Google WWW Talk To Action


The Indian River Incident : What You Can Do

link > The "Stop the ACLU Coalition" Shaming Project
How you can help stop "Stop The ACLU" just by sending a few emails



 'Left Behind' video game imageThe Shaming Project

does the violence of "Left Behind: Eternal Forces" bother you ? If so, what can you do ? Well, to begin with you can email Jonathan Hutson's stories to people you know. That will help to bring more public scrutiny of the game. Public shaming really works ! Just click on the "email" icon and link at the top or bottom of the story and you'll be taken to a form that will allow you email the first story, The Purpose Driven Life Takers or the latest installment without leaving this site. Thanks. 'Left Behind' video game image




Oh No! Not Another Article About Jefferson and the Danbury Baptists!
By Chris RoddaFri Feb 09, 2007 at 03:14:02 PM EST
topic: Church/State Separation section:Front Page printable version print this story
( ed - Chris Rodda is the author of Liars For Jesus: The Religious Right's Alternate Version Of American History )

With the 60th anniversary of Everson v. Board of Education just around the corner, articles about Thomas Jefferson's "wall of separation" metaphor seem to be everywhere. Many of these briefly refute the typical religious right myths about the meaning of Jefferson's letter to the Danbury Baptists (like those from D. James Kennedy and William Federer found later in this article), but I have yet to come across an article that presents an in-depth enough look at the history behind Jefferson's letter to satisfy a history buff like myself. So, I decided to write one.

In order to fully understand Jefferson's letter to the Baptists, it is essential to understand the letter he was replying to, and, in order to understand that letter, a little knowledge about history of the government of Connecticut is necessary, so that's where I'm going to start.

Connecticut, nicknamed the Constitution State, was actually one of the last of the original thirteen states to adopt a state constitution - over forty years after declaring itself a state. What the nickname refers to is the Fundamental Orders of 1638-1639. Because this was the first document written in the colonies by a representative body to form a government, it is considered by many to be the first state constitution. The Fundamental Orders established a form of government for Connecticut that would continue with little change for the next 180 years.

In 1660, when news of the restoration of the monarchy in England reached the colonies, Connecticut's General Court, aware that the new king, Charles II, was not a big fan of Congregationalists, became concerned about the fact that their colony had never been granted an official charter. A charter was quickly drafted, and the colony's governor, John Winthrop, Jr., sailed to England to present it to the Privy Council. Winthrop's mission was successful, and the charter was officially adopted by the General Court on October 9, 1662. Although this charter had almost no effect on the existing government of Connecticut, it is considered by some to be the state's second constitution.

Around the time of the American Revolution, all of the states, with the exception of Connecticut and Rhode Island, adopted state constitutions. These constitutions, written at the suggestion of the Continental Congress, were necessary because these states would need new governments once they were independent from England. Connecticut and Rhode Island, however, both of which already had functioning governments that would not be affected when ties to England were severed, saw no need to write state constitutions at this time. In 1776, the Connecticut General Assembly (formerly the General Court) declared:

That the ancient form of civil government contained in the Charter from Charles the II, King of England, and adopted by the people of this state, shall be and remain the civil constitution of this state, under the sole authority of the people hereof, independent of any king or prince whatever.

So, with the exception of deleting any references to England in the Charter, there was no change to the government of Connecticut.

By 1800, all of the other states had made significant progress towards religious freedom. Not every state had the liberal freedom enjoyed in states like Pennsylvania and Virginia, but none had the degree of religious discrimination practiced in Connecticut. The Congregationalist government of Connecticut, established by the Fundamental Orders in 1638-1639, legitimized by the Charter of 1662, and left unchanged at the time of the Revolution, was the government that still existed on October 7, 1801, when the Danbury Baptist Association wrote the following letter to President Thomas Jefferson.

Sir, Among the many million in America and Europe who rejoice in your election to office; we embrace the first opportunity which we have enjoyed in our collective capacity, since your inauguration, to express our great satisfaction, in your appointment to the chief magistracy in the United States: And though our mode of expression may be less courtly and pompous than what many others clothe their addresses with, we beg you, sir, to believe that none are more sincere.

