A Ten Rock in the Park
Frederick Clarkson printable version print page     Bookmark and Share
Wed Mar 04, 2009 at 07:36:15 PM EST
I was honored to be asked to guest post at the blog of the American Constitution Society regarding the recent unanimous decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Pleasant Grove City vs. Summum. This required my diving into the fascinating decision itself and several concurring opinions. While I don't disagree with the conclusion, (I am, after all, but a humble scribe)  there is a lot of worrisome stuff in how Justice Alito reached his conclusion. And none other than Jay Sekulow, a leading litigator of Religious Right causes, is declaring victory in the case and for the future. This is cross posted from the ACS Blog, where it originally appeared.

The Supreme Court recently unanimously denied that a religious group had a free speech right to place a monument to its "Seven Aphorisms" in a town public park near where a monument to the Ten Commandments has stood for decades.  

Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the Court (PDF) in Pleasant Grove City v. Summum was at pains to say that the decision was limited to saying that Summum had no free speech right to place their presumptuous Seven Rock in the park near the dear old traditional Ten Rock. But Justice Antonin Scalia insisted, in a concurring opinion, that although Pleasant Grove City was "litigated in the shadow the First Amendment's Establishment Clause," there were no establishment clause implications to worry about. He was joined in his concurrence by Justice Clarence Thomas. Me thinks they doth protest too much, so let's stick a red flag on that point. We will return to it shortly.

While it makes sense, as the Court suggested, that public parks not be cluttered with monuments lest they start to look more like cemeteries than nice open spaces for baseball, frisbee, picnics, and public rallies, the justices sidestepped the obvious question of why should local governments be memorializing one religious doctrine over another in public places at all. (I know that they might take issue with that assertion, but that is how I see it.) From this distance, it seemed to take Alito a lot of fancy two-stepping to get to his claim that this is a case of "government speech" and that monuments of are a way that a community seeks to "identify itself." It is the latter part of this formulation that is interesting and concerning.

While that in itself might not be anything to get excited about, what troubles me is not so much the decision but Alito's main precedents, or at least his antecedents. Alito et al do not invoke the history of American religious freedom, the ongoing struggle for equality, why the establishment and free exercise clauses of the first amendment were necessary in the first place, or much about the role of the court as a guarantor of our rights under the Constitution. We hear nothing from Locke, Madison or Jefferson. And while such ancient philosophical statements may not be de rigueur in cases like this, they would be far more reassuring than the court's invocation of the way that kings and emperors "used statues of themselves to remind their subjects of their authority and power."

Pardon my populism, but as I recall we fought a revolution against cats like that.

Here is the full quote from Justice Alito, writing for the Court: (You can almost feel the glory speaking to us down through the ages.)

Governments have long used monuments to speak to the public. Since ancient times, kings, emperors, and other rulers have erected statutes of themselves to remind their subjects of their authority and power. Triumphal arches, columns, and other monuments have been built to commemorate military victories and sacrifices and other events of civic importance. A monument, by definition, is a structure that is designed as a means of expression. When a government entity arranges for the construction of a monument, it does so because it wishes to convey some thought or instill some feeling in those who see the structure.

The justices continued:

Accordingly... Government decision makers select the monuments that portray what they view as appropriate for the place in question, taking into account such content-based factors as esthetics, history, and local culture.

The accepted monuments are meant to convey and have the effect of conveying a government message and thus constitute government speech.

Even when a monument features the written word the monument may be intended to be interpreted, and may in fact be interpreted by different observers, in a variety of ways.

It suddenly occurred to me that all this sounded strangely familiar. Eventually, it came to me: In Through the Looking Glass, by Lewis Carroll, Alice encounters Humpty Dumpty, and the following exchange ensues:

"When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, `it means just what I choose it to mean -- neither more nor less.'

`The question is,' said Alice, `whether you can make words mean so many different things.'

`The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, `which is to be master -- that's all.'"

Indeed.

That said, Alito et al acknowledged the "legitimate concern that the government speech doctrine not be used as a subterfuge for favoring certain viewpoints" and that "government speech must comport with the Establishment Clause." Problem is that the concern is legitimate because there is little wiggle room regarding the intentions of those who place Ten Rocks in public spaces, unless of course, one allows one's imagination to wander sufficiently to consider other interpretations and possible meanings after someone files a lawsuit; or the display is crafted to appear to stand up to current latitudinous judicial scrutiny.

But will there be judicial recourse available in the wake of Pleasant Grove City's apparent grandfathering in of majoritarian religious monuments? Apparently not. Alito suggests that if, in the unlikely event that a violation of the establishment clause could be inferred on an occasion such as this, the people can make their views known in the next election because pols, (stating the obvious) are "ultimately accountable to the electorate and the political process for its advocacy." Okay. But who will ensure the rights of minority religions, the local park commissioner?

