Dinesh D'Souza: Your Friendly Catholic League Advisor (The Catholic Right, Twenty-four In a Series)
Frank Cocozzelli printable version print page     Bookmark and Share
Sat Mar 03, 2007 at 09:40:59 PM EST
Dinesh D'SouzaMeet Dinesh D'Souza. He sits on the Catholic League's Board of Advisors, former editor of the race-baiting  Dartmouth Review and advocate for buccaneering versions of unregulated capitalism.

Oh, and by the way, he is simpatico with the religious beliefs of your local al-Qaeda theocrat.

I kid you not.

Dinesh D'Souza blames liberalism for just about every ill under the sun. For example, his views on slavery and the African-American experience can leave the average--and not so average citizen, with jaw agape.

But in his most recent work, The Enemy at Home: The Cultural Left and Its Responsibility for 9/11, D'Souza truly goes over the edge.  Right in the introduction he concludes:

The left is responsible for 9/11 in the following ways.   First, the cultural left has fostered a decadent American culture that angers and repulses traditional societies, especially those in the Islamic world, that are being overwhelmed with this culture.   In addition, the left is waging an aggressive global campaign to undermine the traditional patriarchal family and to promote secular values in non-Western cultures.

He claims that the  bin-Ladenesque theocrats of the world hate the United States because we are attacking traditional family values -- you know all those traditional values that are the same the world over.  This is how the Catholic League advisory board member puts it:

Contrary to the common liberal view, I don't believe that the 9/11 attacks were payback for U.S. foreign policy. Bin Laden isn't upset because there are U.S. troops in Mecca, as liberals are fond of saying. (There are no U.S. troops in Mecca.) He isn't upset because Washington is allied with despotic regimes in the region. Israel aside, what other regimes are there in the Middle East? It isn't all about Israel. (Why hasn't al-Qaeda launched a single attack against Israel?) The thrust of the radical Muslim critique of America is that Islam is under attack from the global forces of atheism and immorality -- and that the United States is leading that attack.

Contrary to President Bush's view, they don't hate us for our freedom, either. Rather, they hate us for how we use our freedom. When Planned Parenthood International opens clinics in non-Western countries and dispenses contraceptives to unmarried girls, many see it as an assault on prevailing religious and traditional values. When human rights groups use their interpretation of international law to pressure non-Western countries to overturn laws against abortion or to liberalize laws regarding homosexuality, the traditional sensibilities of many of the world's people are violated.

Incredible, isn't it?

D'Souza's credibility is immediately impeached by the facts. Among other things, Osama bin-Laden has openly harangued about American troops on the soil of Muslim states. As bin-Laded told ABC's John Miller in May 1998, " The call to wage war against America was made because America has spear-headed the crusade against the Islamic nation, sending tens of thousands of its troops to the land of the two Holy Mosques over and above its meddling in its affairs and its politics, and its support of the oppressive, corrupt and tyrannical regime that is in control."

The al-Qaeda leader went on in that 1998 diatribe alone to refute D'Souza on just about every claim.

I guess D'Souza--a Robert and Karen Rishwain Fellow at the very conservative Hoover Institution--doesn't know how to use Google or do other basic research. Since it took me only a few seconds to find prominent examples that prove D'Souza so utterly wrong, the objective reader can only reach one of two conclusions: either he is lazy or a liar. In either case, it speaks volumes for what passes as quality scholarship for right-wing think tanks. Apparently, they believe that perpetrating propaganda is more important than arguing the facts.

D'Souza's other new line is that atheism, not religious fanaticism is the real cause of politically-inspired mass murder.  In dissembling on this point, he points to Hitler, Stalin, and Mao as murderous non-believers.

But the poisoned-penned pundit entirely misses the point. The driving issue behind either a Mao or a bin-Laden has always been egotistical self-interest. They, as well as other similar twentieth century tyrants, suffered from the reckless self-delusion of seeing themselves as the state personified, entitled to use ruthless violence to achieve authoritarian ends. And while D'Souza cites Hitler as an atheist, he conveniently overlooks the Fuehrer's constant courtship of religious leadership as well his contemporary Japanese ally's fanatic State Shintoism; a religious belief that greatly contributed to events such as the Rape of Nanking and the Bataan Death March.

