Barton Revises History to Promote the National Council On Bible Curriculum In Public Schools
Chris Rodda printable version print page     Bookmark and Share
Sat Mar 24, 2007 at 01:25:19 AM EST
picture signifying Christian right Bible course for public schoolsOn October 2, 2006, revisionist historian David Barton launched WallBuilders LIVE!, a daily radio program, which airs on the Sirius FamilyNet channel as well as a handful of traditional radio stations. The third guest to appear on the program was Elizabeth Ridenour, president of the National Council On Bible Curriculum In Public Schools, an organization whose advisory board includes Barton.

To listen to the entire program, go to the WallBuilders LIVE! archive and choose either October 4, 2006 or January 16, 2007 (the same program was aired twice).

Before introducing Ridenour, Barton and his co-host Rick Green had an interesting little chat about the history of the Bible in American education in which Barton presented an even more blatant version of a lie that appears in his books -- books which are, of course, recommended by the National Council On Bible Curriculum.

After citing a few irrelevant 17th century laws from the then theocratic colonies of New England, Barton continued with the following:

Now by the time you get to the founding fathers -- I mean we'd had education going then for 140...50...60 years and yes the Bible was definitely in schools, and they took steps to make sure that it stayed in schools. One of the things that we have in the WallBuilders library is one of the rarest books in the world. It is a Bible. It's called the Bible of the Revolution. When it was printed in 1782 they printed 20,000 and there's 26 left in the world today, and -- so we have one - the Library of Congress, etc. -- but what's really cool about that Bible is it was printed by the U.S. Congress and the records of Congress say that this is quote "a neat edition of the Holy Scriptures for the use of our schools" end quote. So, there you have the founding fathers - we just win the Revolution, we just whip the British at Yorktown - and they say let's get a Bible -- by the way let's print one in Congress -- by the way let's make sure we use it in our schools -- and that Bible actually has a Congressional endorsement in the front, which makes it pretty clear where the founding fathers stood on the Bible in schools.

The very first federal public education law they passed, the Northwest Ordinance, said that your public schools had to teach religion, morality, and knowledge. Now that's a federal law that they passed -- which by the way they passed at the at same time they were doing the First Amendment -- they certainly didn't think the First Amendment was going to stop religion in schools, and since they had just done a Bible for the use of schools, you know good and well that that's what they thought as part of religion and morality in schools was the Bible they had just done in Congress for schools.

Needless to say, none of this is true.

Barton mixes two different lies here, combining a distortion of the Northwest Ordinance with his lie about the 1782 Aitken Bible, but I'm going to confine this article to the Bible story, a lie that has been used for over 150 years to promote Bible reading in schools. For those who want to read about Barton's erroneous claim that the Northwest Ordinance required that religion be taught in public schools, the chapter from my book on that subject is available as a free download on my website.

There are many versions of the Aitken Bible story in the religious right American history books, all worded to mislead that Congress either requested the printing of the Bibles, granted Aitken permission to print them, contracted him to print them, paid for the printing, or had the Bibles printed for the use of schools. Congress did none of these things. All they did was grant one of several requests made by Aitken by having their chaplains examine his work, and allowing him to publish their resolution stating that, based on the chaplains' report, they were satisfied that his edition was accurate. The words "a neat edition of the Holy Scriptures for the use of schools" are taken from a letter written by Aitken,(1) not the resolution of Congress.

According to Barton, in his book Original Intent:

"… Robert Aitken, publisher of The Pennsylvania Magazine, petitioned Congress on January 21, 1781, for permission to print the Bibles on his presses here in America rather than import them." and "On September 12, 1782, the full Congress approved that Bible, which soon began rolling off the presses."

From William Federer's America's God and Country Encyclopedia of Quotations:

"Robert Aitken (1734-1802), on January 21, 1781, as publisher of The Pennsylvania Magazine, petitioned Congress for permission to print Bibles, since there was a shortage of Bibles in America due to the Revolutionary War interrupting trade with England. The Continental Congress, September 10, 1782, in response to the shortage of Bibles, approved and recommended to the people that The Holy Bible be printed by Robert Aitken of Philadelphia. This first American Bible was to be 'a neat edition of the Holy Scriptures for the use of schools'"

Elsewhere in the same book, Federer presents a second version of the story, in which Aitken was "contracted" by Congress to print his Bibles:

"Congress of the Confederation September 10, 1782, in response to the need for Bibles which again arose, granted approval to print 'a neat edition of the Holy Scriptures for the use of schools.' The printing was contracted to Robert Aitken of Philadelphia, a bookseller and publisher of The Pennsylvania Magazine, who had previously petitioned Congress on January 21, 1781."

