A Heartbeat Away, or Why Palin's Churches Matter
Bruce Wilson printable version print page     Bookmark and Share
Thu Sep 25, 2008 at 09:35:53 AM EST
Sam Harris - an emergent, outspoken American atheist - has written a new Newsweek op-ed which shows what is to my mind very appropriate concern over Sarah Palin's vice presidential candidacy. But Harris also garbles Palin's likely religious beliefs, under the rubric that all religion is suspect. Precision, whether in surgery, politics or religion, matters. It is unlikely that Sarah Palin believes in the premillennial dispensationalist "Rapture" and, to move beyond the realm of wonkish religious terminology; "speaking in tongues" is not the proper issue of concern - it's just a form of religious expression, no more or less, and not a wise human behavior, if any could be, to mock.

Hundreds of millions worldwide think glossolalia is a valid form of religious expression and, more to the point, charismatic Christianity is not necessarily a stronghold of the political right. Indeed, currently a left-wing Pentecostal, non-violent movement of Brazilian peasants is challenging landlords and elite power structures, in Brazil, over farming rights.

"Muthee exclaimed, "We come against the spirit of witchcraft! We come against the python spirits!" Then, a local pastor took the mic from Muthee and added, "We stomp on the heads of the enemy!" - Journalist Max Blumenthal, describing Palin-anointer Thomas Muthee's appearance at the Wasilla Assembly of God, September 20, 2008

Disturbing evidence pointing towards the likely nature of Sarah Palin's religious beliefs continues to emerge. Yesterday "scrubbed" footage, from a 2005 "anointing" of then-Alaska gubernatorial contender Sarah Palin, resurfaced on the website of the net-based alternative news service The Irregular Times. The footage showed Kenyan minister Thomas Muthee not only praying over and blessing Sarah Palin, to advance her bid for the Alaska governorship and protect Palin from a "spirit of witchcraft", but, prior to the blessing, Muthee gave a seven to eight minute speech in which he called on believing Christians to "infiltrate" a number of key areas of secular society including Banking and finance, schools and education, media, politics and government. [continue reading this story]

Harris mentions "The Rapture" in his op-ed but also declares that Sarah Palin may believe in a conquering "end-time" Christian army of true-believers that will cleanse the earth of evil.
On that latter possibility Sam Harris is appropriately concerned.

Religious behaviors are in themselves mainly irrelevant. What we can observe in Sarah Palin's churches is a form of Christianity in which the experiential aspect of religious experience has been dramatically amplified but from which theological content has been largely drained away. "Jesus is perfect theology" declares Wasilla Assembly of God head pastor Ed Kalnins but "Jesus" in this case in an empty vessel. We're not studying the New Testament Book of Mark, declares Kalnins, nor are we studying the words of Moses. We are studying Jesus, declares Kalnins, but Jesus is not so much "studied" as felt, or intuited, and because what "Jesus" means is almost completely undefined such a Jesus can function as an empty vessel into which leaders of the Third Wave and the New Apostolic Reformation can pour their aggressive and intolerant political ideology. Parallels to the religious ideology held by The Family, as described by Rolling Stone and Harpers author Jeff Sharlet, in The Family: The Secret Fundamentalism at The Heart of American Power are striking. When religion becomes mainly experiential, when theological content is stripped away, it can serve as a powerful and dangerous vehicle for political ideology.

So, religious behaviors, in the case of the Christianity of Sarah Palin's churches, matter insofar as they are yolked to religious doctrines that effect the temporal, earthly realm. Triumphal and exceptionalist religions teaching their believers to "infiltrate" and gain control of governmental, business, educational and media sectors are toxic to the pluralist ethic that has characterized  America's over two-century long pioneering experiment with democracy.

That's why Sarah Palin's churches matter : not because people at Palin's churches speak in tongues or for any specific gestural or behavioral expression. These things are deeply felt and not properly mocked or stigmatized, Rather, Palin's churches matter because pastors in those churches espouse an aggressive form of Christian nationalism and also the doctrine that all forms of religious and philosophical beliefs other than their own are invalid and even under demonic influence.

