No Weigel Room For NBC's Non-Disclosure
Frank Cocozzelli printable version print page     Bookmark and Share
Sun Mar 10, 2013 at 07:18:49 PM EST
George Weigel, who has frequently appeared on the NBC Nightly News as a "Vatican analyst" in the run up to the Conclave of Cardinals that will select the next pope, has served as a  consultant on Catholic issues to NBC since 1999.  But what NBC does not tell us -- is that Weigel is no ordinary expert.  He is one of the leaders of today's Catholic Right.
NBC's go to guy on all things Catholic in fact, has a long record of helping to create a more stridently conservative Catholic Church and has published a new book to help evangelize for it. (The book was was recently cheered on Twitter by no less than mega-church Pastor Rick Warren.)  This comes on the heels of years of working in the trenches building a conservative Catholic-Evangelical alliance that has culminated in The Manhattan Declaration, a manifesto attacking a series of progressive positions from contraception to marriage equality.

I've noted over and over again, Weigel is a Catholic neocon par excellence, having served as a leader of both the Institute on Religion and Democracy and Ethics Public Policy Center as well as being one of the original signatories of the Project for the New American Century.  

NBC's failure to disclose Weigel's relevant affiliations and obvious biases violates the most basic standards of journalism.

As if any and all of this were not enough, there is more that merits disclosure:  Notably, his service as an Adviser to the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights headed by the bombastic William Donohue.Nightly News viewers might be taken aback by Donohue's recent role in trying to obfuscate Kansas City Bishop Robert Finn's misdemeanor conviction for failing to report suspected child abuse by Father Shawn Ratigan.

NBC viewers are also kept in the dark about Weigel's disapproval of over a century Catholic economic principles.  And not only is he one of the most prominent Catholic neo-conservatives, he condescendingly dismisses those co-religionists who disagree with his orthodox Catholic vision as "Catholic Lite" or as being "a culture of dissent." In essence, he belittles the majority of American Catholics..

There are many good reasons why disclosure of potential bias if not conflict of interest is considered the minimum ethical standard for news organizations.

Weigel is, for example, using his analyst perch to subtlety advance his agenda. Consider this recent appearance on MSNBC's Hardball (countered here at least by National Catholic Reporter editor, Tom Roberts). At the 1:21 mark, Weigel substitutes his desire for that of the Cardinals that the next pope continues in the more aggressive evangelization begun by John Paul II. (That Weigel is, in fact, selling a new book on the subject, went unmentioned.)  Later, at the 3:41 mark, he dissembles on priestly celibacy, speaking as if it always existed. As Tom Roberts pointed out, that was not the case.

To fully comprehend how far off the mark NBC is in failing to disclose their Vatican analyst's outlook, just consider that even Fox News generally alerts its viewers of an on-air guest's philosophical leanings.




Display:
(see my recent post about a former Maranatha Campus Ministries pastor on Fox and Friends) but not of MSNBC's parent network. Though, sadly, many Christian Right talking heads from the most to least influential are VERY circumspect about their affiliations and biases... they know their audiences, plural... and most mainstream media don't dig very far to find out, either.

by ulyankee on Mon Mar 11, 2013 at 10:16:56 AM EST
When I was working on my MA, part of the research was seeing if I could find the dominionist connections to a major homeless program in Florida.  My professor thought it would be reasonably easy, but as the web of connections spread further and more complex, we discovered that it wasn't nearly as easy as we thought - downright difficult.  A handful were obvious, but others... well, there were a couple that we found connections near the end of the semester.  There were others that we heard rumors were dominionist, but couldn't find evidence.  Over half of the board had "Suspected" or "Documented" designations.  Only a couple were found to be "OK" (progressive and being involved with groups that really care about people who are homeless or very poor).  The others - hardcore conservative.

It was during that search that I uncovered some Bank of America top management involved with the dominionist churches , and that by accident.  There were also ties between the program and people donating huge sums of money to the Republican party (many thousands of dollars), and the network we were finding had connections between the really suspect ones and the Republican-supporters.  (There were hints that those supporters might be dominionist, but again nothing substantial.)

This research took place before the 2008 election campaign really started getting rolling.  If I can find my notes, I'd bet that there would be all sorts of Tea Party connections found now.

The upshot of that semester's worth of work was that it seemed that the more powerful or wealthy a dominionist was, the more effort they put into hiding their connections.  We also discovered how much effort was needed to research these people - in some cases I might have had to attend those churches (which wouldn't happen - I know how dangerous they are) to see if they were members.  They are very secretive.


by ArchaeoBob on Mon Mar 11, 2013 at 11:17:40 AM EST
Parent


Sadly, I think they are all Fox News now.

by CautionIndicated on Mon Mar 11, 2013 at 09:25:41 PM EST
Parent