Antonin Scalia; An Alternate Assessment
Frank Cocozzelli printable version print page     Bookmark and Share
Mon Feb 22, 2016 at 01:51:59 PM EST
Praise and tribune is being given to the late Justice Antonin Scalia. Among the most common accolades accorded him are the following: "an extraordinary jurist, "consistent" as well as, "a devout Catholic."

While I express sadness at the death of Justice Scalia - as I would any fellow human being, I have a different assessment of his legacy. And it is one I offer as an American, as a Catholic, and an attorney.

Was the late Justice Antonin Scalia that rare combination of confidence and master intellect? Yes, that was part of his legal thought process. Scalia was clearly a man of high scholastic intelligence.

But there were other factors that went into the late associate justice's decision-making; important factors that the mainstream press is either ignoring or under-reporting. A closer scrutiny reveals many of his key decisions were not only less than monumental but often inconsistent and reflected dogmatic religious beliefs.

Inconsistency

Antonin Scalia used his powerfully worded , take no prisoners decisions to push the court to the political right . He is often credited with reviving the doctrine of originalism -- the concept that United States Constitution should be interpreted as it must have been at the time of its adoption.

As much as I disagree with originalism, Scalia often practiced originalism only when it was convenient to advancing a conservative agenda.  Perhaps Pace University law professor Bennett L. Gershman put it best:

Sometimes Scalia claimed to be a textualist, sometimes not. Sometimes he claimed to be an originalist, sometimes not. Sometimes he glorified judicial restraint and vilified his colleagues for their "Czarist arrogance" in expanding constitutional rights. Sometimes he was a clear example of judicial activism.

As Frederick Clarkson commented, "What is odd about Scalia is that for someone who is a literalist and, as I recall a constitutional originalist, relying upon his subjective Catholic notions of providence concerning the death penalty seems to me to be a far greater legal reach than Roe v. Wade's finding of a right to privacy."

But perhaps more importantly, Scalia deviated when it suited him. This was apparent in the majority decision rendered in for Bush v. Gore. And as journalist Patricia Miller recently noted,

But he [Scalia] was at the forefront of a new kind of morality--one that merged conservative Catholic social teaching with the pro-business, small government mentality of the late twentieth century Republican Party. And it was here that Scalia's "originalism" was most useful, because it allowed him to assert that there were no new rights under the Constitution, which conveniently left intact the status quo regarding sexual morality and minority rights, while championing the long-standing "legitimate" rights under the Constitution of business and gun owners.

As well as:

Despite his evident distaste for the social acceptance of homosexuality, he claimed that he was only sticking to his belief in originalism. "Don't paint me as anti-gay or anti-abortion or anything else. All I'm doing on the Supreme Court is opining about who should decide," he said in 2015.

But this self-justification often didn't hold up in reality, especially on the issues that he really cared about: those who reinforced conservative Catholic sexual morality. As John Allen notes in Crux, he had occasion in 2012 to talk to Scalia about the contraceptive mandate in the Affordable Care Act. Scalia told him that if the Catholic bishops wanted an exemption, "they should try to get it through the democratic process." But then he turned around and voted in the Hobby Lobby case for a much more consequential and precedent-shattering exemption for for-profit business owners rather than insist that they go through the "democratic process."

The decision not only contradicted what he told Allen, but his own logic in the foundational religious freedom case Employment Division v. Smith that religious exemptions shouldn't be provided to reasonable, generally applicable laws because they would make a hodge-podge out of the law. Except when they should. It's worth noting that Smith dealt with an exemption for drug use for a minority religion, while Hobby Lobby for the right of male, Christian corporate owners to deny contraception to women.

Religious Dogmatism

This brings us to the widely echoed notion that Scalia was a: "devout Catholic." The more accurate description would be "Opus Dei Catholic."

Antonin Scalia may not have been an actual member of Opus Dei.  There have been carefully worded denials on his behalf (His son Paul, however, is in the Order of the Holy Cross Opus Dei's priestly order as well as being affiliated with Fr. Frank Pavone's Priests for Life..)

