IRD memo as evidence of Conspiracy
John Dorhauer printable version print page     Bookmark and Share
Tue Oct 16, 2007 at 12:51:24 PM EST
Over the next few weeks, I want to focus attention on an internal document of the Institute on Religion and Democracy called "Reforming America's Churches Project: 2001 -2004 Executive Summary."

Written in 2001, this document reads like a grant application from the IRD to their benefactors. It is a request for $3.6 million to fund their mission. They believe "that the next four years offer a rare opportunity to redirect these churches away from their reflexive alliance with the political left and back towards classical Christianity." It is a document that gives us great insight into the machinations, intentions, and orchestrations of the IRD.

I have written lately about the various trips I have taken in response to Steeplejacking - a book I co-wrote with my colleague Rev. Sheldon Culver based on our experiences with churches who have been targeted by trained activists deployed to foment dissent and to drive a wedge of separation between their members and the wider church. To make my case, I bring only two documents with me.

The first is a letter written in 1982 by then President of the United Church of Christ Avery Post warning the denomination about the IRD, imploring them not to wait for this organization to launch its attacks in our local congregations. The second is this Executive Summary.

Sheldon and I are often called `Conspiracy Theorists' - a derisive term when used by our detractors who intend to discredit our research and diminish the impact of our message.

We have come to embrace the term: it is exactly what we are. We are not shy about it anymore. There is a conspiracy to dismantle our churches, to demoralize our denominational leaders, and to diminish the impact of the voice of social conscience, moderation, and liberality that has come to characterize much of Protestant Christianity throughout the history of America.

At any of the public hearings I conduct about this, the simple recitation of tactics outlined in the document I have discovered to be quite sufficient to make the case of conspiracy. I will use the next few weeks to share the content of this document with you.

First, in order to theorize about a conspiracy, there must be partners willing to ally themselves with one another as co-conspirators. Let's take the opportunity today to name and identify them. (In the coming days, we will also need to identify their common goal, in other words that which compels them to ally themselves with one another against a common enemy or target; their tactics, strategies, and tools of implementation; their end game).

There are a number of places in this internal document that name those with whom the IRD will form an alliance. At the top of the second page, we see this:

Grassroots Expansion -- IRD's three denominational committees are Episcopal Action, United Methodist Action and Presbyterian Action. All three empower conservative church members with reporting about their church structure that they will not otherwise hear. IRD is giving special attention to reform of the United Methodist Church, America's third largest religious body, and the largest denomination under Religious Left control. UM Action Briefing currently goes to 275,000 households. Its circulation is expected to be over 500,000 by the start of 2004. Episcopal Action places a key role in the American Anglican Council, an alliance of nearly all the conservative Episcopal renewal groups. Presbyterian Action operates within the Presbyterian renewal movement as a source of proposals to restructure church agencies and re-orient their social message. The circulation for Episcopal Action and Presbyterian Action should grown from 8,000 to 36,000 in the next four years.

They are naming at this point three of their own committees, each of which has a network of allied individuals who are empowered by them "with reporting about their church structure that they will not otherwise hear." Please make note of the kinds of numbers they have and intend to build into their network.

This would be consistent with our own experience. In every church in which we enter, we discover a group of people who call themselves a "Research Committee." Their responsibility is to uncover the untold truth about the denomination, and their reports are derivations on the same theme: the evil liberals have stolen the denomination. The origins of these reports are always left unnamed, and met the almost universal response: "we downloaded them from the internet."

Just two paragraphs further into the document, we read this:

Association for Church Renewal/Next Generation Project -- We are a chief organizer of this coalition of conservative/evangelical renewal groups in all the major mainline churches. The association allows us to synchronize strategies across denominational lines and to counteract the influence of liberal ecumenical groups, such as the National and World Councils of Churches. Key to the longer-range success of the church reform movement is recruiting a younger generation of reformers. The IRD has the experience, expertise, connections and vision to recruit and train young church members for this task.

Pay attention to that opening statement: "We are a chief organizer of this coalition..." Many renewalists make the claim that they have no connection to the IRD, or that the connection does not manifest itself in any tangible way. Here, though, the IRD states clearly that they are a chief organizer of this `coalition' (their language.) Further, as we have long argued and the co-conspirators have long denied, they write that this Association "allows us to synchronize strategies across denominational lines." To find out who these renewalists are that have allied themselves in order to synchronize their strategies across denominational lilnes, check out the IRD website page that lists them, and come back in the following weeks to read more about what this alliance creates for  their trained activists.
NO, there is no conspiracy here! Again, in their own words, the IRD has the "experience, expertise, connections, and vision to recruit and train..."

Recruit and train: next week I want simply to track the use of that latter verb throughout this document - train. It is important we do that, since one of the primary roles of the IRD is to train activists (their language) to be deployed in out local churches.

