What is Christian nationalism?
Michelle Goldberg printable version print page     Bookmark and Share
Thu May 11, 2006 at 03:12:12 PM EST
I've just published a book called "Kingdom Coming: The Rise of Christian Nationalism," and since it appeared, I've been asked several times what Christian nationalism is, and how it differs from Christian fundamentalism. It's an important concept to understand, because the threat to a pluralistic society does not come from those who simply believe in a very conservative interpretation of Christianity. It comes from those who adhere to a political ideology that posits a Christian right to rule.
Christian nationalists believe in a revisionist history, which holds that the founders were devout Christians who never intended to create a secular republic; separation of church and state, according to this history, is a fraud perpetrated by God-hating subversives. One of the foremost Christian revisionist historians is David Barton, who , in addition to running an organization called Wallbuilders that disseminates Christian nationalist books, tracts and videos, is also the vice-chairman of the Texas Republican Party. The goal of Christian nationalist politics is the restoration of the imagined Christian nation. As George Grant, former executive director of D. James Kennedy's influential Coral Ridge Ministries, wrote in his book "The Changing of the Guard:"

"Christians have an obligation, a mandate, a commission, a holy responsibility to reclaim the land for Jesus Christ -- to have dominion in civil structures, just as in every other aspect of life and godliness.
    But it is dominion we are after. Not just a voice.
    It is dominion we are after. Not just influence.
    It is dominion we are after. Not just equal time.
    It is dominion we are after.
    World conquest. That's what Christ has commissioned us to accomplish."

In the Christian nationalist vision of America, non-believers would be free to worship as they choose, as long as they know their place. When Venkatachalapathi Samuldrala became the first Hindu priest to offer an invocation before Congress, the Family Research Council issued a furious statement that reveals much about the America they'd like to create:

"While it is true that the United States of America was founded on the sacred principle of religious freedom for all, that liberty was never intended to exalt other religions to the level that Christianity holds in our country's heritage...Our founders expected that Christianity -- and no other religion -- would receive support from the government as long as that support did not violate peoples' consciences and their right to worship. They would have found utterly incredible the idea that all religions, including paganism, be treated with equal deference."

The iconography of Christian nationalism conflates the cross and the flag. As I write in "Kingdom Coming," it "claims supernatural sanction for its campaign of national renewal and speaks rapturously about vanquishing the millions of Americans who would stand in its way." At one rally at the statehouse in Austin, Texas, a banner pictured a fierce eagle perched upon a bloody cross. For a liberal, such imagery smacks of fascist agitprop. But plenty of deeply committed Christians also object to it as a form of blasphemy. It's important, I think, to separate their faith from the authoritarian impulses of the Christian nationalist movement. Christianity is a religion. Christian nationalism is a political program, and there is nothing sacred about it.

(cross posted at Huffingtonpost.com)




Display:
"The US Christian Flag"

[ from the "US Christian Flag" designer's website ]

"YOU are the USA Regiment, Army of God.  THIS IS HIS LAND & YOU ARE HIS PEOPLE --raise your flag!  CHRISTIAN AMERICANS, BAND TOGETHER! "

"The Pledge of Allegiance  

I pledge allegiance, to the Christian Flag,

of the United States of America,

and to the Lord, who made us great and free.

I purpose, to band together, with all believers,

to protect the truth and liberty of God.

June 13, 2005  Please note:   there is clearly confusion among many.  This pledge, flag, and its mission is not to replace our government pledge OR Old Glory.  We are NOT trying to overthrow our government or force anyone to be a Christian.   We are, however, honoring our LORD and protecting our Christian heritage and liberties.  We are allowed to do that under our Constitution.   The State cannot dictate to our church that we may not. When that day ever comes, You and I will all be in a desperate condition.  May we please agree upon that much?"



by Bruce Wilson on Thu May 11, 2006 at 03:50:54 PM EST
I just wanted to point out that the symbols for the Evangelists have been an angel, lion, ox, and eagle... Mathew/Angel, Mark/Lion, Luke/Ox, John/Eagle... Whoever created this flag did not research the Pagan imagery he employed.

The imagery translates; John is quoting Mathew while standing on a crooked cross of Jesus with a mouth full of garbage... (Which goes against American ethos; Never speak with your mouth full because it is not polite.)

Just thought I would point this...

 

by inlikeflint on Fri May 12, 2006 at 01:21:31 AM EST
Parent

Actually, I think the woman who created the flag might be mortified if someone informed her she was promoting pagan imagery.

by Bruce Wilson on Fri May 12, 2006 at 11:38:17 AM EST
Parent



Excellent! Thank you Michelle!

Very important information here, I've ordered several copies to distribute to friends who've thought I was crazy and/or overreacting as I would try to explain this radical transformation taking place. In fact my phone began ringing during your Fresh Air broaddcast.... "turn it on, she's saying everything you've been telling us!"
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5398604

Listen to the broadcast, buy the book, tell your friends!!!

by Vesica on Thu May 11, 2006 at 10:04:42 PM EST

That two years ago, when I was on the steeper part of the learning curve of getting acquainted with Christian nationalism, I began making posts on one allegedly liberal ( it is actually ) web forum about the threat of impending theocracy. People called me crazy.  