This brings us back to Scalia and Thomas's less than reassuring rush to reassurance. They invoke the 2003 case of Van Orden v. Perry, in which "this Court upheld against Establishment Clause challenge a virtually identical Ten Commandments monument, donated by the very same organization (the Fraternal Order of Eagles), which was displayed on the grounds surrounding the Texas State Capitol. ... all the Justices agreed that government speech was at issue, but the Establishment Clause argument was nonetheless rejected ... because the Ten Commandments "have an undeniable historical meaning" in addition to their "religious significance."

Well, there you have it. History and majoritarian tradition may be unambiguously established under the rubric of government speech. (At least according to Scalia and Thomas.)

Justice David Souter was the only one to worry about the religious establishment implications of Pleasant Grove City: "But the government could well argue, as a development of government speech doctrine, that when it expresses its own views, it is free of the Establishment Clause's stricture against discriminating among religious sects or groups. Under this view of the relationship between the two doctrines, it would be easy for a government to favor some private religious speakers over others by its choice of monuments to accept."

Souter's concern is borne out by the victory statement by Jay Sekulow, Chief Counsel for the American Center for Law and Justice, who represented Pleasant Grove City before the high court. "It's a significant decision that clears the way for government to express its views and its history through the selection of monuments - including religious monuments and displays."

What is particularly odd in all this is that there were two purposes behind the stone monument donated by the Fraternal Order of Eagles to Pleasant Grove City - and some 145 sites in 34 states (including the one on the grounds of the Texas State Capitol.) One was to promote public morality, (and a group of national religious leaders was assembled to find a version of Ten Commandments they could agree on for the purpose). But the whole thing was also part of a Hollywood publicity stunt intended to promote the film The Ten Commandments, starring Charlton Heston. At the dedication of the first Ten Rock at the International Peace Garden on the North Dakota-Canadian border in 1956, Heston, who played Moses in the film declared:

"The Ten Commandments have become the basis for the whole code of human law."

It is odd indeed, that a Hollywood movie promotion lengthens the shadow of the monuments of emperors and kings into our time. But it works for Sekulow. And we can expect that he will make the most of the opportunity to litigate further erosions of the wall of separation of church and state.




Display:
that allows government entities to exempt themeselves from adherence to the establishment clause of the first amendment -- all in the name of "government speech" seems to be an epic bad idea.

by Frederick Clarkson on Thu Mar 05, 2009 at 02:04:04 PM EST

What Alito, and the other justices did was demonstrate their total ignorance of the Establishment Clause.

They have made the claim that a government entity can endorse a particular religion over others.

This is absurd.

by drettmann on Mon Mar 09, 2009 at 01:34:28 PM EST

they just don't agree with it and are looking for an escape hatch.

It will be important for people to make some noise about this. If "government speech" becomes a zone of exemption from the establishment clause (among other things), we will be in for a lot of problems.

by Frederick Clarkson on Mon Mar 09, 2009 at 02:56:42 PM EST
Parent




WWW Talk To Action


Cognitive Dissonance & Dominionism Denial
There is new research on why people are averse to hearing or learning about the views of ideological opponents. Based on evaluation of five......
By Frederick Clarkson (5 comments)
Will the Air Force Do Anything To Rein In Its Dynamic Duo of Gay-Bashing, Misogynistic Bloggers?
"I always get nervous when I see female pastors/chaplains. Here is why everyone should as well: "First, women are not called to be pastors,......
By Chris Rodda (4 comments)
The Legacy of Big Oil
The media is ablaze with the upcoming publication of David Grann's book, Killers of the Flower Moon. The shocking non fiction account of the......
By wilkyjr (0 comments)
Gimme That Old Time Dominionism Denial
Over the years, I have written a great deal here and in other venues about the explicitly theocratic movement called dominionism -- which has......
By Frederick Clarkson (4 comments)
History Advisor to Members of Congress Completely Twists Jefferson's Words to Support Muslim Ban
Pseudo-historian David Barton, best known for his misquoting of our country's founders to promote the notion that America was founded as a Christian nation,......
By Chris Rodda (6 comments)
"Christian Fighter Pilot" Calls First Lesbian Air Force Academy Commandant a Liar
In a new post on his "Christian Fighter Pilot" blog titled "BGen Kristin Goodwin and the USAFA Honor Code," Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Jonathan......
By Chris Rodda (0 comments)
Catholic Right Leader Unapologetic about Call for 'Death to Liberal Professors' -- UPDATED
Today, Donald Trump appointed C-FAM Executive Vice President Lisa Correnti to the US Delegation To UN Commission On Status Of Women. (C-FAM is a......
By Frederick Clarkson (2 comments)
Controlling Information
     Yesterday I listened to Russ Limbaugh.  Rush advised listeners it would be best that they not listen to CNN,MSNBC, ABC, CBS and......
By wilkyjr (4 comments)
Is Bannon Fifth-Columning the Pope?
In December 2016 I wrote about how White House chief strategist Steve Bannon, who likes to flash his Catholic credentials when it comes to......
By Frank Cocozzelli (3 comments)
Ross Douthat's Hackery on the Seemingly Incongruous Alliance of Bannon & Burke
Conservative Catholic writer Ross Douthat has dissembled again. This time, in a February 15, 2017 New York Times op-ed titled The Trump Era's Catholic......
By Frank Cocozzelli (2 comments)
`So-Called Patriots' Attack The Rule Of Law
Every so often, right-wing commentator Pat Buchanan lurches out of the far-right fever swamp where he has resided for the past 50 years to......
By Rob Boston (1 comment)
Bad Faith from Focus on the Family
Here is one from the archives, Feb 12, 2011, that serves as a reminder of how deeply disingenuous people can be. Appeals to seek......
By Frederick Clarkson (6 comments)
The Legacy of George Wallace
"One need not accept any of those views to agree that they had appealed to real concerns of real people, not to mindless, unreasoning......
By wilkyjr (6 comments)
Betsy DeVos's Mudsill View of Public Education
My Talk to Action colleague Rachel Tabachnick has been doing yeoman's work in explaining Betsy DeVos's long-term strategy for decimating universal public education. If......
By Frank Cocozzelli (7 comments)
Prince and DeVos Families at Intersection of Radical Free Market Privatizers and Religious Right
This post from 2011 surfaces important information about President-Elect Trump's nominee for Secretary of Education, Betsy DeVos. -- FC Erik Prince, Brother of Betsy......
By Rachel Tabachnick (21 comments)