The actual resolution of Congress is edited in various ways, the purpose of which is to omit that Congress also had a secular reason for recommending Aitken's Bible, and, in most cases, to make it appear that the resolution was a recommendation of the Bible itself, rather than a recommendation of the accuracy of Aitken's work.

The following is a typical edited version of the resolution, from James T. Hutson's Religion and the Founding of the American Republic exhibit on the Library of Congress website:

"Congress 'highly approve the pious and laudable undertaking of Mr. Aitken, as subservient to the interest of religion...in this country, and...they recommend this edition of the Bible to the inhabitants of the United States.'"

This was the entire resolution:

Whereupon, Resolved, That the United States in Congress assembled, highly approve the pious and laudable undertaking of Mr. Aitken, as subservient to the interest of religion as well as an instance of the progress of arts in this country, and being satisfied from the above report, of his care and accuracy in the execution of the work, they recommend this edition of the Bible to the inhabitants of the United States, and hereby authorise him to publish this recommendation in the manner he shall think proper.(2)

The secular benefit of this resolution, omitted by Hutson and others, was that it acknowledged "an instance of the progress of arts in this country." Publicizing the accuracy of Aitken's Bible was a great way to promote the American printing industry. Few American printers at this time were printing books. Most limited their businesses to broadsides, pamphlets, and newspapers. The books that were printed in America were not only more expensive than those imported from England, but had a reputation for being full of errors. Congress knew that as soon as the war was over and books could once again be imported, any progress that the book shortage had caused in the printing industry would end. The war had created an opportunity for American printers to prove themselves, and Robert Aitken had done that. Printing an accurate edition of a book as large as the Bible was a monumental task for any printer, and Congress wanted it known that an American printer had accomplished it.

Robert Aitken actually asked Congress for quite a bit more than they gave him. In addition to his work being examined by the chaplains, Aitken requested that his Bible "be published under the Authority of Congress,"(3) and that he "be commissioned or otherwise appointed & Authorized to print and vend Editions of the Sacred Scriptures."(4) He also asked Congress to purchase some of his Bibles and distribute them to the states. None of these other requests were granted. The only help Aitken ever got from Congress was the resolution endorsing the accuracy of his work.

David Barton called this Bible The Bible of the Revolution, as do many Christian American history websites, and a handful of books. According to Mark Beliles and Stephen McDowell, in their book America's Providential History:

"In 1782, Congress acted the role of a Bible society by officially approving the printing and distribution of the 'Bible of the Revolution,' an American translation prepared by Robert Aitken."

The Aitken Bible was dubbed The Bible of the Revolution in 1930, when Robert Dearden and Douglas Watson, who were trying to sell over five hundred Aitken Bible leaves, had single leaves, along with facsimilies of various documents related to this Bible, made into books. The books were sold as An Original Leaf from the Bible of the Revolution, and an Essay Concerning It By Robert R. Dearden, Jr. and Douglas S. Watson. The essay written for this book by Dearden and Watson contains many of the same lies about Congress and the Bible used by today's religious right.

A number of myths about the Aitken Bible have been perpetuated by antique book dealers selling these Dearden and Watson leaves, who describe the Bible as small enough to fit in the coat pocket of the soldiers, implying that this was the reason for its size. Some of these book dealers also list the other documents printed in the book, including what is often described as "the text of George Washington's letter commending Robert Aitken for helping to meet the American soldiers' need for Bibles."

Washington did write a letter regarding the Bibles, but it was not a letter to commend Robert Aitken for helping to meet the American soldiers' need for Bibles. These Bibles never even ended up in the hands of the soldiers. Washington's letter was a reply to a letter from Aitken's friend Dr. John Rodgers, a Presbyterian minister who was trying to help Aitken sell his Bibles to Congress.

By the time Aitken finished his Bible, the war was winding down. He knew that if peace was declared, and trade with England resumed, he would be stuck with thousands of Bibles that he would never be able to sell. On September 9, 1782, three days before Congress passed their resolution, Aitken wrote the following to John Hanson, the President of Congress, requesting that Congress buy some of the Bibles.