This is not the first time D'Souza has twisted logic to suit his ends.  At page 83 of his book-length celebration of modern conspicuous consumption, The Virtue of Prosperity, D'Souza declares: "The guy who is worth little has probably little of value. By the same token, the guy who's earning twice as much as you is most likely - perish the thought - twice as good as you are."

What a prince! Dinesh pegs the value of human life to earnings.  It would interesting to know which man has greater value in D'Souza's eyes: Jesus [the working class carpenter] or the wealthy scion of Matthew 19:24 who could not bring himself to sell his worldly possessions, give the proceeds to the poor and follow Christianity's founder?

And as D'Souza defends his book in the media, it becomes quite clear that the controversial author admires al-Qaeda's theocratic message. As New York Times book critic Michiko Kakutani observed:

It's an interpretation he does not deny: "Yes," he writes, "I would rather go to a baseball game or have a drink with Michael Moore than with the grand mufti of Egypt. But when it comes to core beliefs, I'd have to confess that I'm closer to the dignified fellow in the long robe and prayer beads than to the slovenly fellow with the baseball cap."

This is what it comes down to: if you exercise your freedom to be an atheist, you're provoking Muslims into terrorism. If you hold to a more progressive religious tradition than D'Souza (which would include most American Catholics), you too are provoking Muslims into terrorism. And if you as a faithful person treat gays and agnostics as equals -- or even understand that they too can evoke ethical thought-- yes, you too are provoking Muslims into terrorism. But if you invade a predominately Muslim country that had nothing to do with 9/11 you are a hero of the faith.

This brings us back to our good friend Bill Donohue. He himself is well known for Coughlinesque tirades against "Hollywood Jews" as well as his all too casual use of the term "gooks" to describe Asian-Americans. Just like his more mild mannered, but equally demagogic advisory board member, D'Souza crudely defines those with whom he disagrees in terms of the enemy/friend relationship whereby justice is attained by helping friends and hurting enemies.

Should we then be surprised that Bill Donohue seeks advice for his Catholic League from the factually-challenged D'Souza?

Nope. That makes perfect sense.

The Catholic Right: A Series, by Frank Cocozzelli :  Part One  Part Two  Part Three   Part Four  Part Five  Part Six   Intermezzo   Part Eight   Part Nine  Part Ten   Part Eleven   Part Twelve   Part Thirteen   Part Fourteen   Second Intermezzo   Part Sixteen   Part Seventeen   Part Eighteen   Part Eighteen   Part Nineteen   Part Twenty   Part Twenty-one   Part Twenty-two   Part Twenty-three




Display:
And Dinesh D'Souza (a.k.a., Distorta D'Newsa) and William Donohue sure do compliment each other!

by Frank Cocozzelli on Sat Mar 03, 2007 at 09:44:59 PM EST

Appropriately enough, Dinesh D'Souza got his start as an editor at the Dartmouth Review. If I recall correctly, he and Laura Ingraham dated when they were college students. Neither one of them seems to have learned a thing about logic when they were at college, and D'Souza's latest outburst demonstrates this. I also think his book shows just how much D'Souza and his fellow political believers have in common with other political/religious fundamentalists around the globe.

Michael Scheuer does a pretty good job of dismantling arguments like D'Souza's in his book Imperial Hubris, although I disagree with Scheuer on some of his opinions.

Incidentally, D'Souza seems to have adopted some of the race-baiting associated with the Dartmouth Review in some of his past works, including The End of Racism. The American Enterprise Institute, of which D'Souza is a fellow, sponsored and endorsed D'Souza's book, as well as Richard Herrnstein & Charles Murray's The Bell Curve. Joe Conason tells in his book Big Lies that the AEI's sponsorship of these works prompted the AEI's only African-American fellows, Glenn Loury and Robert Woodson, to resign from the AEI. I don't think D'Souza realizes that had it not been for the end of Jim Crow, he might not have been able to benefit from equal accommodation and the other benefits he seems to take for granted.

Kathy

by khughes1963 on Sun Mar 04, 2007 at 08:07:37 AM EST

The trick now is to get the mainstream media to understand the link between these two nasty men. And if the press doesn't want to discuss this, then we have to find a way to get it done.

