Sexual Politics in Bush's America: Ten Days in April
moiv printable version print page     Bookmark and Share
Mon May 07, 2007 at 05:27:33 AM EST
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket About the author: In addition to the less noteworthy accomplishment of being my friend, Carole Joffe is Professor of Sociology at UC-Davis and the author of Doctors of Conscience: The Struggle to Provide Abortion Before and After Roe V. Wade. With co-author Diane di Mauro, Professor Joffe recently published The Religious Right and the Reshaping of Sexual Policy: An Examination of Reproductive Rights and Sexuality Education [pdf link] in Sexuality Research & Social Policy, the journal of the National Sexuality Resource Center. She has granted permission to post the text of her essay in full. -- moiv

"Well, I used to do them--there is less blood loss, and in some situations, it just seems safer. I'm not sure what I will do now."

The speaker is Dr. Jacob Clark (not his real name), a fit man in his 60s, an obstetrician/gynecologist who has spent his life serving poor women in an East Coast city. Over coffee, he is discussing over with me his deep frustration and confusion over the recent Supreme Court decision, Gonzales v Carhart, upholding an abortion ban.

The banned procedure--referred to by medical professionals as "Intact Dilation and Extraction", and by antiabortionists as "Partial Birth Abortion"--is quite rare, less than 1% of all abortions performed in the United States. But Dr. Clark is one of those who performs this procedure, when the situation, in his judgment, calls for it.

Dr. Clark and I are attending a medical conference, shortly after the Court announced its decision. We've just heard the medical director of a large clinic address her colleagues from across the country, and succinctly state the dilemma that abortion providers now face: "We've got to keep our patients safe--and ourselves out of jail."

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
November, 2003: President George W. Bush signs the "Partial Birth Abortion" Ban  

I reflect on the gap that exists between what I am hearing at this conference and what I have been reading in the press by various "pro-choice" pundits about the decision. While professing to be opposed to the Court's judgment, these commentators--for example, David Garrow in the New York Times--are saying, "yes, the decision is bad, but it really doesn't matter, because so few of these abortions are performed."

Such reasoning betrays a true cluelessness about the daily realities of abortion provision. Even if Jacob Clark and his colleagues (and their lawyers) figure out ways to change their techniques sufficiently to circumvent the Court's ruling, and avoid conviction, that doesn't mean that someone can't accuse them of a criminal act--setting off a long and costly court battle. And such accusations will come. The antiabortion movement learned a long time ago how effective this kind of relentless harassment of providers can be, even if ultimately there is no conviction of a crime.

Moreover, the Court's action will inevitably have a chilling effect on those young physicians contemplating abortion provision, a field already seriously understaffed. The two year jail term and huge fine that will now face those convicted of performing an Intact D and E sends quite a signal about the hyper- politicized terrain abortion care has become, even if one has no intention to perform this particular procedure.

But though Gonzales v. Carhart may have been the most shocking and consequential assault on reproductive justice in recent days, it was hardly the only indication of how omnipresent is the Bush Administration's attacks in this sphere. Consider a recent ten day period, from April 14 to April 24:

April 14: Mathematica Policy Research releases a study on abstinence only sex education.

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

The study confirms what virtually everyone, other than the Bush administration and its cronies in the Religious Right, knew already: "Abstinence-only sex education programs are not effective in preventing or delaying teenagers from sexual intercourse."

As Congressman Henry Waxman-- who has long pointed to the shoddy nature of these programs, and their violation of church/state boundaries-- put it, "1.5 billion of taxpayer dollars were wasted." Though hardly a surprise--other researchers have come up with similar findings-- the significance of this Mathematica study is that it was commissioned by Congress itself.

April 18: Gonzales v. Carhart is announced

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

April 19: The Paul Wolfowitz/World Bank scandal deepens.

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

In addition to the charge that Wolfowitz inappropriately arranged a huge salary increase for his companion, the press reports that he encouraged the omission of references to "family planning" and "reproductive health services" from World Bank documents. Jean Jose Danoub, a religious conservative from El Salvador who was brought onto the Bank staff by Wolfowitz, apparently was charged to bring the Bank's policies in line with the Bush administration's ongoing war against contraception.

April 23: Another large study confirms no link between abortion and breast cancer.

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Researchers from Harvard University, studying over 100,000 women, found there is no association between abortion and an increased risk of breast cancer.

