The Book Burning and the Massacre
Frederick Clarkson printable version print page     Bookmark and Share
Sat Apr 02, 2011 at 04:07:59 PM EST
Last Fall, a wide range of world leaders from the Pope to General Petraeus to President Obama asked Jones to please not act on his threat to burn the Qu'ran. American military leaders said that among other things, such an act would endanger the troops. Ultimately, Jones stood down. But on March 20th he went ahead and staged a much less publicized kangaroo court in which he found the sacred text of Islam guilty of "crimes against humanity" -- including causing murder, rape, and terrorism. He sentenced the book to burning.  This enraged several Muslim clerics in Afghanistan, who led a mob in search of Americans against whom to retaliate. Unable to find any, they attacked a United Nations office and killed a number of UN staff (accounts vary.) A number of Afghan civilians were killed or wounded as well. Apparently, no Americans were killed in the fighting.

A video of the burning shows a kerosene-soaked Qu'ran  set ablaze in what appears to be a barbecue grill inside the church hall used for the "trial."

We can all hope that cooler heads will prevail all around. The Muslim Public Affairs Council for one, is clear in its denunciation of the atrocity in Afghanistan. But the episode is likely to reverberate though public life in surprising ways.

But first, let's review what has happened so far.

The New York Times reported

Mr. Ahmadzai, the police spokesman, said the demonstrators were angry about the burning of the Koran at the church of Pastor Terry Jones on Mar. 20. Mr. Jones had caused an international uproar by threatening to burn the Koran last year on the anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks, and demonstrations at the time led to deaths throughout Afghanistan, but on a small scale. Mr. Jones subsequently had publicly promised not to burn a Koran, but then presided over a mock trial and the burning of the Koran at his small fringe church in Gainesville, Fla.

After news of the attack, Mr. Jones, released a statement expressing no regret for the Koran burning. He called the attack on the compound "a very tragic and criminal action" and called on the United States and the United Nations to take action. "The time has come to hold Islam accountable," he said.

A prominent Afghan cleric, Mullavi Qyamudin Kashaf, acting chief of the Ulema Council of Afghanistan, called for American authorities to arrest and try Mr. Jones as a war criminal.

The Ulema Council recently met to discuss the Koran burning, he said. "We expressed our deep concerns about this act and we were expecting the violence that we are witnessing now," Mr. Kashaf said. "Unless they try him and give him the highest possible punishment, we will witness violence and protests not only in Afghanistan but in the entire world."

Last year, even though Mr. Jones called off his burning of the Koran, a subsequent wave of protests at NATO facilities in Afghanistan led to at least five deaths. In several of those incidents, Taliban agitators played a role, allegedly spreading rumors that the Koran burning had taken place. However, the Taliban have had little or no presence in Mazar-i-Sharif, one of the most peaceful places in Afghanistan.

But the outrage is not limited to Afghanistan.  Muslim and other groups around the world have condemned the Qu'ran burning, particularly in Pakistan, where one prominent cleric has demanded that Jones to be arrested and tried as a "terrorist;" another group had put a $2 million dollar bounty on his head; and another called for his execution.

For Americans, Jones's actions cut to the quick of the central ethos of our culture and our Constitutional framework, by pitting rights of free expression against freedom of religion -- while the world looks on and wonders what  is wrong with us.  

Book burning, such as Jones's stunt, is highlighted and condemned annually by the American Library Association and a number of allied publishing, scholarly, and First Amendment advocacy groups, during Banned Books Week.   While we celebrate the freedom to read in this way, we also recognize that the same First Amendment that gives us the right to read books, gives Terry Jones and his ilk the right to burn them. And even as we have the obligation to recognize and denounce his hateful and inflammatory actions and words, we also need to be careful not to call for government censorship of controversial speech.  This is part of the price of maintaining a society where we understand with the fiercest of urgency that free speech is a necessity, and not a luxury to be ho-hummed away in the face of controversies such as this.

But standards are different elsewhere.  Because governments in many places have a far greater say in determining what is allowable speech, people who live there find it hard to believe that the U.S. government has no hand in Jones' outrageous activities. (It is hard to explain for example, why governmental leaders spoke out last Fall, but failed to do so this time.) In other cases, more considered views such as that of the Pakistan Bar Council, the leading body of lawyers in the country, plans to complain to the United Nations. Meanwhile, high-level responses have varied. The presidents of Pakistan and Afghanistan have condemned the burning, the president of the United States has condemned the attack on the UN office but took awhile to issue a statement that found a nuanced way of condemning both the burning and the massacre.

