Gingrich v The Separation of Church and State
mick arran printable version print page     Bookmark and Share
Sun Dec 17, 2006 at 10:53:55 AM EST
Newt Gingrich is launching a new and ambitious committee aimed at re-making American society in the neoconservative image. But just below the surface lurks an assault on the doctrine of separation of church and state that has been dear to his heart for decades.
When last we saw the diminutive Georgian, mastermind of the Contract with America and the '94 Republican takeover, he was lurching from Washington with his tail between his legs and charges of corruption, influence-peddling, and various other "unethical behaviors" nipping at his heels. He's been quiet the last few years, giving the rumpus a chance to die down, but according to a story in today's NY Times, he's back and he has big plans.
Mr. Gingrich's...agenda includes a new political action committee to try to identify changes America must make to survive. It is an effort that he said would be 50 times as ambitious as the political action committee Gopac, which in the 1980s and '90s he turned into a training ground for hundreds of Republican politicians and a personal fund-raising fief. It will be, in Mr. Gingrich's telling, the 1994 Contract With America, which swept Republicans into power on Capitol Hill and him into the speaker's chair, on an extra-large scale.

The new committee, called American Solutions for Winning the Future, will be organized as a so-called 527 group, he said. Those committees, named for a section of the tax code, can raise and spend unlimited money with minimal disclosure.

Mr. Gingrich said he would try to raise tens of millions of dollars through the committee to find bipartisan solutions to the nation's problems. Any candidate of any party who wants to share in the effort will be welcome, he said.

The committee will also promote Mr. Gingrich's latest manifesto, a 10-point Contract With America for the 21st century, which includes Social Security privatization, electoral reform, radical streamlining of government, and "patriotic education" for schoolchildren and immigrants. The document also includes a call to "recenter America on the creator from whom all our liberties come" and to appoint judges who understand "the centrality of God in American history." (emphasis added)

The NYT article, in standard MSM fashion, wastes a lot of time pretending that this is some kind of presidential bid and handicapping it on that basis, but Gingrich - who knew what the reporter (John Broder) wanted to hear - gave him a lot of help.
Mr. Gingrich acknowledged that he was probably better at formulating ideas than at carrying them out, more of a revolutionary agitator than an elected executive. He said that unexpected events swept him into the speaker's office -- though he had spent years planning to get there -- and that the same could happen with the Oval Office.

"It all depends on whether the movement I'm building gets big enough and how large the vacuum of leadership is," he said.

Uh-huh. Let's dispense with this bit of disinformation as quickly as possible.
Merle Black, a professor of government at Emory University and an authority on Southern politics, said Mr. Gingrich was dreaming. His appeal is limited to a relatively narrow slice of right-wing voters, Professor Black said, with virtually no support from independents and Democrats.

"He couldn't get elected to statewide office in Georgia," Professor Black said, citing a recent poll of Georgia Republicans that placed Mr. Gingrich a distant third in presidential preference in his home state, behind Mr. Giuliani and Mr. McCain. "I cannot imagine him winning a presidential race in the United States."

Amen. And let's add to that the fact that the above laundry list of conservative shibboleths is the same one the right has been flogging for 25 years and the same one that's been consistently rejected by American voters with 2 exceptions: "patriotic education" (a terrifying phrase coming from someone like Gingrich whose defense of the genocide practiced against Native Americans in the 19th century is legendary) and the election or appointment of theocratic judges. Both are worrying but the former is an annoyance; the latter is bloody dangerous.

Everything Gingrich says and believes may be demonstrably wrong but that doesn't mean he's stupid. He's a shrewd politician with a dead-on instinct for what rich right-wingers will donate scads of money to do and for what middle-class right-wingers and moderates will support. And while the neoconservatives of the Bush Administration may have been embarrassed in November, they're still in control of the Republican party and showing no sign whatever that they're willing to give that up.

In a T2A diary by Joan Bokaer titled "The Fight for the Soul of the GOP Is On!", Ms Bokaer points out that the disenchantment of the religious right with the way neocons in the Bush Admin shuffled their concerns onto a back burner in order to concentrate on an attempt to control Middle east oil caused mucho defections.

And now -- perhaps the final? -- battle for the soul of the GOP is on. Karl Rove and associates still believe they have a winning formula - keep the Christian Conservative base of the GOP happy. Rove thinks the last election was a fluke and he is sticking to his strategy. But many traditional Republicans, independents, libertarians, mainstream Christians, and, yes, evangelicals left the party. Some notables such as Jim Webb (newly elected Senator from VA) was a Republican and the former Secretary of the Navy under Ronald Reagan. He unseated a darling of the religious right, Senator George Allen (R-VA).
What Gingrich has hit on is a perfect set of targets with wide potential appeal to the the GOP's base, wide enough, perhaps, to bring the defectors back. It's hard to argue against the concept of "patriotic education" being injected into our curricula when it will most likely be sold as nothing more than an extra emphasis on American history, and easy to argue that such an effort is necessary, desirable, and even important.