Again, no surprises here. This topic has been intensively debated in past years, as antiabortion spokespeople have tried to make such claims. Indeed, an early scandal in the Bush administration was a posting on the National Cancer Institute website, claiming such an association--eventually the posting was dropped after a scientific gathering, convened by the NCI, disputed the finding.

Nevertheless, at least five "red" states now require abortion providers, as part of the "informed consent" process, to tell patients that abortion may increase the risk for breast cancer. In short, these doctors are being forced to commit malpractice.

The question for progressives, of course, is how consequential is the damage done as a result of years of these multi-faceted attacks on sexual and reproductive rights and services? As those people sporting those cool "Bush watches" on their wrists might say, there are only 21 months, one week, eleven days, etc. left to this horrible presidency, and then (knock on wood) our country will inaugurate a Democratic president.

Assuming a Democrat wins, of the four items mentioned above, some things appear more "fixable" than others. When professionals, not ideologues, are put back in charge in federal agencies, for example, the Department of Health and Human Services, comprehensive sex education programs--not abstinence only ones--will receive federal dollars.

Government websites will no longer post embarrassing distortions about the effectiveness of condoms, and the nonexistent link between abortion and breast cancer. Funds to help poor women afford contraception may actually be increased, rather than slashed. A President Obama (or Clinton or Edwards, etc) will not instruct a World Bank president (or his/her UN chief delegate ) to delete all references to "reproductive health" or "family planning" in official documents or insist that one third of the funds that the U.S. devotes to international AIDS work be devoted to abstinence education. The cruel "Global Gag Rule" which precludes U.S. funds going to any organization that uses its own funds for abortion services or referrals will be overturned. And so on. So undoubtedly some truly awful policies will be brought to an end.

But the culture wars will not be over, and the Religious Right will not go away. Some of the most effective anti-abortion and anti-contraception policies are carried out at the state level--for example, the redirection of family planning funds to so-called "crisis pregnancy centers" and "TRAP laws" (targeted regulation of abortion providers), often bizarre state laws whose only function is to make abortion provision even more challenging.

But the most disastrous legacy of the George W. Bush presidency, with respect to sexual and reproductive justice, is the Supreme Court. With his appointment of John Roberts and Samuel Alito, Bush enabled a situation in which--astonishing to even seasoned Court observers-- five justices were willing to ignore precedent (and human decency) and state that a woman's health no longer need be taken into consideration in judging the constitutionality of an abortion case brought before the Court. The next president, even if s/he is a Democrat, will be more likely to have to replace one of the Court's liberal members, and the country is thus stuck with the Abortion Ban.

Five for the foreseeable future. Meanwhile, the tireless lawyers of the reproductive freedom movement are bracing for even more egregious assaults on Roe. And my friend, Jacob Clark, and his colleagues, wonder what the hell they are going to do.

Images
"PBA" Ban: Mikhaela
Wolfowitz: AllHatNoCattle.net
Abstinence: Mother Jones
Abortion/Breast cancer: BushWatch.com




Display:
This commentary should be spread far and wide, and I'm sorry I didn't read it earlier.  Carole Joffe is brilliant.

I was at a meeting just yesterday in New York, in which some of these same issues were discussed, with the same frustrations of the doctor described here.

Three points:  

1) 20 months?  President Bush could easily have another Supreme Court pick.  If we want to be really real, we need to recognize that more bad things can come in 20 months.

2) A pro-choice Democrat will win? This is, by no means, a given.  People thought Kerry would win.  People though Gore would win (and maybe he did.)  

3) On David Garrow: 2,000 women won't be able to get the services they need, he says, so no big deal.  That's five women every day of the year.  Even if one woman needs services, that's enough.  Let's get over these numbers, and say flat-out that every woman should have the health services that she needs.  

by cyncooper on Tue May 08, 2007 at 03:27:57 PM EST

2,000 women, as long as none of them is his wife. I deeply admire writer Dan Neil for sharing his family's story.

MY WIFE AND I just had an abortion. Two, actually. We walked into a doctor's office in downtown Los Angeles with four thriving fetuses -- two girls and two boys -- and walked out an hour later with just the girls, whom we will name, if we're lucky enough to keep them, Rosalind and Vivian. Rosalind is my mother's name.

We didn't want to. We didn't mean to. We didn't do anything wrong, which is to say, we did everything right. Four years ago, when Tina and I set out on this journey to have children, such a circumstance was unimaginable. And yet there I was, holding her hand, watching the ultrasound as a needle with potassium chloride found its mark, stopping the heart of one male fetus, then the other, hidden in my wife's suffering belly.