Christians caught up in the Third Wave or New Apostolic Reformation tend to believe that all Christian sects and denominations are invalid and even under demonic influence because their theological substrate holds that when Adam and Eve sinned in The Garden, God withdrew his protective cover from the Earth and demons flooded in. Palin's churches are demon-haunted churches which tend to view the Catholic Church (especially) as well as all Protestant denominations as invalid and as manifestations of a "religious spirit" that's held to be demonic. Things devolve from there - the Third Wave stigmatizes much of Protestant and Catholic Christianity but it vilifies and literally demonizes Hinduism, Buddhism, Islam and all non-Christian religions and belief systems as manifestations of "witchcraft", to be driven from the Earth by "spiritual warfare" and by a physical, end-time, purifying last-generation army.

What would it mean for America to have a vice president, let alone a president, who might feel (though she would of course deny it) that Catholics and most Christians, and all non-Christians, hold invalid religious or philosophical beliefs and are under demonic influence ?

Phrases Mr. Harris uses indicate to me that he might be reading the articles my research team has written. So, if that's indeed true I'd like to suggest the following to Sam Harris :

Precision matters - in politics, in surgery and in religion. My research team's efforts led to the 3:40 video, shown around the world, credited by the New York Times, CNN, MSNBC and Newsweek with forcing John McCain to renounce the political endorsement of Texas megachurch evangelist John Hagee. That simple video three minute, forty second video was informed by years of research on Hagee and the Christian right. In other words, there is much to learn about contemporary religion, and politicized religion, of our age. And, religious traditions evolve and change, sometimes very rapidly. Understandings of American fundamentalism rooted in research done years or decades ago may no longer fit emerging traditions - many fundamentalist Christians are no longer waiting for the Rapture.

What does Sarah Palin believe ?

We'll never know for sure if she doesn't make a public declaration, and beliefs can change, of course, over time as well.

But Sarah Palin has spent roughly two and one half decades, most of her adult life so far, at the Wasilla Assembly of God. At twelve year's old, Palin - along with her entire family, was baptized at the church.

According to the Wasilla Assembly of God head pastor, Ed Kalnins, Palin maintains a "friendship" with the church including going to special church events.

One of those 'special' events might have been a May, 2005 anointing of Palin, shown in a video that was scrubbed from the Wasilla Assembly of God website and which has just resurfaced.

IN 2005, as she was starting her bid for the Alaska governor's seat, GOP vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin was "anointed" by three pastors, in a ceremony at the Wassila Assembly of God church in Wasilla, Alaska.

Two of the pastors who anointed Palin have stated that believing Christians, as they define those, can learn to raise from the dead. Those two pastors have also made statements indicating they believe that crime and social pathologies are caused when "demons" possess geographic areas and that "curses" can be transmitted from one human generation to the next.

[below: "May 2005 anointing of Sarah Palin, courtesy of The Irregular Times ]

I have no interest in disputing the validity of speaking in tongues, being "slain in the spirit", or miraculous healing. Many major religious have traditions that allow for such phenomena, real or not.

But in terms of dealing with the prospect that GOP Vice Presidential contender Sarah Palin might be a heartbeat away from the presidency of the most militarily powerful nation on Earth I'd suggest this approach : let's try to ascertain what her core beliefs might actually be.

Religious belief matters and is a valid subject for discussion - especially if a vice presidential candidate, who might be a heartbeat away from the US presidency, might believe that her sectarian form of religious belief is the only valid form of religious belief on earth.

Judging by statements made by the pastors who blessed and anointed Sarah Palin, as shown in a newly-surfaced May 2005 video taken at the Wasilla Assembly of God church, Sarah Palin may well believe that the majority of Christians on Earth, and all humans living with non-Christian religious and philosophical belief systems, hold beliefs that are not only invalid but also even demonically influenced.