Our sentiments are uniformly on the side of religious liberty-that religion is at all times and places a matter between God and individuals-that no man ought to suffer in name, person, or effects on account of his religious opinions-that the legitimate power of civil government extends no further than to punish the man who works ill to his neighbors; But, sir, our constitution of government is not specific. Our ancient charter together with the law made coincident therewith, were adopted as the basis of our government, at the time of our revolution; and such had been our laws and usages, and such still are; that religion is considered as the first object of legislation; and therefore what religious privileges we enjoy (as a minor part of the state) we enjoy as favors granted, and not as inalienable rights; and these favors we receive at the expense of such degrading acknowledgements as are inconsistent with the rights of freemen. It is not to be wondered at therefore; if those who seek after power and gain under the pretense of government and religion should reproach their fellow men-should reproach their order magistrate, as a enemy of religion, law, and good order, because he will not, dare not, assume the prerogatives of Jehovah and make laws to govern the kingdom of Christ.

Sir, we are sensible that the president of the United States is not the national legislator, and also sensible that the national government cannot destroy the laws of each state; but our hopes are strong that the sentiments of our beloved president, which have had such genial effect already, like the radiant beams of the sun, will shine and prevail through all these states and all the world, till hierarchy and tyranny be destroyed from the earth. Sir, when we reflect on your past services, and see a glow of philanthropy and good will shining forth in a course of more than thirty years we have reason to believe that America's God has raised you up to fill the chair of state out of that goodwill which he bears to the millions which you preside over. May God strengthen you for your arduous task which providence and the voice of the people have called you to sustain and support you enjoy administration against all the predetermined opposition of those who wish to raise to wealth and importance on the poverty and subjection of the people.

And may the Lord preserve you safe from every evil and bring you at last to his heavenly kingdom through Jesus Christ our Glorious Mediator.

Signed in behalf of the association,

Nehemiah Dodge Ephraim Robbins Stephen S. Nelson

According to D. James Kennedy, in his book What If America Were A Christian Nation Again?:

"...Late in 1801, while he was president, he received a letter from the Association of Baptists in Danbury, Connecticut, who were concerned about the threat of the newly formed federal government. This `leviathan,' they feared, could become a great danger to their Christian faith and to their churches."

"...On the first day of the year 1802, Jefferson wrote back to the Danbury Baptists. In this letter, he said that he was greatly impressed that the American people, through the First Amendment had, in effect, erected a `wall of separation between the church and the state,' so the Baptists didn't need to fear that the federal government was going to intrude upon their religion or in any way disturb their faith."

According to William Federer, in his book America's God and Country Encyclopedia of Quotations:

"On January 1, 1802, Jefferson wrote a letter to the Danbury Baptist Association of Danbury, Connecticut, calming their fears that Congress was not in the process of choosing any one single Christian denomination to be the `state' denomination, as was the case with the Anglican Church in England and Virginia...."

"...This personal letter reassured the Baptists that the government's hands were tied from interfering with, or in any way controlling, the affairs or decisions of the churches in America."

The biggest myth about this letter is the Baptists wrote it because they feared that the federal government planned to establish a national religion, a notion that is ridiculous for several reasons. The most obvious of these is that the letter refers only to the problem in Connecticut - that the state was still governed by it's "ancient charter" and the laws of their state's established religion. The "degrading acknowledgements" referred to in the second paragraph of the letter, for example, were the certificates required to exempt those of other religions from paying taxes to support the Congregationalist church. By this time, Connecticut law did allow non-Congregationalists of certain denominations to have their religious taxes go to their own churches, but the process of obtaining and filing the necessary exemption certificate was made as difficult and demeaning as possible. The Baptists mention nothing whatsoever about a fear of the federal government establishing a national religion. The myth that they were writing to Jefferson for a reassurance that this couldn't happen is clearly contradicted by the third paragraph of the letter. This paragraph clearly shows that the Baptists fully understood the First Amendment and the limitations of the federal government's power. When they wrote "our constitution of government is not specific," they were referring to their state's constitution of government, not the federal Constitution. While they knew that Jefferson would be sympathetic to their situation, they also knew that he was powerless to do anything about it.