Respect for Others? or Political Correctness?
The term "political correctness" as used by Conservatives and Republicans has often puzzled me: what exactly do they mean by it? After reading Chip Berlin's piece here-- http://www.talk2action.org/story/2016/7/21/04356/9417 I thought about what he explained......
MTOLincoln (5 comments)
Fear
What I'm feeling now is fear.  I swear that it seems my nightmares are coming true with this new "president".  I'm also frustrated because so many people are not connecting all the dots! I've......
ArchaeoBob (6 comments)
"America - love it or LEAVE!"
I've been hearing that and similar sentiments fairly frequently in the last few days - far FAR more often than ever before.  Hearing about "consequences for burning the flag (actions) from Trump is chilling!......
ArchaeoBob (6 comments)
"Faked!" Meme
Keep your eyes and ears open for a possible move to try to discredit the people openly opposing Trump and the bigots, especially people who have experienced terrorism from the "Right"  (Christian Terrorism is......
ArchaeoBob (8 comments)
More aggressive proselytizing
My wife told me today of an experience she had this last week, where she was proselytized by a McDonald's employee while in the store. ......
ArchaeoBob (5 comments)
See if you recognize names on this list
This comes from the local newspaper, which was conservative before and took a hard right turn after it was sold. Hint: Sarah Palin's name is on it!  (It's also connected to Trump.) ......
ArchaeoBob (3 comments)
Unions: A Labor Day Discussion
This is a revision of an article which I posted on my personal board and also on Dailykos. I had an interesting discussion on a discussion board concerning Unions. I tried to piece it......
Xulon (5 comments)
Extremely obnoxious protesters at WitchsFest NYC: connected to NAR?
In July of this year, some extremely loud, obnoxious Christian-identified protesters showed up at WitchsFest, an annual Pagan street fair here in NYC.  Here's an account of the protest by Pagan writer Heather Greene......
Diane Vera (3 comments)
Capitalism and the Attack on the Imago Dei
I joined this site today, having been linked here by Crooksandliars' Blog Roundup. I thought I'd put up something I put up previously on my Wordpress blog and also at the DailyKos. As will......
Xulon (2 comments)
History of attitudes towards poverty and the churches.
Jesus is said to have stated that "The Poor will always be with you" and some Christians have used that to refuse to try to help the poor, because "they will always be with......
ArchaeoBob (13 comments)
Alternate economy medical treatment
Dogemperor wrote several times about the alternate economy structure that dominionists have built.  Well, it's actually made the news.  Pretty good article, although it doesn't get into how bad people could be (have been)......
ArchaeoBob (5 comments)
Evidence violence is more common than believed
Think I've been making things up about experiencing Christian Terrorism or exaggerating, or that it was an isolated incident?  I suggest you read this article (linked below in body), which is about our great......
ArchaeoBob (7 comments)
Central Florida Sheriff Preached Sermon in Uniform
If anyone has been following the craziness in Polk County Florida, they know that some really strange and troubling things have happened here.  We've had multiple separation of church and state lawsuits going at......
ArchaeoBob (2 comments)
Demon Mammon?
An anthropologist from outer space might be forgiven for concluding that the god of this world is Mammon. (Or, rather, The Market, as depicted by John McMurtry in his book The Cancer Stage of......
daerie (2 comments)
Anti-Sharia Fever in Texas: This is How It Starts
The mayor of a mid-size Texan city has emerged in recent months as the newest face of Islamophobia. Aligning herself with extremists hostile to Islam, Mayor Beth Van Duyne of Irving, Texas has helped......
JSanford (3 comments)

More Diaries...




All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments, posts, stories, and all other content are owned by the authors. Everything else 2005 Talk to Action, LLC.