We don't feel guilty. We don't feel ashamed. We're not even really sad, because terminating these fetuses -- at 15 weeks' gestation -- was a medical imperative. This has been a white-knuckle pregnancy from Day 1, and had it gone on as it was going, Tina's health would have been in jeopardy, according to her doctor. The fact is, multiple pregnancies are high risk, and they can go bad very suddenly. I wasn't going to allow that, though the fires of hell might beckon.

In the midst of this experience, practically on the eve of our procedure, the U.S. Supreme Court announced its ruling in Gonzales vs. Carhart, upholding the federal ban on a rare obstetrical procedure called intact dilation and extraction, or intact D&E, also known as "partial-birth" abortion.



by moiv on Wed May 09, 2007 at 01:23:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Carole Joffe does brilliant work. :-)

by moiv on Wed May 09, 2007 at 01:24:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Thanks for your kind thoughts.

Here's another first-person commentary you may have seen about the need for the abortion procedure the Supremes dumped.  

This was on the web section of Newsweek on the MSNBC site.
I needed that now-banned procedure known as 'partial-birth' abortion. Why the Supreme Court's decision to outlaw it was a dark day for American women. by Ilene Jaroslaw.

A couple of snippets:


On Wednesday, April 18, 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court suggested that women do not fully comprehend the abortion procedure, and thus may come to regret it.  Not this woman. Four years ago,  I asked my doctor whether the Federal Partial-Birth Abortion Act, which was then being considered by Congress, would outlaw the dilation and evacuation procedure he intended to use.  Yes, he told me, it would.  

Before I became a mother, I'd had two uterine fibroid surgeries that weakened the walls of my uterus.  After the second surgery, my obstetrician-gynecologist advised that my children would have to be delivered weeks before my due date by cesarean section to minimize the risk of uterine rupture.  Toby was born by early cesarean in 1997, and Simone in 1999 also by early cesarean.  Before my abortion, my surgeon knew that my uterus had undergone four prior surgeries, and he also knew that I ached for a third child.  I pleaded with him not to do anything in the operating room that could possibly compromise my ability to have another child.  My surgeon promised me he would do everything he could to preserve my fertility, and he kept his word.  I am forever grateful.  And one day my 2 ½-year-old daughter will be too.


Lots of reader comments on all sides of the equation are at the site.


by cyncooper on Wed May 09, 2007 at 01:25:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]





WWW Talk To Action


Ah, True Remonstrance!
In previous posts I have called for mainstream Catholics to offer remonstrance - an earnest presentation of reasons for opposition or grievance against the......
By Frank Cocozzelli (4 comments)
Congressman Wants Citizens of ALL Religions to Reflect on the Ten Commandments
Well, spring is in the air, and that can mean only one thing. It's time for a member of Congress to introduce a resolution......
By Chris Rodda (0 comments)
Happy Birthday, Pat!: Virginia Legislature Lauds Extremist TV Preacher Robertson
TV evangelist Pat Robertson's 80th birthday is on Monday, and to mark that momentous occasion, the Virginia legislature decided to pass a resolution lauding......
By Rob Boston (1 comment)
Netanyahu and Hagee, Serial Obstructionists
Last week I wrote about Prime Minister Netanyahu's participation at John Hagee's CUFI rally held in Jerusalem on the evening of Joe Biden's arrival......
By Rachel Tabachnick (0 comments)
Bill Donohue: Defender of Glenn Beck.
Glenn Beck's recent admonition that people who attend a church that teaches social justice should leave -- was anti-Catholicism. This was obvious from a......
By Frank Cocozzelli (5 comments)
Blog Against Theocracy!
It's that time of year again.  It's time for the annual Blog Against Theocracy, April 2-4, 2010.   The prime mover of this blogtacular......
By Frederick Clarkson (1 comment)
Creeping Religious Rightism in the Democratic Party, Cont.
  Barry Lynn, executive director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State has an op-ed today at AOL News discussing how, campaign......
By Frederick Clarkson (6 comments)
Invoking Intolerance: Religious Right Throws Fit Over Islamic Prayer In Virginia
Today an imam delivered the opening prayer before the Virginia House of Delegates - and once again the Religious Right is having kittens. Three......
By Rob Boston (1 comment)
Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu and John Hagee Share Stage as Biden Arrives in Israel
Yesterday (Monday) Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spoke to hundreds of Christian Zionists in Jerusalem at an event organized by John Hagee and Christians......
By Rachel Tabachnick (6 comments)
When the Truth Is Shown to Be Lies
It's been a year since President Obama lifted the Bush administration's restrictions on the federal funding of embryonic stem cell research.  Nevertheless, religious opponents......
By Frank Cocozzelli (7 comments)
Repent Amarillo's Spiritual Mapping and Vigilantism
Repent Amarillo, a Texas ministry which refers to itself as an "Army of God,"  is making news for its spiritual warfare and vigilante tactics.......
By Rachel Tabachnick (17 comments)
Whale Tale: AFA Staffer Says Bible Mandates Death For SeaWorld Orca
On Feb. 24, a tragedy occurred at SeaWorld in Orlando, Fla. A six-ton killer whale known as Tillikum pulled trainer Dawn Brancheau underwater to......
By Rob Boston (5 comments)
A Call to Censor the Religion Blogosphere
Some time ago, I filled out a survey from the Social Science Research Council (SSRC) in connection with an academic study they were doing......
By Frederick Clarkson (8 comments)
Prayer Warriors of the New Apostolic Reformation Getting Some Exposure
Yesterday Alternet published an article by Bill Berkowitz including an interview with me about the New Apostolic Reformation, or the "largest religious movement you......
By Rachel Tabachnick (8 comments)
Role Models of Remonstrance
I recently called for mainstream Catholics to offer remonstrance -- an earnest presentation of reasons for opposition or grievance against the reactionaries now fomenting......
By Frank Cocozzelli (8 comments)