Frederick Clarkson and I started this site ( see : "Welcome To Talk To Action / about this site " ) to aggregate perspectives such as Michelle's :

There's never been an ongoing forum such as this - on the internet or off of it - which kept up a sustained focus on the Christian right as a movement and featured a range of authors, researchers, and activists who specialize in covering ( and working against ) the movement. Such people never have had a dedicated forum.

So here it is.

by Bruce Wilson on Fri May 12, 2006 at 11:46:40 AM EST
Parent


Vesica,

I suspect there are a lot more people like you who have been voices crying in the wilderness about the rise of Dominionism.

Almost everybody thinks, "It can't happen here!"  But it is happening.

Michelle has been doing an excellent job telling this story.  My copy of her book is in the mail.  I hope it receives wide circulation.

by Mainstream Baptist on Fri May 12, 2006 at 02:47:24 PM EST
Parent

are doing an excellent job of generating meaningful dialog and I'm grateful for this site and for Joan's Theocracy Watch. Thank you!

I became aware of the seriousness of a mass movement some years ago after studying the works of Egyptian Sayid Qtub, the acknowledged philosopher and spiritual godfather of the Muslim Brotherhood, and was deeply disturbed by the startling similarity of thought promoted by the Christian Right. Looking deeper I came to the writing of folks like Fred and Chip.

Fred, I am especially appreciative of your sensitivity to avoid inflammatory remarks as those on the cusp that could be led to new understanding are instead shut down by tones of disrespect.

I posted the link to Michelle's post here on ScienceMusings.com/blog, a forum by author Chet Raymo where the intersection of science, religion and politics is a frequent topic, handled with intellectual elegance. I encourage everyone to take a look.

I would also like to draw everyone's attention to a recently released book, The Great Transformation by Karen Armstrong. I'd like to write a book review for this site if I could ever set aside the time. A description from a recent interview  on her book tour:

"Her new book is about the Axial Age, from 900 to 200 B.C., a time of ferment when four different philosophies took shape in four distinct cultures -- Confucianism and Taoism in China, Hinduism and Buddhism in India, monotheism in the vicinity of Israel and philosophical rationalism in Greece. She describes the era as "one of the most seminal periods of intellectual, psychological, philosophical and religious change in recorded history," and when she talks about it, she makes it sound totally relevant to today's world." Because of the parallels with the Axial Age, Armstrong believes, it's highly possible that the world is at another religious turning point. "In every single case, the catalyst of major religious change was revulsion from warfare and aggression."

"These guys worked hard at it," she says, "to find a solution to the spiritual and political ills of humanity. The Axial Age people seem to be talking to us."
....
"Her idea is to start a new "theology of power," based on the Golden Rule. "To understand that other people and other nations, however remote and alien, are in real terms as important as Washington."

"You have got a clash of two opposing notions of what is sacred. And that's very worrying in a society where you have a divide where people can't really speak to one another"

Q: "You're seen by many as a bridge builder. But I wonder if you think the fundamentalists are open to your books?

A: Oh, surely not. No! But I think the onus lies on us to have a different attitude than they do -- that to go in there with guns blazing and say that these folks are crazy is not the way.

And the contempt that we have expressed for the fundamentalist camp -- and I'm not talking about terrorists -- I'm talking about the rank and file who consider themselves religious -- that gets across, and of course it riles and enrages.
What's the alternative?

I think we've got to decode the fundamentalist imagery so that we learn to read these theologies. We need to see the fear and anxiety that lie behind a theology such as the rapture.



by Vesica on Sun May 14, 2006 at 12:03:39 AM EST
Parent
Speaking of the Golden Rule, here is a great collection of how this ethic of reciprocity is enshrined as a central precept by all the world's great religions:

http://abercrombielalioff.com/reciprosity.htm

by Vesica on Sun May 14, 2006 at 12:11:36 AM EST
Parent





It's really hard to explain to most people about the threats to democratic process posed by Christian dominionism and theocracy, but the idea of "Christian Nationalism" as explained in Michelle Goldberg's Kingdom Coming strikes a chord and does the job.

Congratulations on a great book that makes it clear that "Christianity is a religion. Christian nationalism is a political program, and there is nothing sacred about it." I plan to spread that quote around.

_ _ _

Chip Berlet: Research for Progress - Building Human Rights
by Chip Berlet on Thu May 11, 2006 at 11:23:33 PM EST

I just wrote a ten page paper for my American History paper (i know it's not so much, but i am only in grade 11) about the rise of the religious right in America, and i agree with this woman's ideas, if only i could have thought of a term as cohesive as christian nationalism. Anyways, i'm sure her book would have been a good source for me, and those of you interested in this book should check out Duane Oldfield's "the Right and the Righteous" and Kevin Phillips "American Theocracy"

Around the county, evangelical and likethinking conservative christians are taking over America directly through the Republican Party. This is not the majority of America, this is one small segment of the population who have been very effective in swinging the last two presidential elections for the Republicans. We've been seeing it since Pat Robertson ran for the Republican Party presidential nomination in 1988 and even though he lost, his dirty money was able to buy him whole states by infiltrating the state Republican Parties.

