Making a Difference
John Dorhauer printable version print page     Bookmark and Share
Mon May 01, 2006 at 10:59:00 PM EST
Image hosting by Photobucket
This matters.

Taking the time to write about, and to expose, the work being done to dismantle our beloved congregations is making a difference.

A number of things happened this week that demonstrate that.

Two weeks ago, in my Article "On the Run", I wrote that Faithful and Welcoming - the newest renewal group within the United Church of Christ - moved its National Gathering from a Nazarene Church to a United Church of Christ Congregation.

Their website now reads this way regarding the National Gathering:

"National Gathering Rescheduled
The FWC national gathering, originally scheduled for First UCC New Knoxville, Ohio July 2-4, has been rescheduled.
We regret any inconvenience this may cause those who had planned to attend. All who had preregistered to date will receive notice of the rescheduling, and may transfer their registration to the new event or request a refund."

First, let it be noted that New Knoxville was NOT where this was originally scheduled. This is, in fact, the third congregation at which the event was to be held. When members of the church asked the pastor to reconsider his willingness to host this event for this group, the pastor uninvited Faithful and Welcoming. As of now, they have no one who wants to host their event, and they are left with no choice but to cancel the event. They may indeed find a place, but it will be their fourth (that we know about). And there are fewer and fewer places willing to ally with them.

Ok, I should stop and rewrite this article. I have been logging on to the website as I write this to make sure I have my information straight, and as I finished that last paragraph this appeared on their website:

"New National Gathering Plans
We believe the rescheduling is of the Lord, and we invite all who can to join us at Shepherd of the Hills in Bechtelsville, PA (Penn Southeast Conference) August 4-5, 2006. The board of the church has enthusiastically and unanimously extended their invitation to us, and our plans are firm. Within one week, we will post registration information on our web site.
Because we have revised the event theme and purpose, we will not be paying for keynote speakers, so we have reduced the price of attending the event to $25 per person, with a 20% discount ($20 per person) for five or more registrations from one church. The cost includes two meals (Friday and Saturday lunch) on site -- other meals and lodging will be on your own."

I won't rewrite, but will continue from this point so that you get the same sense that I have gotten about how crazy this is, and how hard it is to keep up with what is going on and how to interpret it.

Also new is this statement about the intent of the gathering:
"Although FWC has been created for those who choose to stay, we are aware that many individuals and congregations are still wrestling with their decisions. Therefore, we are creating a gathering for all relevant voices to address the critical question, "What is our future in the UCC?""

This is a laying down of the gauntlet. It is a dramatic shift, not so much in their intent (for this has been the intent all along) but in their need to keep it a secret any longer. They are now actively searching for churches who wish to leave, and providing space and voice for them to do so.

A little further down the page is a heading that reads "Why discuss the option of leaving?", and therein will be found and invitation to join their chat room so that you can share your thoughts about this. The invitation reads this way:

"FWC believes all of us should be in conversation with each other, and should listen to one another's concerns and options."

All of us?

Well, no, not really. Just a couple of paragraphs later this can be found:

"To comment in an open forum on the future in the UCC for those who consider themselves evangelical, traditional, conservative, or orthodox, visit the FWC web page."

So, is an "Open Forum" by definition open only to those of a particular theological bent?

And as if that were not enough, the next paragraph includes this:

"If you are supportive of the principles of FWC, you may join the FWChurches Yahoo! chat room or the FWClergy chat room - the latter is by invitation to clergy who register as FWClergy on the web site."

So, we have gone from "all of us should be in conversation" to "Those who consider themselves evangelical, traditional. Conservative, or orthodox," to "If you are supportive..., by invitation only."

It should also be noted that they are reporting on their website that all of the keynoters are being uninvited. Actually, that is an assumption. What they write is this:
"Because we have revised the event theme and purpose, we will not be paying for keynote speakers."

That means no Presbyterian Layman; no Exodus International.

Instead, they will "...invite national and regional UCC leaders to share with us why they want us to stay in the UCC and how our voices will be heard and valued." I will be most curious to see whom they invite.

OK, enough on Faithful and Welcoming.

I started this article wanting to write about the difference we were making as we work to expose those bent on attacking Mainline Churches.

I received correspondence from a member of one our St. Louis area churches who began reading the site a number of weeks ago when a friend of hers called and told her to read my Feb. 13 article (The Role of the Pastor in an Attack: the Aggressor). Her friend was upset that I mentioned her pastor Mark Friz by name. Her friend then wanted her to call me and ask me to stop writing about Mark.

This woman wanted to write and tell me that it was at that point she started reading the Talk2action website. She called her friend back and told her she would not ask me to stop writing, and she began reading the site every week.