Publicizing the existence of the NAR -- some suggestions
Some regular columnists here on Talk to Action have complained about difficulties in getting the mass media to notice the existence of a new but rapidly growing - and already highly influential - religious......
Diane Vera (2 comments)
School Board, State and school prayer
Now both the Polk County School Board and the state of Florida are trying to push prayers in the schools! ......
ArchaeoBob (0 comments)
City in trouble for sectarian prayers
The city of Lakeland, Florida has been challenged by Atheists of Florida and the local synagogue for having sectarian prayers before public meetings. ......
ArchaeoBob (0 comments)
The Blind Side's Blind Spot
The hit movie, The Blind Side, is all about the Christian values of being your "brother's keeper." Or is it? ......
John Sheirer (3 comments)
When Christianity is Un-American
Just thought readers might be interested in linking to this article at The Yurica Report: ......
TMurray (1 comment)
Violence increasing
I think people should read this article- and realize that the dominionists are becoming more and more violent.  If something isn't done to counter their hate, this country is in deep trouble! ......
ArchaeoBob (3 comments)
His "Freedom" Means Denying Yours - With Your Own Taxes
Referring to recent political skirmishes over the rights of gays and lesbians to marry, Cardinal Francis George called five rocks thrown at empty buildings and the theft of a few lawn signs "quasi-fascism."  He......
bettyclermont (0 comments)
Rome has spoken....Man the lifeboats!
When Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger was elected Pope Benedict XVI in 2005, it was widely reported that he preferred a smaller, more obedient flock in his Church. Once again, he is proving those reports to......
bettyclermont (0 comments)
Your children will be forced to shower with gays! (says the AFA)
I've just received the following American Family Association email, which claims that the Obama administration has a nefarious plan to force gays and straights in the US military to shower together ! Donald Wildmon......
Bruce Wilson (3 comments)
Pope John Paul II's Penitential Practices: The Opus Dei Connection
We are pleased to once again welcome theologian William Lindsey as a guest front pager. This piece is crossposted from the new progressive Catholic group blog, The Open Tabernacle: Here Comes Everybody. -- FC......
William Lindsey (0 comments)
WallBuilders, Inc., Promoting a dominionist "Christian Nation"
Cherry Hill Seminary Supports Patrick McCollum in 9th Circuit Case Against California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation http://snipurl.com/u8kcj ......
Dragonzmajick (2 comments)
Roeder verdict sparks fears of more anti-abortion violence
cross-posted at dKos Scott Roeder is likely to spend the rest of his life in prison for the murder of George Tiller.  At the very least, he'll by 75 years old before he can......
Christian Dem in NC (0 comments)
The dark underside of the Latter Rain--a walkaway's view
cross-posted at dKos I read Bruce Wilson's posts on dKos and Talk To Action regarding the "Pray For Newark" initiative with particular alarm.  While Pray for Newark appears to espouse an admirable goal--community empowerment--it's......
Christian Dem in NC (2 comments)
Bishops as Provocateurs
In a thinly-veiled reference to the campaign of President Barack Obama, Archbishop Emeritus of St. Louis, Raymond Burke, charged that Americans are "embracing a totalitarianism which masks itself as the 'hope,' the 'future' of......
bettyclermont (0 comments)
The Vatican v. Children
Yesterday was not a good day for children seeking justice from the Roman Catholic Church. The internet brought the following news: ......
bettyclermont (0 comments)
Religious bigots control supermarket chain
