Talk To Action | The Oogedy-Boogedy Gap, Defined

Create an account:
it's free Forgotten name
or password ?

Fake History, and the myth that the United States was founded originally as a "Christian Nation", is now being taught in hundreds of schools across America. Please click here to help Talk To Action Fight Fake History

Talk To Action Speakers Bureau

Religious Right Organizations

Site Sections

The War on Reproductive Rights

Attacking Public Education

Shadow War: the battle for mainstream faith
the covert campaign against liberal chuches and the social justice tradition

War on Judicial Independence

[above: click on image for YouTube video trailer]"Renewal or Ruin": New Video Documentary By Steve D. Martin Spotlights Secretive Rightwing Effort To Destroy Mainstream Protestant Churches

Eternal Hostility: The Struggle Between Theocracy and Democracy, by Frederick Clarkson

Right-Wing Populism in America: Too Close for Comfort
by Chip Berlet and Matthew N. Lyons
sample chapter

God's Profits: Faith, Fraud and the Republican Crusade For Values Voters
By Sarah Posner

Liars for Jesus: The Religious Right's Alternate Version of American History
By Chris Rodda

Kingdom Coming: The Rise of Christian Nationalism
: by Michelle Goldberg

With God on Their Side: How Christian Fundamentalists Trampled Science, Policy, and Democracy in George W. Bush's White House.
by Esther Kaplan

Straight to Jesus: Sexual and Christian Conversions in the Ex-Gay Movement
Tanya Erzen

Special Features

Attack on The United Churches of Christ

Attack on The United Methodist Church

"The Christian Right, Dominionism, and Theocracy", by Chip Berlet

Parts One Two Three Four Five

"Taking Over The Republican Party", a four part series by Joan Bokaer

The Woman in A Mink Coat While We Were sleeping Angels On a Pinhead Under Cover of Night

The Indian River Incident : What You Can Do

link > The "Stop the ACLU Coalition" Shaming Project
How you can help stop "Stop The ACLU" just by sending a few emails

The Shaming Project

does the violence of "Left Behind: Eternal Forces" bother you ? If so, what can you do ? Well, to begin with you can email Jonathan Hutson's stories to people you know. That will help to bring more public scrutiny of the game. Public shaming really works ! Just click on the "email" icon and link at the top or bottom of the story and you'll be taken to a form that will allow you email the first story, The Purpose Driven Life Takers or the latest installment without leaving this site. Thanks.

Donate to or support
Talk to Action

The Oogedy-Boogedy Gap, Defined

By Frederick Clarkson	Mon Nov 24, 2008 at 03:06:05 PM EST	print story

It was not so long ago that liberals and Democrats were wringing their hands about how more deeply religious voters were tending to vote Republican. This was called the God Gap. The Party was also horrified to learn from national polls that it was widely viewed as "hostile" to people of faith. Much scurrying has ensued to try to correct this perception.

Meanwhile the tensions within the Republican Party and the Religious Right are spectacularly boiling out, (as such things often do when a political party searches for reasons for historic losses. )

It is in that sense that a recent piece by conservative columnist Kathleen Parker is an important moment. It is significant not only because it gives voice to the longstanding discomfort of conventional conservatives with the excesses of the Religious Right -- but their discomfort with the Religious Right itself. Most remarkably of all, it was stated in terms that stray deeply into territory that if it had been expresed by anyone any less conservative, the howls about "anti-Christian bigotry" would have been heard around the world and non-stop on Fox News.

What this situation has revealed is an Oogedy Boogedy Gap, which we may define as the absence of outrage when a conservative enages in an act of religious bigotry that would have had them an uproar had something similar said by a liberal.

But in searching around, I was unable to find much outrage -- even from the Religious Right. Imagine what the reaction would have been if say, Michael Moore, or Katha Pollit or a Democratic candidate for office -- anywhere -- had written this:

"As Republicans sort out the reasons for their defeat, they likely will overlook or dismiss the gorilla in the pulpit.
Three little letters, great big problem: G-O-D... the evangelical, right-wing, oogedy-boogedy branch of the GOP is what ails the erstwhile conservative party and will continue to afflict and marginalize its constituents if reckoning doesn't soon cometh.
Simply put: Armband religion is killing the Republican Party.... the Grand Old Party since the 1980s or so ... has become increasingly beholden to an element that used to be relegated to wooden crates on street corners.... the GOP has surrendered its high ground to its lowest brows.