Theocratic judges are a bit dicier but the fundamentalists want them badly and lots of evangelicals wouldn't mind having them. The idea of a movement to bring their version of Christ into US law is more than attractive, it's a motivator. It gets their juices (and their contributions) flowing, maybe not as much as abortion but a lot more than evolution. Packaged inside a glittery platform of high-minded platitudes and grandiose visions, there's every reason to believe that the simple-minded scions of the right, who dearly love slogans behind which flags can fly and choirs of angels can sing, might very well flock back to the neoconservative banner to do battle, united once more, with the evil, godless liberals.

In a comment on Ms Bokaer's diary, I took a particularly Pollyanna-ish view that the fresh split between those in the religious right who remained avidly political and those who were beginning to think that maybe politics wasn't the way to get what they wanted after all might very well be the spark to the ultimate disintegration of the religious right by causing it to break down into dozens of splinter groups more intent on fighting each other than us.

Yes, there will be a fight for control of the GOP but it isn't even clear that the religious right will be anything other than bystanders, possibly of their own choice. A split has developed in the last year or two between those who believe, like Brownback, that the dominionist camp should be in complete control of the Pubs and ought to work toward using their leverage and true control at the local level to hijack the Federal govt, and those who are now questioning whether they ever should have gotten involved in the political process to begin with.

The outcome of that split is unclear as is the question of whether or not what's left of the "new" GOP after Bush's meltdown even wants the religious right on their side - polls have been showing for years that a majority of the country isn't interested in overturning Roe v Wade or passing a Constitutional amendment "protecting marriage" or forcing ID into science classrooms, and it is dawning on the PTB that in the long run the fundies may be more of a drag than a help.

Gingrich's new effort could very well heal that split before it has a chance to do its work, and in the process face us with a whole new well-financed war on the Constitution and the SOCAS doctrine.

That can't be good for anybody.




Display:

In a recent address -- ironically at a dinner celebrating free speech -- Newt Gingrich warned that the threat of terrorism necessitates curbs on free speech and a "level of supervision" by the gov't never before dreamed of.   I've never heard any proposal by Bush or Cheney half so frightening. Here's Keith Olbermann's response:

http://www.alternet.org/blogs/video/45004/



by Gnosys on Mon Dec 18, 2006 at 12:44:02 AM EST
was among the best of many really good points he has made.

Being that the Forum was about the celebration of free speech and the state the one with the motto "live free or die", Newt Gingrich was very aptly described as "an arsonist  giving the keynote speech at a Firefighter's convention" extolling the virtues of his avocation.

That description should follow Newt everywhere he goes in his quest.

