Speaking at Netroots Nation
Frederick Clarkson printable version print page     Bookmark and Share
Wed Jun 17, 2009 at 06:45:14 PM EST
The annual gathering of progressive political bloggers, Netroots Nation is coming up August 13–16 at the David L. Lawrence Convention Center in Pittsburgh, PA. Conference organizers are beginning to post the agenda.

I have agreed to appear on a panel. But I do not agree with the premises of the panel, "A New Progressive Vision of Church and State, as described. As a matter of fact, that is why I am going.

A New Progressive Vision for Church and State
date and time TBA

The old liberal vision of a total separation of religion from politics has been discredited. Despite growing secularization, a secular progressive majority is still impossible, and a new two-part approach is needed--one that first admits that there is no political wall of separation. Voters must be allowed, without criticism, to propose policies based on religious belief. But, when government speaks and acts, messages must be universal. The burden is on religious believers, therefore, to explain public references like "under God" in universal terms. For example, the word "God" can refer to the ceaseless creativity of the universe and the objective validity of human rights. Promoting and accepting religious images as universal will help heal culture-war divisions and promote the formation of a broad-based progressive coalition.

I expect that I will have more to say about this before and after the conference. But in the meantime, here it is for your consideration.




Display:
Well, you have your work cut out for you.

by Bruce Wilson on Wed Jun 17, 2009 at 08:08:16 PM EST

What a wholesale crock of b*s*

Who in their right mind came up with that one?

by RevDeb on Wed Jun 17, 2009 at 06:59:11 PM EST


I, too, wonder who the "progressives" that came up with this are. It sounds more like an insidious kind of hijacking to me. Once you let a "universal" God into politics, the majority God will quickly take over, leaving us with the God of the religious right. Damn, but this is really scary! Give 'em hell, Fred...

by phatkhat on Thu Jun 18, 2009 at 01:48:32 AM EST

The very premise "a new two-part approach is needed--one that first admits that there is no political wall of separation. Voters must be allowed, without criticism, to propose policies based on religious belief"is so dumb it is not to be believed.

Certainly EVERYONE should be allowed to express their beliefs/ideas/visions, that is what the First Amendment is for. However, once one expresses a religious belief in the political arena it becomes a political idea not a religious one. It is open to criticism and the believer can not hide behind the notion their religion is being attacked when the proposed religious idea is criticized.

Should one be allowed to express their religious belief that homosexuals should be stoned to death and work in the political arena toward that goal and that idea not be severely criticized for advancing such a legal remedy for homosexuals even though it is their sincerely held religious belief?

Separation of Church and State should be absolute. Government should remain neutral in the matter of religion.

And people of faith should not try to get their religious beliefs made into laws.  Look what a mess people of faith got us into with Prohibition.

Look how long it took women to obtain the vote because most religions of the day taught a woman's place was in the home and she could not understand politics.

Religion brought about the Hayes Commission which censored what we could see in movies.

Religion through law kept our businesses closed on Sundays even though Sunday was not a "holy" day for a minority of Americans who possibly wanted to conduct business on Sunday.

The list of "sins" religion has tried to correct in society through law should be a new book for Fred or Rob to write.

If the idea of total separation has been discredited it is because of the lies told by the Right about America being a Christian nation from its founding and because most liberals (read Democrats) have been too cowed to refute these lies.

by JerrySloan on Thu Jun 18, 2009 at 01:49:20 AM EST


There seems to be no end to historical revisionism. Given that the political class concentrates on controlling the electorate rather than representing it, it's not surprising they would latch on to religion to further their duplicitousness. dci
off
by lackawack on Thu Jun 18, 2009 at 02:19:45 PM EST

This description is very odd, I'm not even sure I know what this panel is going to be about.

The old liberal vision of a total separation of religion from politics has been discredited.

I'm not sure anyone has ever advocated total separation of religion and politics, just church and state.  Most liberals still identify as theists, so I assume that some religious beliefs inform their politics.

Despite growing secularization, a secular progressive majority is still impossible, and a new two-part approach is needed--one that first admits that there is no political wall of separation.

America is becoming more secular, with fewer people saying they belong to any particular religious group and slightly lower church attendance.  A secular progessive majority is not possible because most people in America are not liberals/leftists or secular.  I'm not sure what a "political wall of separation" means.