The silence is deafening -- with two notable exceptions: Steve Waldman, editor of BeliefNet and Jonah Goldberg editor of The National Review.

Goldberg denounced

"...the quasi-bigotry that has you calling religious Christians low brows, gorillas and oogedy-boogedy types... [and he demanded that she]... drop the nonsense about how the G-O-D people or the Palin people are low brows and beasts. There are low brows and beasts everywhere, on every side of the ideological spectrum.

Waldman:

The rest of the column engages in gross stereotyping of religious conservatives. The party is "increasingly beholden to an element that used to be relegated to wooden crates on street corners" and has surrendered "high ground to its lowest brows."
So, religious conservatives are crazy, dumb and scary, says Parker.
Meanwhile, Christine Todd Whitman referred to the "social fundamentalists" as "hostage takers."
Remember when David Kuo wrote that inside the White House the non-evangelical conservatives mocked Christians as useful stooges? Maybe he should have said Useful Ooogedy-Boogedies.

Before liberals get too smug, we should remind ourselves that it was not so long ago that calling conservative religious people with whom we disagreed (from non-violent nuns praying in front of clinics to Ralph Reed to the Aryan Nations) meaningless epithets like "religious political extremists" was considered state of the art politics. Inside the Beltway consulting firms were paid big bucks to craft this and similar focus-grouped epithets (read, "messages"). Later, liberals and Demorats were shocked, shocked to find out that the electorate viewed the party as "hostile" to people of faith.

The fact is that religious bigotry, both subtle and overt, exists across the religious and political spectrum (including that obnoxious variant, anti-religionism). That this is surfacing so spectacularly in the Republican Party and in the conservative movement is an opportunity for progressives.

Let's remind ourselves that religious equality and toleration have, along with absolute respect for the right of indidvidual conscience and separation of church and state, long been core values for both religious and non-religious progressives. If we want to be able to gain and hold the moral, intellectual and political high ground in defending and advancing our values, it is essential to know (or at least to seek to know) the difference between fair criticism and religious bigotry. It is difficult to hold the moral high ground against the religious bigots of the Religious Right, if we think, act and speak like religious bigots ourselves.

The Oogedy-Boogedy Gap provides us with an extraordinary opportunity to define ourselves in ways consistent with the values of the rights of individual conscience and separation of church and state that made possible the coalitions that forged the Constitution of the United States from Article 6 that proscribed religious tests for public office, and later, the First Amendment.

To discuss this story, sign up for a free account

The Oogedy-Boogedy Gap, Defined | 18 comments (18 topical, 0 hidden)

The Oogedy Boogedy Gap (5.00 / 1)

Draft Definition: The absence of outrage that occurs when a conservative enages in an act of religious bigotry that would have had them an uproar had something similar said by a liberal.

by Frederick Clarkson on Mon Nov 24, 2008 at 03:27:07 PM EST

Fred, here's one thought : (none / 0)

The "because we can" factor ; the right has methodically developed its own dedicated media that has no counterpart on the left, and so the message projection capability on the right is greater. The Internet may be leveling the playing field slightly, and Air America doesn't hurt. But the media environment nonetheless seems more conducive to factually dubious or hyperbolic claims put out from the right.

by Bruce Wilson on Mon Nov 24, 2008 at 05:33:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

yeah, all true but (none / 0)

I think this one is different.

Kathleen Parker is not a creature of the internet age. She is old school print, and her collumn's home base is The Washington Post, and her other hat is as a teacher of writing that is part of the extended Buckley family (as in William F. et al) Her vulgar outburst is important because it comes from such a considered perspective.

I think what is at issue for us is not so much overall media capacity of the right, which is certainly greater, but getting folks of the center/left to recognize what is happening with Parker is more than just moderate convervatives blaming the RR for their recent electoral losses. Parker's piece illuminates the ugly side of their values -- the ones that allowed them to join with the RR in gaining political hegemony in the first place. Parker et al have benefited from and helped enable the rise of the religious right.