So, if the Baptists knew Jefferson had no power to help them, why did they even bother to mention the problem with their state government and its religious establishment? Jefferson's election and the ousting of the Federalist administration on the national level had given the Baptists hope that change was also possible in their state. The Baptists as well as other minority denominations in Connecticut were growing in numbers. If all of these religious dissenters joined the Republicans in Connecticut, the combination might become a political force capable of overthrowing their state's Federalist, Congregationalist government. While the religious dissenters and the Republicans had somewhat different priorities, they both had the same goals - a truly representative government and a real state constitution.

The following, dated January 1, 1802, was Jefferson's reply to the Baptist Association's letter.

Gentlemen The affectionate sentiments of esteem and approbation which you are so good as to express towards me, on behalf of the Danbury Baptist association, give me the highest satisfaction. my duties dictate a faithful and zealous pursuit of the interests of my constituents, & in proportion as they are persuaded of my fidelity to those duties, the discharge of them becomes more and more pleasing.

Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, & not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between Church & State. Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties.

I reciprocate your kind prayers for the protection & blessing of the common father and creator of man, and tender you for yourselves & your religious association, assurances of my high respect & esteem.

One of the biggest misconceptions promoted in religious right American history books is that Jefferson's reply to the Baptists was a personal letter and/or a hastily scribbled note that he put little thought into. This is simply not true. The existing copy of the letter is actually Jefferson's first draft, not the final letter. Just the fact that he wrote a first draft proves that this was not a hastily scribbled note. Jefferson then submitted his draft to two different New Englanders in his administration, Postmaster General Gideon Granger of Connecticut and Attorney General Levi Lincoln of Massachusetts, requesting their opinions on how it would be received in their states. Obviously, Jefferson did not consider this a personal letter to the Baptist Association. He was well aware of the likelihood that such a letter would be made public, and did not want to offend any New England political allies. On the advice of Levi Lincoln, Jefferson deleted a paragraph explaining his refusal to proclaim days of thanksgiving, writing the following reason in the margin.

paragraph was omitted on the suggestion that it might give uneasiness to some of our republican friends in the eastern states where the proclamation of thanksgivings etc. by their Executives is an antient habit & is respected.

A common question about Jefferson's letter has to do with what government he was referring to. Was it the federal government or the state governments? The correct answer is both. In his letter, Jefferson described the First Amendment's establishment and free exercise clauses as an "expression of the supreme will of the nation," clearly referring to the federal government. His next sentence, however, doesn't make much sense unless he was referring to the "progress of those sentiments" in the individual states, especially given the fact that he was replying to a letter regarding the lack of religious freedom in one particular state. He couldn't have been referring to the "progress of those sentiments" in the federal government because no progress was necessary there - the First Amendment had already taken care of that. While the federal government couldn't do anything to speed up this progress in the states, Jefferson wrote that he would "see with sincere satisfaction the progress" when it was made. In Connecticut, the kind of progress Jefferson was talking about would take another 16 years.

Connecticut did eventually progress from almost complete intolerance to a degree of religious freedom on par with the other states. When the original commonwealth was formed in the 1630s, the law was simple - religions other than Congregationalism were just not allowed. In the early 1700s, it appeared that progress was being made. The law preventing Quakers from settling in Connecticut was repealed in 1702. In 1708, the General Assembly passed the Toleration Act, which allowed some privileges to certain government approved dissenting religions. These laws, however, were not were not a result of the Congregationalists becoming more tolerant, but the result of the Congregationalists' fear of royal disfavor. England's Parliament had passed an act of religious toleration in 1689, and, although the Charter of 1662 hadn't changed the laws of the state, it did include a condition that Connecticut's laws could not be in conflict with the laws of England. The General Assembly was aware that Queen Anne had received complaints of intolerance from the Quakers and, more importantly, the Connecticut Anglicans. Things started to change during the Great Awakening of the 1740s. Separatist Congregational churches began to split off from the established parish churches. This was seen as a such a tremendous threat that, in 1743, the General Assembly repealed the Toleration Act in an attempt to prevent these churches from organizing. This continued until the 1770s, when the separatists were granted a status similar to other government approved religions like the Baptists and the Quakers. This meant that worship in their churches was now considered to meet the legal requirement of attendance at a government recognized church. The sepa- ratists could no longer be fined for neglecting worship, but, like the Baptists, they had to pay taxes to the Congregational Church unless they filed an exemption certificate. Other denominations, such as the Anglicans and Episcopalians (the ones with money), had become somewhat more accepted, and had even gained a small representation in the government.

