some examples:
Eschatology: The idea that there is an "end time" for the current historic epoch at which point the forces of evil will be vanquished and the forces for good rewarded. In Christianity, the study of Biblical prophesy regarding the end times. And mainstream journalism is also tackling definitions and useage in a new online stylebook.
The Religion Newswriters Association, an organzation of professional journalists, has recently posted an online stylebook similar to those published by the Associated Press and The New York Times. It focuses on simple definitions and useage, and sometimes delves into thumnail history. Here are a few examples:
faith-based: Term that came into popular use when President George W. Bush established the White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives in 2001. Generally, the adjective faith alone is preferred, as in faith groups instead of faith-based groups. Since it is a work in progress and serves mainstream journalism, it is interesting to note what is not included, as well as what is. I find that so far, it is helpful for definitions and useage of basic terms like menorah, non-denominational, or National Council of Churches, but it does not go into the major theological terms or factions with political implications, such as Premillenialism and Postmillenialism; Christian nationalism, Christian Idenitity, liberation theology, Christian Zionism, dominionism and Christian Reconstructionism. Although there are discussions of the terms gay and lesbian, there is no mention of for example, of "reparative therapy" or "conversion therapy" the controversial notion that Christian conversion and counseling of a certain sort, can cure homosexuality,and is often in the news. (Then again, the other glossaries have not gotten to that one either although the Wikipedia, always a useful reference, has.) There is a detailed definition for Opus Dei and its relation to The DaVinci Code, but there is no mention of Tim LaHaye and the Left Behind series of novels, movies and the video game. There are no definitions of secular, humanism, or secular humanism. And although elements of the story are reported by religion writers all the time, there is no defitition of the controversial rightwing "renewal groups," in mainline churches, and the group driving them -- the Institute on Religion and Democracy. The terms theocracy, theocratic, and theonomy, have so far gone undefined, although they stand at the center of contemporary writing about religion and public affairs in the U.S. and internationally. As a work in progress the Religion Newswriters Association invites comments and suggestions. These online glossaries, each with their different emphases, are valuable tools for anyone seeking to write, speak and think clearly about the religious right, and religion and politics in general.
Writin' 'bout the Religious Right | 3 comments (3 topical, 0 hidden)
Writin' 'bout the Religious Right | 3 comments (3 topical, 0 hidden)
|
BlogsBartholomew's Notes On ReligionChip BerletMax BlumenthalThe Panda's ThumbFrederick Clarkson Chuck Currie DefCon father Jake Stops The World John Gorenfeld Religion Clause Chris Mooney Religious Right Watch The Revealer Jesus Politics Majority Report Radio Blog Mainstream Baptist Orcinus Dispatches from the Culture Wars Ex-Gay Watch The Wall of Separation Blog From The Capital:a blog on religious liberty issues and the separation of church and stateOrganizationsAmerican Booksellers Foundation for Freedom of ExpressionACLUAnti-Defamation LeagueAmerican Library AssociationChristian Alliance for ProgressCitizens ProjectDefCon: Campaign to Defend The ConstitutionFaithful America People For the American wayInstitute For Democracy StudiesInterfaith AllianceJews On First: Defending the First AmendmentAmerican Fundamentalists Americans United for Separation of Church and StateBaptist Joint Committee on Religious Liberty The Clergy and laity Network Political Research Associates Theocracy Watch Media Matters for AmericaMilitary Religious Freedom FoundationMontana Human Rights NetworkNational Center For Science EducationReligious Coalition for Reproductive ChoiceThe RevealerSouthern Poverty Law CenterTexas Freedom NetworkCrossLeft: Organizing the Christian LeftTheocracy WatchTruth Wins Out" |
|||||||||||||