But times have changed and power has shifted. And Parker et al are scramblig not to get, umm, left behind. But in her haste, she reveals her true self.

by Frederick Clarkson on Mon Nov 24, 2008 at 06:55:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

OK, I'll buy that... (none / 0)

One way of rapidly summing up your point, if you think this characterization has merit, might be to say that Parker has claimed that she has manners and supports pluralism.

by Bruce Wilson on Tue Nov 25, 2008 at 02:04:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]

: One might say that.... (none / 0)

One might also say that Kathleen Parker is an ureconstructed religious bigot of the Old School, whose sulphurous attitudes spew when frustrated and angry.

by Frederick Clarkson on Tue Nov 25, 2008 at 09:29:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]

This is true (none / 0)

I recall that Kathleen Parker received a lot of angry letters and emails from professed conservatives when she dared to suggest Sarah Palin was perhaps not the best choice the GOP could have made for the vice-presidential ticket. The angry Religious Right was all over Parker about that, and sent her much hate mail about it.

by khughes1963 on Tue Nov 25, 2008 at 07:08:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]

otherwise known as IOKIYAR, religious version (none / 0)

IOKIYAR = "It's O.K. if you are Republican"

I am mostly amused by the sight of Republican circular firing squads. I thought that was a Democratic monopoly....

by NancyP on Mon Nov 24, 2008 at 10:31:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

As one of that "Obnoxioous variant"... (none / 0)

....I can see a need to make the church/state and even church/society boundaries less fuzzy. The RR is so far over the line that there is little disagreement that they are over the secular boundary, but there are many here who have also used Secular to mean atheist or non-religious (in the not thinking about religion sense rather than the not involving religion sense that is the real definition) and had reactions in me as those who have lumped all deeply religious folk with the RR would have in the religious left.

When one is drowning, one does not worry about damp feet, and the damp feet are a lot less annoying, but annoying none the less. I often side against the Atheists who see no use in any part of religion, but a country where nearly half think that the earth is 6,000 years old has a serious issue about their choice of encyclopedia, and that can have negative effect on the whole society.

With the old Marxists saying that Religion is the opiate of the people and we need to eliminate it, and the Neocons saying that Religion is the opiate of the people and we need to pump out as much opium as possible, it would seem to me that a much more nuanced conversation is called for.

While I find much to discuss and learn in all religions I draw the line at the point where the religion becomes an encyclopedia, easily when at odds with scientific observation, but also when asserting as fact what cannot yet (or ever) be observed. I know you would ban "That obnoxious variant" from the site, but I think that the brighter the line the easier it is to know when you have crossed it from either side.

by FreeDem on Tue Nov 25, 2008 at 09:55:47 AM EST

They are religious, political, and extreme (none / 0)

... meaningless epithets like "religious political extremists" was considered state of the art politics. Inside the Beltway consulting firms were paid big bucks to craft this and similar focus-grouped epithets (read, "messages").

Oh? Can you name a specific example of such a campaign, and who paid whom to coin which labels?

And since you claim this was a Democratic project, please specify whether it was done under the leadership of Carter, Clinton, or which other supposedly anti-religious fanatic?

That the Democrats should be perceived by what we now so delicately call "low information citizens" as sworn enemies of all that is holy can be ascribed to the work of that other party, one we might dub the "disinformation citizens". Whose interests does it serve for this blog to echo this slander?

My (perhaps fallacious) memories of the "religious political extremists" tag have it that this line was used by your (and my) former employers at Planned Parenthood - which was, and is, under endless attack by people for whom "RPE" is, if anything, a euphemism. Just how would you propose a group or movement in the crosshairs of the (very) religious (hardly ever) right describe their antagonists?

by Pierce R Butler on Tue Nov 25, 2008 at 08:52:49 PM EST

First of all, there is no single "they" (none / 0)

And as long as anyone thinks there is only a "they" (AKA "them") there is little room for increasing our knowledge, let alone the efficacy of what we do politically.

In any case, we have been over this ground before. But to refresh your memory it was Celinda Lake who for years in the 90s trotted out new slogans for her clients, including Planned Parenthood, until the post 911 world made the labeling and denomiization of people with whom one happens to disagree as extremists became transparently wrong headed. Yes, there are people of extreme views and people whose modus operadi are extremist, and certainly PP has been vicitimized by them. But many people who are critics of PP do not merit the label.