The founding fathers did not want there to be a dominant religion in America. They were secularites at best. Sure our country is founded in Christianity, but its idiotic to say that they had any intention for a dominant religion. The way people use them in their arguments is disgusting, and should no longer be tollerated.

by hirsh39 on Fri May 12, 2006 at 06:02:29 AM EST

I haven't read Duane Oldfield's book, but you might be interested to know that Kevin Phillips drew on the research of one of the founders of this website - Frederick Clarkson - in his book "American Theocracy".

by Bruce Wilson on Fri May 12, 2006 at 11:55:13 AM EST
Parent


You state "Christian nationalists believe in a revisionist history, which holds that the founders were devout Christians who never intended to create a secular republic" in your second paragraph.

My understanding of the word "revisionist" is
"Advocacy of the revision of an accepted, usually long-standing view, theory, or doctrine, especially a revision of historical events and movements", which sounds exactly what you are advocating.  Our Founding Fathers were not Christians and anyone who believes differently needs to take off their blinders.  Our Founding Fathers were Deist pure and simple.  Whenever Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, et al refer to god in a speach they are not talking about the god of Abraham, but rather the creator of this universe.  Deist beleive in an "Absentee Landlord" creator, which means they believe in a creator who does not interfere in the daily lives of people.  

I'm sick and tired of the Ultra Right-Wing nuts claiming this is a Christian nation founded on Christian beliefs.  This is a nation founded on the principle of freedom from tyranny and oppression, in all it's forms.  People need to start reading their history books a little more, and not the ones provided in public schools, before they begin claiming "separation of church and state, according to this history, is a fraud perpetrated by God-hating subversives."

by snoogans on Fri May 12, 2006 at 08:49:05 AM EST


Hi there

My name is Lucas and I am from Montreal. I always stick up for America against many of your bashers poiniting out all your good stuff. Thats been increasingly hard with the whole rise of an insane Southern theocracy, the trampling of your democracy, etc., I was kind losing a little faith.

This site has made my year. Thank fuck you exist - I was getting very nervous.

I just wanted to get that in there.

Love Lucas

by LucasK on Fri May 12, 2006 at 10:48:44 AM EST

We are very glad to be considered part of the "good stuff" of America.  There is much that is worth fighting for, and we are in it for the long haul.

by Frederick Clarkson on Fri May 12, 2006 at 01:40:20 PM EST
Parent

It would be good for folks outside the US to know that the majority of Americans aren't minions marching to a theocratic drumbeat.

Most are just uninformed about the Christian nationalist movement. Hence, Talk To Action.

by Bruce Wilson on Fri May 12, 2006 at 01:47:15 PM EST
Parent



And with people like him running the GOP in Texas, the rest of the country still wonders how folks down here can keep electing the likes of Tom DeLay.

What they fail to understand is that everything is relative -- and that compared to someone as extreme as Barton, DeLay looked like a moderate.

Sometimes I have to laugh just to keep from crying.

by moiv on Fri May 12, 2006 at 01:13:39 AM EST


With any small bit of research, a competent human being can quickly find that the Founding Fathers of our great Country were NOT in fact Christians.

One would quickly find that most of the Founding Fathers were in fact, Deists.

Don't be sheep people, learn the truth by doing a little research.

by Athevol on Fri May 12, 2006 at 06:46:32 AM EST


Actually it sounds like crypto-fascism to me.

by drg1138 on Fri May 12, 2006 at 08:21:05 AM EST


by montpellier on Fri May 12, 2006 at 11:01:08 AM EST
Parent


Christian nationalism is different from fundamentalism?

Just how lost can these people be? How lost can they be to put down in black and white that they believe in revisionist history?

Not that which did happen, but that which they believe should have happened.

The original idea of church and state separation, was to keep the state out of the church's affairs.

My, oh my, how that one's been dumped on its ear?

Stuff like this is so totally depressing to me.

I've got fundies, and other deep believers in my own family. I really do try to get into their heads and minds and fathom just where they are, and who they are, and how they can think the way that they do. And all the while it's oh so obvious to me that if they'd been presented with something else, then that's what they'd be basing their lives on.

How come this is as plain as day to me? And, oh so totally lost on the millions of "true believers" out there.

Their mindset is so totally perplexing and alien to me.

And this from someone who spent ten years on two continents in catholic schools.

How is it that I never connected with any of it? Not from the first minute as a five-year old, that I set foot inside a catholic school door and was directed to turn to page 1 and start chanting from the catechism? I simply don't have an answer for it.

The closest I can get is that we're predisposed to whatever it is in life that we're predisposed to. If we come with a religious gene, then I guess we come with a religious gene.

And corrollary to this, beliefs hinge on which region of the planet we were born in.

How could it possibly be any other way?

The strife and the muddle will continue.

by biglot on Fri May 12, 2006 at 09:01:45 AM EST

It didn't 'stick' with me, either, in spite of multiple attempts by my family to make me a 'good' little girl. I think that my proudest moment was when I had to leave 6th grade catechism because I 'asked too many difficult questions' and was considered a 'disruptive influence'. My sin? Telling other little girls that they didn't have to be mommies when they grew up, and that I was going to do what I wanted.

Heh. I did.

by Lorie Johnson on Fri May 12, 2006 at 11:05:22 AM EST
Parent


In my case, it only stuck until I was 12--and they started saying stuff about how Christian heavy metal bands were Satanic (ironically, I have the fact I was a fan of the Christian rock and metal artists Stryper and Petra to thank for being a walkaway now! :3) that made me start questioning.  

