That Which We Call Renewal Groups
John Dorhauer printable version print page     Bookmark and Share
Mon Jan 30, 2006 at 11:45:56 PM EST
Image hosting by Photobucket
"What's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other word would smell as sweet."

Leave it to Shakespeare. Who else could state with such precision and beauty the simple truths that, once disclosed, reveal so much of human behavior, practice, and principle?

And what Juliet here reveals to Romeo is relevant: call it what you want, it is what it is. The naming of a thing does not alter the essence of the thing.

So let's talk about renewal groups.

In what has been a comprehensive and decades long effort to obfuscate, perhaps the ultimate obfuscation of this movement has been the unfortunate moniker by which they have chosen to be called: Renewal Groups.

The Institute on Religion and Democracy (talk about a misnomer!) claims on its website that that its own work is done "in cooperation with like-minded groups that represent seven major denominations through our Association for Church Renewal." The IRD  claims that it currently has over 30 such renewal groups in its active alliance.

What is a Renewal Group? And why is the IRD investing so much in the establishment of their alliance?

To answer the first question, let us look at some of those groups and read their own language describing themselves and stating why they came into existence.

From the `American Anglican Council':
We are a "network of individuals, parishes, and specialized ministries who affirm biblical authority and Christian orthodoxy within the Anglican community."

From the Biblical Witness Fellowship (United Church of Christ):
"(We are) a confessing fellowship of ordinary people and pastors.... We welcome all who are committed to Jesus Christ as Lord and who believe that God's written word, the Bible, is true. We seek to hold fast to the historic Christian faith as it has been revealed in Holy Scripture and testified to in the great creeds and confessions of the church."

From Good News (United Methodist):
"The Good News movement is a voice for repentance, an agent for reform, and a catalyst for renewal within the United Methodist Church. By God's grace, we will proclaim and demonstrate the power and effectiveness of historic Christianity as emphasized in Wesleyan doctrine and practice."

I won't go through all 30. They all say pretty much the same thing. They each identify themselves as a renewal group destined to return the wayward, apostate, heretical church in which they function to the true teachings of Holy Scripture and the historic, orthodox doctrines of the Church. The basis of their `renewal' is an argument that maintains that the teachings of Mainline Protestant Christianity have gone so far astray of scripture and tradition that they must `renew' efforts to return to orthodoxy.

Over time, the issues which drive their passion for renewal, and which also provide the evidence of their denomination's apostasy, have changed. When the IRD initiated its first assault on the National Council of Churches in 1981, it used America's hatred of the `red threat' to enflame passions. It accused the National Council of churches and its member bodies of using money from the offering plates of our churches to fund communist rebels around the globe. Not long after that, the focus was on the ordination of women. In an article posted on the Presbyterian site The Laymen Online, Dr. R. C. Sproul cautions members not to leave an apostate church until such clear evidence can be presented that shows that said church has fully abandoned the teachings of scripture. He shares that the moment to leave came for him when his good colleague Walter Kenyon was defrocked for saying he would not participate in the ordination of women in 1981. Other such divisive issues have included a woman's right to reproductive choice and stem cell research.

But far and away their most effective tool to date is the issue de jour: homosexuality.

Just a quick glimpse of each of their websites reveals the following:
·    The first press release listed on the Anglican renewal page is an expression of `grave concern' over newly appointed Bishops who do not `adhere to the authority of Scritpure' and therefore `commit to the immediate cessation of the ordination of non-celibate homosexuals."
·    The Biblical Witness Fellowship, at the top of their site, includes a letter from the Calvin Synod asking churches to stop funding the United Church of Christ because of their support for marriage equality
·    On the opening page of the Evangelical Lutheran Confessing Fellowship is an ad for a DVD entitled "Truth in Love: The Bible and Same Sex Behavior."
·    On the front page of the Good News (United Methodist) is an invitation to read an article in "Recent News" entitled "44 Methodist Ministers in Richmond VA say they'll let Homosexuals join church"
·    The front cover of the latest IRD publication shows John Thomas (president of the UCC) sitting at his desk with SpongeBob Squarepants, and bearing the derisive title "The Church of SpongeBob."  (SpongeBob was publicly derided by Pat Robertson as gay friendly because he held the hand of a starfish).