by FreeDem on Mon Jan 29, 2007 at 11:34:02 AM EST
Parent




WWW Talk To Action


Cognitive Dissonance & Dominionism Denial
There is new research on why people are averse to hearing or learning about the views of ideological opponents. Based on evaluation of five......
By Frederick Clarkson (374 comments)
Will the Air Force Do Anything To Rein In Its Dynamic Duo of Gay-Bashing, Misogynistic Bloggers?
"I always get nervous when I see female pastors/chaplains. Here is why everyone should as well: "First, women are not called to be pastors,......
By Chris Rodda (199 comments)
The Legacy of Big Oil
The media is ablaze with the upcoming publication of David Grann's book, Killers of the Flower Moon. The shocking non fiction account of the......
By wilkyjr (111 comments)
Gimme That Old Time Dominionism Denial
Over the years, I have written a great deal here and in other venues about the explicitly theocratic movement called dominionism -- which has......
By Frederick Clarkson (101 comments)
History Advisor to Members of Congress Completely Twists Jefferson's Words to Support Muslim Ban
Pseudo-historian David Barton, best known for his misquoting of our country's founders to promote the notion that America was founded as a Christian nation,......
By Chris Rodda (113 comments)
"Christian Fighter Pilot" Calls First Lesbian Air Force Academy Commandant a Liar
In a new post on his "Christian Fighter Pilot" blog titled "BGen Kristin Goodwin and the USAFA Honor Code," Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Jonathan......
By Chris Rodda (144 comments)
Catholic Right Leader Unapologetic about Call for 'Death to Liberal Professors' -- UPDATED
Today, Donald Trump appointed C-FAM Executive Vice President Lisa Correnti to the US Delegation To UN Commission On Status Of Women. (C-FAM is a......
By Frederick Clarkson (126 comments)
Controlling Information
     Yesterday I listened to Russ Limbaugh.  Rush advised listeners it would be best that they not listen to CNN,MSNBC, ABC, CBS and......
By wilkyjr (118 comments)
Is Bannon Fifth-Columning the Pope?
In December 2016 I wrote about how White House chief strategist Steve Bannon, who likes to flash his Catholic credentials when it comes to......
By Frank Cocozzelli (251 comments)
Ross Douthat's Hackery on the Seemingly Incongruous Alliance of Bannon & Burke
Conservative Catholic writer Ross Douthat has dissembled again. This time, in a February 15, 2017 New York Times op-ed titled The Trump Era's Catholic......
By Frank Cocozzelli (64 comments)
`So-Called Patriots' Attack The Rule Of Law
Every so often, right-wing commentator Pat Buchanan lurches out of the far-right fever swamp where he has resided for the past 50 years to......
By Rob Boston (161 comments)
Bad Faith from Focus on the Family
Here is one from the archives, Feb 12, 2011, that serves as a reminder of how deeply disingenuous people can be. Appeals to seek......
By Frederick Clarkson (177 comments)
The Legacy of George Wallace
"One need not accept any of those views to agree that they had appealed to real concerns of real people, not to mindless, unreasoning......
By wilkyjr (70 comments)
Betsy DeVos's Mudsill View of Public Education
My Talk to Action colleague Rachel Tabachnick has been doing yeoman's work in explaining Betsy DeVos's long-term strategy for decimating universal public education. If......
By Frank Cocozzelli (80 comments)
Prince and DeVos Families at Intersection of Radical Free Market Privatizers and Religious Right
This post from 2011 surfaces important information about President-Elect Trump's nominee for Secretary of Education, Betsy DeVos. -- FC Erik Prince, Brother of Betsy......
By Rachel Tabachnick (218 comments)

Respect for Others? or Political Correctness?
The term "political correctness" as used by Conservatives and Republicans has often puzzled me: what exactly do they mean by it? After reading Chip Berlin's piece here-- http://www.talk2action.org/story/2016/7/21/04356/9417 I thought about what he explained......
MTOLincoln (253 comments)
Fear
What I'm feeling now is fear.  I swear that it seems my nightmares are coming true with this new "president".  I'm also frustrated because so many people are not connecting all the dots! I've......
ArchaeoBob (107 comments)
"America - love it or LEAVE!"
I've been hearing that and similar sentiments fairly frequently in the last few days - far FAR more often than ever before.  Hearing about "consequences for burning the flag (actions) from Trump is chilling!......
ArchaeoBob (211 comments)
"Faked!" Meme
Keep your eyes and ears open for a possible move to try to discredit the people openly opposing Trump and the bigots, especially people who have experienced terrorism from the "Right"  (Christian Terrorism is......
ArchaeoBob (165 comments)
More aggressive proselytizing
My wife told me today of an experience she had this last week, where she was proselytized by a McDonald's employee while in the store. ......
ArchaeoBob (163 comments)
See if you recognize names on this list
This comes from the local newspaper, which was conservative before and took a hard right turn after it was sold. Hint: Sarah Palin's name is on it!  (It's also connected to Trump.) ......
ArchaeoBob (169 comments)
Unions: A Labor Day Discussion
This is a revision of an article which I posted on my personal board and also on Dailykos. I had an interesting discussion on a discussion board concerning Unions. I tried to piece it......
Xulon (180 comments)
Extremely obnoxious protesters at WitchsFest NYC: connected to NAR?
In July of this year, some extremely loud, obnoxious Christian-identified protesters showed up at WitchsFest, an annual Pagan street fair here in NYC.  Here's an account of the protest by Pagan writer Heather Greene......
Diane Vera (130 comments)
Capitalism and the Attack on the Imago Dei
I joined this site today, having been linked here by Crooksandliars' Blog Roundup. I thought I'd put up something I put up previously on my Wordpress blog and also at the DailyKos. As will......
Xulon (331 comments)
History of attitudes towards poverty and the churches.
Jesus is said to have stated that "The Poor will always be with you" and some Christians have used that to refuse to try to help the poor, because "they will always be with......
ArchaeoBob (148 comments)
Alternate economy medical treatment
Dogemperor wrote several times about the alternate economy structure that dominionists have built.  Well, it's actually made the news.  Pretty good article, although it doesn't get into how bad people could be (have been)......
ArchaeoBob (90 comments)
Evidence violence is more common than believed
Think I've been making things up about experiencing Christian Terrorism or exaggerating, or that it was an isolated incident?  I suggest you read this article (linked below in body), which is about our great......
ArchaeoBob (214 comments)

More Diaries...




All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments, posts, stories, and all other content are owned by the authors. Everything else © 2005 Talk to Action, LLC.