It need not be suggested to the Wisdom of that Honourable Body that the Monarchs of Europe have hitherto deemed the Sacred Scriptures peculiarly worthy of the Royal Patronage, nor that a Work of such magnitude must nearly crush an individual unless assisted by exterior Aid in supporting so great a weight; nor will I presume to prescribe the Mode in which Such Aid may be afforded; but I beg leave to intimate, that as I apprehend my greatest risque arises from the Near Approach of Peace, my utmost wishes would be accomplished if Congress will purchase a proportion of the edition on Acct of the United States. One Fourth of it will not Amount to 200 Bibles for each State; And as I am anxious merely to secure the sale of the Books, it will not be inconsistent with my views to allow a Moderate Credit.(5)

As already mentioned, this request was denied. Eight months later, despite his anticipation of a great demand for Bibles in America, the resolution of Congress, and no competition from imports, Aitken hadn't sold many Bibles. In April 1783, Congress officially declared the end of hostilities, and the army was beginning to disband. In May 1783, Aitken tried again to get Congress to buy his Bibles - this time to give as gifts to the soldiers being discharged. Aitken knew that Congress would deny the request if he made it himself, so he had Rodgers write to George Washington, suggesting not only that Congress buy the Bibles for the soldiers, but that Washington propose the idea as if it was his own. Congress, of course, would be extremely unlikely to deny a request that came from George Washington.

The following is from Dr. Rodgers's letter:

There is another Subject I beg Leave to mention to your Excellency, & that is the case of a worthy citizen of these states, Mr. Robert Aitkin, who has published an Edition of the Bible in our Language; and which was undertaken at a Time when that sacred book was very scarce & the Inhabitants of these States in great Want of it--but the peculiar difficulty & expence attending a Work of such Magnitude in the then State of our Country delayed it's Completion till the Approach of Peace; and British Bibles being imported much cheaper than he can afford to sell His, He is like to be ruined by His generous Effort in behalf of our Divine Religion--Painful Thought, and not very honorable is this rising Empire, that the first Man who undertook to print the holy Scriptures in our language in America, Should be beggared by it.

What I would take the Liberty to suggest to your Excellency, is the presenting each Soldier, & Non Commissioned Officer in the American Army, with a Copy of this Bible, by Congress, on their being disbanded. This would serve not only to save a deserving Citizen from Ruin who highly Merits Attention; but would serve to furnish those brave Men to whom America is so greatly indebted for their Liberties, in the Hand of Heaven with a sure Guide to eternal Life, if they will but take heed to it.

Such are the Obligations that your Country, & Congress as their grand representation, are under to your Excellency, and such is just Sense they have of these obligations, that a Line from your Excellency to Congress on the Subject, and I would wish it as a *** Motion of your own, would probably have the desired Effect--I take a Liberty--to suggest the Thought, and your Excellency will make such Use of it as your Prudence shall dictate.(6)

The following was Washington's reply:

Your proposition concerning Mr. Aikin's Bibles would have been particularly noted by me, had it been suggested in season, but the late Resolution of Congress for discharging part of the Army, taking off near two thirds of our numbers, it is now too late to make the attempt. It would have pleased me well, if Congress had been pleased to make such an important present to the brave fellows, who have done so much for the security of their Country's rights and establishment.(7)

This letter was nothing more than a polite reply to Dr. Rodgers. It is highly unlikely that Washington would have asked Congress to buy the Bibles, even if the idea had been proposed earlier. Most of the soldiers being discharged were owed months, or even years, of back pay and Congress was deeply in debt. Dissent among the officers, who feared that Congress wouldn't have the money to pay their promised pensions, was so bad that a group of politicians was able to instigate the Newburgh Conspiracy. With the goal of raising money to pay the country's debts, these politicians hatched a plot to scare the American people into allowing Congress to impose taxes on them, a power that it didn't have under the Articles of Confederation. A few anonymous addresses was all it took to get some of Washington's officers to cook up what would look like a threat of an armed takeover of the government by the disgruntled army. Washington had just managed to put a stop to this a few months before receiving Dr. Rodgers's letter. In another incident not long after this, a mob of armed soldiers marched into Philadelphia demanding their pay, surrounding the State House and forcing the Congress to move to Princeton. It's a pretty safe bet that Washington would have been far more concerned with paying the soldiers than giving them Bibles.