Again, we don't need to go through all of the websites: the point is made. Today's wedge issue is homosexuality, and renewal groups have latched onto it as the most recent evidence of the church's apostasy. Their mission is to save the church from such heretical practices, and to `renew' and restore the church to its truer, more historic past.

The problem is that these groups have much more nefarious intentions. It is not the `renewal' of the church that they are interested in, but the destabilization and destruction of what has been throughout the history of the United States the most consistent, courageous, and clear voice of social reform and justice.

Their own words betray them.

In the Mission Statement found on the IRD website we read this lengthy quote:
"The IRD aims its reports and analyses at a broad audience of U.S. Christians. Its organizational work is concentrated in the Oldline Protestant churches and the National Council of Churches, where the problems are most serious. We have committees that unite reform activists in three denominations representing over 12 million persons.... The IRD trains activists, with topics ranging from issues to tactics. At national church meetings, IRD activists assist delegates in drafting legislation and framing arguments for debate. This work is done in cooperation with like-minded groups in seven major denominations (representing nearly 20 million Americans) through our Association for Church Renewal."

These are not renewal groups: they are trained activists intent on the demise, the destabilization, and the destruction of Mainline Protestant Christianity. They use cleverly chosen wedge issues to divide otherwise united congregations and denominations. They produce, print, and circulate periodicals, pamphlets, and diatribes filled with innuendo and misinformation intended to enflame the passions of otherwise content congregants.

This is not to argue that renewal groups should not exist. They should. It is simply an argument that what is sold today as a renewal group is anything but. They are well funded and well trained activists spent not on renewing, but destroying, the church.

This is not to argue that the church should be a monolith of convention and homogeneity. It should reflect the rich diversity of opinion and principle of which every human family and institution is composed, be those principles liberal or conservative, orthodox or reform. And always the church should invite the kind of dialogue and debate that honors all such voices. But that advocate for reasonable debate cannot be the creation of a `renewal group' that begins the dialogue with an accusation of heresy and apostasy; that trains activists and tacticians to destroy and destabilize the church; and that circulates material meant to defame, defraud, and defy.

It is imperative that we in Mainline Protestant churches know what we are up against. To call these organizations intent on our demise `Renewal Groups' is a gross mischaracterization of their true purpose.

That which we call a renewal group by any other word would smell as rotten. Call it what you want, it is what it is.




Display:
"Renewal" is actually a codeword that has been in use in especially the pentecostal flavours of dominionism for decades, and is very specifically a codeword for conversion of a group (church, government, society, what have you) to dominion theology.

If you want to know where this ultimately stems from, I've an article on dominion theology as practiced by pente dominionist groups--and "dominion theology" is often termed "the renewal movement" or "restoration theology" within those churches.

by dogemperor on Tue Jan 31, 2006 at 08:00:16 AM EST


on Talk2Action. Now - of course - there are great and obvious differences between online communities and the sorts of religious communities you describe.  But there are similarities too. In terms of immunizing a community against concerted efforts by members who profess to act in good faith and yet have the intent of inciting and ultimately breaking that community up, here is the approach we hit upon for this website. [ I am not asserting that it is necessarily a practical approach for mainline Protestant denominations, but it illustrates the nature of the problem ].

Individuals joining this website must - as a necessary precondition for membership - indicate that they have read and agree to abide by the following :

There is an editorial framework for this site than that is different than you will find on other major blog sites, so please read this carefully: We are pro-religious equality and pro-separation of church and state. We are prochoice, and we support gay and lesbian civil rights -- including marriage equality. Therefore, debates about the validity of abortion and gay rights are off topic. We understand that some people who share our general concern about the politics of the Christian Right may not agree on all of these matters. That's fine. Anyone who agrees with the general mission of this site is welcome to participate -- but bearing this in mind. It is our intention to take the conversation forward, and not let it be held back by debating what, in our view are or should be, settled matters of human, civil and constitutional rights. Similarly, religious debates are off topic, especially debates between theism and atheism. Finally, we are nonpartisan. While political discussions are welcome, -- even central to the purpose of this site -- we do not wish the site itself to be a platform that is necessarily for or opposed to any particular party.

