The Fog of the Abortion War
Frederick Clarkson printable version print page     Bookmark and Share
Fri Dec 10, 2010 at 11:25:11 PM EST
This past election cycle, the latest version of the urban legend that the Religious Right is dead and that the culture wars are over, or nearly so -- was that the tea party movement was all about secular concern for smaller government and lower taxes.  The narrative had some truth to it in that the themes regarding taxes and the size of government were certainly emphasized -- but that was never all there was to it.  Nevertheless, the shallow version of the narrative largely continued through the election period and is carried forward by some to this day. The media and some in the political classes may (unsurprisingly) be too heavily invested in the spin of the false narrative to ever get themselves unspun. But this, and historical revisionism about recent events, are contributing to the gathering fog around the actual dynamics of the politics of abortion.  
The tea party candidates, nearly all Religious Right social conservatives, beat more established and establishment type pols all over the country. For the Senate alone, Rand Paul, Joe Miller, Sharon Angle, Ken Buck and Christine O'Donnell were among the most militantly antiabortion candidates for major office in history. Some Religious Right candidates downplayed their religious rightyness and rode the anti-tax, small government Tea Party narrative into many electoral successes. But the post election, Beltway Insider version of the narrative insists that religion had little to nothing to do with the election results.

Meteor Blades, writing at Daily Kos offers a set of facts that does not seek to measure the religiosity of the candidates, but illuminates the election results in practical terms. He wrote:

Without having tallied close races, NARAL's BlogforChoice put the anti-choice forces as of Nov. 3 clearly in control of the House, with 248 Representatives in the anti-choice column and 33 with a mixed record. In the Senate the lines are more closely drawn, with 46 anti-choice, 40 pro-choice and 14 mixed-choice Senators. In both houses together, that's a 60-vote gain for the anti-choice forces. [emphasis added]
If abortion is the premier issue of the culture wars, then clearly the antiabortion movement gained a smashing victory in battle of the 2010 federal elections. It is already well established that Religious Right initiated antiabortion legislation and regulation in the states, where most policy is made, has made great progress in recent years -- this, while Beltway Insiders were busy seeking common ground with anti-abortion activists. This was the subject of considerable discussion, and in the end, dubious outcomes. I would have thought that even Inside The Beltway, the discussion would have progressed. But if a recent blog post at Bold Faith Type is any indication, it may have regressed. Nick Sementelli writes:
There are numerous examples of common-ground ideas being adopted by political actors or introduced as legislative proposals. Notably, the Democratic Party added abortion reduction language in their 2008 party platform, then-Senator Obama mentioned it in his presidential nomination acceptance speech, the Ryan-DeLauro bill introduced last year incorporated a host of ideas about prevention and support for pregnant women aimed at the same thing, and the Affordable Care Act included $250 million in funding for programs supporting pregnant and parenting women and families.
Let's address the problems with this paragraph one at a time. First, the 2008 Democratic Party platform explicitly rejected abortion reduction language, as has the White House. Both use the general phrase and concept of seeking to reduce unintended pregnancies and thus need for abortion. In fact, the goal of numerical abortion reduction is a key strategic concept in the long term war of attrition the antiabortion movement has waged in the states.

Second, Obama's one line on abortion in his 2008 convention speech was consistent with the party platform: "We may not agree on abortion," he said, "but surely we can agree on reducing the number of unwanted pregnancies in this country." To some, this may seem to be a distinction without a difference, but in the world of abortion politics, it is huge, and the result of hard fought negotiations in the Democratic Platform Committee.

Third, the Ryan-DeLauro bill, introduced to much fanfare, got zero support from leading antiabortion organizations (although some individuals did support the bill) many of which oppose contraception, which was a featured element of the bill, and in combination with sex education, the only proven method of reducing unwanted pregnancies. The bill went nowhere and its prospects are dim at best in the new antiabortion, Republican majority Congress. Indeed, the prolife cosponsor Rep. Tim Ryan (D-OH) was kicked off the advisory board of Democrats for Life for advocating the bill.