It may be as Lake claimed that "research" showed that in the narrow confines of her parameters, one term is better than another. What her research did not cover, was how people who used terms of demonization as gross generalties would come across. (Answer, not nearly as well as they thought they were coming across; conveying messages about themselves that were unanticipated.)

Part of the point here (beyond the above mentioned points about labeling and demonization that have been much discused on this site, such as here http://www.talk2action.org/story/2006/1/19/235149/867) there is a difference between fact and propodanda. Some people come to believe that terms of propaganda reflect reality; others come to adopt propaganda terms, almost as a fashion statement -- using such terms as often as possible to show how "in the know" they are. Unfortunately, the routine invocation of such terms often limit thought, conversation and the capacity to aquire knowledge, and thus limits our ability to evaluate formidable opponents and thus undermimes political effectiveness. But one of the main problem with labeling and demonization techiniques and terms is that there can be a lot of blowback. And I believe that is what happened in this instance.

by Frederick Clarkson on Fri Nov 28, 2008 at 10:53:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]

what do anti-choice activists have in common? (none / 0)

Imagine yourself in a women's clinic, with Randall Terry and friends howling outside one window, the American Life League chanting on the sidewalk, Missionaries to the Preborn playing paramilitary off to the other side, and anonymous heroes of the Army of God tossing suspicious packages at the back door. A reporter calls up and asks you for a comment on the situation, and you say,

"We're surrounded by ... ____"

Just how would you complete that sentence?

by Pierce R Butler on Fri Nov 28, 2008 at 08:53:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

fill in the blank with "hyoptheticals" (none / 0)

PP staff did not need an expensive and out of touch PR firm to be able to desecribe mobs, criminals, terrorists, and sure, extremists (when those things were present.)

I maintain that PPFA and others made an error in thinking that one size fits all when it comes to basic vocabulary about the Religious Right, and believing that labels and smear tactics are an appropriate or adequate substitute for knowledge.

The tactic backfired, and even Celinda Lake now advises people against using it. It is important for those who are serious about these things to learn from the mistakes of the past, and at the very least, not insist on continuing to make them.

by Frederick Clarkson on Sat Nov 29, 2008 at 02:24:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

a matter of purpose (none / 0)

... PPFA and others made an error in thinking that one size fits all when it comes to basic vocabulary about the Religious Right...

Perhaps the major part of our contention here arises from different motivations. You seem to be seeking an analytical taxonomy; I respect that, but have greater need of a rhetorical handle.

For you, "religious political extremists" is too vague. I more regret its failure because I'd enjoy labeling militant fundies as "urpies" (RPEs) - or anything else pithy, disrespectful, & street-useful.

It's highly unlikely the same lexicon could meet both requirements, but neither function lacks validity.

by Pierce R Butler on Tue Dec 02, 2008 at 10:39:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

: actually my point is different (none / 0)

I say that we need accurate terms of description and the knowledge to back them up so we can even have coherent conversations, let alone have effective political strategies.
I maintain that the religious political extremists phrase (and other similar ones) politically backfired; offended vast numbers of people unnecessarily, and too often made (and make) the peope who use them come off as bigoted and ill informed.
Additionaly, these terms of demonization also function as thought stoppers, which goes to my point above. Sometimes people who come off as bigoted and ill-informed, actually are.

by Frederick Clarkson on Wed Dec 03, 2008 at 01:01:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

None of the usual pundits remarked on it... (none / 0)

but if you read some of the nearly 400 comments following her opinion piece, you will see that rank-and-file Republicans are certainly in a tizzy! Anybody who dares to defame St. Sarah is lower than a snake's belly in Death Valley.

I am reasonably hopeful about the next four years, but after that? If St. Sarah makes a comeback, we may be needing that place in Canada after all...

by phatkhat on Tue Nov 25, 2008 at 09:17:23 PM EST

Yes (none / 0)

I've been hearing that sort of thing, and in many areas cannot say what I think- while they condemn Obama and say all sorts of lies about him while praising Palin and referring to her as if she were some sort of saint.