For the last several weeks I have been working in a research team that has been mapping out the emerging Christian religious stream Sarah Palin falls in. It is not synonymous with Pentecostalism or the Assemblies of God. It is a new, highly experiential and extremely militant form of Christianity that, until now, has outstripped the best efforts of journalists and academics who might have classified it. You can read about the New Apostolic Reformation, and the third Wave, in the following series of Talk To Action articles:

Sarah Palin's Churches

Series of Documentary Videos and Supporting Articles


Sarah Palin's Churches and the Third Wave, Part One

http://www.talk2action.org/story/2008/9/5/0244/84583/

 Sarah Palin's Churches and the Third Wave, Part Two

httpwww.talk2action.org/story/2008/9/5/03830/11602

 Sarah Palin's Demon Haunted Churches, Complete Edition
With videos, documentation , and article

http/www.talk2action.org/story/2008/9/8/114332/7479

 Palin's Churches and the Holy Laughter Anointing,
Video, Documentation, and Article

http/www.talk2action.org/story/2008/9/11/113733/968

YouTube Censors Viral Video Documentary on Palin's Churches

http/www.talk2action.org/story/2008/9/13/1538/09770

Palin, Muthee, and the Witch- Journalists Miss the Major Story
http/www.talk2action.org/story/2008/9/20/171755/145

The "Lions in the Pews"

http://www.talk2action.org/story/2008/9/24/82239/9750/"


Direct video links:



Sarah Palin's Churches and the Third Wave, also titled
Palin's Demon Haunted Churches

http://www.vimeo.com/1679097?pg=embed&sec=1679097

Palin's Churches and the Holy Laughter Anointing

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_CkZWTvKBc

 




Display:
One of the leaders of my former movement, Leo Lawson of Every Nation Churches, taught that EVERYONE has demons.

Including ALL CHRISTIANS.  Especially ALL CHRISTIANS.  Including those who identify as "born again."

In order to be truly "free" of these demons, one has to go through "inner healing and deliverance," which is really mind and behavioral control.

Anyone who resists this movement is under the influence of a demon and needs to be cleansed of that demon.  Check out one of C. Peter Wagner's tomes, Freedom from the Religious Spirit, which features a chapter by Lawson on how to deal with dissent, er, I mean those who disagree with them because they have a religious spirit.  So... even Christians who stand up to them are the enemy.  Not to mention everyone else.

If these freaks actually succeed in their plans, it will be like giving Fifth Monarchists WMDs.  Very, very scary.

by ulyankee on Thu Sep 25, 2008 at 11:24:06 AM EST


writer. All religion is delusion. Ok. Heard that one. His ignorance and bigotry (as has been so well-exposed by Chris Hedges) makes him an exceptionally poor choice to present as an informed commentator in any respectable forum.

by Frederick Clarkson on Thu Sep 25, 2008 at 02:56:18 PM EST
Harris is notable among the new wave of atheists, in that he doesn't quite agree with Hitchens that "there is no eastern solution" when it comes to religion.

There's a touching moment in "End of Faith" where Harris tells the reader there's a shelf of Hindu/Buddhist literature behind him, and he's going to reach back and pluck a random volume off, open to a random page, plunk his finger down on a random passage, and then read the passage off, cold. The effect is stunning, and serves to highlight his thesis; there are traditions which few people would hesitate to call "religious," and which are to creed-based faiths as night is to day.

So I would say your suggestion that Harris has blown his wad is not quite right on at least one count.

by razajac on Sun Sep 28, 2008 at 09:50:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]



Bruce, you said,

What we can observe in Sarah Palin's churches is a form of Christianity in which the experiential aspect of religious experience has been dramatically amplified but from which theological content has been largely drained away.

I have to disagree with this statement, though I also understand why this seems to back up your observations.  There IS a theology, a warped, non-systematic one, but a theology nonetheless.  However, since it is so off the wall, and most pew sitters in these churches wouldn't go along with it if they knew what it was (or knew right away), it is couched in experientialism and biblical-sounding rhetoric.  Also, since many of the non-denominational churches in the NAR movement attract so many youth and otherwise new converts, they don't have the theological or historical background to be able to figure out anything is wrong, allowing themselves to be gradually and totally indoctrinated.

