Why Can't Democrats Be More Like Rick Santorum?
Frederick Clarkson printable version print page     Bookmark and Share
Fri Nov 15, 2013 at 11:15:19 PM EST
A blog post by Lisa Webster co-editor of Religion Dispatches raises an interesting question. She wonders if The New York Times is dumbing down religion reporting. Webster will be writing a series about the debate on the point between Leon Wieseltier of The New Republic and anthropologist Tanya Luhrmann an op-ed contributor to the Times. I look forward to it.  Meanwhile, I was reminded of a one of Luhrmann's Times op-eds from the run-up to the election last year. My response, slightly revised, is reprised below.  This post was first published as Why Can't Secular Liberals be More Like Rick Santorum?  on May 28, 2012. -- FC

Why can't secular liberals be more like evangelicals? That 's the question posed by Stanford anthropologist T.M. Luhrmann in a 2012 op-ed in The New York Times.  She thinks that some evangelicals might find Democratic candidates more attractive if, well, they were more like evangelicals.  But her idea strikes me as the political equivalent of the immortal words of Professor Henry Higgins, in My Fair Lady, "Why can't a woman be more like a man?"  

Happily, Professor Higgins overcomes his perplexity before the show is over.  But bafflement over why another cannot be more like oneself, especially when it comes to politics and religion, continues to bedevil the American experiment in democracy and its most original feature - religious equality under the law and a culture of religious pluralism.  One tiresome trope that interferes with our national conversation on these matters is on vivid display in Professor Luhrmann's essay.

When a Pander Goes a Bridge too Far

Our story begins with Luhrmann's contrasting supposedly good evangelicals like the ones she has studied in two largely white middle class Vineyard Churches against unnamed, allegedly uncomprehending, non-religious liberals of the Democratic Party.  She asserts that more evangelicals might vote Democratic - if only Dems, especially secular liberals, would be more like evangelicals.  This gettable group is smarter, Luhrmann asserts, than those darn liberals give them credit for.  If only they understood that some of them are doctors and professors - and compassionate too!  Some even went to help out victims of Hurricane Katrina.  But liberals, you see, don't know about these things. What is wrong with them?  Why, as Henry Higgins sang, can't they be more like me?

Unlike the story in My Fair Lady, the obvious questions raised by Luhrmann's essay go unresolved.  Who exactly who is she writing about, and why are they a problem to be solved?  She claims that among Democrats "secular liberals" are the most "puzzled" about evangelicals - but she names not a single puzzled person, or anyone whose perspective or presentation could be improved.

Whoever these people may be, Luhrmann offers only one idea to help Dems reap a harvest of white evangelical voters in 2012. It is a telling example, but probably not in the way she had hoped.  She advises that "secular liberals" should be more like... Rick Santorum!  

She cites an excerpt from a speech by the former Republican Senator at the 2010 Values Voters Summit for which he had "won praise."  She does not mention, however, that the Values Voters Summit is the leading annual political conference of the Religious Right, attracting top conservative and Republican leaders and Fox News celebrities.

Nevertheless, she commends the following Santorum soundbite to Democrats:

"Go into the neighborhoods in America where there is a lack of virtue and what will you find?  Two things.  You will find no families, no mothers and fathers living together in marriage.  And you will find government everywhere:  police, social service agencies.  Why?  Because without faith, family and virtue, government takes over."

"This perspective" Luhrmann concludes, "emphasizes developing individual virtue from within -- not changing social conditions from without."

That is a very narrow interpretation. Santorum's meaning is broader and deeper and presumes that only unvirtuous, unmarried and unfaithful people need government services.  He further implies that government services themselves are part of the problem, not the solution.  It is probably fair to say that the communities that Santorum was referring to are poor, disproportionately comprise people of color and recent immigrants.  That Santorum was speaking in old fashioned race and religion-baiting code to this audience is unsurprising.  What is remarkable is that Luhrmann thinks that Democrats would find this a helpful model.

There is a narrative running in the background in Luhrmann's op-ed that frames and informs a wide range of evangelical thought from Christian Right leaders to Jim Wallis.  The narrative is essentially that creeping secularism is destroying America.  The labels for those allegedly responsible for this vary and include but are not limited to, "secular liberals," "the secular left," and "secular humanism."  The operative word here is "secular."  