Prior to 1801, Federalist candidates in Connecticut were rarely contested. This was due, in large part, to the complete lack of secrecy in the voting process. Local elections, held at town meetings, pretty much forced the voters to vote for Federalist candidates or risk being branded troublemakers. Voters were given pieces of paper. One by one, the names of the candidates were read from a list. A voter would hand in one of their pieces of paper when the name of the candidate they wanted to vote for was called off. By always listing the Federalist candidates first, it was obvious that anyone still holding a piece of paper after all the Federalists' names had been called hadn't voted for a Federalist. In 1801, the first Republican candidates for Governor and Lieutenant Governor appeared on the ballot. The Republicans received only a small fraction of the vote, and only 33 of 200 seats in the Assembly, but the Federalists considered this enough of a threat to change the election process to further discourage Republican candidates. Up until this time, although the actual vote was far from secret, the nomination process had been done by secret ballot. In 1801 the law was changed to make nominations public as well.

The big campaign issue in the elections of the early 1800s was that Connecticut still did not have a constitution. As already mentioned, both the Republicans and the religious dissenters wanted a constitution, albeit for different reasons.The Republican priorities were separation of powers and expanded suffrage; the religious dissenters' priority was disestablishment of the Congregational church. The Republicans gained even more support when the War of 1812 ended. Funds for the war had been raised through imposing internal taxes. When the conflict was over, the U.S. Treasury had a large surplus and returned this money to the states. By giving a disproportionately large amount of this money to the Congregationalists, and little or nothing to the other denominations, the General Assembly alienated the Episcopalians. The Republicans now had the support of this large minority, which then comprised about ten percent of the population. The potential of religious dissenters combining with Jefferson's Republican party, which the Baptists had seen 16 years earlier, had became a reality. In 1817, with Oliver Wolcott running for Governor and Jonathan Ingersoll, an Episcopalian, for Lieutenant Governor, the Republicans narrowly defeated the Federalists. In the next election, the Federalists lost their majority in the Assembly. In August and September of 1818, Connecticut held its constitutional convention.

Although he was powerless to help the Connecticut Baptists in 1801, Thomas Jefferson did eventually "see with sincere satisfaction" the disestablishment of the Congregationalist Church. Upon hearing of the Republican victory in the Connecticut election of 1817, Jefferson expressed this satisfaction in a letter to John Adams.

I join you therefore in sincere congratulations that this den of the priesthood is at length broken up, and that a protestant popedom is no longer to disgrace the American history and character.



Display:

This is a very interesting and informative article. Thank you for educating me.  I've heard the term "separation of church and state" many times, think it's an awfully good idea and like most had only a vague idea about it's origin.

I notice the Danbury Babtists were concerned about being taxed by another faith, a state one no less.  The tax laws today do exactly that but in the interest of all faiths.   If we have fair tax laws then each tax payer is fairly taxed relative to all others.  All receive the benefits of taxes equally so why shouldn't all pay equally.  I don't want to address graduated scale taxes but in passing let us notice the bank needs the police a lot more than the bag lady so perhaps the banker might see fit to throw in a buck or two more than her to pay their salaries and let it rest there.

Tithes, taxes paid to God and collected and spent by God's representatives is what I'm talking about.   If we assume that all are obligated to pay taxes then the notion of tax exemptions of the three main types, income, deductions, (tax reducers) and property for religions force non believers to pay a higher tax thus de facto forcing them to be tithed.