I then learned they were lying about other things too (like putting aborted babies in facial cream (false), like how Ozzy Osbourne's song "Suicide Solution" was about telling you to kill yourself (false, it's a song about alcoholism being a form of slow suicide, a message you'd think the teetotalers of my church would agree with!), like how the ERA would require all women to be lesbians and the Boy and Girl Scouts to merge (false, all it stated was you couldn't discriminate on the basis of sex; Boy and Girl Scouting are run by completely separate organisations at that).  I learned that they were BS'ing about how the peace sign was a Satanic symbol (it's derived from the semaphores for "nuclear disarmament", not as an upside-down cross with broken arms!).

The house of cards began to tumble after that; when the televangelist scandals started hitting, I have to admit I wasn't surprised.  (My mother, into the dominionist cult since it started, still trusted the televangelists were "men of God" and accused me of being demon possessed for merely suggesting they might be con men.)

by dogemperor on Fri May 12, 2006 at 11:47:55 AM EST
Parent

It might be very good for aggregating and debunking these sorts of lies.

I'd never heard the foetus/face cream myth before. It would be good to have a compilation of the more outrageous of such Christian right urban myths - with debunkings.

by Bruce Wilson on Fri May 12, 2006 at 01:39:07 PM EST
Parent

I'm actually surprised you never heard it--it was a commonly promoted urban legend in the Assemblies community (then again, this may be one of those things you never see unless you're a dominionist).

Anyways, the urban legend in full claims that products containing "placenta"--usually facial creams or "Placenta Plus" shampoo--contain rendered human fetuses (in fact, they usually contain cattle placenta) and that you were supposedly supporting abortion if you used those products.  (It's an interesting play on some of the reports from the Holocaust of people being rendered into soap or skins of Holocaust victims being made into lampshades.)

In a Google search, I've been able to find a few links to dominionist sources that have made the claim that aborted fetuses are rendered into cosmetics:

Reprint of article, presumably from American Life League, about the "rendered fetuses" urban legend
Newsletter from Life Legal Defense Fund promoting this urban legend (the descriptions used are in fact typical and have only varied by target in the past twenty or so years)
Link from dominionist anti-abortion blog recounting this urban legend (in an increasing trend, combining it with slams against China, in part due to its one-child policy--now abandoned)
Link from South African dominionist group recounting this urban legend (from a group connected with "Third Wave" pentecostalism; as I noted, this urban legend has been promoted in the Assemblies for literally decades)
link from what may be a dominionist Orthodox group promoting this urban legend
Free Republic thread documenting this urban legend
Dominionist  "Baptist" group recounting this urban legend (and also, in an increasing trend in the dominionist community, objecting to use of vaccines cultured in human diploid cells, claiming this is promoting abortion as well; dominionists are increasingly objecting to vaccination because of this, and are even pushing parents to use religious exemption laws in regards to vaccination to "opt out" of jabs--putting kids at risk of catching preventable diseases--and give parents pre-filled forms in regard to opting out (interestingly, one of the "opt-out" vaccines is for hep-B, a vaccine dominionists have opposed children receiving on claims it is a "gay disease" or "druggie disease"))

And that's probably just for starters.

by dogemperor on Fri May 12, 2006 at 07:55:56 PM EST
Parent




Hard as it may be to believe in these days of strident far-right religio-political activism, Christian Fundamentalism has spent a lot more years running like hell away from political involvement in the world at large than not.

Historically, the prevailing attitude has been that there is something inherently sinful in political involvement on the larger scale, that it's too much "of the world" and that believers should focus instead on "the things of Heaven."

Those who have espoused a specifically religious-based society (fundamentalist or otherwise) in modern history have been far more likely to withdraw from "the world" and, in many cases, to establish their own "holy experiments" ranging from Calvinist Geneva and the Puritan New England colonies, the German-based separatist movements (Amish, Old Order Mennonites, Hutterites, and Moravians, all of which are still going strong) and various religious communes such as the Shakers and the Oneida Community (yeah, the silverware people), all the way to the Children of God and the People's Temple.

(Interesting, isn't it, how many of those "holy experiments" were born in, or came to maturity as immigrants to, what's now the "secular" Hew-Hess-of-Hay?)

The U-turn into activism has happened occasionally, but only in recent years has it become a dominant theme in Fundamentalist circles. (For the real history of Christian faith-based social/political activism, we have to look to the Quakers, the Social Gospel, et al.)

That being said, we need to keep in mind that "Fundamentalism" isn't the religious or the political monolith it often appears to be. Beyond the straight-and-narrow basics, Fundamentalists can be as all over the map theologically as the rest of us, and the same goes for their political orientation. Some groups (the Jehovah's Witnesses come to mind; someone correct me if I'm wrong and they've taken a similar turn) still eschew politics. One of my brothers belongs to a "nonpolitcal" Fundamentalist group. And I'm sure there are quite a few others; we tend to forget about them because they're not out there yelling.


by anomalous4 on Sat Jul 08, 2006 at 04:12:28 PM EST
Parent



Here's the link to Michelle's Fresh Air show:

Ne w Book Examines Christian Nationalism

I'm just about finished reading the book. It's quite riveting.

by Lorie Johnson on Fri May 12, 2006 at 09:16:26 AM EST


I'm a pretty ardent Catholic, and I can say that this line of thinking (Christian Nationalism) is completely against Christ's teachings. It's so obvious, I have to have pity on these people because they are so misguided.