It was when she read last week's article (A Church Fights Back) that she wrote to me. It dawned on her how important it was for key Lay leaders to stand up and defend their church against attack.  She recounted in her mind how some members of her own church had begun to hint at dissatisfaction with the UCC, and how in her own church strong leaders stood up to them; and how she was going to commit herself to the defense of her own church from any further attacks.

This is why we write: to inform and empower leaders within their own churches. Too many attacks occur without full knowledge of who and what are behind them.

We are making a difference.




Display:
About 4 years ago my congregation voted whether or not to affiliate with the UCC.  It was a difficult time because the church was less than 20 years old and had had strong growth without a centralized denominational support structure.  The church had just called a new, passionate minister who firmly wanted us to join the UCC, despite the firm rejection by a number of founding members.  The measure failed by a small majority and my church remains an independent congregation--not unlike the original congregational churches of New England and our founding fathers.  I share this with you to state the following point: how could my beloved congregation ever reconsider visiting this issue again?  At a time when the UCC could use the strength my congregation could offer, I see no way to raise the measure of affilitation again simply because of the hatefulness behind the FWC.  Maybe I am wrong, (in the negative) maybe there is a core faction of my congregation that would embrace FWC--but I sincerely doubt it.  My minister routinely addresses all of the FWC's contentions and places them at the forefront of his ministry--radically inclusive love for all--regardless of just about anything.  I will keep my eyes on this work and point concerned members of my church this way for guidance and support.  Thanks!

by Pauljaxon on Tue May 02, 2006 at 06:04:55 PM EST
Boy, that is tough. I can't see a church led by such a pastor embracing any denomination whom the pastor is so intent on demonizing. I thank you for your level-headedness in the presence of such a campaign to deminish the work and ministry of the UCC. It can be hard to imagine what fuels such a single-minded, uni-dimensional attack on a partner in the ministry of the gospel - and one can see in such circumstances how the anger of such a pastor must be fed by something, someone who is compelling him to act in such ways. That is where groups like FWC, BWF, and the IRD come in - that is precisely their role, and they will continue to feed him the kind of misinformation that engenders his far-reaching anger.
Shalom, Rev. Dr. John C. Dorhauer "Time makes ancient good uncouth; we must onward still and upward who would keep abreast of truth." from Lowell, "The Present Crisis"
by John Dorhauer on Wed May 03, 2006 at 08:40:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]
John:

Thank you very much.  I know in the future I will use this resource to assist those members of my congregation who request some insight into FWC.

Keep up the terrific work.

Paul

by Pauljaxon on Wed May 03, 2006 at 11:09:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]


John:

As I re-read this thread, I wanted to point out that I have no strong evidence that the FWC was involved in the vote that took place for affiliation.  I suspect it to some degree, but I have been told that the primary reason for a dissenting vote was a desire to remain truly autonomous.  This entire situation plays well into the majority's case (sadly) as it proves their point on dissension in the denomination.  They are happier sailing our ship of church outside of a fleet.

Thanks again,
Paul

by Pauljaxon on Wed May 03, 2006 at 11:17:31 AM EST
[ Parent ]




It is good to see the FWC scrambling to regain its footing after its exposure in this, and other communities.

Places like this can make the difference. People can make the difference. The push-back must continue.

Thank you for the article.

by Lorie Johnson on Tue May 02, 2006 at 10:55:35 AM EST


This post epitomizes what  Talk to Action is for. It tracks and analyzes the latest developments, and highlights sucesses.  

by Frederick Clarkson on Wed May 03, 2006 at 01:27:43 AM EST

We do not usually make public mention when we delete inappropriate comments or ban trolls. We do not wish such matters to distract us from the focus and people's experience of the site; or to extend the efforts of a troll to be the center of attention.

I this instance, I am making an exception.

The president of Faithful and Welcoming, named Bob Thompson, (aka Corinthpastor), who John Dorhauer has written a bit about, posted a comment in which he acknowledged that he does not agree with the purposes of this site, but requested the opportunity to comment anyway.

I politely declined, but we did not delete his comment or ban him from the site. We prefer to assume that people understand English and are honorable people until proved otherwise. We have dealt with some others in this way to everyone's satisfaction.  

Then, Thompson posted a second comment anyway.

Here is how he opened his second comment:

OK, I haven't been kicked off the site yet, so I'm going to post my response to John and see where we go from here.  If I am removed or asked to leave, I'm OK with that.

Well, I am not "OK with that." I do not like it that Thompson abused the courtesy I extended to him and that he is forcing my hand.  Thompson took the fact that he was not immediately kicked off the site as permission to post -- in flagrant disregard of what I said.

A little futher down, he writes

If my being in this "talk2action" blog is perceived as an unwelcome intrusion, I'll bow out.