Now, as easy as religious communities are disrupted by intentional provocation and subversion, Internet communities are probably much easier to disrupt, and Frederick Clarkson wrote the section of the site guidelines above in order to prevent members from either accidentally or intentionally derailling conversations - there are defined parameters for discussion, and members who stray outside of those can be challenged on those grounds.

This has already proven an effective tool, and a number of individuals have already been confronted with the following : "When you signed up for membership on this site you indicated agreement with the site guidelines. Have you read and do you agree with the site guidelines ?"

That challenge - above - means, in short, "do you agree with the values of this community ? Do you share our values ? You indicated you did when you joined, and so if you tell us now that you do not share those values and agree to our site guidelines then you are here under false premises and are unwelcome."

Of course, it is the issue of  "core values"  that is at stake in the IRD's effort to break up mainline Protestant denominations. The work of "Renewal" groups to promote the wedge issue of opposition to homosexuality and hatred of homosexuals asserts those as core church "values" , and for leaders of Protestant denominations to assert that members should publicly agree ( or not ) with a values statement that included support for gay rights might simply play into the hands of the IRD. But - surely - to ask Protestant faith communities the question "What are our values ? What values do we see emphasized in the New Testament ?" would help to place the efforts of the IRD's "Renewal" groups in a very dfferent light.

IN terms of an analog to the Talk To Action site guidelines that could be applied in Protestant denominations, one approach  that occurs to me is the following :

"Because Jesus Christ has clearly stated that all are equal and welcome under God, that salvation is open to all,  Individuals or groups asserting that others within the church be expelled or relegated to any status of less than full equality must answer to the following requirement - because Christ has said all are equally deserving of salvation, grounds for expulsion, censure, or reduction in status for church members or groups could arise only from legal conviction for criminal acts, proven in a court of law. In such cases allegations of threat to the community may be considered valid.

All allegations of threat to the church community must meet that strict legal test - legal conviction for a criminal act or acts. Individuals and groups whose allegations against others within the church community fail to meet that legal test risk community censure for defamation, incitement of conflict, and antagonism to the inclusionary spirit of Christ.  "

If I were to design such a statement to immunize a faith group against intentional subversion and provocation, that would be my initial draft. I'm not asserting that such an approach is even remotely practical, but I thought I'd sketch it out noneletheless.

by Bruce Wilson on Tue Jan 31, 2006 at 10:10:07 AM EST

The twisting of language in groups like 'renewal' groups absolutely fascinates me. It's gotten to where I do not trust the words said by certain groups, but look to their actual actions to see where their intentions truly lie.

Creating a set of rules that must be acknowledged and agreed with is one way to immunize churches from such destructive tactics, but vigilance must always be maintained. Kenneth Haugk's "Antagonists in the Church" makes that perfectly clear- there will always be people in congregations who have nothing better to do than to disrupt and destroy it. "Renewal" groups have taken that a step further- going from disrupting and destroying individual congregations to undermining and 'borgifying' entire sects.

The tools used to spot individual troublemakers might also be applied to catch 'renewal' groups before they spread their toxins in a congregation.

by Lorie Johnson on Tue Jan 31, 2006 at 11:39:10 AM EST
Parent


Bruce

I find your comments very insightful, and must confess that I am desirous of proposing such a By-Law amendment to a few very carefully chosen churches. I will be interested to see how they might receive such an invitation; and how they might therefrom live into this new way of expressing their corporate acceptance of the gospel's own core value: the dignity and worth of every humna being.
Shalom, Rev. Dr. John C. Dorhauer "Time makes ancient good uncouth; we must onward still and upward who would keep abreast of truth." from Lowell, "The Present Crisis"
by John Dorhauer on Tue Jan 31, 2006 at 04:05:36 PM EST
Parent

I imagine there would be many drafts and that any eventual By-Law amendment would likely read very differently. I have to credit Frederick Clarkson and also PastorDan ( The Rev. Daniel Schulz of StreetProphets ) for the approach as applied on this site.