I liken the NAR's leadership to a small, elite cult which is infiltrating churches in order to turn them into cult recruitment facilities.  Or even if they don't actually get in the church, they attract people out to go to conferences and large-scale events like TheCall, where they can then be recruited into their ministries and/or training programs.  Youth are the main targets.  However, middle aged folk like me are important--our job is to support and finance the thing, even if we don't exactly know what "it" is.  So many pew sitters are left in the dark for exactly that reason.  My former group was especially conscious about not exposing too much too soon, or committing too much to writing, because of what happened with Maranatha Campus Ministries... the last thing they want is to be labeled a cult like Maranatha was.

However, the myriad training schools and programs that NAR churches and front groups very definitely teach a theology to their acolytes.  In my former group, that theology was a fusion of Christian Reconstructionism, Latter Rain-ism, Shepherding, Moral Government Theology, and enough classical Pentecostalism, Reformed, and generic Protestant theology to make seem palatable.  (Poison is seldom served straight up.) There are differences among NAR groups but Latter Rain type charismaticism and at least some Shepherding tenets tend to be common threads.  Most of the pastors of my former local church also used to be in the Assemblies (they came out of Texas and were influenced by YWAM and Agape Force) so we also had a Master's Commission... where they taught demonology and practiced very, very heavy Shepherding, but it was couched in something that looked like classical A/G Pentecostalism on the surface.  Anyone who knows anything about Christian theology would know right away that you can't make those widely disparate pieces fit into a coherent, systematic whole.  Wars have been fought over them!  Right.  Cognitive dissonance abounds in these places.  The leaders in my movement insist over and over that they aren't dualists but who else could be so obsessed with demons and curses?  But if you hear it enough times, you begin to believe it, even if it totally conflicts with the facts.

The glue, at least in my group, was the constant insistance that our leaders knew what was best for us and if we were good Christians, we would submit to them.  They spent a lot of time trying to build trust in the leadership.  That's also where the experientialism comes in.  Once members have their trust, then they get strung along bit by bit.  

So they do make their members blank slates so they can imprint them with their "spiritual DNA."  But there is a most definitely a theology.  It's just not apparent to those visiting and observing.  It's generally taught to those who take the bait and are recruited into their "leadership training."  And even then, they don't get the full of it.

BTW, the closest thing to a systematic theology in the Latter Rain movement was George Warnock's Feast of Tabernacles, which is still considered a "foundational" text.  That was recommended reading in my former group's training school.  However, since that was recommended verbally and not in writing, all I have are handwritten notes as proof of that. :-)

by ulyankee on Thu Sep 25, 2008 at 04:31:38 PM EST

One way of reconciling what we've both wrote might be through the question - theology for whom ? In other words, I very much agree that there's a highly specific theological viewpoint in play here. But, as you seem to suggest, it's a theology for an elite class rather than for average adherents - who get steered towards the experiential realm. But, that's just my current viewpoint. Interesting re Warnock - recommended, yet covert. Best, BruceW

by Bruce Wilson on Thu Sep 25, 2008 at 11:53:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Ok, that does reconcile our viewpoints.  I've heard leaders in my former group say things like "in my theology" like it's a purely personally held thing rather than something that drives the movement.  There's several reasons for that.  (1) If questioned, then the leadership can say, "well, it's just one person saying that and doesn't necessarily reflect the views of the movement."  They actually said that about Jim Laffoon's "To Reach and To Rule" after the text was posted online, even though that sermon contains the raison d'etre of the movement and completely reflects Every Nation's and the NAR's theology. And (2) then it allows them to hide between Matthew 18... so if you question something, it is considered personal disagreement between you and the leader (even if you've never met the person) and you have to deal with it as a personal offense, rather than as a public teaching.  Oh, and (3) it keeps people from leaving and taking their tithes with them.