SIGH. I've heard "Obama is the antichrist" and things like that recently by people who obviously believed it- and they openly and publicly express HATE about people feeling a sense of joy and relief in his election. (We're being offensive and disrespectful towards their religion- even if it's quiet private talk among friends! In the "blogosphere"- they don't want ANYTHING positive said about Obama and the election in some of the blogs I've seen- non-religious and non-political blogs!)

The racist language and jokes are also getting more numerous and worse. Their reality is starting to show.

by ArchaeoBob on Fri Nov 28, 2008 at 11:58:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]

: Thinking... (none / 0)

I've been thinking about this subject a lot today.
I think a good part of it comes down to the source of people's knowledge.
We've been going on first-hand experience, recorded speech and activities, and written records. We use logic and examine the evidence. We read what others have written and weigh their words and evidence. (And, yes, we admit that we're wrong or that we disagree with each other- and that doesn't necessarily end the relationship.)
In some sense, what I have observed is very similar to what is done in science.
From what I've observed, the dominionists listen to preachers and take what they say as the basis for their knowledge. They don't question, they don't disagree, they don't use logic or think about what the source of their knowledge is. There is little real internal discussion- and any disagreement gets one expelled or punished.
On one hand, there are people who have had the same experiences I have, and have recordings and other evidence which I find persuasive. On the other hand, there are people who repeat one version or another of the same old stuff I'd been told in the dominionist churches I attended years ago- and have heard since then. I've personally caught the second group lying time and time again. Indeed, the things we all have problems with are based upon one lie or another.
We've all seen the distortions and fantastic claims. They are based upon lies (or falsehoods)- and we are NOT just disagreeing with their ideas.
In a sense, this whole argument is like the one between Science and pseudoscience- do we dignify their nonsense with a reply, do we show them the respect due to people and watch them turn that shown respect into further support for nonsense (as has happened with pseudoscience promoters)- or do we call them quacks and fakes and refute them every chance we can?
Much of what I've seen- reported here, in the (as a friend of mine puts it) "meat world", in print and elsewhere- are VERY much like the claims made by pseudoscience (which I've been dealing with for a few years now). Some of it is obviously based on "The Big Lie", and I've seen other techniques being used.
The question is- how do we respond to people who are promoting falsehood (just like the pseudoscience people) for political or financial reasons without empowering them or their cause any more? Our response must be done in such a way that they can't get any traction with it. And as scientists are finding out- you HAVE to speak out against the nonsense. Not doing so means risking that the lie will spread.
This is rather a summation of the thoughts I've been having about this topic.

by ArchaeoBob on Sat Nov 29, 2008 at 12:35:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]

re (none / 0)

�� 2009 �� 2009 �� 2009 �� 2009 �� hguhf �� http://www.arabstart.com/sitemaps/sitemap_index.xml.gz http://forum.arabstart.com/sitemap_index.xml.gz

by helali on Sun May 10, 2009 at 08:35:34 PM EST

The Oogedy-Boogedy Gap, Defined | 18 comments (18 topical, 0 hidden)

TTA site search engine

WWW Talk To Action

The Fog is Lifting over Common Ground on Abortion
President Obama has made much about finding common ground on abortion, and Democratic oriented think tanks like Third Way and Faith in Public Life......
By Frederick Clarkson (0 comments)

Short Takes
Examiner.com: A few years ago, Talk to Action exposed the convert or die ideology of the video game based on Tim LaHaye's Left Behind......
By Frederick Clarkson (6 comments)

Sally Kern, Unpatriot: Why Does Oklahoma's Looney Lawmaker Hate America?
Everyone's favorite raging theocrat, Oklahoma House member Sally Kern, is at it again. Numerous reports indicate that Kern and her supporters plan to publicly......
By Rob Boston (3 comments)

Camp David Chaplain: "First we get the military, then we get the nation"
For a few hours today it seemed, according to a new Time Magazine story by Amy Sullivan, released Monday morning, that US President Barack......
By Bruce Wilson (0 comments)

Obama's [Reported] New Pastor: "First we get the military, then we get the nation"
UPDATE: The White House has denied the report that Obama has chosen the chapel at Camp David as his church. This, however, does not......
By Chris Rodda (2 comments)