Beyond that, my comment was really an extension of thinking and researching I've been doing on the claims made by leaders of the Christian right on the threat allegedly posed by gays and gay marriage.  All the major World faith traditions I'm aware of teach the value of honesty, and I feel that the failure of those making such allegations to offer proof to substantiate their dire claims puts them in an untenable position with regard to their religious belief.

by Bruce Wilson on Tue Jan 31, 2006 at 04:54:58 PM EST
Parent




See this recent comment by Talk To Action member tikkun  

by Bruce Wilson on Sun Feb 05, 2006 at 10:20:06 PM EST

A provision protecting members from being "expelled or relegated to any status of less than full equality" could be misused by the IRD subversives to shield themselves from church discipline while they continue to undermine the denomination. You need something that will protect the church without providing cover for the IRD infiltrators.

Similarly, the provision about expelling members for "legal conviction for criminal acts, proven in a court of law" should make it clear you're talking about a crime against the church, otherwise it could be used to expel legitimate members who were busted for smoking pot 30 years ago. Joining a Christian church should not require a background check.

John, is the average clergyman in the mainline demoninations aware of what IRD and the groups under its umbrella are doing? Is the average member in the pews aware? My guess is the answer to both is probably no.

by unworthy on Mon Oct 08, 2007 at 02:12:00 AM EST


WWW Talk To Action


Cognitive Dissonance & Dominionism Denial
There is new research on why people are averse to hearing or learning about the views of ideological opponents. Based on evaluation of five......
By Frederick Clarkson (5 comments)
Will the Air Force Do Anything To Rein In Its Dynamic Duo of Gay-Bashing, Misogynistic Bloggers?
"I always get nervous when I see female pastors/chaplains. Here is why everyone should as well: "First, women are not called to be pastors,......
By Chris Rodda (3 comments)
The Legacy of Big Oil
The media is ablaze with the upcoming publication of David Grann's book, Killers of the Flower Moon. The shocking non fiction account of the......
By wilkyjr (0 comments)
Gimme That Old Time Dominionism Denial
Over the years, I have written a great deal here and in other venues about the explicitly theocratic movement called dominionism -- which has......
By Frederick Clarkson (4 comments)
History Advisor to Members of Congress Completely Twists Jefferson's Words to Support Muslim Ban
Pseudo-historian David Barton, best known for his misquoting of our country's founders to promote the notion that America was founded as a Christian nation,......
By Chris Rodda (5 comments)
"Christian Fighter Pilot" Calls First Lesbian Air Force Academy Commandant a Liar
In a new post on his "Christian Fighter Pilot" blog titled "BGen Kristin Goodwin and the USAFA Honor Code," Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Jonathan......
By Chris Rodda (0 comments)
Catholic Right Leader Unapologetic about Call for 'Death to Liberal Professors' -- UPDATED
Today, Donald Trump appointed C-FAM Executive Vice President Lisa Correnti to the US Delegation To UN Commission On Status Of Women. (C-FAM is a......
By Frederick Clarkson (2 comments)
Controlling Information
     Yesterday I listened to Russ Limbaugh.  Rush advised listeners it would be best that they not listen to CNN,MSNBC, ABC, CBS and......
By wilkyjr (4 comments)
Is Bannon Fifth-Columning the Pope?
In December 2016 I wrote about how White House chief strategist Steve Bannon, who likes to flash his Catholic credentials when it comes to......
By Frank Cocozzelli (3 comments)
Ross Douthat's Hackery on the Seemingly Incongruous Alliance of Bannon & Burke
Conservative Catholic writer Ross Douthat has dissembled again. This time, in a February 15, 2017 New York Times op-ed titled The Trump Era's Catholic......
By Frank Cocozzelli (2 comments)
`So-Called Patriots' Attack The Rule Of Law
Every so often, right-wing commentator Pat Buchanan lurches out of the far-right fever swamp where he has resided for the past 50 years to......
By Rob Boston (1 comment)
Bad Faith from Focus on the Family
Here is one from the archives, Feb 12, 2011, that serves as a reminder of how deeply disingenuous people can be. Appeals to seek......
By Frederick Clarkson (6 comments)
The Legacy of George Wallace
"One need not accept any of those views to agree that they had appealed to real concerns of real people, not to mindless, unreasoning......
By wilkyjr (6 comments)
Betsy DeVos's Mudsill View of Public Education
My Talk to Action colleague Rachel Tabachnick has been doing yeoman's work in explaining Betsy DeVos's long-term strategy for decimating universal public education. If......
By Frank Cocozzelli (7 comments)
Prince and DeVos Families at Intersection of Radical Free Market Privatizers and Religious Right
This post from 2011 surfaces important information about President-Elect Trump's nominee for Secretary of Education, Betsy DeVos. -- FC Erik Prince, Brother of Betsy......
By Rachel Tabachnick (21 comments)