Robert Aitken ended up losing over £3,000 on the 10,000 Bibles he printed. (Barton's number of 20,000 is incorrect.) Religious right history authors don't like to mention that the Aitken Bible sold poorly, and those who do blame it solely on the competition of cheaper British Bibles. The problem with this, however, is that although Aitken was clearly concerned when he completed his Bible in September 1782 that the end of the war would hinder its sales, he did end up having quite a bit of time with no competition. His Bible was completed seven months before the end of hostilities was declared by Congress, and over a year before the peace treaty with Great Britain was ratified. According to the treaty, American ports would not be open to British ships until all British troops were removed, which was clearly going to take a while, so the possibility of a supply of imported Bibles was still uncertain even at this point.

In 1777, Rev. Francis Alison, in a memorial to Congress regarding his idea to alleviate the Bible shortage by printing an edition in Philadelphia, speculated that the "number of purchasers is so great, that we doubt not but a large impression would soon be sold."(8) Obviously, Rev. Alison greatly overestimated the demand for Bibles because, in 1782, after five more years without a supply, Robert Aitken couldn't sell his. In what was his only factual statement about the Aitken Bible, David Barton called it one of the rarest books in the world. Even well over a century ago, fewer than fifty copies were thought to exist. The presumable explanation for its rarity? Hardly any of the 10,000 Bibles printed were ever sold, and the piles of unsold copies were eventually thrown out.


1. Papers of the Continental Congress, National Archives Microfilm Publication M247, r48, i41, v1, p63.
2. Gaillard Hunt, ed., Journals of the Continental Congress, 1774-1789, vol. 23, (Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1914), 574.
3. Papers of the Continental Congress, National Archives Microfilm Publication M247, r48, i41, v1, p63.
4. ibid.
5. ibid., M247, r90, i78, v1, p421.
6. John Rodgers to George Washington, May 30, 1783, George Washington Papers at the Library of Congress, 1741-1799: Series 4, General Correspondence.
7. George Washington to John Rodgers, June 11, 1783, ibid.
8. Papers of the Continental Congress, National Archives Microfilm Publication M247, r53, i42, v1, p35

Previous articles in this series on Historical Revisionism from the National Council On Bible Curriculum In Public Schools:

More Historical Revisionism from the National Council On Bible Curriculum In Public Schools - 3/18/ 2007
Historical Revisionism from the National Council On Bible Curriculum In Public Schools - 3/10/2007




Display:

Since most of my posts here tend to be quite long, I've decided to omit from the posts themselves some of the quotes and other information not essential to understand the story, and instead post a comment at the end for those who want to read the other documents I refer to, as well as related documents that some might find interesting. Images of most of these documents are already on my website, in a "footnote archive" that I created to allow those reading my book to easily check its footnotes and read longer excerpts of the documents cited, so, what I'm going to do here is post a link to the appropriate footnote page, and then provide the footnote numbers for the applicable documents.

Everything listed here can be found at http://www.liarsforjesus.com/footnotes_1.htm

The memorial of Robert Aitken to the Continental Congress regarding the printing of his Bibles, (footnotes #1, 3, and 4 in my post), is at footnote #8 on the webpage.
(This document includes Aitken's other requests, which were denied by Congress, and is the source of the misused phrase -"a neat edition of the Holy Scriptures for the use of schools.")

The letter from the Continental Congress to its chaplains requesting that they examine Aitken's Bible for accuracy is at footnote #12; and the report of the chaplains at #13.

Other related stuff...

Robert Aitken was still broke in 1790, and used the financial losses from (and a few lies about) his 1782 Bible in an failed attempt to get George Washington to have him appointed as the printer to the new Congress. Footnote #17 has images of the correspondence related to this.