For D'Souza and Donohue, Catholicism seems to be more of a cover for reactionary economics than a universal means to spirituality.

by Frank Cocozzelli on Sun Mar 04, 2007 at 10:10:36 AM EST
Parent

By his name, he is of Goan descent on his father's side at least. Most Goanese are Catholic, as this town was an important port for Portugal in the India Trade, starting in the late 1600s or so.

D'Souza may just be lazy and dishonorable. It's an easy living to be a "minority" right wing "intellectual". All you have to do is promote yourself endlessly on talk shows and book tours. Since the books are generally purchased in bulk by corporations who give them to employees, the books need not be well thought out or well written.

by NancyP on Mon Mar 05, 2007 at 02:59:47 PM EST
Parent

Michelle Malkin has figured how how to make the role of "minority right wing intellectual" pay for herself. D'Souza has done the same.

Kathy

by khughes1963 on Mon Mar 05, 2007 at 10:06:08 PM EST
Parent

...is that both Malkin and D'Souza may (don't know for certain) buy into the whole noble lie concept. In that scenario, it is possible that they seem themselves as having greater wisdom among unequals and that lying to the masses for their own good serves a noble purpose.

As Aristotle saw it, the master, not the slave; the patrician, not the plebe, had a better understanding of what the common good requires from each citizen.

That is what I suspect is going on in theor heads.  I could be wrong, but that is what my gut is telling me.

by Frank Cocozzelli on Tue Mar 06, 2007 at 03:43:12 PM EST
Parent






I am sure they can parrot the Straussian / Aristotelian "noble lie" line, if only because more senior conservative pundits have done so, but in my not so humble opinion, d'Souza and Malkin are merely hacktacular and out for the buxx.

by NancyP on Tue Mar 06, 2007 at 05:01:18 PM EST
...they are just plain, nasty folks.

by Frank Cocozzelli on Wed Mar 07, 2007 at 12:01:13 PM EST
Parent



WWW Talk To Action


Cognitive Dissonance & Dominionism Denial
There is new research on why people are averse to hearing or learning about the views of ideological opponents. Based on evaluation of five......
By Frederick Clarkson (374 comments)
Will the Air Force Do Anything To Rein In Its Dynamic Duo of Gay-Bashing, Misogynistic Bloggers?
"I always get nervous when I see female pastors/chaplains. Here is why everyone should as well: "First, women are not called to be pastors,......
By Chris Rodda (195 comments)
The Legacy of Big Oil
The media is ablaze with the upcoming publication of David Grann's book, Killers of the Flower Moon. The shocking non fiction account of the......
By wilkyjr (110 comments)
Gimme That Old Time Dominionism Denial
Over the years, I have written a great deal here and in other venues about the explicitly theocratic movement called dominionism -- which has......
By Frederick Clarkson (101 comments)
History Advisor to Members of Congress Completely Twists Jefferson's Words to Support Muslim Ban
Pseudo-historian David Barton, best known for his misquoting of our country's founders to promote the notion that America was founded as a Christian nation,......
By Chris Rodda (113 comments)
"Christian Fighter Pilot" Calls First Lesbian Air Force Academy Commandant a Liar
In a new post on his "Christian Fighter Pilot" blog titled "BGen Kristin Goodwin and the USAFA Honor Code," Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Jonathan......
By Chris Rodda (144 comments)
Catholic Right Leader Unapologetic about Call for 'Death to Liberal Professors' -- UPDATED
Today, Donald Trump appointed C-FAM Executive Vice President Lisa Correnti to the US Delegation To UN Commission On Status Of Women. (C-FAM is a......
By Frederick Clarkson (126 comments)
Controlling Information
     Yesterday I listened to Russ Limbaugh.  Rush advised listeners it would be best that they not listen to CNN,MSNBC, ABC, CBS and......
By wilkyjr (118 comments)
Is Bannon Fifth-Columning the Pope?
In December 2016 I wrote about how White House chief strategist Steve Bannon, who likes to flash his Catholic credentials when it comes to......
By Frank Cocozzelli (250 comments)
Ross Douthat's Hackery on the Seemingly Incongruous Alliance of Bannon & Burke
Conservative Catholic writer Ross Douthat has dissembled again. This time, in a February 15, 2017 New York Times op-ed titled The Trump Era's Catholic......
By Frank Cocozzelli (64 comments)
`So-Called Patriots' Attack The Rule Of Law
Every so often, right-wing commentator Pat Buchanan lurches out of the far-right fever swamp where he has resided for the past 50 years to......
By Rob Boston (161 comments)
Bad Faith from Focus on the Family
Here is one from the archives, Feb 12, 2011, that serves as a reminder of how deeply disingenuous people can be. Appeals to seek......
By Frederick Clarkson (176 comments)
The Legacy of George Wallace
"One need not accept any of those views to agree that they had appealed to real concerns of real people, not to mindless, unreasoning......
By wilkyjr (70 comments)
Betsy DeVos's Mudsill View of Public Education
My Talk to Action colleague Rachel Tabachnick has been doing yeoman's work in explaining Betsy DeVos's long-term strategy for decimating universal public education. If......
By Frank Cocozzelli (80 comments)
Prince and DeVos Families at Intersection of Radical Free Market Privatizers and Religious Right
This post from 2011 surfaces important information about President-Elect Trump's nominee for Secretary of Education, Betsy DeVos. -- FC Erik Prince, Brother of Betsy......
By Rachel Tabachnick (218 comments)