Those of us who look to current events with an eye to history will note that the rightist ideological ancestors of the Values Voters crowd routinely smeared liberals as "Godless," and directly or indirectly sought to link them with Soviet Communism.  These terms are used in much the same way.  

That said, Luhrmann's is certainly a lite version of the narrative, and in fairness, she does not claim that creeping secularism is destroying America.  But she feels no more obligation than the others to present any basis for her claim that liberals, Democrats, and "secular liberals" insufficiently understand evangelicals or why her prescriptions would garner evangelical votes.

Let's consider a few facts to help us to transcend the bogus narrative.

First:  Let's acknowledge that evangelical Christians are not the only religious people in America and that they also do not have a corner on Christianity.  

Second:  Democrats know that there are plenty of evangelicals in the Democratic Party already. Some are even former presidents of the United States.  Jimmy Carter was the first evangelical Christian president.  Bill Clinton was the second.  What's more, Clinton's vice president for two terms, Al Gore, was also an evangelical Christian and went on to became the party's nominee for president.  

Third:  Let's also stipulate that evangelicals do not have the corner on goodness and morality; non-religious liberals do not necessarily live in uncomprehending darkness; and neither group is necessarily in any greater need of deliverance from evil than anyone else.

Finally:  Let's also clear the air about another aspect of the trope.  Non-religious Americans are not exclusively liberal; nor are liberals exclusively non-religious.  There are plenty of non-religious conservatives to be found, for example, among the followers of Ayn Rand and of neoconservative philosopher Leo Strauss.  What's more, there are plenty of religious progressives, as epitomized by the authors of the essays in a book I edited, Dispatches from the Religious Left:  The Future of Faith and Politics in America, and more generally by such groups as the Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice.

Is Government about the Development of "Moral Character"?

Now let's go to the core of Luhrmann's advice for Democrats:

"If Democrats want to reach more evangelical voters, they should use a political language that evangelicals can hear.  They should talk about the kind of people we are aiming to be and about the transformational journey that any choice will take us on.  They should talk about how we can grow in compassion and care.  They could talk about the way their policy interventions will allow those who receive them to become better people and how those of us who support them will better ourselves as we reach out in love."

This can sound good on a casual reading.  But there is a revealing presumption wrapped up in Luhrmann's warm and fuzzy language that is not only offensive and wrong, but echoes Rick Santorum.  Luhrmann wants Democrats to try to persuade some evangelicals that "their policy interventions will allow those who receive them to become better people...".  

It is more than presumptuous to suggest that people who need, say, food, medical help, or domestic violence counseling also need to learn how to be better people; that government programs in anyway prevent anyone from becoming a better person; and that government programs should focus on developing, as she also writes, our "moral character."

Suggesting that beneficiaries of government programs are morally defective may be the kind of thing attendees at the Values Voters Summit pay to hear from Republican candidates - but it is far-fetched to think that they would choose a Democrat who tries to do the dog whistles and mouth the platitudes - over a conservative Republican who actually believes them.

These things said, there is certainly no harm, as Luhrmann suggests, in emphasizing how the president's health care program helps to alleviate human suffering rather than focusing on economic aspects.  This is common sense, and all pols should be wise not to indulge in mind-clenching wonkery.  Addressing political and policy problems in moral language is one way of overcoming jaw dropping obscurantism in discussing governmental policies.  You don't have to be an evangelical to listen to some pols and wonder who it is that they think they are talking to, and what in the world they are talking about.  It is healthy for pols to know their audience and to find ways to better engage them.  But pols also do not need to resort to conservative evangelical tropes to communicate about how we can all go forward together as a democratic, religiously plural society.

If faith is to be a focus for Democrats running for office, how about appealing to all Americans based on shared principles of mutual respect for each others right to believe as we will?  Democrats have far better role models to look to than the coarse religious bigotry of Rick Santorum.  Dems could do worse than to look to President Barack Obama - whose eloquent statement on the occasion of Religious Freedom Day 2011 could serve as a model for how to express Democratic values towards faith:  

"The writ of the Founding Fathers has upheld the ability of Americans to worship and practice religion as they choose, including the right to believe in no religion at all. However, these liberties are not self-sustaining, and require a stalwart commitment by each generation to preserve and apply them. Throughout our Nation's history, our founding ideal of religious freedom has served as an example to the world.