Well, they've won again.  The religious bigots have forced Publix Supermarkets into bowing to their wishes. ......
ArchaeoBob (11 comments)
Manhattan Declaration is to Theology what Fox is to Journalism
The December 20, 2009, New York Times ran a lengthy article by David D. Kirkpatrick about Robert P. George, "The Conservative-Christian Big Thinker." The occasion was release of George's "Manhattan Declaration" signed by the......
bettyclermont (2 comments)
Merry Freakin' Christmas: I'm Taking Your Stuff, and you Can't Stop Me!
A humorous look at the larger implications of a seemingly harmless holiday tradition. ......
John Sheirer (1 comment)
Lou Engle, September 25, 2007, Los Angeles: "Holywood"
[This is a partial transcription of a sermon/speech Lou Engle, Founder of TheCall gave on September 25, 2007, in Los Angeles. The full sermon is slightly over 63 minutes. This partial transcript is of......
Bruce Wilson (0 comments)
Rick Warren Tweet complains my videos of his "Hitler/Lenin/Mao" speech are unfair
It's gratifying to know "America's most powerful pastor" seems to have taken notice of my videos, showcasing Rick Warren's 2005 speech at California's Anaheim Angels Stadium, during which Warren outlined a "stealth" program to......
Bruce Wilson (4 comments)
Blurring Reproductive Rights and the Religious Right
The principle of the Hyde Amendment, which restricted federal funds from paying for abortion back in 1976 -- is now seen as an acceptable, "abortion neutral" position for the prochoice Democratic Party. How did......
Frederick Clarkson (0 comments)
Rick Warren Calls on Followers To Be Dedicated as Followers of Lenin and Mao
[note: for more recent news on Rick Warren, see Rick Warren's Dissertation Advisor Leads Network Promoting Uganda Anti-Gay Bill] Video, below contains audio recording, photos, and transcript from Rick Warren's April 17, 2005 speech......
Bruce Wilson (6 comments)
Julius Oyet Touts The College of Prayer
A new Talk To Action story identifies Apostle and bishop Julius Oyet as a major player in the recent effort in the Ugandan parliament to pass a draconian anti-gay bill. In this video [transcript......
Bruce Wilson (1 comment)
Mark Silk on the Hagee / Rodriguez Entente
Mark Silk, at Spiritual Politics has picked up on my notice of the Hagee-Rodriguez embrace and zeroes in on what's certainly one of the most notable aspects: "The key thing to understand about the......
Bruce Wilson (1 comment)
Inscribing Christian Values in our Children Before Birth?
Following the evolution of evangelical discourse as it re-defines homosexuality as evidence of "fallen creation", Terri Murray looks at how the Christian right have shifted their rhetoric to adapt to empirical research showing that......
TMurray (1 comment)
US News & World Report Showcases Creationist Ray Comfort
US News and World Report's Dan Gilgoff has charitably provided evangelist Ray Comfort a media platform in the form of a US News & World "exclusive" through which Comfort defends his efforts to distribute,......
Bruce Wilson (0 comments)
Atheist billboard in Central Florida
The organization "Atheists of Florida" sponsored a billboard promoting atheism in Lakeland, Florida.  I, however, have some concerns. ......
ArchaeoBob (4 comments)
Transcript: Billy Graham and Richard Nixon, February 21, 1973
The following is my own transcript of a 20 minute phone conversation between Richard Nixon and Billy Graham, on February 23, 1973. As far as I am aware this is the only publicly available,......
Bruce Wilson (0 comments)
Rifqa Bary being sent back to Ohio now
Well, there's a change in this case.  After the judge gets immigration documents and so on from the parents, he will send her back. ......
ArchaeoBob (2 comments)

More Diaries...




All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments, posts, stories, and all other content are owned by the authors. Everything else © 2005 Talk to Action, LLC. Powered by Scoop