CBS's Go To (Rightwing) Catholic Guy
The go to guy at CBS News for all-things Catholic is one Father Thomas D. Williams. Never heard of him? Well, if you watch......
By Frank Cocozzelli (2 comments)

MRFF Demands DoD Revoke Authority of Chaplain Endorser Who Suggested Democrats Should Be Executed
As I wrote back in May, the antics of disgraced former Navy chaplain Gordon Klingenschmitt, and his retaliation against the Military Religious Freedom Foundation......
By Chris Rodda (4 comments)

Al Jazeera Special Report Covers Advance of Fundamentalism in US Military
A June 23, 2009 report from Al Jazeera (English) by Josh Rushing, "Fault Lines - Religion in the Military", expertly covers a topic the......
By Bruce Wilson (2 comments)

Ann Coulter Justifies The Tiller Assasination
Ann Coulter is skilled at saying what she really believes while building in a certain plausible deniability, and that is what she has repeatedly......
By Frederick Clarkson (5 comments)

More on the Pre-Netroots Nation Pie Fight
The other day, I reported about the pies launched in response to the description of one of the first sessions to be announced for......
By Frederick Clarkson (3 comments)

Ralph's Resurrection?: Former Christian Coalition Honcho Reed Seeks To Rise From The Crypt
Last month I wrote a story for Church & State speculating about possible new leaders for the Religious Right. I focused on Mike Huckabee,......
By Rob Boston (3 comments)

Liberty Learns A Lesson: Falwell School Accepts AU Advice On Political Clubs
Americans United for Separation of Church and State reacted quickly when word spread recently that officials at Liberty University had revoked university recognition of......
By Rob Boston (0 comments)

Defense Department-Certified Agency Newsletter Suggests Killing Democrats
"In 2008, Ammerman implied that four presidential candidates should be "arrested, quickly tried and hanged" for not voting to designate English America's official language,......
By Bruce Wilson (2 comments)

Col. Jim Ammerman, Apostle & New World Order Conspiracy Theorist
Part Two - Conspiracy as Prophecy New World Order Conspiracy is not disseminated by white supremacist groups alone. New World Order conspiracy is a......
By Ruth (2 comments)

Common Ground Sink Hole at RH Reality Check
There is an odd new section to the prochoice site, RH Reality Check devoted to discussion of common ground on abortion, and featuring some......
By Frederick Clarkson (3 comments)

Radio host: We're only united through Christianity
Most of you in Indiana may know about Peter Heck, who hosts a daily radio show in Kokomo and puts out a column that appears in several newspapers across the state and in OneNewsNow.......
By Christian Dem in NC (1 comment)

Cindy Jacobs--the new leader of the NAR
You may remember that Lou Engle has made moves of late to position himself as the new power in the religious right. He's a member of the Apostolic Council of Prophetic Elders, a group......
By Christian Dem in NC (1 comment)

James F. Linzey Espouses anti-Semitic, White Racialist Conspiracy Theory
James F. Linzey is a prominent, active duty chaplain in the United States military. Linzey has stated that he was the command chaplain for the Operation Iraqi Freedom troop mobilization prior to the US......
By Bruce Wilson (0 comments)

White Supremacist named as Holocaust Museum Shooter
An 89 year old, vehemently antiSemitic Ron Paul supporter has been named by police as the gunman who opened fire in the Holocaust Museum shortly after noon today: Gunman, guard shot at Holocaust museum......
By CynthiaGee (0 comments)

From Focus On The Family to La Familia Michoacana
I didn't think my work on the religous right would converge with what I'm doing on the narcoguerra in Mexico...but here it is: the Faith-Based Cartel. ......
By julydogs (1 comment)

A Pagan Among the Mainstream Churches in Boise
The participation by an "out" Pagan in the Idaho Hunger Relief Task Force proves that some religions will accept and welcome help from all quarters, in recognition that we are all human. The glaring......
By Chiawana (0 comments)

Clarkson on CounterSpin
Hear me discuss the Tiller assasination this week on the nationally syndicated radio program CounterSpin, the progressive media criticism show produced by Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR). You can also listen via Mp3......
By Frederick Clarkson (0 comments)