Though our Nation has sometimes fallen short of the weighty task of ensuring freedom of religious expression and practice, we have remained a Nation in which people of different faiths coexist with mutual respect and equality under the law. America's unshakeable commitment to religious freedom binds us together as a people, and the strength of our values underpins a country that is tolerant, just, and strong."

If liberals and the Democratic Party are going to do political outreach to religious constituencies, then let's have it be based on our highest values as a nation and of the Democratic Party.  Anyone who does not know the depth and breadth of how these values frame and inform Democratic Party approaches to government and public policy need to hear from the party's most articulate spokespeople.  There are undoubtedly many reasonable and effective ways to do this.  But one thing is certain:  We do not need to hear from anyone who thinks that aping Rick Santorum will actually help any Democratic candidates anywhere.

I disposed of my perfectly good sweater vest to be less like Santorum.  Couldn't even bring myself to donate it to Goodwill.

by ancient1 on Sat Nov 16, 2013 at 08:28:25 PM EST

WWW Talk To Action

Cognitive Dissonance & Dominionism Denial
There is new research on why people are averse to hearing or learning about the views of ideological opponents. Based on evaluation of five......
By Frederick Clarkson (56 comments)
Will the Air Force Do Anything To Rein In Its Dynamic Duo of Gay-Bashing, Misogynistic Bloggers?
"I always get nervous when I see female pastors/chaplains. Here is why everyone should as well: "First, women are not called to be pastors,......
By Chris Rodda (12 comments)
The Legacy of Big Oil
The media is ablaze with the upcoming publication of David Grann's book, Killers of the Flower Moon. The shocking non fiction account of the......
By wilkyjr (11 comments)
Gimme That Old Time Dominionism Denial
Over the years, I have written a great deal here and in other venues about the explicitly theocratic movement called dominionism -- which has......
By Frederick Clarkson (8 comments)
History Advisor to Members of Congress Completely Twists Jefferson's Words to Support Muslim Ban
Pseudo-historian David Barton, best known for his misquoting of our country's founders to promote the notion that America was founded as a Christian nation,......
By Chris Rodda (18 comments)
"Christian Fighter Pilot" Calls First Lesbian Air Force Academy Commandant a Liar
In a new post on his "Christian Fighter Pilot" blog titled "BGen Kristin Goodwin and the USAFA Honor Code," Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Jonathan......
By Chris Rodda (8 comments)
Catholic Right Leader Unapologetic about Call for 'Death to Liberal Professors' -- UPDATED
Today, Donald Trump appointed C-FAM Executive Vice President Lisa Correnti to the US Delegation To UN Commission On Status Of Women. (C-FAM is a......
By Frederick Clarkson (9 comments)
Controlling Information
     Yesterday I listened to Russ Limbaugh.  Rush advised listeners it would be best that they not listen to CNN,MSNBC, ABC, CBS and......
By wilkyjr (9 comments)
Is Bannon Fifth-Columning the Pope?
In December 2016 I wrote about how White House chief strategist Steve Bannon, who likes to flash his Catholic credentials when it comes to......
By Frank Cocozzelli (5 comments)
Ross Douthat's Hackery on the Seemingly Incongruous Alliance of Bannon & Burke
Conservative Catholic writer Ross Douthat has dissembled again. This time, in a February 15, 2017 New York Times op-ed titled The Trump Era's Catholic......
By Frank Cocozzelli (4 comments)
`So-Called Patriots' Attack The Rule Of Law
Every so often, right-wing commentator Pat Buchanan lurches out of the far-right fever swamp where he has resided for the past 50 years to......
By Rob Boston (9 comments)
Bad Faith from Focus on the Family
Here is one from the archives, Feb 12, 2011, that serves as a reminder of how deeply disingenuous people can be. Appeals to seek......
By Frederick Clarkson (12 comments)
The Legacy of George Wallace
"One need not accept any of those views to agree that they had appealed to real concerns of real people, not to mindless, unreasoning......
By wilkyjr (7 comments)
Betsy DeVos's Mudsill View of Public Education
My Talk to Action colleague Rachel Tabachnick has been doing yeoman's work in explaining Betsy DeVos's long-term strategy for decimating universal public education. If......
By Frank Cocozzelli (8 comments)
Prince and DeVos Families at Intersection of Radical Free Market Privatizers and Religious Right
This post from 2011 surfaces important information about President-Elect Trump's nominee for Secretary of Education, Betsy DeVos. -- FC Erik Prince, Brother of Betsy......
By Rachel Tabachnick (22 comments)