Christians should be IN the world, not OF the world, meaning we have to be here and participate, but we should not seek to run secular affairs. Christ even said, "Render unto Ceasar what is Caesar's" -- meaning "Do what you have to do to exist in this world, but do not be too concerned with running its affairs".

We are called to speak the truth and illuminate the world about the love of God and how Sin tears us apart, creates hate instead of love, misery instead of happiness, dispair instead of Hope.

As you may recall, Catholics have got excited about involvement in secular affairs on several occasions in history and EVERY SINGLE TIME it was a complete disaster. Humanity and the Church itself suffered for it.

Now you have protestants who have rejected their roots and gone astray and now they're doomed to repeat the same crimes.

All this boils down to the sin of PRIDE --- they think that they can do better and alter God's plan. Pride is the deadliest of all sins because, as you're seeing, it replaces God's will with the individual's will.

by cmyers on Fri May 12, 2006 at 09:16:58 AM EST

by the way, i wasnt trying to preach. i was just trying to give insight into how those 'other' Christians think about things like nationalism (both Christian and secular).

by cmyers on Fri May 12, 2006 at 11:21:21 AM EST
Parent
There are currents of belief on the Christian right which hold that Catholicism is not actual Christianity, or even that it is "witchcraft". Some maintain the Catholic church is a tool of the devil.

Anti Catholic sentiments in America never went away, but lately they've been growing.

by Bruce Wilson on Fri May 12, 2006 at 01:51:07 PM EST
Parent

Bruce, I expected to get flamed for my comment. My experience with the left, and left-leaning sites has been complete opposition of anything religious. I was immediately turned ON to this site because it approaches the subject of religion, and specifically Christianity from a left-leaning viewpoint, but without immediately dismissing religion as some stupid kooky cultism that the Right practices.

Thank you for not flaming me and for furthering intelligent debate by making a truthful (albeit pithy ;) ) comment about the state of affairs. I mean that sincerely, not sarcastically.

I was a rabid Right Winger protestant and recently (few years ago) converted to Catholicism and it has opened my eyes to how nationalism and the concept of 'freedom' (the American version of it) are blinding Christians in general.

Catholicism calls us to transcend nationalism and aspire to communion with all humanity (under Christ of course, but most people can identify with the first part, at least). The Church is actually very left leaning in social matters -- its very pro-worker rights and collective bargaining, it's very human rights concious (one of the very few organizations crying out about the genocide in the Sudan, Nigeria, and Chad), and very human dignity concious (poverty, war, refugees, etc). These are positions not common associated with the Religious Right.

I have found myself leaning a little more to the left, at least w/r/t to political, national, and foreign policy concerns (not morality, though I'm more compassionate to causes I was normally mean or downright hateful towards like homosexuality, abortion, etc). For example, American nationalism is grossly arrogant and self-destructive. We indulge ourselves so much in our own affairs and own concerns that we essentially ignore the plight of much of the world. We're not good stewards of God's creation (environment -- though I'm perhaps not as environmentalist as many of those on the left). We talk about Christianity and God all the time, and then go off an do terrible things in its and His name (and no, I'm not JUST referring to Iraq).

I think the evangelical movement in America means well, I really do, it's just that they have such a perverted and dangerous view of Christianity, that I'm not sure any amount of logic, reason, truth, or even quoting of Scripture will change their minds.

It took a major reformation in the late 1500's to turn the Catholic Church around (unfortunately it spawned a terrible schism and led many Christians astray in the process). I wonder if great strife isn't coming for Evangelical Christianity and another reformation and schism isn't coming again -- to the detriment of everyone and the Church.

by cmyers on Fri May 12, 2006 at 05:32:23 PM EST
Parent

Talk To Action is doing something new : it is neither for nor against religion, and it's written into the site guidelines that members should not criticize religious faith per se. Occasionally, diatribes against religion are indeed removed from the site.

The one exception to that general rule concerns religious faiths that are "domionist" or "supremacist" - faiths which claim an inherent divine right to dominate entire governments and societies.

On the other hand, proselytization is also against the site guidelines....

It's a very fine line to walk.

In a sense, you could think of the Talk To Action approach to religion and politics as a "libertarian" approach : individual faith can and does inform individual politics. How that could possibly be otherwise ? But individuals and faiths - even majority faiths - do not have the right to use government and the public sphere ( or the "public square" ) to impose their faith on others and entire societies. There is a sphere that is appropriately secular, and secular does not mean "anti-religious" : it means "a-religious".

As far as reactiveness of the left towards religion goes, I've noticed that in the past, and I've actually noticed a sea change in the last few years and even the last few months :  what was once incomprehension, dismissal, and sometimes ridicule has shifted to alarm and fear. I think the fear has been building and long latent but is just now consciously surfacing.

In terms of the gradual awakening of the American left to the fact that religion is a force in politics, I think that process of psychological accomodation is very similar to Kubler Ross' 5 "5 Stages of Death and Dying" : Denial, Anger, Bargaining, Depression, Acceptance ( I hope I've gotten that correct ).  I think many on the American left are at least moving out of the denial stage.