Forcing non believers to pay tithes is clearly unconstitutional.  "No law shall establish religion" is being ignored.  Clearly religion like any business must have income.  Part of religion's income is being paid by non believers by law thus violating that part of the first amendment.  The tax laws establish religion as presently written.

This must be remedied else in the end religious organizations will own all.  It's a mathematical certainty that any untaxed real estate that's allowed to grow will grow to become all the real estate there is.  We will become as the ancient Egyptians and rent our real property from  the relitious establishment.  It takes a very long time for that to happen but religion has all the time there is and claim rights to time after death even.

Those alarmed by the encroachment of religion into the political arena are not falsely alarmed.  They should take note of forced tithing and make it a political issue.  It appears to me to be a place where the ACLU might get involved.  My best guess is that the average American once informed will see the need to slap religion on the writst or perhaps a little lower and harder.  Noticing that the Bible belt holds Bubba's pants up tells us to admonish religion cautiously.



by grunt on Mon Feb 12, 2007 at 12:38:32 PM EST

I had learned about the Danbury letter in HS, but never had the good through background on Connecticut politics that gives it full place and setting.  I think Jeffersons position was clear even without that information, but it's even more clear with it.  

by montpellier on Mon Feb 12, 2007 at 01:45:26 PM EST

Left Behind: Eternal Forces: Installments of Jonathan Hutson's Talk To Action expose series on the "Left Behind: Eternal Forces" video game have been viewed by up to 1/2 million people. See our site section featuring Over 35 original articles covering the controversial "Left Behind: Eternal Forces" video game that has provoked a boycott by a coalition of religious groups and a letter writing campaign urging Walmart to stop selling the game. Media inquiries click here
(image: detail from Francoise Dubois' rendition of the Bartholomew's Day Massacre reveals the actual nature of religious warfare)