Liberty Counsel tries to SLAPP Americans United
In what can charitably be described as an act of desperation, Liberty Counsel is asking the IRS to investigate Americans United's tax-exempt status. This comes only days after AU asked the IRS to investigate......
By Christian Dem in NC (0 comments)

Strange how things bring the nutcases out
I read today that Westboro Baptist staged a protest at a vigil held for Dr. Tiller in Wichita. I'm not surprised, but what did surprise me was that they had 20 people there......
By ArchaeoBob (0 comments)

Southern Baptists may be abandoning public schools
Via OneNewsNow, I discovered a story by former Southern Baptist Convention president Morris Chapman that appears to call for SBC churches to begin setting up Christian schools. I now wonder if our focus in......
By Christian Dem in NC (0 comments)

Footnote about Ammerman / Palin / Wagner Linkage
Colonel "Jim" Ammerman was listed as being an apostle in C. Peter Wagner's International Coalition of Apostles [see ICA prospectus] from the organization's inception in 2001 through to December 2008. The ICA is one......
By Bruce Wilson (0 comments)

The Singapore Struggle, after AWARE
An introductory post on steeplejacking in Singapore after the attempted takeover of a woman's NGO and a summary of recent updates. ......
By Sniper (2 comments)

What Does Bobby Jindal Really Want to Do To Louisiana Higher Education?
In recent weeks, Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal has stood back and watched while both the Louisiana House and Senate wrestled with his original budget proposal to cut $219 million from Louisiana public higher education.......
By ulyankee (3 comments)

Yank Dominionists are considering taking over....New Zealand?????
No, it's not a plot for a bad sci-fi movie, it's.... "The Three Greatest Issues Facing the Men of New Zealand" ....and the first wave of the "invasion" has already hit the island, just......
By CynthiaGee (1 comment)

The AWARE steeplejackers and their deep connections to Joel's Army and American dominionists
Thanks to a few Singaporean friends (who shall remain anonymous), I had become aware of a disturbing development--an attempted hijack of a major women's NGO. Through those same folks and Fred Clarkson's post on......
By dogemperor (0 comments)

Common Enemies: LGBT, Abortion Share Foes
by Pam Chamberlain [On The Issues Magazine] When I was in college, a group of radical women dressed as witches ran around major U.S. cities doing zap actions, placing hexes on male-dominated institutions like......
By On The Issues Magazine (0 comments)

Florida Theocrats at it again.
There are two news articles in today's Ledger that are of concern. http://www.theledger.com/article/20090424/NEWS/904259979/1003/NEW S00?Title=Jesus-License-Plate-Could-Come The new license plates come up for a vote this year. http://www.theledger.com/article/20090423/NEWS/904235098/1005/NEW S02?Title=Bill-Would-Strengthen-Voucher-Program This bill, also possibly up for a......
By ArchaeoBob (4 comments)

Is Humanism Arrogant?
Much to the dismay of theocratic Christians, humanists claim that ethics can be understood without resorting to the supernatural or alleged divine authority from religious texts. Christian theocrats say this is hubris. ......
By TMurray (8 comments)

Terry Schaivo back in the news
http://www.theledger.com/article/20090330/NEWS/903305040/1003/NEW S00?Title=Schiavo-Anniversary-Mass-Planned Another move by the religious right- rather than letting Terry go (after an autopsy PROVED that she had severe and irreversible brain damage), they're dragging her up again. ......
By ArchaeoBob (5 comments)

no ark no temple
how can you build a new temple in jerusalem if there is no ark of the covanent to put in it? book of jerimiah states that the ark will not be reconstructed. what does......
By keyknow (5 comments)

WND.com Cashes In on "Birther" Conspiracy Theories
WorldNetDaily has been spinning ridiculous yarns about Barack Obama since last year's presidential campaign, particularly about the idea that he's a foreign-born usurper to the Oval Office. Now you can own a peice of......
By Scoutstr295 (0 comments)

Did you know NC's constitution bars atheists from holding office?
When I found out that an Arkansas state rep is trying to repeal a provision in his state constitution that bars atheists from holding office, I remembered that, sadly, North Carolina's constitution has a......
By Christian Dem in NC (2 comments)