I've debated with other former members (some activist, some not) over how important it is to piece together the leaders' theology... I've argued that it's extremely important to know what they believe since beliefs determine behavior, and as a result I have spent a lot of time piecing together and studying their teachings.  While it isn't a coherent whole (impossible) I think I have a pretty good idea, and I can also document it.  Others have argued that their behavior has backed some of them into their beliefs, and that most rank and file don't care about theology anyway... that if you talk about botched finances, leaders living in mansions, emotional and mental control and abuse, acolytes cut off from their families, etc. then people will be more likely to leave.  True, but I'm also interested in breaking the pattern, especially since several churches and ministers have left my former group over finances and abuses but with their belief systems still intact. As a result, there's the risk they'll stay in the larger NAR/Third Wave movement, or worse, possibly join up with or morph into something more virulent.  Or go into a previously healthy church and infect it with the NAR "spiritual DNA," as I know has also happened.  And the risk is high that a rank and file walkaway will go back into something just as bad if not worse if they can't articulate the underlying reasons why they need to leave not just the church but the larger movement.  This requires addressing the underlying theology, worldview, belief system, whatever you want to call it, even if it's not always consciously held.

Not to mention that those who do care about theology, namely ministers of churches at risk of being infiltrated or taken over, often don't have a clue how dangerously warped this movement is. They NEED to know, as you've said, since it is most definitely a war upon other churches.  I know the young missionaries in my former movement are strongly encouraged to raise support OUTSIDE THE MOVEMENT rather than in their home churches, including in mainline and non-NAR evangelical churches.  They also try to recruit youth from these same churches.   (Do not let your kids go to TheCall or to Campus Harvest!!!!!)  They also have actively tried to "take over" college campuses, including denominational, evangelical Christian ones, under the guise of "reaching students with the gospel."

My hope is that ministers learn how crazy and cultic dominion theology is as a whole in all its forms so that they stop defacto supporting it.  I know just from my experience with my former group that if you cut off these leaders from money, good publicity, support, and new recruits, and not just for a short while but permanently (since they won't stop on their own ever due to "their theology"), then changes might start to take place.

by ulyankee on Fri Sep 26, 2008 at 08:30:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]




So after becoming famous for anointing someone called Palin Muthee rails against the "python spirit"...

(sorry, obvious and lame...)

by Richard Bartholomew on Thu Sep 25, 2008 at 05:15:44 PM EST


Bruce says: "'speaking in tongues' is not the proper issue of concern - it's just a form of religious expression, no more or less, and not a wise human behavior, if any could be, to mock."

Y'know, I'm an extraordinary liberal guy. In my life, Ive handed out benefits of my doubt like so many fistfulls of Chicklets.

But there comes a time when you salvage something mindful and self-respecting. And "tongues" is one area where the barrier has long been breached.

I speak English, a little French, and a little Chinese; and it takes a smidgen of knowledge of languge to know when someone is squeezing phonetic scrambled eggs though a funnel. It grates me no end on the occasions where I've been in fundie groupings where someone starts "speaking in tongues." I have no doubt that, if you took aside 5 people who claimed the phenomenon to be real, and asked them each to write down a translation, three of them would admit they have no idea--just that it's, like, you know, a "gift from God"--and the other two would proffer two distinct interpretations. In other words, nothing of any actual meaning to anyone is being said. Furthermore, folks I've known who leant credence to tongues as a divine phenomenon were the kinds of folks who weren't tremendously invested in "meaning" anyway--which is, itself, quite telling.

Add to this the fact that researchers did an MRI neuron firing "brain mapping" study of glossalalia, and found the the firing wasn't taking place in the language centers.

Now, I know I can be easily accused of being overly rational, not "available" to the divine, etc., etc. I just feel that such an accusation, when it comes to this issue, is facile. There comes a time when a person understands that a human institution has been bouncing around in the woods, far too deeply, for far too long. I think tongues is one of these institutions.

I'm perfectly content to see Harris bash away at this sacred cow.

by razajac on Sun Sep 28, 2008 at 10:12:27 AM EST

First, I have a "smidgen of knowledge of language"- I've got quite a few graduate level hours spent in Linguistic Anthropology, as well as several undergraduate hours in that branch of Anthropology.  I do know a little bit about it, and a little about language in general (including things like language structure, creation and formation, acquisition, and so on).

While I mainly speak English, I also have studied some Spanish and French (many years back), and know a few words in Italian and my ancestral tongue- Muskogean.  I have also been exposed to quite a few of the world's different languages at one time or another.  So I am not exactly monolingual, although I cannot claim to really talk any of the other languages.  (And I can say that I'm familiar with the "sound" of some of the languages).