As I mentioned at the beginning of my post, the Aitken Bible lie has been used for over 150 years. Footnote #18 is an example of this, showing its use in 1849 by Rev.W.P. Strickland in History of the American Bible Society from its Organization to the Present Time.
(David Barton, in his book Original Intent, accurately quotes from Rev. Strickland's book several times. When he quotes from this part related to the Bible in schools, however, he misrepresents the book itself, making it appear to be a secular history book rather than a Bible society publication. He refers to Rev. Strickland not by name, but only as"an early historian," and omits the word"Bible" from the book's title in his endnote, so it reads "History of the American Society…")

by Chris Rodda on Sat Mar 24, 2007 at 01:35:01 AM EST


Your car is beyond a mere mode of transport. Rather, it's your best friend and companion - accompanying you in almost every walk of life. So, it's your prime duty to take good care of your friend. Although timely services help combat breakdowns to a certain extent,    Auto-repair


by johnlaw827 on Fri May 09, 2014 at 02:28:50 AM EST

Well, that is actually good news to hear. I have always given a thought about the importance of bringing in some revision to the bible curriculum which we have started to follow from a long time now. And I hope to see that it is done in a proper way.

EHR

by Mason863 on Mon May 04, 2015 at 12:19:35 AM EST



WWW Talk To Action


Thoughts on the Finale of the Finn Debacle
Now that Bishop Robert Finn has finally resigned his leadership of the Diocese of Kansas City-St. Joseph, Missouri -- here are some final thoughts......
By Frank Cocozzelli (2 comments)
DeVos and School Privatization Funders Backing Philadelphia Democratic Mayoral Candidate
The Betsy DeVos-led American Federation for Children (AFC) and its core funders have spent more than fifteen million dollars in Pennsylvania over the last......
By Rachel Tabachnick (0 comments)
Religious Right Rabbi: Christian Coalition Favorite Daniel Lapin Resurfaces
Back in the 1990s when I was regularly covering the antics of TV preacher Pat Robertson's Christian Coalition, one part of the job was......
By Rob Boston (0 comments)
Christian Right leaders escalate anti-LGBTQ threats
As marriage equality has advanced around the country, and the U.S. Supreme Court is set to rule on the issue in June, threatening language......
By Frederick Clarkson (1 comment)
Could Support for LGBTQ Rights Disrupt the Coalition of Jews and Evangelical Christian Zionists?
Some might say that the relationship between the conservative US Jewish community and Evangelicals is inviolable, with support for Israel being the cement that......
By Bill Berkowitz (1 comment)
Whine Festival: Second-Tier Religious Right Leaders Still Don't Like Marriage Equality
The U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments tomorrow in Obergefell v. Hodges, the marriage equality case.In preparation for this, a sad collection of......
By Rob Boston (0 comments)
Whither the Christian Right in the Democratic Party?
You don't have to be a Hillary hater (and I'm not) to recognize that Clinton and other Democratic Party leaders have had long and......
By Frederick Clarkson (1 comment)
Bishop Robert Finn Resigns Leadership of St. Joseph-Kansas City Diocese
Bishop Robert W. Finn, the Opus Dei Bishop who was convicted by a Missouri court for failing to report suspected child abuse by a......
By Frank Cocozzelli (5 comments)
Two Overlooked Indiana Outcomes that Could Haunt the Christian Right
I think there are two underreported features of the fallout from Indiana that we should make sure do not get lost in the hoo......
By Frederick Clarkson (2 comments)
Terms, Definitions & Glossaries for Writing about the Religious Right
One of the challenges in writing about the Religious Right and what to do about it is the matter of terms and definitions. That's......
By Frederick Clarkson (0 comments)
President Obama Can Help Stop Religious Discrimination
Barry Lynn, the longtime executive director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, recently posted an important essay at Huffington Post. In......
By Frederick Clarkson (0 comments)
Marriage Matters: Thoughts On The Recent Unpleasantness In Indiana
Last week I taped an interview with Sister Maureen Fielder, host of "Interfaith Voices," a popular radio program exploring religious issues that is carried......
By Rob Boston (1 comment)
The Campaign Against Pro-LGBTQ Denominations
The recent endorsement of marriage equality by the Presbyterian Church (USA) seemed like a good moment to discuss the campaign to divide and conquer......
By Frederick Clarkson (0 comments)
Upcoming Conference: From Abortion Rights to Social Justice
The 29th annual conference From Abortion Rights to Social Justice: Building the Movement for Reproductive Freedom will be held from April 10-12 at Hampshire......
By Frederick Clarkson (2 comments)
Why Is Bishop Robert Finn Still In Power?
As I reported in September 2014, Bishop Robert Finn, head of the Diocese of Kansas City-St. Joseph, Missouri has been under Vatican investigation to......
By Frank Cocozzelli (2 comments)