Respect for Others? or Political Correctness?
The term "political correctness" as used by Conservatives and Republicans has often puzzled me: what exactly do they mean by it? After reading Chip Berlin's piece here-- http://www.talk2action.org/story/2016/7/21/04356/9417 I thought about what he explained......
MTOLincoln (253 comments)
Fear
What I'm feeling now is fear.  I swear that it seems my nightmares are coming true with this new "president".  I'm also frustrated because so many people are not connecting all the dots! I've......
ArchaeoBob (107 comments)
"America - love it or LEAVE!"
I've been hearing that and similar sentiments fairly frequently in the last few days - far FAR more often than ever before.  Hearing about "consequences for burning the flag (actions) from Trump is chilling!......
ArchaeoBob (211 comments)
"Faked!" Meme
Keep your eyes and ears open for a possible move to try to discredit the people openly opposing Trump and the bigots, especially people who have experienced terrorism from the "Right"  (Christian Terrorism is......
ArchaeoBob (165 comments)
More aggressive proselytizing
My wife told me today of an experience she had this last week, where she was proselytized by a McDonald's employee while in the store. ......
ArchaeoBob (163 comments)
See if you recognize names on this list
This comes from the local newspaper, which was conservative before and took a hard right turn after it was sold. Hint: Sarah Palin's name is on it!  (It's also connected to Trump.) ......
ArchaeoBob (169 comments)
Unions: A Labor Day Discussion
This is a revision of an article which I posted on my personal board and also on Dailykos. I had an interesting discussion on a discussion board concerning Unions. I tried to piece it......
Xulon (156 comments)
Extremely obnoxious protesters at WitchsFest NYC: connected to NAR?
In July of this year, some extremely loud, obnoxious Christian-identified protesters showed up at WitchsFest, an annual Pagan street fair here in NYC.  Here's an account of the protest by Pagan writer Heather Greene......
Diane Vera (130 comments)
Capitalism and the Attack on the Imago Dei
I joined this site today, having been linked here by Crooksandliars' Blog Roundup. I thought I'd put up something I put up previously on my Wordpress blog and also at the DailyKos. As will......
Xulon (329 comments)
History of attitudes towards poverty and the churches.
Jesus is said to have stated that "The Poor will always be with you" and some Christians have used that to refuse to try to help the poor, because "they will always be with......
ArchaeoBob (148 comments)
Alternate economy medical treatment
Dogemperor wrote several times about the alternate economy structure that dominionists have built.  Well, it's actually made the news.  Pretty good article, although it doesn't get into how bad people could be (have been)......
ArchaeoBob (90 comments)
Evidence violence is more common than believed
Think I've been making things up about experiencing Christian Terrorism or exaggerating, or that it was an isolated incident?  I suggest you read this article (linked below in body), which is about our great......
ArchaeoBob (214 comments)

More Diaries...




All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments, posts, stories, and all other content are owned by the authors. Everything else © 2005 Talk to Action, LLC.