The option to bow out gracefully had already been extended. But Thompson abused this courtesy, and as his language quoted above indicates, he was well aware of exactly what he was doing.  The option to "bow out" is no longer his.

This troll has been banned.

by Frederick Clarkson on Sat May 06, 2006 at 03:51:44 PM EST

Now I know this. You know this. And, Mr. Troll knows this. But, if getting banned was the intent and getting mileage from that also, perhaps ................ to the casual observer, you might not be. So, wondering if you should have that link highly visible somewhere on each story page.

For sure, it should have been within your response. Just protecting your backside. William

Site Guidelines. If you don't like them, create your own website - http://www.talk2action.org/special/site_guidelines

by williambrandes on Sun May 07, 2006 at 06:42:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]

good point. The guidelines are pretty clear but certainly need to be updated and clarified once in awhile.

I am always amused by the efforts of trolls here, and on other sites to do site guidelines versions of proof texting.  

We do not wish to make the site policies or how they are administered a subject of site discussion. Its just good once in awhile to let trolls and troll wannabes know that there is a zero tolerance policy when it comes to trolls. People who hold points of view that are inconsistent with our statement of purpose and guidelines have a big blogosphere to write in. And if nothing suits, setting up a blog of one's own is free.

by Frederick Clarkson on Mon May 08, 2006 at 11:52:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]





WWW Talk To Action


Adopting Bias: New Va. Rules Seek To Safeguard 'Faith-Based' Bigotry
Legislators and media pundits in Washington, D.C., continue to obsess over the birth control mandate in the new health care law and whether church-related......
By Rob Boston (4 comments)
GOP Candidates Embrace a Major Religious Right Narrative
Rick Santorum and Mitt Romney's demagogic claims that President Obama is engaged in a "war against religion" are as unsurprising as they are disturbing.......
By Frederick Clarkson (5 comments)
NAR Apostle Harold Caballeros Heads Guatemala Foreign Ministry
In January 2012, with the inauguration of former military general Otto Pérez Molina as Guatemala's president, NAR apostle Harold Caballeros took charge of Guatemala's......
By Bruce Wilson (2 comments)
As Eddie Long Controversy Grows, Video Emerges of 'Rabbi' Messer Wrapping Paula White in Torah
A Christian Post article dated February 5 is one of many reports of denials by televangelist Paula White and her attorney of any ties......
By Rachel Tabachnick (9 comments)
Garlow Introduced Gingrich, Called for Pastors Revolt Against IRS Rules at NAR Church in Nevada
On Friday night Newt Gingrich spoke at the "Prayer for America" event at the International Church of Las Vegas (ICLV) led by Apostle Paul......
By Rachel Tabachnick (3 comments)
A Must Read Book: "The Good News Club"
For anyone who wants to read a book that really goes inside the movement to indoctrinate children through our public schools, I highly recommend......
By Chris Rodda (3 comments)
More On Yale's Templeton-Funded "Spiritual Capital Initiative"
Should Chick-Fil-A be known for its extensive ties to, and funding of, some of the most aggressively anti-gay groups in America, as well as......
By Bruce Wilson (4 comments)
Gettting Well Versed
Michelle Boorstein at The Washington Post's "Under God" blog reports that Faithful America's petition calling for Kansas House Speaker Michael O'Neal to resign now......
By Frederick Clarkson (3 comments)
Alabama State Senator: Pay Increases for Teachers are Against 'Biblical Principle'
This is a new twist on "biblical economics" that I've not heard before.  According to Alabama State Sen. Shadrack McGill, a 62% pay increase......
By Rachel Tabachnick (5 comments)
Wagner Recognized by Delaware House for Commissioning Apostles (Copy of Tribute Included)
This morning I contacted the offices of Rep. Daniel B. Short and Chief Clerk of the House Richard Puffer and confirmed that C. Peter......
By Rachel Tabachnick (7 comments)
Trial Date Set for Bishop Finn
The trial date for Bishop Robert W. Finn,of the Diocese of Kansas City-St. Joseph, Missouri will be September 24, 2012.  Finn and the diocese......
By Frank Cocozzelli (3 comments)
The Culture of Demonization and Imprecatory Prayer
We have written a great deal here at Talk to Action about the Religious Right culture of conspiracy theory, labeling and demonization as animating......
By Frederick Clarkson (3 comments)
To Bigotry No Sanction, to Persecution No Assistance
As the finale of our extended celebration of Religious Freedom Day, we are honored to welcome George Washington as a guest front pager.  ......
By George Washington (0 comments)
George Barna and the New Apostolic Reformation
Given the secretive nature of the movement, documenting the involvement of public figures in C. Peter Wagner's New Apostolic Reformation can be a time-consuming......
By Bruce Wilson (2 comments)
Gingrich, Alinsky, and the Christian Right Grand Conspiracy Narrative
Gingrich's claims about an Alinsky-Obama-socialist conspiracy against Christianity and freedom echo conspiracy theories from the Tea Parties, Glenn Beck, the John Birch Society, and......
By Chip Berlet (0 comments)