In any case, welcome to Talk To Action !

by Bruce Wilson on Sat May 13, 2006 at 09:33:20 AM EST
Parent






As a minor heads up to the folks paying for the bandwidth, apparently this article, and Talk2Action as a whole, made it on fark.com this morning.

Fark.com, as an aside, is quite possibly one of the most heavily visited sites on the Internet, and articles featured on Fark and on Slashdot tend to get very heavy visitation.  We will probably be doing a lot of educating people over the next few days.

Good job, folks.  All of you :3

by dogemperor on Fri May 12, 2006 at 01:17:11 PM EST

I think today's traffic will be around X20 of average. But, I think the site merits even more.

by Bruce Wilson on Fri May 12, 2006 at 01:43:16 PM EST
Parent

I'm putting on my Christian cowboy boots and doing a jig. My spurs are jangling. And that's no horseshit!

by jhutson on Fri May 12, 2006 at 05:49:39 PM EST
Parent


at last, our work is paying off. Each week some new insight into the attacks on our country and our churches emerges and attracts new ears and new voices. Michelle, this is marvelous, and I am leaving my office immediately to purchase your book. I just this week signed a contract with a New York publishing firm to write one on how this manifests itself in the inner workings of our local congregations. We hope to have it out by next spring. Having fought this battle alone for too many years, it is refreshing and energizing to continuously find new allies. And the more voices that emerge, then the more the message is heard, and the less we are all seen as lonely conspiracy theorists: that card just can no longer be played. As one of my local pastors said to me yesterday, people that used to think we were making this stuff up are putting the pieces together. He tells me he reads this site every day now, and many of his colleagues are joining him. Good stuff!
Shalom, Rev. Dr. John C. Dorhauer "Time makes ancient good uncouth; we must onward still and upward who would keep abreast of truth." from Lowell, "The Present Crisis"
by John Dorhauer on Fri May 12, 2006 at 04:41:06 PM EST
That's great. I'm looking forward to it.

It is very good that this story is breaking into the open. As I've written before, the documentation of succesful conspiracies is the bread and butter of professional historians. Humans conspire for advantage - is that so strange or unthinkable ?  And, those involved in conspiracies often do not engage in them out of self interest. It is very easy to fall into the trap of vilifying conspiracy. But in the end all that matters is documentation - that is what distinguishes real conspiracy from hearsay or wild eyed speculation.

At a certain point, an accumulation of evidence - and the publicization of that evidence - can lead to a "tipping point".

The documentation of financial and other connections between the IRD and "renewal" groups, and documentation of how those groups operate has raised this issue - attacks on the mainline churches - to the level of fact.

So, now, we're at a tipping point. It's long overdue.


by Bruce Wilson on Sat May 13, 2006 at 09:47:31 AM EST
Parent



Thank you for bringing to attention this troubling movement. I never knew it in this manifestation of a written theology, though I have seen the effects they have had on young minds first hand.

I have seen the act of 'witnessing' in my high school and college (both in Georgia). Students (and parishioners) are encouraged by their pastors to stand openly in busy places and proclaim loudly (read: yell) their faith and our perceived sins. Often they focused on a selection of extreme biblical views applicable to their `audience.'

In high school many students did this during breakfast in our cafeteria before classes, often despite the obvious discomfort of other students. The administration's initial response was that of indifference. In college, many times, there was an individual who stood outside the cafeteria speaking far more `damnation' and even apocalyptic warnings, though fully endorsed by a gaggle of near-campus ministries.

I discussed his actions often with like-minded students, who had only to say that it was profound. Other students sought to have him silenced, but were met with near disgust by the staff. Some students made it a mission, then, to share the same venue for their own beliefs, only to be met with threats from students and warnings of expulsion from the administration.

I realize this may be a normal, healthy activity for young southern zealots and such indifference is to be expected of a small-town community. However, increasingly I find such methods and goals spreading to the arena of political activism and finding their ways into the decision-making of public officials. I realized, then, there was a program, rooted in both societies, to undermine political processes through organized religion.

The Christian community is highly influential, though I believe most Christians do not wish to push their beliefs on others. However, as a fundamental part of that faith, it is hard to ignore their organizations' increasingly ambitious and accelerating actions to this aim. I'm glad that there is a campaign to educate people about the threat of religious beliefs tacitly affecting the actions of our nation.

by jcampbell on Fri May 12, 2006 at 10:07:04 PM EST

Depending on how one might define that term. Actually, we are a loose association of determined individuals.

In other words, the problem has not been solved, and the "solution" is still wildly inadequate to address the problem.

We have to start somewhere though.

Welcome to Talk To Action.

by Bruce Wilson on Sat May 13, 2006 at 09:51:43 AM EST
Parent



thank god i live in canada.
well, not god, i don't believe in him/her so much anymore.

someone's description of people yelling bible verses in Georgia really struck me as awful. No offence to all of you Southrons, but I don't know if a Jew like me could survive it among the evangelicals down there. And someone preaching during breakfast at school cafeteria? I generally have a no prostelyzing before 9 AM rule in my life. I'm glad to live in a country and attend a high school where faith is more or less left off the table. Pray all you want, i just don't want to hear about it.