Finally, there was indeed money included in the health care bill to help women bring pregnancies to term. Unmentioned is that anti-abortion Democrats forced the most draconian antiabortion provisions since Roe vs. Wade in exchange for their support for the bill. On the point, Sementelli links to an article by Sen. Bob Casey (D-PA) who details how the bill is intended at reducing the number of abortions. What a coincidence.

Antiabortion forces are already moving the abortion reduction agenda in the health care bill through the states. For example, the Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice reports:

Ultra-conservative lawmakers took control of at least 10 additional state legislatures for a total of 26 and 10 additional governorships in the November election... In short, we’re up against a comprehensive assault on reproductive freedom. The target is the new state insurance exchanges created by health care reform.

Their immediate strategy is to exclude coverage of abortion services from the exchanges, including from women’s private insurance plans. But make no mistake, this is a systematic effort to ban abortion, even while Roe v. Wade still stands.




Display:
to mention the hundreds of arsons and bombings, dozens of murders and attempted murders, thousands of episodes of stalking, death threats, bomb threats and more.  (The National Abortion Federation keeps statistics culled from law enforcement data.)

A question worth pondering is if one side sees itself in a war and the other side does not, what do we suppose the outcome will be?

by Frederick Clarkson on Sat Dec 11, 2010 at 12:12:05 AM EST

for reproductive rights. That's what the outcome will be. History is littered with the remains of groups that simply refused to believe that the other side was waging war against them.
My reading of the NAF statistics shows a pattern of terrorist assaults that are backed by a network of supporters and yet these groups seem to be exempt from the Patriot Act.
It is past time to start asking some hard, serious questions of our government.

by Frank Frey on Sat Dec 11, 2010 at 09:58:40 AM EST
Parent
Not only do we need to ask these questions, but we also need to demand why they're going after Wikileaks and it's founder, and not against the domestic "Christian" terrorists in this country.

Things are being revealed that show the true state of the situation in this world... the very things that anthropologists and others have been saying for years.  This country needs to clean up it's act, and once people realize the U.S. is NOT a "Godly" nation and never was, maybe they'll realize that the country needs to live up to its promise and not down to its reality.

I'm tired of appearance over substance.  That was what the jackass Limbaugh spouted, but everything he supported was just appearance.  This nation needs to realize that a religious movement is taking over... and minorities are going to be the first to feel the effects (and then once they've come for us, they'll start coming for people who thought they were 'safe'!).

What struck me about this election was the lack of talk about freedom of choice.  The Religious Right (with notable exceptions) kept that out of the public discourse, and focused on raising anger over the economic misery people were facing.  Even then, they lied and misled people as to the real cause of what they faced (although I think a lot more people realize the misery is the fault of the rich, which I also think they're trying to change).  I think someone has advised them to not focus on the things near to their heart (taking away freedom from everyone else) and keep harping on the things that push the immediate needs button everyone has.  

If people knew the true state of affairs in this country, there would be a rebellion.  The sad thing is that would involve violence, and people would get hurt.  If we could change this country for the better without hurting people (except punishing those who are guilty), it would be a good thing and necessary.  Unfortunately, history teaches us that right rarely wins, because of things like not considering the opponents as enemies.

by ArchaeoBob on Sat Dec 11, 2010 at 10:19:33 AM EST
Parent




All this talk about the rights of individuals and government being intrusive only applies when it suits either the right or the left purposes.
I will, once again, reiterate a statement that seems to be the slogan of the left. If you or your mate don't want an abortion then carry your pregnancy to full term. If another couple chooses another option then it is nobody's business but theirs.