Seven Questions US Media Has Neglected To Ask, About Sarah Palin
1. On December 26, 2007, a statement from the office of Alaska Governor Sarah Palin announced the appointment of Rev. Patrick Donelson to the......
By Bruce Wilson (0 comments)
CrossLeft Issues Press Release On Palin's Ongoing Association With Anti-Catholic NAR Clergy.
In light of Alaskan Governor & Current GOP Vice-Presidential nominee Sarah Palin's ongoing association with clergy affiliated with the New Apostolic reformation movement, CrossLeft......
By Frank Cocozzelli (2 comments)
SILHOUETTE CITY Excerpt: Council for National Policy Meeting
We are pleased to welcome Michael W. Wilson as a guest front pager. He is the director of Silhouette City, a highly praised documentary......
By MichaelWWilson (0 comments)
Short Takes
Salon.com Max Blumenthal and David Neiwert go deeper into Sarah Palin's relationship with the Alaska affiliate of the theocratic Constitution party. Connecticut Supreme Court......
By Frederick Clarkson (0 comments)
Palin in My Prayer Group, Says Witchcraft-Fighting "Spiritual Warfare" Leader
[please vote up this story on Digg and Reddit. Here's a compilation of our research also on digg.] [author note: this story was a......
By Bruce Wilson (12 comments)
John McCain, Shelly Shannon and the Army of God
Raw Story reports that John McCain, against the advice of wiser heads, addressed a conference of the far right Oregon Citizens Alliance in the......
By Frederick Clarkson (4 comments)
My Response to the "Dayton Daily News"
An October 3 article from the Dayton Daily News, titled "Bloggers call mosque attack hate crime," not only continues the paper's attempts to minimize......
By Chris Rodda (6 comments)
A Dramatic Book Launch in New York City
Amidst the frenzy of the election and the meltdown on Wall Street it can be hard to capture people's attention when a new book......
By Frederick Clarkson (1 comment)
Focus On The Flip-Flop: Dobson Decides To Endorse McCain After All
Back in the fall of 2007, I attended the Family Research Council's "Values Voter Summit." The Republican presidential field was quite crowded then, and......
By Rob Boston (3 comments)
Palin and the Apostles
Palin's Churches and the Third Wave series Following is a compilation of the work that our research team has done in recent weeks on......
By Ruth (8 comments)
The Question Catholics Must Ask Sarah Palin
Bruce Wilson and Ruth have reported here at Talk to Action about Alaskan Governor and GOP Vice-Presidential nominee Sarah Palin's ties to the Wasila......
By Frank Cocozzelli (2 comments)
Short Takes
Street Prophets: Pastordan talks to the local press about why he won't be endorsing candidates from the pulpit -- unlike another Wisconsin pastor who......
By Frederick Clarkson (3 comments)
The Financial Crisis was Caused by Sex
Michael Heath thinks God gave us the crisis on Wall Street because he doesn't like America's approach to sex. While Heath is probably not......
By Frederick Clarkson (3 comments)
Biblical Stories and Urban Myths About Jews
Anti-Semitism is as old as the book of Exodus. Chapter One of the scrolls tells us in Verse 8, that the new king knew......
By wilkyjr (4 comments)
Fishers and Hunters - the Continuing Saga of Christian Zionism
Palin's Churches and the Third Wave series Two controversial stories featuring Sarah Palin were published in Jewish news sources last week. One was in......
By Ruth (3 comments)
The Problem With Militias
Sarah Palin supports the militia movement? Public Good Project's Paul de Armond explains why that's a problem. ......
By Jay Taber (0 comments)
Assemblies of God, Palin, and me
I spent eight years of my life as a Pentecostal in the Assembly of God. It's as odd and alien a sect to most people as Mitt Romney's Mormonism. ......
By whaleman42 (1 comment)
Dispatches from the Religious Left -- Now Available!
At least it is now "in stock" over at Amazon.com. It should also be widely available in independent bookstores and chain stores as well.  I will not clutter this site with too much news......
By Frederick Clarkson (0 comments)
Transcript for Mary Glazier Video
Transcript of Audio "Opening the Gate of Heaven on Earth: Receiving the New Prophetic Wind for Increase" Conference, June 12 - 14, Everett, Washington Description of Conference at: <a href="http://freshpublishing.com/global-harvest-ministries-c-192-p-1-pr-33372.html ">http://freshpublishing.com/global-harvest-ministries-c-192-p-1-pr-33372.html Mary Glazier Alaska......
By Ruth (0 comments)
"Seven Mountains" and the "Joel's Army" plan for takeover
In yesterday's post, I went into some of the initial detail on a statement given by Thomas Muthee in the infamous sermon where he "annointed" Sarah Palin and also claimed to literally run a......
By dogemperor (0 comments)
Christian Fascism
Sarah Palin's propulsion into politics was fueled by religious intolerance, organized through malicious harassment, and targeted at democracy. Her use of the power of the state to deny equal protection under the law and......
By Jay Taber (0 comments)
Politics of Thuggery
Much as most Americans prefer politics as entertainment, or at most as an informal seminar, the reality is that the politics of thuggery -- especially as practiced by the GOP -- is anything but......
By Jay Taber (0 comments)
Thomas Muthee's "Seven Mountains" and coded messages
Today's diary is--and yes, I know, this is a shocker--NOT going to be about Sarah Palin.  At least, not directly.  This is more towards some of her supporters...and especially in light of Palin throwing......
By dogemperor (1 comment)
New Model for Change