For now, though, let me restate the case clearly and succinctly: this is a conspiracy. An alliance has been formed between the IRD and renewal groups deployed in all of the major Protestant denominations. Their goal is to diminish, demoralize, and demean them.




Display:
Clearly, this is the executive summary of a request for long term funding. IRD has never denied the authenticity of the document on which a fair amount of reporting has been based.

Also, the conspiracy you point to is not a theory, it's a fact.  One of the things I say when skeptics of this or that use the "conspiracy theory" charge, is to simply point out that every group or coalition of groups makes plans. Sometimes they are secret, or at least not publicly known.  

It is absurd to say that the IRD and the related renewal groups have not made plans, some of them secret or at least not public.  Indeed, we know a fair amount about the plans and activities of the IRD and its affiliates, the pooh poohers not withstanding.

The document you reference above is certainly proof of IRD's intentions on many aspects of what we have been talking about for so long, even if it doesn't lay out the entire plan, and is a few years old now.

This is significant because the intentions of groups and individuals are not always easy to prove. Those who are well-informed about the divisive fights in their denominations over the past few years can now see an important part of what has been driving them, if they choose to.

by Frederick Clarkson on Tue Oct 16, 2007 at 02:10:23 PM EST

Calling it a 'memo' is taking this a bit too lightly. This is an eleven page document which, as you say, makes it ever so clear what the INTENTIONS are. This document - which came late to my attention, in other words after all of my own theories about the conspiracies had been developed and after I had been accused over and over again of not having any proof (only that which I witnessed first hand in my own churches) - supports every facet of the theory we deduced at the end of our research into these dynamics. It truly does amount to proof - which is why it is the only document I need bring with me (save the letter from Avery Post) when I present our case to the public. It alone suffices.
Shalom, Rev. Dr. John C. Dorhauer "Time makes ancient good uncouth; we must onward still and upward who would keep abreast of truth." from Lowell, "The Present Crisis"
by John Dorhauer on Tue Oct 16, 2007 at 09:03:06 PM EST
Parent


Clear, concise analysis like this greatly helps all of us who are working to shine light on the IRD's intent to harm the mainline churches.  I look forward to hearing more in this series, and will incorporate this into my work also.

by Steven D. Martin on Tue Oct 16, 2007 at 09:33:08 PM EST

John,

It seems you are making the case that since the IRD says they are the coordinator of these efforts, it should be believed.  And that groups involved "with reporting about their church structure that they (parishioners) will not otherwise hear." are formally allied with the IRD.

Or is "formally allied" too strong?  And is there another way to characterize that relationship?

I would agree that groups which publish unflattering, critical and otherwise unknown flaws and failings of their denomination are doing part of what the IRD wants done.  But a conspiracy means more than just this, doesn't it.  Isn't the implication in "conspiracy" that of communication, of talking together, intentionally coordinating efforts?  

I don't think you'd assert that any critic of the UCC is informed, manipulated, in communication with or otherwise allied with the IRD just because they are doing some ofwhat the IRD thinks ought to be done, would you?

I know this may be irritating, but I don't mean it to be.  I am not someone who dismisses your efforts though some of my cyber-friends do.  I want to press you on making your case as firmly and objectively as is possible so that those who are less willing (as opposed to those flatly unwilling) might hear.

And maybe the response to this is simply "stay turned, Don."

p.s. I can't find a list on the IRD site.


by Don Niederfrank on Wed Oct 17, 2007 at 09:27:21 AM EST

You write:

"Isn't the implication in "conspiracy" that of communication, of talking together, intentionally coordinating efforts?"

How else do you interpret the following:
"We are a chief organizer of this coalition of conservative/evangelical renewal groups in all the major mainline churches"

And the very next sentence:
"The association allows us to synchronize strategies across denominational lines"

'Synchronizing strategies'; 'chief organizers'; 'all the major denominations' - that is conspiratorial language. Am I arguing that every person who attacks, criticizes, or disparages the denomination or its leaders or knowingly involved in this conspiracy? No. Am I arguing that regardless of their level of knowledge or intent they are influenced by, and indirectly complicitous with, the more willing conspiratorialists? Yes, for some of the material that they discover or download or have unwittingly sent to them was produced by those synchronizing their strategies across denominational lines.

As for the list: when you open the IRD website, scroll down about 2/3 of the way down the page and in the left hand margin you will see a menu option for ACR - click on that and it opens a page for the Association for Church Renewal, and in the center of the page, mayber two inches down from the top, will be a series of highlighted choices, one of which is 'member organizations.' Click on that, and you will see a list of the current IRD allied Renewal Movements.