Respect for Others? or Political Correctness?
The term "political correctness" as used by Conservatives and Republicans has often puzzled me: what exactly do they mean by it? After reading Chip Berlin's piece here-- http://www.talk2action.org/story/2016/7/21/04356/9417 I thought about what he explained......
MTOLincoln (28 comments)
What I'm feeling now is fear.  I swear that it seems my nightmares are coming true with this new "president".  I'm also frustrated because so many people are not connecting all the dots! I've......
ArchaeoBob (11 comments)
"America - love it or LEAVE!"
I've been hearing that and similar sentiments fairly frequently in the last few days - far FAR more often than ever before.  Hearing about "consequences for burning the flag (actions) from Trump is chilling!......
ArchaeoBob (12 comments)
"Faked!" Meme
Keep your eyes and ears open for a possible move to try to discredit the people openly opposing Trump and the bigots, especially people who have experienced terrorism from the "Right"  (Christian Terrorism is......
ArchaeoBob (45 comments)
More aggressive proselytizing
My wife told me today of an experience she had this last week, where she was proselytized by a McDonald's employee while in the store. ......
ArchaeoBob (10 comments)
See if you recognize names on this list
This comes from the local newspaper, which was conservative before and took a hard right turn after it was sold. Hint: Sarah Palin's name is on it!  (It's also connected to Trump.) ......
ArchaeoBob (7 comments)
Unions: A Labor Day Discussion
This is a revision of an article which I posted on my personal board and also on Dailykos. I had an interesting discussion on a discussion board concerning Unions. I tried to piece it......
Xulon (10 comments)
Extremely obnoxious protesters at WitchsFest NYC: connected to NAR?
In July of this year, some extremely loud, obnoxious Christian-identified protesters showed up at WitchsFest, an annual Pagan street fair here in NYC.  Here's an account of the protest by Pagan writer Heather Greene......
Diane Vera (6 comments)
Capitalism and the Attack on the Imago Dei
I joined this site today, having been linked here by Crooksandliars' Blog Roundup. I thought I'd put up something I put up previously on my Wordpress blog and also at the DailyKos. As will......
Xulon (8 comments)
History of attitudes towards poverty and the churches.
Jesus is said to have stated that "The Poor will always be with you" and some Christians have used that to refuse to try to help the poor, because "they will always be with......
ArchaeoBob (14 comments)
Alternate economy medical treatment
Dogemperor wrote several times about the alternate economy structure that dominionists have built.  Well, it's actually made the news.  Pretty good article, although it doesn't get into how bad people could be (have been)......
ArchaeoBob (11 comments)
Evidence violence is more common than believed
Think I've been making things up about experiencing Christian Terrorism or exaggerating, or that it was an isolated incident?  I suggest you read this article (linked below in body), which is about our great......
ArchaeoBob (9 comments)
Central Florida Sheriff Preached Sermon in Uniform
If anyone has been following the craziness in Polk County Florida, they know that some really strange and troubling things have happened here.  We've had multiple separation of church and state lawsuits going at......
ArchaeoBob (7 comments)
Demon Mammon?
An anthropologist from outer space might be forgiven for concluding that the god of this world is Mammon. (Or, rather, The Market, as depicted by John McMurtry in his book The Cancer Stage of......
daerie (6 comments)
Anti-Sharia Fever in Texas: This is How It Starts
The mayor of a mid-size Texan city has emerged in recent months as the newest face of Islamophobia. Aligning herself with extremists hostile to Islam, Mayor Beth Van Duyne of Irving, Texas has helped......
JSanford (12 comments)

More Diaries...

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments, posts, stories, and all other content are owned by the authors. Everything else 2005 Talk to Action, LLC.