Voters must be allowed, without criticism, to propose policies based on religious belief. But, when government speaks and acts, messages must be universal.

I'm not sure what "without criticism" modifies in the first sentence: the fact that voters shouldn't be criticize for proposing policies based on religious beliefs, or that the policies based on religous beliefs themselves shouldn't be criticized.  In a pluralist democracy, one can propose policies based on their religious beliefs, but one would hope those proposals could be criticized.  One would also hope that when the government speaks or acts, it would do so in a religiously nuetral way.

The burden is on religious believers, therefore, to explain public references like "under God" in universal terms. For example, the word "God" can refer to the ceaseless creativity of the universe and the objective validity of human rights.

This is weird.  "Under God" can't be put into universal terms, since belief in "God" isn't even universal among religious believers (for example, Hindus and most Buddhists).  Most theist who believe in God can't agree amongst themselves on what God really is or wants.  The second second sentence seems to refer to God in a pantheist sense, but I'm not sure.  I don't know if this is some stab at ceremonial deism or civic religion.

Promoting and accepting religious images as universal will help heal culture-war divisions and promote the formation of a broad-based progressive coalition.

I have no idea what this means.  Religious images healing divisions caused by the culture wars?  Are they serious?

Good luck to you, Fred.  You've got your work cut out for you with this panel...

-------------
"I believe in a President whose views on religion are his own private affair" - JFK, Address to the Greater Houston Ministerial Association
by hardindr on Thu Jun 18, 2009 at 08:06:26 PM EST

This is just the panel description of course. The presentation by Professor Ledewitz is supposed to go for 20 minutes, with the rest of us offering critiques.

In the time I have, I imagine that I will be able to make and develop no more than two or three points.

by Frederick Clarkson on Fri Jun 19, 2009 at 11:00:10 AM EST
Parent




WWW Talk To Action


Cognitive Dissonance & Dominionism Denial
There is new research on why people are averse to hearing or learning about the views of ideological opponents. Based on evaluation of five......
By Frederick Clarkson (374 comments)
Will the Air Force Do Anything To Rein In Its Dynamic Duo of Gay-Bashing, Misogynistic Bloggers?
"I always get nervous when I see female pastors/chaplains. Here is why everyone should as well: "First, women are not called to be pastors,......
By Chris Rodda (195 comments)
The Legacy of Big Oil
The media is ablaze with the upcoming publication of David Grann's book, Killers of the Flower Moon. The shocking non fiction account of the......
By wilkyjr (110 comments)
Gimme That Old Time Dominionism Denial
Over the years, I have written a great deal here and in other venues about the explicitly theocratic movement called dominionism -- which has......
By Frederick Clarkson (101 comments)
History Advisor to Members of Congress Completely Twists Jefferson's Words to Support Muslim Ban
Pseudo-historian David Barton, best known for his misquoting of our country's founders to promote the notion that America was founded as a Christian nation,......
By Chris Rodda (113 comments)
"Christian Fighter Pilot" Calls First Lesbian Air Force Academy Commandant a Liar
In a new post on his "Christian Fighter Pilot" blog titled "BGen Kristin Goodwin and the USAFA Honor Code," Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Jonathan......
By Chris Rodda (144 comments)
Catholic Right Leader Unapologetic about Call for 'Death to Liberal Professors' -- UPDATED
Today, Donald Trump appointed C-FAM Executive Vice President Lisa Correnti to the US Delegation To UN Commission On Status Of Women. (C-FAM is a......
By Frederick Clarkson (126 comments)
Controlling Information
     Yesterday I listened to Russ Limbaugh.  Rush advised listeners it would be best that they not listen to CNN,MSNBC, ABC, CBS and......
By wilkyjr (118 comments)
Is Bannon Fifth-Columning the Pope?
In December 2016 I wrote about how White House chief strategist Steve Bannon, who likes to flash his Catholic credentials when it comes to......
By Frank Cocozzelli (250 comments)
Ross Douthat's Hackery on the Seemingly Incongruous Alliance of Bannon & Burke
Conservative Catholic writer Ross Douthat has dissembled again. This time, in a February 15, 2017 New York Times op-ed titled The Trump Era's Catholic......
By Frank Cocozzelli (64 comments)
`So-Called Patriots' Attack The Rule Of Law
Every so often, right-wing commentator Pat Buchanan lurches out of the far-right fever swamp where he has resided for the past 50 years to......
By Rob Boston (161 comments)
Bad Faith from Focus on the Family
Here is one from the archives, Feb 12, 2011, that serves as a reminder of how deeply disingenuous people can be. Appeals to seek......
By Frederick Clarkson (176 comments)
The Legacy of George Wallace
"One need not accept any of those views to agree that they had appealed to real concerns of real people, not to mindless, unreasoning......
By wilkyjr (70 comments)
Betsy DeVos's Mudsill View of Public Education
My Talk to Action colleague Rachel Tabachnick has been doing yeoman's work in explaining Betsy DeVos's long-term strategy for decimating universal public education. If......
By Frank Cocozzelli (80 comments)
Prince and DeVos Families at Intersection of Radical Free Market Privatizers and Religious Right
This post from 2011 surfaces important information about President-Elect Trump's nominee for Secretary of Education, Betsy DeVos. -- FC Erik Prince, Brother of Betsy......
By Rachel Tabachnick (218 comments)