Demanding severest possible action against the culprits for committing this heinous act - that not only gravely offended the Muslims but could also fan terrorism and religious hatred - the committee condemned the inaction and indifference of the US government on the issue and its `deliberate avoidance of taking any action against the culprits'.

While from this distance, U.S. cooperation in any legal sanctions against  Jones would seem unlikely, the respect for the rights of Americans to hold and express controversial views will likely be severely strained. Will, for example, there be efforts to suppress domestic free speech, or internet commentary and publications, because it might endanger American personnel in other countries?

Past first amendment controversies while bearing certain similarities are actually very different. The recent case of Fred Phelps is perhaps the best example.  His ugly protests at the funerals of people who have died of AIDS, and American soldiers who died in combat, were the subject of laws designed to stop him -- but his activities no matter how heinous were  upheld  as constitutionally protected free speech by the Supreme Court.  

But last Fall, our top governmental leaders believed that there was a significant risk to American servicemen in Afghanistan and elsewhere if Jones went through with his planned bonfire of the Qu'rans -- and they publicly spoke out.  As we can see now, their concerns were not unfounded. As hateful as Phelps can be, to my knowledge no one has ever attacked Americans or UN staff overseas because of him.  Jones's mediagenic provocations already have.   Jones denies that he is in anyway responsible for inciting mob violence.  Rather, he says that the violence proves his point about Islam.  

And that's where it gets complicated, volatile, and dangerous.  Jones's web site includes pictures of the trial and the burning, and some key passages from the bogus trial.  So the provocation will continue, and the undisputed evidence of what occurred and why is available for all the world to see.  Although we have no way of knowing if there is a connection to the web site, there was a second day of rioting, deaths and injuries in Kandahar in response to the the burning, according to the Christian Science Monitor.

The activities of Terry Jones and Fred Phelps certainly epitomize the aphorism that just because you have the right to do something, doesn't mean that it is the right thing to do.  How we navigate the ongoing Jones spectacle, will be a test of how well we embrace the sometimes paradoxical values of freedom of conscience and free speech.




Display:
on April 22nd, protesting in front of a mosque in Dearborn.  

Dearborn has a large Arab-American population, and the mosque is reportedly the largest in the U.S.

by Frederick Clarkson on Sat Apr 02, 2011 at 07:38:52 PM EST

otherwise I'd go to protest against HIM.

by ArchaeoBob on Sat Apr 02, 2011 at 10:30:09 PM EST
Parent


Terry Jones has (1) given aid and comfort to the enemy (all those who wish a holy war between Christianity and Islam have an excuse due to his actions, which were broadcast by him over the internet) (2) endangered the lives of American troops, Americans and their allies (the deaths at the UN station are a direct consequence of his actions, as the assault the next day on a US base by suicide bombers. . .he has no right to yell "Fire!" in a crowded theater) Terry Jones fits the bill. He should be tried for treason, detained at either a superprison or Guantanamo. He must learn there are consequences for the choices he makes, as there are for all of us.

by okami on Sun Apr 03, 2011 at 08:38:53 PM EST

Why is the cross in his church at the angle of the Swastika?  Regardless, I thought it was pretty tacky for people to try to stop him from doing it, or for the media to even bother covering it in the first place.  

Just because something isn't the right thing to do, doesn't mean you shouldn't do it.

He is correct in asserting that the violence in the Middle East over his actions does more to enforce the view of Islam as irrationally violent.

No Presidents urged Salman Rushdie not to write The Satanic Verses, and the UK Police protect him to this day.  Granted, there is a quality of art in Rushdie's work wholly lacking in Jones' actions, but the principle is the same.

by OldChaosoftheSun on Sat Apr 02, 2011 at 04:43:05 PM EST

Ain't nobody else responsible for his acts of provocation.

He knew full well what the responses might be like, and he went ahead and did it anyway.  Words, like deeds, have consequences, and with a few exceptions, we are all responsible for what we do and say.

Jones does not get a pass in that regard. Whatever he may believe, hi is also a hate-filled provocateur and a crass opportunist. The internet can make even obscure figures like Jones international sensations, and that is a good bit of what happened, and seems likely to continue to happen.