And, finally, yes - I am going to say 'stay tuned' - over the next few weeks, I will be highighting the language from the IRD document.
Shalom, Rev. Dr. John C. Dorhauer "Time makes ancient good uncouth; we must onward still and upward who would keep abreast of truth." from Lowell, "The Present Crisis"
by John Dorhauer on Mon Oct 22, 2007 at 09:14:40 AM EST
Parent

My doubt--and it is doubt not outright disbelief--is in the source of those words you quote, i.e. a 5 y.o. fund-raising letter from a disreputable organization.

I have no doubt that the IRD has been working in the three denominations it has targeted.

I've posted a response to BWF's affiliation with Association For Church Renewal which seems to be closely tied to the IRD.  My response in part--
This may be one of the stupidest things BWF has done...  Whatever nefarious purposes would-be-warriors want to attribute to this misguided group, this reduces their credibility with folks like me, and contrary to public portrayal, we are legion in the UCC.  And we do write checks.

I think I am most saddened for some of the good-hearted folk I know in the BWF and for a denomination, which at least nominally, seeks to be "united and uniting..."

Staying tuned...

by Don Niederfrank on Mon Oct 22, 2007 at 11:26:45 AM EST
Parent

There is no doubt about the aunthenticity of this document. Have you followed the link and read the document yourself? That would help. In the coming weeks, I will continue to refer to it, so it would be a great help to actually download it yourself, print a copy, and read through it.

To their credit, early on the Faithful and Welcoming group was called on the carpet for their alliance with the IRD (unlie the BWF, they actually had a direct link from their website to the IRD's) and immediately, at least publicly, broke that tie.
Shalom, Rev. Dr. John C. Dorhauer "Time makes ancient good uncouth; we must onward still and upward who would keep abreast of truth." from Lowell, "The Present Crisis"
by John Dorhauer on Tue Oct 23, 2007 at 11:05:07 AM EST
Parent



UCC Truths is not on the list on the IRD's ACR page.  Has it recently been removed?

by Rusty Pipes on Fri Oct 26, 2007 at 04:55:27 AM EST
Parent
BFW is, as is another UCC group. But not UCC Truths.

by Frederick Clarkson on Sat Oct 27, 2007 at 08:53:42 PM EST
Parent





WWW Talk To Action


Cognitive Dissonance & Dominionism Denial
There is new research on why people are averse to hearing or learning about the views of ideological opponents. Based on evaluation of five......
By Frederick Clarkson (5 comments)
Will the Air Force Do Anything To Rein In Its Dynamic Duo of Gay-Bashing, Misogynistic Bloggers?
"I always get nervous when I see female pastors/chaplains. Here is why everyone should as well: "First, women are not called to be pastors,......
By Chris Rodda (4 comments)
The Legacy of Big Oil
The media is ablaze with the upcoming publication of David Grann's book, Killers of the Flower Moon. The shocking non fiction account of the......
By wilkyjr (0 comments)
Gimme That Old Time Dominionism Denial
Over the years, I have written a great deal here and in other venues about the explicitly theocratic movement called dominionism -- which has......
By Frederick Clarkson (4 comments)
History Advisor to Members of Congress Completely Twists Jefferson's Words to Support Muslim Ban
Pseudo-historian David Barton, best known for his misquoting of our country's founders to promote the notion that America was founded as a Christian nation,......
By Chris Rodda (6 comments)
"Christian Fighter Pilot" Calls First Lesbian Air Force Academy Commandant a Liar
In a new post on his "Christian Fighter Pilot" blog titled "BGen Kristin Goodwin and the USAFA Honor Code," Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Jonathan......
By Chris Rodda (0 comments)
Catholic Right Leader Unapologetic about Call for 'Death to Liberal Professors' -- UPDATED
Today, Donald Trump appointed C-FAM Executive Vice President Lisa Correnti to the US Delegation To UN Commission On Status Of Women. (C-FAM is a......
By Frederick Clarkson (2 comments)
Controlling Information
     Yesterday I listened to Russ Limbaugh.  Rush advised listeners it would be best that they not listen to CNN,MSNBC, ABC, CBS and......
By wilkyjr (4 comments)
Is Bannon Fifth-Columning the Pope?
In December 2016 I wrote about how White House chief strategist Steve Bannon, who likes to flash his Catholic credentials when it comes to......
By Frank Cocozzelli (3 comments)
Ross Douthat's Hackery on the Seemingly Incongruous Alliance of Bannon & Burke
Conservative Catholic writer Ross Douthat has dissembled again. This time, in a February 15, 2017 New York Times op-ed titled The Trump Era's Catholic......
By Frank Cocozzelli (2 comments)
`So-Called Patriots' Attack The Rule Of Law
Every so often, right-wing commentator Pat Buchanan lurches out of the far-right fever swamp where he has resided for the past 50 years to......
By Rob Boston (1 comment)
Bad Faith from Focus on the Family
Here is one from the archives, Feb 12, 2011, that serves as a reminder of how deeply disingenuous people can be. Appeals to seek......
By Frederick Clarkson (6 comments)
The Legacy of George Wallace
"One need not accept any of those views to agree that they had appealed to real concerns of real people, not to mindless, unreasoning......
By wilkyjr (6 comments)
Betsy DeVos's Mudsill View of Public Education
My Talk to Action colleague Rachel Tabachnick has been doing yeoman's work in explaining Betsy DeVos's long-term strategy for decimating universal public education. If......
By Frank Cocozzelli (7 comments)
Prince and DeVos Families at Intersection of Radical Free Market Privatizers and Religious Right
This post from 2011 surfaces important information about President-Elect Trump's nominee for Secretary of Education, Betsy DeVos. -- FC Erik Prince, Brother of Betsy......
By Rachel Tabachnick (21 comments)