Respect for Others? or Political Correctness?
The term "political correctness" as used by Conservatives and Republicans has often puzzled me: what exactly do they mean by it? After reading Chip Berlin's piece here-- http://www.talk2action.org/story/2016/7/21/04356/9417 I thought about what he explained......
MTOLincoln (253 comments)
Fear
What I'm feeling now is fear.  I swear that it seems my nightmares are coming true with this new "president".  I'm also frustrated because so many people are not connecting all the dots! I've......
ArchaeoBob (107 comments)
"America - love it or LEAVE!"
I've been hearing that and similar sentiments fairly frequently in the last few days - far FAR more often than ever before.  Hearing about "consequences for burning the flag (actions) from Trump is chilling!......
ArchaeoBob (211 comments)
"Faked!" Meme
Keep your eyes and ears open for a possible move to try to discredit the people openly opposing Trump and the bigots, especially people who have experienced terrorism from the "Right"  (Christian Terrorism is......
ArchaeoBob (165 comments)
More aggressive proselytizing
My wife told me today of an experience she had this last week, where she was proselytized by a McDonald's employee while in the store. ......
ArchaeoBob (163 comments)
See if you recognize names on this list
This comes from the local newspaper, which was conservative before and took a hard right turn after it was sold. Hint: Sarah Palin's name is on it!  (It's also connected to Trump.) ......
ArchaeoBob (169 comments)
Unions: A Labor Day Discussion
This is a revision of an article which I posted on my personal board and also on Dailykos. I had an interesting discussion on a discussion board concerning Unions. I tried to piece it......
Xulon (156 comments)
Extremely obnoxious protesters at WitchsFest NYC: connected to NAR?
In July of this year, some extremely loud, obnoxious Christian-identified protesters showed up at WitchsFest, an annual Pagan street fair here in NYC.  Here's an account of the protest by Pagan writer Heather Greene......
Diane Vera (130 comments)
Capitalism and the Attack on the Imago Dei
I joined this site today, having been linked here by Crooksandliars' Blog Roundup. I thought I'd put up something I put up previously on my Wordpress blog and also at the DailyKos. As will......
Xulon (329 comments)
History of attitudes towards poverty and the churches.
Jesus is said to have stated that "The Poor will always be with you" and some Christians have used that to refuse to try to help the poor, because "they will always be with......
ArchaeoBob (148 comments)
Alternate economy medical treatment
Dogemperor wrote several times about the alternate economy structure that dominionists have built.  Well, it's actually made the news.  Pretty good article, although it doesn't get into how bad people could be (have been)......
ArchaeoBob (90 comments)
Evidence violence is more common than believed
Think I've been making things up about experiencing Christian Terrorism or exaggerating, or that it was an isolated incident?  I suggest you read this article (linked below in body), which is about our great......
ArchaeoBob (214 comments)

More Diaries...




All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments, posts, stories, and all other content are owned by the authors. Everything else © 2005 Talk to Action, LLC.