I would love to see the government ban all abortions as soon as they have enough people signed up to adopt those children. So those of you on the right or left opposed to abortion rush right down to your US member of the House of Representatives or your US Senator or even your state representatives and put your name on the list for adopting a baby or two or three. Come on busybodies, put your money where your mouth is. Bring your signs stating you will adopt so someone doesn't have to abort.

by deke4 on Mon Dec 13, 2010 at 05:44:25 AM EST

As we make clear in the site guidelines, this is broadly speaking, a prochoice site and abortion is not up for debate.  Our focus is on understanding the role of the Religious Right for whom abortion is obviously a central animating issue.

by Frederick Clarkson on Mon Dec 13, 2010 at 10:22:41 AM EST
Parent



WWW Talk To Action


Cognitive Dissonance & Dominionism Denial
There is new research on why people are averse to hearing or learning about the views of ideological opponents. Based on evaluation of five......
By Frederick Clarkson (4 comments)
Will the Air Force Do Anything To Rein In Its Dynamic Duo of Gay-Bashing, Misogynistic Bloggers?
"I always get nervous when I see female pastors/chaplains. Here is why everyone should as well: "First, women are not called to be pastors,......
By Chris Rodda (2 comments)
The Legacy of Big Oil
The media is ablaze with the upcoming publication of David Grann's book, Killers of the Flower Moon. The shocking non fiction account of the......
By wilkyjr (0 comments)
Gimme That Old Time Dominionism Denial
Over the years, I have written a great deal here and in other venues about the explicitly theocratic movement called dominionism -- which has......
By Frederick Clarkson (4 comments)
History Advisor to Members of Congress Completely Twists Jefferson's Words to Support Muslim Ban
Pseudo-historian David Barton, best known for his misquoting of our country's founders to promote the notion that America was founded as a Christian nation,......
By Chris Rodda (5 comments)
"Christian Fighter Pilot" Calls First Lesbian Air Force Academy Commandant a Liar
In a new post on his "Christian Fighter Pilot" blog titled "BGen Kristin Goodwin and the USAFA Honor Code," Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Jonathan......
By Chris Rodda (0 comments)
Catholic Right Leader Unapologetic about Call for 'Death to Liberal Professors' -- UPDATED
Today, Donald Trump appointed C-FAM Executive Vice President Lisa Correnti to the US Delegation To UN Commission On Status Of Women. (C-FAM is a......
By Frederick Clarkson (2 comments)
Controlling Information
     Yesterday I listened to Russ Limbaugh.  Rush advised listeners it would be best that they not listen to CNN,MSNBC, ABC, CBS and......
By wilkyjr (4 comments)
Is Bannon Fifth-Columning the Pope?
In December 2016 I wrote about how White House chief strategist Steve Bannon, who likes to flash his Catholic credentials when it comes to......
By Frank Cocozzelli (3 comments)
Ross Douthat's Hackery on the Seemingly Incongruous Alliance of Bannon & Burke
Conservative Catholic writer Ross Douthat has dissembled again. This time, in a February 15, 2017 New York Times op-ed titled The Trump Era's Catholic......
By Frank Cocozzelli (2 comments)
`So-Called Patriots' Attack The Rule Of Law
Every so often, right-wing commentator Pat Buchanan lurches out of the far-right fever swamp where he has resided for the past 50 years to......
By Rob Boston (1 comment)
Bad Faith from Focus on the Family
Here is one from the archives, Feb 12, 2011, that serves as a reminder of how deeply disingenuous people can be. Appeals to seek......
By Frederick Clarkson (6 comments)
The Legacy of George Wallace
"One need not accept any of those views to agree that they had appealed to real concerns of real people, not to mindless, unreasoning......
By wilkyjr (6 comments)
Betsy DeVos's Mudsill View of Public Education
My Talk to Action colleague Rachel Tabachnick has been doing yeoman's work in explaining Betsy DeVos's long-term strategy for decimating universal public education. If......
By Frank Cocozzelli (7 comments)
Prince and DeVos Families at Intersection of Radical Free Market Privatizers and Religious Right
This post from 2011 surfaces important information about President-Elect Trump's nominee for Secretary of Education, Betsy DeVos. -- FC Erik Prince, Brother of Betsy......
By Rachel Tabachnick (21 comments)