With American society in free fall, some activists are now reviewing the effectiveness of political organizing models they've used in the past. We suggest they include in their discussions two of our reports on......
By Jay Taber (0 comments)
Promoting Murder in America
Contrary to public opinion, promoting murder is not protected by the Constitution. Nor is it protected by tax exempt status, as in the case of charitable trusts and organized religions. The only place we......
By Jay Taber (0 comments)
War of Ideas
<h2> Attacking the Truth</h2> Robert Parry talks about the role of right-wing US foundations in funding the attack on truth in media. ......
By Jay Taber (0 comments)
Vigil Land
I receive on average half a dozen e-mails from Bay Area activists* daily. Almost all of these unsolicited notices are for vigils held at various locations in Berkeley, Oakland, or San Francisco. In addition......
By Jay Taber (0 comments)
Defending Democracy
Defending democracy requires overcoming obstacles to moral conduct. ......
By Jay Taber (0 comments)
Thoughts and Deeds
There's a difference, as we know, between thoughts and deeds. Inciting hatred that leads to violence -- especially hatred based on rejection of human rights -- is more than just thinking; it's an act......
By Jay Taber (0 comments)
Israeli Exceptionalism
I often wondered how otherwise reasonable people in the US could believe in human equality and civil rights in our country, while at the same time opposing equality in Israel. Granted, ADL is much......
By Jay Taber (0 comments)
"In God We Trust" License Plates passed in Florida
There is an article in the Lakeland Ledger about a new law starting the "In God We Trust" license plates.  There are two such plates- one is a regular plate in which the motto......
By ArchaeoBob (0 comments)
A Mandate from God
Paul de Armond explains why Christian militancy should concern us. As he observes, "A mandate from God is a powerful thing." ......
By Jay Taber (0 comments)
Prophets of Doom
America didn't suddenly become a nuthouse, that took some effort. While it's always been home to religious fanatics and prophets of doom, it's only by the mainstreaming of these damaged people that it seems......
By Jay Taber (0 comments)
Palin, TrooperGate, RapeKitGate...and Joel'sArmyGate
Over the past few weeks, folks on the Internet have turned up an impressive amount of info re Sarah Palin's questionable judgements--including scandals involving the Alaska State Police (now known as "TrooperGate") and similar......
By dogemperor (0 comments)
Criticizing Sister Sarah?
I just now got around to the posting about Keith Olbermann's evisceration of Sarah Palin. I saw that show and was a bit taken aback myself, largely because Keith took an obviously mark and......
By bughouse square (0 comments)
Palin, dominionist intimidation, and *actual* witch-hunters
A few days ago, I had reported on Palin's linkages to "Bible-based cult" promoter Bill Gothard...and, sadly, followup info proves that this may be far from her only links to religiously motivated abuse. It......
By dogemperor (0 comments)
Damaged People
Just like there are violent and non-violent people, there are violent and non-violent religions. In fact, they often go together.Not surprisingly, violent people who profess violent religious beliefs have frequently been on the receiving......
By Jay Taber (0 comments)
Palin, Gothard, and dog-whistles to dominionists
A few days ago, I wrote an article detailing several more links between Palin and particularly disturbing elements of the "Joel's Army" movement--namely, apparent links between Palin and Bill Gothard's network of groups, and......
By dogemperor (0 comments)
A Pragmatic Arrangement
The political marriage of McCain and Palin isn’t the first time America’s aristocracy courted terrorists as bedfellows; the last time they openly displayed such a pragmatic arrangement was when the Taliban were entertained at......
By Jay Taber (0 comments)
New revelations re Palin and dominionists
Much like the US Postal Service, neither rain nor snow nor 70% of my hometown's power infrastructure being eaten by Ike will stop me from posting the latest on Palin's connections with dominionists. We've......
By dogemperor (0 comments)
The Next 50 Days and Women for Obama
"I know it's right, I know it's fair, I know in my heart we can change the world with my help. I will spend the next 50 days making my voice heard."-Deidre Hall ......
By eileen fleming (1 comment)
More info comes out on Palin and dominionism, Armageddon, and book bans
Over the past few days, I've been one of those Damned Annoying Palin Diarists--though not on BabyGate or some of the other stuff, but more on the fact she was originally put in as......
By dogemperor (0 comments)
Jewish and Christian Eschatology
      The following is an excerpt (Appendix XI) from my unpublished book manuscript entitled SEX, SWORDS AND SCRIPTURE: A SERMON OF SORTS.  It examines several biblical stories in terms of their deviation......
By June Fredman (0 comments)
"Curiouser and Curiouser!"
 ". . .  cried Alice, ( so much surprised that for the moment she quite forgot how to speak good English)."  Would that we were in a Lewis Carroll book from which we could......
By June Fredman (0 comments)
A Palin presidency may have literal apocalyptic consequences
Over the past few days I've been writing about Sarah Palin's extensive dominionist connections, including ongoing relationships with and even guest-preaching at and taxpayer support of several Assemblies and "Assemblies family" churches connected with......
By dogemperor (1 comment)

More Diaries...