Someone above mentioned the ERA act which was shot down about 20 years ago and the fallacies which some church/es had spread about it. Funny because up until Reagan became president the GOP(God's own Party) was in favour of the ERA act. Maybe it was Reagan feeling like he had to throw Fallwell and the other moral majority folks a bone for helping him win an election. Now the ERA act is gone, just the start of the Republican party becoming the Chrisitan Party. Within a few years, the majority of Republicans were anti-abortion, anti-homosexual, and Reagan was touting his "family values". All bullshit. The religious right is the republican party, right down to their shit-eating-grin leader George W. and his Christian coalition friends.

I hope Jeb doesn't get elected, there would be way too many American women coming up here for abortions.

by hirsh39 on Fri May 12, 2006 at 10:35:14 PM EST

But, the Christian right is well entrenched in Canada and on the move.

by Bruce Wilson on Sat May 13, 2006 at 09:54:40 AM EST
Parent


I just finished reading Kingdom Coming yesterday, and I would wholeheartedly recommend it to anyone concerned about the very real threat the Christian right poses to the separation of church and state.

She mixes in personal conversations with a lot of well-researched data, making it an enjoyable and informative read.

I found the book particularly useful as someone who is just starting to learn more and more about the influence of the Christian right, because Goldberg brings to light so many key people, ideas, and organizations that are essential to be aware of.

I thorougly enjoyed this book, and look forward to seeing what else Goldberg comes out with in the future....


by bright on Wed Nov 01, 2006 at 11:08:30 PM EST


A constitution is a piece of paper and society is more than a piece of paper.

The founding fathers obviously intended America to be a slave-owning society: but it didn't turn out like that.

On the assumption that "origin is essence", the American origin is surely Christian, and its subsequent history of conquest was partly enacted in terms of "Christian vs. heathen". Thus, the tendency towards domination - in the name of Christ or colour - is an American, indeed one would say, European tendency.

As Americans, you cannot feel the full impact of your tendency towards domination as we, the dominated, can. Under Democrats and Republicans, we have been dominated in the name of democracy. Under Bill Clinton, we had democracy shoved down our collective throats and this continued under George Bush until we gagged on it - and America had to impose military rule to stop violence going out of control.

We'll probably never know how may women have been raped or how many young men murdered by the thugs of the political parties, but the ultimate blame rests with you. These monsters were created and sustained by US - Democratic as well as Republican - foreign policy.

From here, we don't see any difference between your religious or secular values.

http://www.axisoflogic.com/artman/publish/article_23393.shtml

by Iftekhar on Sun Sep 20, 2009 at 01:05:51 PM EST



WWW Talk To Action


Refuting Nullification, Part One
The emerging influence of Thomas J. Woods and other neo-Confederate ideologues within the Catholic Right was the focus of the first post in this......
By Frank Cocozzelli (0 comments)
The Film the Christian Right Does Not Want You to See
The acclaimed documentary God Loves Uganda, which depicts the role of American conservative evangelicals in generating vicious antigay campaigns in Uganda will be screened......
By Frederick Clarkson (0 comments)
Reflections One Month after the Boston Marathon Bombing
A month after the Boston Marathon Bombing, the unified response here in the Boston area is the slogan "Boston Strong," which I see on......
By Chip Berlet (0 comments)
The Partisan Preacher's Complaint: Franklin Graham Has No Grounds To Whine About IRS
The ongoing scandal over the Internal Revenue Service's heightened scrutiny of Tea Party groups took another twist yesterday when evangelist Franklin Graham complained that......
By Rob Boston (3 comments)
`Merry Christmas' In May?: Texas Legislators Reaffirm Right To Use Holiday Greeting
Texas legislators appear to have too much time on their hands. Members of the House of Representatives just passed legislation protecting everyone's right to......
By Rob Boston (5 comments)
Why Nullification Matters
In the first post in this series, I discussed the push for secession and nullification now being made by Catholic Right Neo-Confederates, notably Thomas......
By Frank Cocozzelli (5 comments)
Rios Montt, Hero to the Christian Right, Guilty of Genocide in Guatemala
Former Guatemalan dictator and darling of the American Christian Right, Rios Montt, was found guilty of genocide, making world news. ABC News has a......
By Bill Berkowitz (8 comments)
"It's Great to be a Government-Paid Missionary"
These are the exact words of Maj. Douglas W. Duerksen, a military chaplain, which you can hear for yourself in the embedded video below.......
By Rachel Tabachnick (2 comments)
Mark Sanford and His Free Pass from Religion
Mark Sanford, recently elected Congressman from South Carolina, has hit the airwaves with a startling comeback. The former governor of the state, hid in......
By wilkyjr (7 comments)
Christian Right Default: Blame the Jews
This past week we saw a remarkable example of the whipping-up of outrage over the alleged persecution of Christians. The story turned out to......
By Frederick Clarkson (2 comments)
Investigating the Indiana Family Institute
The Indiana Society of Professional Journalists gave Andy Kopsa its 2012 award for Best Investigative Reporting for a newspaper under 40,000 in circulation.  And......
By Frederick Clarkson (0 comments)
Thomas E. Woods, Jr. and the Neo-Confederate Catholic Right
Thomas Woods is an increasingly influential  player on the Catholic Right. In this and a subsequent post, we will consider how his world view......
By Frank Cocozzelli (3 comments)
Memo To The Religious Right: You Don't Need The Government To Tell You When To Pray
Thursday is the National Day of Prayer, and if you want to pray, by all means have at it.I'll let you in on a......
By Rob Boston (3 comments)
Book in 2012 Predicted Boston Bombing Motive
A book published in 2012 predicted the motive for the suspects in the Boston Marathon bombing. Terrorist's Creed, by professor Roger Griffin, explains how......
By Chip Berlet (0 comments)
The End of the Literature of Pooh Poohery about Dominionism?
It is no small thing that Sally Quinn, doyenne of religion at The Washington Post, seems to have turned around on the problem of......
By Frederick Clarkson (1 comment)