Respect for Others? or Political Correctness?
The term "political correctness" as used by Conservatives and Republicans has often puzzled me: what exactly do they mean by it? After reading Chip Berlin's piece here-- http://www.talk2action.org/story/2016/7/21/04356/9417 I thought about what he explained......
MTOLincoln (4 comments)
Fear
What I'm feeling now is fear.  I swear that it seems my nightmares are coming true with this new "president".  I'm also frustrated because so many people are not connecting all the dots! I've......
ArchaeoBob (6 comments)
"America - love it or LEAVE!"
I've been hearing that and similar sentiments fairly frequently in the last few days - far FAR more often than ever before.  Hearing about "consequences for burning the flag (actions) from Trump is chilling!......
ArchaeoBob (6 comments)
"Faked!" Meme
Keep your eyes and ears open for a possible move to try to discredit the people openly opposing Trump and the bigots, especially people who have experienced terrorism from the "Right"  (Christian Terrorism is......
ArchaeoBob (8 comments)
More aggressive proselytizing
My wife told me today of an experience she had this last week, where she was proselytized by a McDonald's employee while in the store. ......
ArchaeoBob (5 comments)
See if you recognize names on this list
This comes from the local newspaper, which was conservative before and took a hard right turn after it was sold. Hint: Sarah Palin's name is on it!  (It's also connected to Trump.) ......
ArchaeoBob (3 comments)
Unions: A Labor Day Discussion
This is a revision of an article which I posted on my personal board and also on Dailykos. I had an interesting discussion on a discussion board concerning Unions. I tried to piece it......
Xulon (4 comments)
Extremely obnoxious protesters at WitchsFest NYC: connected to NAR?
In July of this year, some extremely loud, obnoxious Christian-identified protesters showed up at WitchsFest, an annual Pagan street fair here in NYC.  Here's an account of the protest by Pagan writer Heather Greene......
Diane Vera (3 comments)
Capitalism and the Attack on the Imago Dei
I joined this site today, having been linked here by Crooksandliars' Blog Roundup. I thought I'd put up something I put up previously on my Wordpress blog and also at the DailyKos. As will......
Xulon (2 comments)
History of attitudes towards poverty and the churches.
Jesus is said to have stated that "The Poor will always be with you" and some Christians have used that to refuse to try to help the poor, because "they will always be with......
ArchaeoBob (13 comments)
Alternate economy medical treatment
Dogemperor wrote several times about the alternate economy structure that dominionists have built.  Well, it's actually made the news.  Pretty good article, although it doesn't get into how bad people could be (have been)......
ArchaeoBob (5 comments)
Evidence violence is more common than believed
Think I've been making things up about experiencing Christian Terrorism or exaggerating, or that it was an isolated incident?  I suggest you read this article (linked below in body), which is about our great......
ArchaeoBob (7 comments)
Central Florida Sheriff Preached Sermon in Uniform
If anyone has been following the craziness in Polk County Florida, they know that some really strange and troubling things have happened here.  We've had multiple separation of church and state lawsuits going at......
ArchaeoBob (2 comments)
Demon Mammon?
An anthropologist from outer space might be forgiven for concluding that the god of this world is Mammon. (Or, rather, The Market, as depicted by John McMurtry in his book The Cancer Stage of......
daerie (2 comments)
Anti-Sharia Fever in Texas: This is How It Starts
The mayor of a mid-size Texan city has emerged in recent months as the newest face of Islamophobia. Aligning herself with extremists hostile to Islam, Mayor Beth Van Duyne of Irving, Texas has helped......
JSanford (2 comments)

More Diaries...




All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments, posts, stories, and all other content are owned by the authors. Everything else 2005 Talk to Action, LLC.