Respect for Others? or Political Correctness?
The term "political correctness" as used by Conservatives and Republicans has often puzzled me: what exactly do they mean by it? After reading Chip Berlin's piece here-- http://www.talk2action.org/story/2016/7/21/04356/9417 I thought about what he explained......
MTOLincoln (4 comments)
Fear
What I'm feeling now is fear.  I swear that it seems my nightmares are coming true with this new "president".  I'm also frustrated because so many people are not connecting all the dots! I've......
ArchaeoBob (6 comments)
"America - love it or LEAVE!"
I've been hearing that and similar sentiments fairly frequently in the last few days - far FAR more often than ever before.  Hearing about "consequences for burning the flag (actions) from Trump is chilling!......
ArchaeoBob (6 comments)
"Faked!" Meme
Keep your eyes and ears open for a possible move to try to discredit the people openly opposing Trump and the bigots, especially people who have experienced terrorism from the "Right"  (Christian Terrorism is......
ArchaeoBob (8 comments)
More aggressive proselytizing
My wife told me today of an experience she had this last week, where she was proselytized by a McDonald's employee while in the store. ......
ArchaeoBob (5 comments)
See if you recognize names on this list
This comes from the local newspaper, which was conservative before and took a hard right turn after it was sold. Hint: Sarah Palin's name is on it!  (It's also connected to Trump.) ......
ArchaeoBob (3 comments)
Unions: A Labor Day Discussion
This is a revision of an article which I posted on my personal board and also on Dailykos. I had an interesting discussion on a discussion board concerning Unions. I tried to piece it......
Xulon (4 comments)
Extremely obnoxious protesters at WitchsFest NYC: connected to NAR?
In July of this year, some extremely loud, obnoxious Christian-identified protesters showed up at WitchsFest, an annual Pagan street fair here in NYC.  Here's an account of the protest by Pagan writer Heather Greene......
Diane Vera (3 comments)
Capitalism and the Attack on the Imago Dei
I joined this site today, having been linked here by Crooksandliars' Blog Roundup. I thought I'd put up something I put up previously on my Wordpress blog and also at the DailyKos. As will......
Xulon (2 comments)
History of attitudes towards poverty and the churches.
Jesus is said to have stated that "The Poor will always be with you" and some Christians have used that to refuse to try to help the poor, because "they will always be with......
ArchaeoBob (13 comments)
Alternate economy medical treatment
Dogemperor wrote several times about the alternate economy structure that dominionists have built.  Well, it's actually made the news.  Pretty good article, although it doesn't get into how bad people could be (have been)......
ArchaeoBob (5 comments)
Evidence violence is more common than believed
Think I've been making things up about experiencing Christian Terrorism or exaggerating, or that it was an isolated incident?  I suggest you read this article (linked below in body), which is about our great......
ArchaeoBob (7 comments)
Central Florida Sheriff Preached Sermon in Uniform
If anyone has been following the craziness in Polk County Florida, they know that some really strange and troubling things have happened here.  We've had multiple separation of church and state lawsuits going at......
ArchaeoBob (2 comments)
Demon Mammon?
An anthropologist from outer space might be forgiven for concluding that the god of this world is Mammon. (Or, rather, The Market, as depicted by John McMurtry in his book The Cancer Stage of......
daerie (2 comments)
Anti-Sharia Fever in Texas: This is How It Starts
The mayor of a mid-size Texan city has emerged in recent months as the newest face of Islamophobia. Aligning herself with extremists hostile to Islam, Mayor Beth Van Duyne of Irving, Texas has helped......
JSanford (2 comments)

More Diaries...




All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments, posts, stories, and all other content are owned by the authors. Everything else © 2005 Talk to Action, LLC.