AP helping religious right again--this time in Arkansas
I'm starting to wonder if the American Family Association has a moleat the Associated Press. That's the only plausible explanation for an AP story about a possible referendum about removing constitutional restrictions on atheists......
By Christian Dem in NC (1 comment)

Creationists' new angle--it's in the name of academic freedom
(cross-posted at dKos) Looks like the creationist crowd is trying a new tack to try and get a toe in the evolution debate. Apparently shutting out discussion of creation amounts to a denial of......
By Christian Dem in NC (2 comments)

Religious right threatens lawsuit over provision of stimulus bill
cross-posted at dKos The American Center for Law and Justice is threatening a lawsuit over the stimulus package. At issue? A provision that it claims may force colleges receiving funds to renovate their facilities......
By Christian Dem in NC (3 comments)

Fundies raising stink about prospective gay appointment
cross-posted at dKosI had a funny feeling the religious right would find something about Obama to get worked up about, and wouldn't you know, it looks like they have. Apparently the prospect of Obama--horrors!--appointing......
By Christian Dem in NC (1 comment)

The Churches may need Redefining
John Aravosis www.americablog.com/ has reported that Archbishop Rino Fisichella is commenting on the arrogance of newly elected President Obama as someone who is opening the door to abortion and thus the......
By tangodaddy (1 comment)

Blackwater: Guns for Hire or Trojan Horsemen?
The Los Angeles Times reports this morning that Blackwater security may be forced out of Iraq: "Blackwater Worldwide,the security firm that allegedly used excessive force to protect U.S. diplomats in Iraq, will soon be......
By CynthiaGee (0 comments)

If Abortion is Murder what do you do with the Killers?
This is a video I found today of a guy who interviewed pro-life activists at an anti-abortion rally. The interviewer asked the question, "What do you do with all of the women who commit......
By inlikeflint (0 comments)

Boston Globe Notes Warren's Hitler Cites, Misses "Africa Problem"
As a new Boston Globe article, "Effort to surmount polarizing debates backfires on pastor", by Michael Paulson, noticed, "The Huffington Post, noting that Warren has cited the success Hitler, Lenin and Mao had at......
By Bruce Wilson (4 comments)

More Diaries...

Donate to or support
Talk to Action

Left Behind: Eternal Forces: Installments of Jonathan Hutson's Talk To Action expose series

on the "Left Behind: Eternal Forces" video game have been viewed by up to 1/2 million people. See our site section featuring Over 35 original articles covering the controversial "Left Behind: Eternal Forces" video game that has provoked a boycott by a coalition of religious groups and a letter writing campaign urging Walmart to stop selling the game. Media inquiries click here
(image: detail from Francoise Dubois' rendition of the Bartholomew's Day Massacre reveals the actual nature of religious warfare)

Blogs

Bartholomew's Notes On Religion Chip Berlet Max Blumenthal The Panda's Thumb Frederick Clarkson Chuck Currie DefCon father Jake Stops The World John Gorenfeld Religion Clause Chris Mooney Religious Right Watch The Revealer Jesus Politics Majority Report Radio Blog Mainstream Baptist Orcinus Dispatches from the Culture Wars Ex-Gay Watch The Wall of Separation Blog From The Capital:a blog on religious liberty issues and the separation of church and state

CrossLeft: Organizing The Christian Left Dark Christianity The Daily Kos Booman Tribune ePluribus Media My Left Wing Political Cortex Street Prophets

Organizations

American Booksellers Foundation for Freedom of Expression ACLU Anti-Defamation League American Library Association Christian Alliance for Progress Citizens Project DefCon: Campaign to Defend The Constitution Faithful America People For the American way Institute For Democracy Studies Interfaith Alliance Jews On First: Defending the First Amendment American Fundamentalists Americans United for Separation of Church and State Baptist Joint Committee on Religious Liberty The Clergy and laity Network Political Research Associates Theocracy Watch Media Matters for America Military Religious Freedom Foundation Montana Human Rights Network National Center For Science Education Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice The Revealer Southern Poverty Law Center Texas Freedom Network CrossLeft: Organizing the Christian Left Theocracy Watch Truth Wins Out"