(1) The "neuron firing" study you mentioned also had another very important point- that the section of the brain to do with identity, self, and knowledge was quiescent.  This I also consider important, as important as the section of the brain dealing with language being inactive.   Maybe even more important.

(2) Glossolalia is not restricted to fundamentalist Christianity- it is NOT unknown in other religions.  Now, I don't remember the source of that tidbit, but I do remember that the source was rather authoritative on the subject.

(3) I know people who seem to have been born with this- beyond the infantile babbling (in one case, a person generally prayed in tongues until an adult unbeliever heard that person at several years of age and "beat it out of him/her".  In this case, the person had no exposure to fundamentalism).  I myself pray (at times) in tongues- it's a private thing, and in my case, not generally for "public consumption".  Also, in my case, I began doing it without the "laying on of hands" (required according to the dominionist churches I attended decades ago), and it's not an especially emotional thing for me.  So, many of the things taught about this are not necessarily correct- and by this I mean there's far more to it than the narrow teaching of a still more restrictive sect.

I've listened to people speaking in tongues- and there is a wide variety of things I hear.  Some are obviously mimicking or possibly even faking it.  Others seem to be basically babbling (or even as you put it, "squeezing phonetic scrambled eggs though a funnel".  That is not always true in every case.  In some cases there is a clear cadence and phonetic stream that has (to describe it best) the "music" of a spoken language.  Now, I recently spent 5 weeks in Sicily.  In that area, many of the Sicilians spoke their native tongue for most things, and spoke Italian as a second language.  I could hear the "music" of their native tongue both when they spoke it AND as an accent in their Italian.  I've had many other confirmed experiences where I could hear the "music" of a different language behind the one being spoken, and in a few cases could even identify it.  We've all had this experience with the languages we speak- but it is also possible to "hear" this in languages we do NOT speak.

So, consider that I may sometimes be able to actually identify language being spoken, without understanding it- and tell the difference between language and "phonetic scrambled eggs squeezed through a funnel".

There is something very real there.  In my own case, this "gift" as it were helps me in times of pain or trouble.  It helps me to focus, and in some cases to "unfocus" when I need to.  I don't use it all the time, but it is there.  It's helped my faith.

So, I would advise not denigrating glossolalia.  I would be the first person to tell you that my experience with people who focus on the "gifts" is that they generally become very harsh-hearted and legalistic.  This may be because of their focus, or it may be because of the influence of the dominionists that usually "push" this sort of thing.  I will admit that I'm cautious around people who focus on tongues and things like that- but again, I strongly advise NOT to denigrate it.

One final point- there are sounds in one language that are not in another, and in some cases if a person doesn't grow up with using that sound or combination of sounds, it becomes very difficult to make them.  I've heard anecdotal evidence that this has been observed in glossolalia.  It would REALLY make me interested to encounter this, and especially to document it!  Hopefully- the person doing so would not be "faking it".

   

by ArchaeoBob on Mon Sep 29, 2008 at 09:15:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]



One more thing: My statement above actually dovetails quite nicely with Bruce's thesis. In the end, Bruce nails the demon to the tree: He correctly characterizes the central problem with this "new wave" theology as being actually bereft of theology.

Well, there's another, more telling way to word it: It's bereft of meaning. The second you try to get someone to say something meaningful--to actually insist on real communication--in such hyper-religious settings you may as well have asked them to renounce God. And you did: You asked them to renounce their God, who apparently has nothing more going than a kind of protracted cocaine peak of "spirit filling", the vacuum neatly filled by a convenient (for the leaders) authoritarianism.