Respect for Others? or Political Correctness?
The term "political correctness" as used by Conservatives and Republicans has often puzzled me: what exactly do they mean by it? After reading Chip Berlin's piece here-- http://www.talk2action.org/story/2016/7/21/04356/9417 I thought about what he explained......
MTOLincoln (5 comments)
Fear
What I'm feeling now is fear.  I swear that it seems my nightmares are coming true with this new "president".  I'm also frustrated because so many people are not connecting all the dots! I've......
ArchaeoBob (6 comments)
"America - love it or LEAVE!"
I've been hearing that and similar sentiments fairly frequently in the last few days - far FAR more often than ever before.  Hearing about "consequences for burning the flag (actions) from Trump is chilling!......
ArchaeoBob (6 comments)
"Faked!" Meme
Keep your eyes and ears open for a possible move to try to discredit the people openly opposing Trump and the bigots, especially people who have experienced terrorism from the "Right"  (Christian Terrorism is......
ArchaeoBob (8 comments)
More aggressive proselytizing
My wife told me today of an experience she had this last week, where she was proselytized by a McDonald's employee while in the store. ......
ArchaeoBob (5 comments)
See if you recognize names on this list
This comes from the local newspaper, which was conservative before and took a hard right turn after it was sold. Hint: Sarah Palin's name is on it!  (It's also connected to Trump.) ......
ArchaeoBob (3 comments)
Unions: A Labor Day Discussion
This is a revision of an article which I posted on my personal board and also on Dailykos. I had an interesting discussion on a discussion board concerning Unions. I tried to piece it......
Xulon (5 comments)
Extremely obnoxious protesters at WitchsFest NYC: connected to NAR?
In July of this year, some extremely loud, obnoxious Christian-identified protesters showed up at WitchsFest, an annual Pagan street fair here in NYC.  Here's an account of the protest by Pagan writer Heather Greene......
Diane Vera (3 comments)
Capitalism and the Attack on the Imago Dei
I joined this site today, having been linked here by Crooksandliars' Blog Roundup. I thought I'd put up something I put up previously on my Wordpress blog and also at the DailyKos. As will......
Xulon (2 comments)
History of attitudes towards poverty and the churches.
Jesus is said to have stated that "The Poor will always be with you" and some Christians have used that to refuse to try to help the poor, because "they will always be with......
ArchaeoBob (13 comments)
Alternate economy medical treatment
Dogemperor wrote several times about the alternate economy structure that dominionists have built.  Well, it's actually made the news.  Pretty good article, although it doesn't get into how bad people could be (have been)......
ArchaeoBob (5 comments)
Evidence violence is more common than believed
Think I've been making things up about experiencing Christian Terrorism or exaggerating, or that it was an isolated incident?  I suggest you read this article (linked below in body), which is about our great......
ArchaeoBob (7 comments)
Central Florida Sheriff Preached Sermon in Uniform
If anyone has been following the craziness in Polk County Florida, they know that some really strange and troubling things have happened here.  We've had multiple separation of church and state lawsuits going at......
ArchaeoBob (2 comments)
Demon Mammon?
An anthropologist from outer space might be forgiven for concluding that the god of this world is Mammon. (Or, rather, The Market, as depicted by John McMurtry in his book The Cancer Stage of......
daerie (2 comments)
Anti-Sharia Fever in Texas: This is How It Starts
The mayor of a mid-size Texan city has emerged in recent months as the newest face of Islamophobia. Aligning herself with extremists hostile to Islam, Mayor Beth Van Duyne of Irving, Texas has helped......
JSanford (3 comments)

More Diaries...




All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments, posts, stories, and all other content are owned by the authors. Everything else 2005 Talk to Action, LLC.