Demon Mammon?
An anthropologist from outer space might be forgiven for concluding that the god of this world is Mammon. (Or, rather, The Market, as depicted by John McMurtry in his book The Cancer Stage of......
daerie (0 comments)
Anti-Sharia Fever in Texas: This is How It Starts
The mayor of a mid-size Texan city has emerged in recent months as the newest face of Islamophobia. Aligning herself with extremists hostile to Islam, Mayor Beth Van Duyne of Irving, Texas has helped......
JSanford (0 comments)
Evangelicals Seduced By Ayn Rand Worship Crypto-Satanism, Suggest Scholars
[update: also see my closely related stories, "Crypto-Cultists" and "Cranks": The Video Paul Ryan Hoped Would Go Away, and The Paul Ryan/Ayn Rand/Satanism Connection Made Simple] "I give people Ayn Rand with trappings" -......
Bruce Wilson (10 comments)
Ted Cruz Anointed By Pastor Who Says Jesus Opposed Minimum Wage, and Constitution Based on the Bible
In the video below, from a July 19-20th, 2013 pastor's rally at a Marriott Hotel in Des Moines, Iowa, Tea Party potentate Ted Cruz is blessed by religious right leader David Barton, who claims......
Bruce Wilson (0 comments)
Galt and God: Ayn Randians and Christian Rightists Expand Ties
Ayn Rand's followers find themselves sharing a lot of common ground with the Christian Right these days. The Tea Party, with its stress on righteous liberty and a robust form of capitalism, has been......
JSanford (3 comments)
Witchhunts in Africa and the U.S.A.
Nigerian human rights activist Leo Igwe has recently written at least two blog posts about how some African Pentecostal churches are sending missionaries to Europe and the U.S.A. in an attempt to "re-evangelize the......
Diane Vera (1 comment)
Charles Taze Russell and John Hagee
No doubt exists that Texas mega-church Pastor John Hagee would be loathe to be associated with the theology of Pastor C.T. Russell (wrongly credited with founding the Jehovah's Witnesses) but their theological orbits, while......
COinMS (0 comments)
A death among the common people ... imagination.
Or maybe my title would better fit as “Laws, Books, where to find, and the people who trust them.”What a society we've become!The wise ones tell us over and over how the more things......
Arthur Ruger (0 comments)
Deconstructing the Dominionists, Part VI
This is part 6 of a series by guest front pager Mahanoy, originally dated November 15, 2007 which I had to delete and repost for technical reasons. It is referred to in this post,......
Frederick Clarkson (1 comment)
Republican infighting in Mississippi
After a bruising GOP runoff election for U.S. Senator, current MS Senator Thad Cochran has retained his position and will face Travis Childers (Democrat) in the next senate election. The MS GOP is fractured......
COinMS (5 comments)
America's Most Convenient Bank® refuses to serve Christians
Representatives of a well known faith-based charitable organization were refused a New Jersey bank’s notarization service by an atheist employee. After inquiring about the nature of the non-profit organization and the documents requiring......
Jody Lane (5 comments)
John Benefiel takes credit for GOP takeover of Oklahoma
Many of you know that Oklahoma has turned an unrecognizable shade of red in recent years.  Yesterday, one of the leading members of the New Apostolic Reformation all but declared that he was responsible......
Christian Dem in NC (2 comments)
John Benefiel thinks America is under curse because Egyptians dedicated North America to Baal
You may remember that Rick Perry put together his "Response" prayer rallies with the help of a slew of NAR figures.  One of them was John Benefiel, an Oklahoma City-based "apostle."  He heads up......
Christian Dem in NC (5 comments)
Mississippi Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
Yes, that's right. We have totally lost our religious freedom in Mississippi and it must be restored by our legislators. ......
COinMS (2 comments)
Bill Gothard accused of harassing women and failing to report child abuse
Surprised no one's mentioned this, but one of the longest-standing leaders of the religious right is in a world of trouble.  Bill Gothard has been active in the fundie movement for over half......
Christian Dem in NC (2 comments)

More Diaries...




All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments, posts, stories, and all other content are owned by the authors. Everything else 2005 Talk to Action, LLC.