The genuine quest for meaning is the bane of authoritarianism, and that the authoritarian meaninglessness of these gatherings is peppered with folks spouting glossolalic gibberish is nothing less than further confirmation of Bruce's core thesis. In fine Talmudic tradition, the quest for meaning was an overarching theme of Christ's teachings. As Bruce notes, it's absent from these new churches, and glossolalia--a meaningless distraction--is therefore certainly a benign pastime in such groupings.

by razajac on Sun Sep 28, 2008 at 10:31:19 AM EST



WWW Talk To Action


Adopting Bias: New Va. Rules Seek To Safeguard 'Faith-Based' Bigotry
Legislators and media pundits in Washington, D.C., continue to obsess over the birth control mandate in the new health care law and whether church-related......
By Rob Boston (3 comments)
GOP Candidates Embrace a Major Religious Right Narrative
Rick Santorum and Mitt Romney's demagogic claims that President Obama is engaged in a "war against religion" are as unsurprising as they are disturbing.......
By Frederick Clarkson (4 comments)
NAR Apostle Harold Caballeros Heads Guatemala Foreign Ministry
In January 2012, with the inauguration of former military general Otto Pérez Molina as Guatemala's president, NAR apostle Harold Caballeros took charge of Guatemala's......
By Bruce Wilson (1 comment)
As Eddie Long Controversy Grows, Video Emerges of 'Rabbi' Messer Wrapping Paula White in Torah
A Christian Post article dated February 5 is one of many reports of denials by televangelist Paula White and her attorney of any ties......
By Rachel Tabachnick (9 comments)
Garlow Introduced Gingrich, Called for Pastors Revolt Against IRS Rules at NAR Church in Nevada
On Friday night Newt Gingrich spoke at the "Prayer for America" event at the International Church of Las Vegas (ICLV) led by Apostle Paul......
By Rachel Tabachnick (3 comments)
A Must Read Book: "The Good News Club"
For anyone who wants to read a book that really goes inside the movement to indoctrinate children through our public schools, I highly recommend......
By Chris Rodda (3 comments)
More On Yale's Templeton-Funded "Spiritual Capital Initiative"
Should Chick-Fil-A be known for its extensive ties to, and funding of, some of the most aggressively anti-gay groups in America, as well as......
By Bruce Wilson (4 comments)
Gettting Well Versed
Michelle Boorstein at The Washington Post's "Under God" blog reports that Faithful America's petition calling for Kansas House Speaker Michael O'Neal to resign now......
By Frederick Clarkson (3 comments)
Alabama State Senator: Pay Increases for Teachers are Against 'Biblical Principle'
This is a new twist on "biblical economics" that I've not heard before.  According to Alabama State Sen. Shadrack McGill, a 62% pay increase......
By Rachel Tabachnick (5 comments)
Wagner Recognized by Delaware House for Commissioning Apostles (Copy of Tribute Included)
This morning I contacted the offices of Rep. Daniel B. Short and Chief Clerk of the House Richard Puffer and confirmed that C. Peter......
By Rachel Tabachnick (7 comments)
Trial Date Set for Bishop Finn
The trial date for Bishop Robert W. Finn,of the Diocese of Kansas City-St. Joseph, Missouri will be September 24, 2012.  Finn and the diocese......
By Frank Cocozzelli (3 comments)
The Culture of Demonization and Imprecatory Prayer
We have written a great deal here at Talk to Action about the Religious Right culture of conspiracy theory, labeling and demonization as animating......
By Frederick Clarkson (3 comments)
To Bigotry No Sanction, to Persecution No Assistance
As the finale of our extended celebration of Religious Freedom Day, we are honored to welcome George Washington as a guest front pager.  ......
By George Washington (0 comments)
George Barna and the New Apostolic Reformation
Given the secretive nature of the movement, documenting the involvement of public figures in C. Peter Wagner's New Apostolic Reformation can be a time-consuming......
By Bruce Wilson (2 comments)
Gingrich, Alinsky, and the Christian Right Grand Conspiracy Narrative
Gingrich's claims about an Alinsky-Obama-socialist conspiracy against Christianity and freedom echo conspiracy theories from the Tea Parties, Glenn Beck, the John Birch Society, and......
By Chip Berlet (0 comments)