It is important that our religious and political leaders speak out about this, hopefully providing some wisdom in addition to the usual boilerplate.  

by Frederick Clarkson on Sat Apr 02, 2011 at 05:12:44 PM EST
Parent

Frederick, I think it goes further than Jones being responsible for the things he says and does.

I think he is morally responsible for the harm his actions and words caused for others.  That is something the dominionists (and fundamentalists and others) would like to get away from... the responsibility for the harm done to others.

I don't like the response to his burning the Koran one tiny bit, and the so-called "protesters" too have responsibility for the harm they caused to their victims.  They murdered innocent people who were there to help, for God's sake!!!!  Just because they were angry over Jones' action (I understand about the politics and misunderstanding about our government and societal structure - if anything, this is a call for more exposure to difference and for travel).

Innocent people died because of an act of stupidity and hatred, and that is what is really wrong.  It's ironic to me that Jones AND the "protesters" equally share responsibility in this tragedy.   That is what I think.

Maybe emphasizing that the importance of respecting the Other and showing respect for different religions doesn't mean that you have to agree with them or accept their tenets, will help to lead a way out of this mess.  I think that both "sides" (both guilty parties) would be surprised that I see a lot of parallels between them.  The insistence on public sectarian prayers that we encounter from the dominionists and fundamentalists - compared to the demand that we not say anything negative about Islam, the Koran, or Mohammad.  Another comparison between the guilty parties is a desire for enactment of religious law over the populace ("Bible-based" law vs Sharia law).  On both sides we have people stirring up trouble and trying to increase the polarity in society.

It makes things really hard for the rest of us.

A live and let live attitude is best, as long as people aren't being hurt.

My (sad and angered) two cents worth...


by ArchaeoBob on Sat Apr 02, 2011 at 05:52:10 PM EST
Parent

for ones words and actions, certainly includes the idea of being "morally responsible for the harm his actions and words caused for others" by any reasonable definition of the term.

by Frederick Clarkson on Sat Apr 02, 2011 at 05:59:35 PM EST
Parent
The dominionist teachings I got (and even got to a degree from people in the steeplejacked church we used to attend) on this topic was that you were responsible for what happened to you (especially as related to your words and actions), but not for how they affected others.

The other people (and maybe Jesus according to some ways of thinking) are responsible for everything that happens to them.  If they aren't magically cured or fixed or whatever when they pray, then they "lacked faith" or "had hidden sin in their life" - it's not your responsibility.  You're only responsible for you (and paying your tithes and supporting your preacher and ...).

A lot of very evil people were getting away with things they never should have back when I was Assemblies of God, because of these teachings.

I don't always think in terms of the taking responsibility as you put it, because that's not the way I heard it for a long time (and still rarely hear it in that context).  

Thanks, because you brought me up short and made me realize just how much influence they still have in my thoughts (and as you know, I'd walked over 28 years ago, and left the steeplejacked churches in 2004).

I rather think that Jones thinks his "faith" makes everything OK, based upon that thinking.


by ArchaeoBob on Sat Apr 02, 2011 at 07:26:32 PM EST
Parent


...seems to me the Islamic Clerics that rallied mobs into violent frenzies are morally responsible.  I have more love for Dominionism than Sharia, though I think they're just two sides of the same coin.  Why are these U.N. Bases not better protected against assault?

by OldChaosoftheSun on Sat Apr 02, 2011 at 09:53:29 PM EST
Parent
ALSO morally responsible.

Just as the preachers have equal responsibility when their preaching incites violence.

by ArchaeoBob on Sat Apr 02, 2011 at 10:22:52 PM EST
Parent

...in this country they don't.  Otherwise we could arrest Bill Reilly for the murder of George Tiller.

by OldChaosoftheSun on Sun Apr 03, 2011 at 07:09:36 AM EST
Parent
O'Reilly

by OldChaosoftheSun on Sun Apr 03, 2011 at 07:10:04 AM EST
Parent






...Rushdie knew as well what the response would be, to date, far more have been killed as a result of his novel than , which is, albeit, not open hate, but with deep artistic merit.  However, I can still buy the book in Barnes and Noble.  

The moment we censor speech because it attacks, whether from a perspective of careful artistry, or from blind, ignorant hatred, a religion which may be provoked to violence is the moment we legitimize terrorism as a method of enforcing one's views.

by OldChaosoftheSun on Sat Apr 02, 2011 at 05:26:48 PM EST
Parent

-- at least not yet. And certainly not me, as any fair reading of this essay can see.  