Christian Hate For Hire
The Chairwoman of Republican Liberty Caucus of Washington (the Ron Paul formation), is Sandi Brendale, wife of Philip Brendale–a featured speaker at the regional Anti-Indian Conference held in Bellingham on April 6. Sandi Brendale,......
Jay Taber (3 comments)
Mississippi high school forces students to attend Christian lectures: lawsuit
Reposted from Raw Story: A high school in central Mississippi allegedly forced students to watch a Christian video and listen to church officials preach about Jesus Christ. The American Humanist Association's legal center filed......
COinMS (0 comments)
PA Candidate Max Myers Advocates Theocratic Church Governance
I'm working on a story to go with this video, but for now here's just the video. For context, see Rachel Tabachnick's story, NAR Leader Running for Governor in Pennsylvania - As a Democrat......
Bruce Wilson (1 comment)
Former Maranatha Pastor Stars as Thomas Jefferson in Fox and Friends Segment
I wasn't planning on playing Seven Degrees of Maranatha Campus Ministries this evening, but was instead perusing my usual array of news and opinion websites when I found this gem on Talking Points Memo:......
ulyankee (5 comments)
American Family Association launching drive to influence 2014 elections
CBN's David Brody has learned that the American Family Association is greasing the wheels for an effort to influence the 2014 elections.  The American Renewal Project, an AFA-affiliated group that helped push Prop 8......
Christian Dem in NC (2 comments)
Kevin Swanson encourages Christian educators to break law and push religion on kids
cross-posted at dKos Kevin Swanson of Generations Radio was in rare form on his podcast yesterday.  He decried the numerous Supreme Court decisions that have resulted in government-mandated prayer being barred from the public......
Christian Dem in NC (1 comment)
Far-right religious group behind 'Path to 9/11' film continues to infiltrate mainstream media
‘Path to 9/11’ director David Cunningham, who was outed a few years ago as a member of the far-right group Youth with a Mission, has been toiling away on a number of media projects......
unholyalliances (1 comment)
S. 3526: Military Religious Freedom Act of 2012
My senator, Roger Wicker, has introduced the Military Religious Freedom Act of 2012. A couple of things here: 1.) It's very interesting that it bears the exact same name as the Military Religious Freedom......
COinMS (2 comments)
West Point cadet drops out to protest influence of fundamentalist Christianity
Blake Page was a senior at the United States Military Academy, slated to graduate in May.  He was due to be commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Army, and once he left the......
Christian Dem in NC (2 comments)
Brownback endorses major fundie/dominionist prayer rally on Saturday
Those of you in the Kansas City/Topeka area, be on alert--there's going to be a major invasion of fundie lunacy in Topeka on Saturday.  And it has the endorsement of none other than Kansas'......
Christian Dem in NC (2 comments)
Why is the religious right defending an unrepentant con man who preyed on minority communities?
All indications are that the religious right is rallying to the defense of Jews Offering Alternatives for Healing (JONAH), the "pray away the gay" outfit that is facing a lawsuit from four former clients......
Christian Dem in NC (1 comment)
Mike Bickle's Sexually Charged "Bridal Mysticism" IHOP Teachings
I've been picking through Mike Bickle's teachings on Bridal Mysticism and the Song of Solomon - which Bickle seems to view as allegorical for the end-time relationship of the church (the Bride of Christ)......
Bruce Wilson (19 comments)
Rick Joyner and Bob Jones delude themselves into thinking Obama will help them
Two days ago, I mentioned that Rick Joyner hosted a post-election "webinar" with another NAR leader, Bob Jones.  In it, Joyner and Jones actually laughed about the damage wrought by Hurricane Sandy because......
Christian Dem in NC (2 comments)
NAR leaders LAUGH about destruction wrought by Hurricane Sandy
If you want to get a picture of how fundamentally sick and twisted the New Apostolic Reformation is at bottom, I offer as an example a video recently released by Rick Joyner. Yesterday, Joyner......
Christian Dem in NC (16 comments)
Rick Joyner, who wants to set up a dictatorship, accuses Obama of wanting to set up tyranny
Last Sunday, Rick Joyner told his flock at MorningStar Fellowship Church in Fort Mill, South Carolina (only 20 minutes south of me--gag) that if Obama is reelected, he plans to set up "the worst,......
Christian Dem in NC (5 comments)

More Diaries...




All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments, posts, stories, and all other content are owned by the authors. Everything else © 2005 Talk to Action, LLC.