Harold Caballeros, October 5, 2006, #1
On October 5, 2006, Harold Cabballeros, founder and senior pastor of El Shaddai Church in Guatemala City, spoke at the "Spirit in the World: The Dynamics of Pentecostal Growth and Experience" symposium sponsored by......
Bruce Wilson (0 comments)
Truth Wins Out Reports on Exodus International's Attempt at Rebranding
An extensive report has been posted at Truth Wins Out (TWO) on the rebranding of Exodus International, the discredited and financially strapped pray-away-the-gay organization. The report is titled "The Exodus SmokeScreen" and subtitled, "Exodus......
Rachel Tabachnick (0 comments)
Breast cancer awareness T-shirt prompts dispute at skating rink
crossposted from The Clarion Ledger) http://www.clarionledger.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2012202040 349 ""I am offended as a mother; as the daughter of a cancer patient; as a Christian woman; as a fundraiser and donor of time and money to......
COinMS (0 comments)
Delaware state house Dems distance themselves from Wagner tribute
The Democrats in the Delaware state House of Representatives are in full damage control mode over a tribute given back in January to C. Peter Wagner, a prominent leader of the New Apostolic......
Christian Dem in NC (1 comment)
Is Peter Wagner lying about commendation from state of Delaware?
Those of us who have watched the New Apostolic Reformation have come to expect bizarre claims.  Well, today  C. Peter Wagner made one of the most bizarre claims yet.  He sent out an......
Christian Dem in NC (1 comment)
New dominionist effort to target Hollywood with prayer
In yet more proof that the New Apostolic Reformation is trying to make itself heard in a big way this year, late yesterday several leaders of that movement got together to announce a......
Christian Dem in NC (0 comments)
Santorum Accuses Colleges of Anti-Religious "Indoctrination" But Gingrich Said it First
CBS and other media outlets have pounced on a Rick Santorum claim, that America's colleges and universities are hotbeds of anti-religious "indoctrination", but Newt Gingrich has been saying that for years. As Santorum declared......
Bruce Wilson (2 comments)
Leader of NC gay marriage ban effort, in his own words
cross-posted at dKos One of the leaders of the effort to write a gay marriage ban into North Carolina's constitution is Patrick Wooden, the pastor of Upper Room Church of God in Christ in......
Christian Dem in NC (2 comments)
AFA endorses AIDS denialism
If Public Policy Polling's early numbers are accurate (and there's little reason to doubt they are) Newt Gingrich will likely take the lead in national polling this week.  In light of this, there's......
Christian Dem in NC (1 comment)
Family Research Council chaplain openly calls for non-Christians to be banned from public office
Anyone who's studied the religious right can't help but notice a pattern to how they've operated over the last three decades.  They get a little bit of power, only to overreach and get smacked......
Christian Dem in NC (4 comments)
Cindy Jacobs prophecies divine intervention unless we elect Repubs
Late last week, New Apostolic Reformation "prophetess" Cindy Jacobs announced the yearly "Word of the Lord" from the Apostolic Council of Prophetic Elders.  (h/t to PFAW's Right Wing Watch). This "Word" makes for......
Christian Dem in NC (3 comments)
Robert Jeffress: First Amendment protections invite wrath of God
We already knew that the religious right would like nothing better than to sweep away the First Amendment.  Well, one of its more prominent leaders just came out and said it in terms as......
Christian Dem in NC (3 comments)
Cindy Jacobs announces 2012 prayer initiative--and declares war on separation of church and state
Late last night, Cindy Jacobs announced the formation of a major prayer drive with the goal of influencing the election.  The campaign, called "FastForward," is sponsored by her newly formed United States Reformation Prayer......
Christian Dem in NC (2 comments)
Personhood returns
Having soundly been defeated at the ballot box, the Personhood initiative in Mississippi has been resurrected via the new governor of Mississippi, Phil Bryant and his allies in the state government. For the first......
COinMS (0 comments)
Exposing The Dark Side Of Tupelo MS
It’s really ironic that the so-called Christian Religious Right (ie., AFA) are seemingly dedicated to the unnecessary bashing of Paganism when Pagans made such a well-documented historical contribution toward the rise of Christianity. For......
AlBratt (0 comments)

More Diaries...




All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments, posts, stories, and all other content are owned by the authors. Everything else © 2005 Talk to Action, LLC. Powered by Scoop