Rather, I am raising the specter of possible censorship and am suggesting that we need to consider what we will do if it comes up.

by Frederick Clarkson on Sat Apr 02, 2011 at 05:55:29 PM EST
Parent



...I've no like for Terry Jones at all, the guy should be irrelevant to the media.  It would likely be best if we had not heard of him in the first place, but the media decided to make a figure out of his idiocy.

by OldChaosoftheSun on Sat Apr 02, 2011 at 05:29:23 PM EST
Parent


The angled cross is sometimes used to represent the cross as Jesus bore it through the streets of Jerusalem. It is more commonly seen as part of a depiction of the whole scene, with Jesus bowed beneath the weight of the cross. Since this is a Baptist church, they probably wouldn't permit that kind of iconography, so they just have the cross without Jesus.

As for the swastika, or broken cross, it was a perfectly good Christian symbol until the Nazis perverted it. It is sometimes seen on 19th century Amish quilts, among other representations.

by MLouise on Sun Apr 03, 2011 at 09:02:29 AM EST
Parent



WWW Talk To Action


Why Is Bishop Robert Finn Still In Power?
As I reported in September 2014, Bishop Robert Finn, head of the Diocese of Kansas City-St. Joseph, Missouri has been under Vatican investigation to......
By Frank Cocozzelli (0 comments)
Thus It Was Prophesied in 2012: Ted Cruz Will Be VP, Or a Supreme Court Justice
This is a transcript, of pastor Larry Huch and Rafael Cruz, father of U.S. Senator Ted Cruz, from an appearance Rafael Cruz made at......
By Bruce Wilson (1 comment)
Crusin with Cruz
Ted Cruz threw his hat into the ring, announcing his bid for President in the worship center at Jerry Falwell's University last night.  Mother......
By wilkyjr (1 comment)
Ted Cruz: Born From The Heart of the Dominionist Christian Right
[welcome, Thom Hartmann Show fans, here is a short introduction to my past coverage on Ted Cruz and the dominionist Christian right] Did you......
By Bruce Wilson (0 comments)
Coming Soon to Utah: An International Festival of Bigotry
An international network of some of the world's most vitriolic Religious Right activists and self-proclaimed orthodox religious leaders is holding its ninth global conference......
By Frederick Clarkson (0 comments)
Bumpy Lane: Religious Right Operative Seeks To Build (Another) Church-Based Political Machine
Here's what the country doesn't need right now: another zealot aiming to mobilize right-wing pastors to become a force in electoral politics.Yet that's what......
By Rob Boston (1 comment)
American ISIS: Christian Reconstructionists And `Biblical Law' In America
Every now and then, while scanning the day's news, I come across a headline that's hard to believe.Like this one: "California lawyer proposes ballot......
By Rob Boston (3 comments)
Will our Prisons Overflow with Christians this Summer?
Many leaders of the Christian Right, from megachurch pastors like Rick Warren to the top prelates in the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, have......
By Frederick Clarkson (3 comments)
Say You Want A Christian Nation?: Let's Try This One
Last week an article began circulating on social media claiming that 57 percent of Republicans in a recent poll said they believe Christianity should......
By Rob Boston (3 comments)
Are The Fundamentalists Winning?
We missed Evolution Weekend, which was held February 13-15 this year.   This worthwhile effort, which began the same year as Talk to Action,......
By Frederick Clarkson (0 comments)
Mario Cuomo's Memorable Lesson on Challenging the Political Authority of the Church
It is never too late to remember. Here is a reposting of a column I did following the death of former New York Gov.......
By Frederick Clarkson (0 comments)
The Legacy of Francis Bellamy
"We assemble here that we, too, may exalt the free school that embodies the American principles of universal enlightenment and equality; the most characteristic......
By wilkyjr (1 comment)
The Inquisitional Urge Gets the Better of Bill Donohue (Again)
Bill Donohue is at it again. The Catholic League president went apoplectic over President Obama’s seemingly innocuous comments at the February 5th National Prayer......
By Frank Cocozzelli (2 comments)
John Dorhauer Recommended to Lead United Church of Christ
I am very pleased to report that John Dorhauer, who joined us early on at Talk to Action has been recommended by a national......
By Frederick Clarkson (3 comments)
Terms, Definitions & Glossaries for Writing about the Religious Right
One of the challenges in writing about the Religious Right and what to do about it is the matter of terms and definitions. That's......
By Frederick Clarkson (0 comments)