Harold Caballeros, October 5, 2006, #1
On October 5, 2006, Harold Cabballeros, founder and senior pastor of El Shaddai Church in Guatemala City, spoke at the "Spirit in the World: The Dynamics of Pentecostal Growth and Experience" symposium sponsored by......
Bruce Wilson (0 comments)
Truth Wins Out Reports on Exodus International's Attempt at Rebranding
An extensive report has been posted at Truth Wins Out (TWO) on the rebranding of Exodus International, the discredited and financially strapped pray-away-the-gay organization. The report is titled "The Exodus SmokeScreen" and subtitled, "Exodus......
Rachel Tabachnick (0 comments)
Breast cancer awareness T-shirt prompts dispute at skating rink
crossposted from The Clarion Ledger) http://www.clarionledger.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2012202040 349 ""I am offended as a mother; as the daughter of a cancer patient; as a Christian woman; as a fundraiser and donor of time and money to......
COinMS (0 comments)
Delaware state house Dems distance themselves from Wagner tribute
The Democrats in the Delaware state House of Representatives are in full damage control mode over a tribute given back in January to C. Peter Wagner, a prominent leader of the New Apostolic......
Christian Dem in NC (1 comment)
Is Peter Wagner lying about commendation from state of Delaware?
Those of us who have watched the New Apostolic Reformation have come to expect bizarre claims.  Well, today  C. Peter Wagner made one of the most bizarre claims yet.  He sent out an......
Christian Dem in NC (1 comment)
New dominionist effort to target Hollywood with prayer
In yet more proof that the New Apostolic Reformation is trying to make itself heard in a big way this year, late yesterday several leaders of that movement got together to announce a......
Christian Dem in NC (0 comments)
Santorum Accuses Colleges of Anti-Religious "Indoctrination" But Gingrich Said it First
CBS and other media outlets have pounced on a Rick Santorum claim, that America's colleges and universities are hotbeds of anti-religious "indoctrination", but Newt Gingrich has been saying that for years. As Santorum declared......
Bruce Wilson (2 comments)
Leader of NC gay marriage ban effort, in his own words
cross-posted at dKos One of the leaders of the effort to write a gay marriage ban into North Carolina's constitution is Patrick Wooden, the pastor of Upper Room Church of God in Christ in......
Christian Dem in NC (2 comments)
AFA endorses AIDS denialism
If Public Policy Polling's early numbers are accurate (and there's little reason to doubt they are) Newt Gingrich will likely take the lead in national polling this week.  In light of this, there's......
Christian Dem in NC (1 comment)
Family Research Council chaplain openly calls for non-Christians to be banned from public office
Anyone who's studied the religious right can't help but notice a pattern to how they've operated over the last three decades.  They get a little bit of power, only to overreach and get smacked......
Christian Dem in NC (4 comments)
Cindy Jacobs prophecies divine intervention unless we elect Repubs
Late last week, New Apostolic Reformation "prophetess" Cindy Jacobs announced the yearly "Word of the Lord" from the Apostolic Council of Prophetic Elders.  (h/t to PFAW's Right Wing Watch). This "Word" makes for......
Christian Dem in NC (3 comments)
Robert Jeffress: First Amendment protections invite wrath of God
We already knew that the religious right would like nothing better than to sweep away the First Amendment.  Well, one of its more prominent leaders just came out and said it in terms as......
Christian Dem in NC (3 comments)
Cindy Jacobs announces 2012 prayer initiative--and declares war on separation of church and state
Late last night, Cindy Jacobs announced the formation of a major prayer drive with the goal of influencing the election.  The campaign, called "FastForward," is sponsored by her newly formed United States Reformation Prayer......
Christian Dem in NC (2 comments)
Personhood returns
Having soundly been defeated at the ballot box, the Personhood initiative in Mississippi has been resurrected via the new governor of Mississippi, Phil Bryant and his allies in the state government. For the first......
COinMS (0 comments)
Exposing The Dark Side Of Tupelo MS
It’s really ironic that the so-called Christian Religious Right (ie., AFA) are seemingly dedicated to the unnecessary bashing of Paganism when Pagans made such a well-documented historical contribution toward the rise of Christianity. For......
AlBratt (0 comments)

More Diaries...




All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments, posts, stories, and all other content are owned by the authors. Everything else © 2005 Talk to Action, LLC. Powered by Scoop