Evangelicals Seduced By Ayn Rand Worship Crypto-Satanism, Suggest Scholars
[update: also see my closely related stories, "Crypto-Cultists" and "Cranks": The Video Paul Ryan Hoped Would Go Away, and The Paul Ryan/Ayn Rand/Satanism Connection Made Simple] "I give people Ayn Rand with trappings" -......
Bruce Wilson (8 comments)
Ted Cruz Anointed By Pastor Who Says Jesus Opposed Minimum Wage, and Constitution Based on the Bible
In the video below, from a July 19-20th, 2013 pastor's rally at a Marriott Hotel in Des Moines, Iowa, Tea Party potentate Ted Cruz is blessed by religious right leader David Barton, who claims......
Bruce Wilson (0 comments)
Galt and God: Ayn Randians and Christian Rightists Expand Ties
Ayn Rand's followers find themselves sharing a lot of common ground with the Christian Right these days. The Tea Party, with its stress on righteous liberty and a robust form of capitalism, has been......
JSanford (2 comments)
Witchhunts in Africa and the U.S.A.
Nigerian human rights activist Leo Igwe has recently written at least two blog posts about how some African Pentecostal churches are sending missionaries to Europe and the U.S.A. in an attempt to "re-evangelize the......
Diane Vera (1 comment)
Charles Taze Russell and John Hagee
No doubt exists that Texas mega-church Pastor John Hagee would be loathe to be associated with the theology of Pastor C.T. Russell (wrongly credited with founding the Jehovah's Witnesses) but their theological orbits, while......
COinMS (0 comments)
A death among the common people ... imagination.
Or maybe my title would better fit as “Laws, Books, where to find, and the people who trust them.”What a society we've become!The wise ones tell us over and over how the more things......
Arthur Ruger (0 comments)
Deconstructing the Dominionists, Part VI
This is part 6 of a series by guest front pager Mahanoy, originally dated November 15, 2007 which I had to delete and repost for technical reasons. It is referred to in this post,......
Frederick Clarkson (1 comment)
Republican infighting in Mississippi
After a bruising GOP runoff election for U.S. Senator, current MS Senator Thad Cochran has retained his position and will face Travis Childers (Democrat) in the next senate election. The MS GOP is fractured......
COinMS (3 comments)
America's Most Convenient Bank® refuses to serve Christians
Representatives of a well known faith-based charitable organization were refused a New Jersey bank’s notarization service by an atheist employee. After inquiring about the nature of the non-profit organization and the documents requiring......
Jody Lane (5 comments)
John Benefiel takes credit for GOP takeover of Oklahoma
Many of you know that Oklahoma has turned an unrecognizable shade of red in recent years.  Yesterday, one of the leading members of the New Apostolic Reformation all but declared that he was responsible......
Christian Dem in NC (2 comments)
John Benefiel thinks America is under curse because Egyptians dedicated North America to Baal
You may remember that Rick Perry put together his "Response" prayer rallies with the help of a slew of NAR figures.  One of them was John Benefiel, an Oklahoma City-based "apostle."  He heads up......
Christian Dem in NC (5 comments)
Mississippi Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
Yes, that's right. We have totally lost our religious freedom in Mississippi and it must be restored by our legislators. ......
COinMS (2 comments)
Bill Gothard accused of harassing women and failing to report child abuse
Surprised no one's mentioned this, but one of the longest-standing leaders of the religious right is in a world of trouble.  Bill Gothard has been active in the fundie movement for over half......
Christian Dem in NC (2 comments)
Eugene Delgaudio may lose his day job as Virginia county supervisor
Surprised no one's noticed this, but one of the nation's most virulent homophobes is in a fight to keep his day job.  Eugene Delgaudio is best known as the head of Public Advocate......
Christian Dem in NC (1 comment)
Starkville Becomes First City in Mississippi to Pass Resolution Recognizing LGBT Residents
This caught me by surprise. I guess times are a changin in Dixieland. ------------------------------------- Cross posted from the HRC blog. Starkville Becomes First City in Mississippi to Pass Resolution Recognizing LGBT Residents January 21,......
COinMS (1 comment)

More Diaries...




All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments, posts, stories, and all other content are owned by the authors. Everything else 2005 Talk to Action, LLC.