 Justice Scalia was most likely an Opus Dei cooperator -- a term used by Opus Dei to describe someone not officially a member, but sympathetic and supportive of its goals.

In fact, he attended St. Catherine of Siena Church in Falls Church, Virginia, St. Catherine's has a strong Opus Dei presence, complete with Sunday morning Latin Mass. It is the Washington, DC parish for many Opus Dei members and cooperators.

Opus Dei displays many tendencies that are contrary to mainstream American Catholic thought. This is evidenced by its ignoring many of the changes brought about by the Second Vatican Council such saying Mass in the local language facing those attending -- instead of in Latin, facing away from the faithful. Some of Opus Dei founder Josemaria Escriva de Balaguer's beliefs, besides being factually incorrect (such as on the creation of the Roman papacy and the concept of papal infallibility) reflect some disturbing rules for behavior.

In two of Escrvia's books, The Way and In Love with the Church, he urged secrecy in his apostolate (The Way, No. 839), defines compromise as laziness and weakness (The Way, No. 54) demands blind obedience to Church teachings.

Escriva also purged his followers to put away their scruples (The Way, Nos. 258 and 259), seemingly teaching that the ends always justify the means. Perhaps maxims 258 and 259 might explain Scalia's and Thomas's ability to abandon both their states' rights and strict constitutional ist constructionist principles in Bush vs. Gore.

In a piece I posted several years ago, I noted the following about the late Justice Scalia:

In an article entitled God's Justice and Ours' Justice Antonin Scalia stated: "Before proceeding to discuss the morality of capital punishment, I want to make clear that my views on the subject have nothing to do with how I vote in capital cases that come before the Supreme Court."

Let us return to a quote Scalia gave a few years back:

"Indeed, it seems to me that the more Christian a country is the less likely it is to regard the death penalty as immoral. Abolition has taken its firmest hold in post-Christian Europe, and has least support in the churchgoing United States. I attribute that to the fact that, for the believing Christian, death is no big deal. Intentionally killing an innocent person is a big deal: it is a grave sin, which causes one to lose his soul. But losing this life, in exchange for the next?"

Such a statement exhibits a rather cavalier attitude towards life and death issues. And although Justice Scalia claims that his "...views on the subject have nothing to do with how I vote in capital cases that come before the Supreme Court," his actions may indicate otherwise.

Over the last 30 years I have had many conversations regarding Justice Scalia. Invariably, I would close these discussions with the comment, "As an American Catholic and as an attorney, I wish it were Mario Cuomo sitting in his place on the Supreme Court." Cuomo, also a New York attorney and Catholic was far more representative of mainstream American Catholics. At least in my eyes it was the former New York governor who is better described as a devout Catholic. And he acted as one without imposing his religious beliefs on his fellow citizens.

As for Scalia, I will let historian Sean Wilentz (from 2002) provide the final contrast:

There have always been Americans who have thought as Justice Scalia does now. In 1781 a Massachusetts minister, Jonas Clark, preached that religion is ''the source of liberty, the soul of government and the life of a people.'' But ever since the Revolution, this has been a minority view, even an eccentric one, among Americans. It has had no appreciable place in our constitutional history because the framers rejected it.

They had many reasons for doing so, not least the factionalism mentioned by Madison. They had an idea that sovereignty rested with a free people, even if some among those people didn't believe in God, or in the same God, or in the same way.




Display:
It is sad that with all his intellectual gifts, Scalia didn't use them to advocate for poor and underserved people, but used them to defend the rich and powerful. Not surprisingly, the GOP decided to come out and refuse to accept any presidential nominee. I have heard conflicting information as to whether Scalia was a member of OD, although I think it most likely that he was a cooperator, and his son is a member.

by khughes1963 on Mon Feb 22, 2016 at 07:31:41 PM EST
It seems to fit with his opinions and words on and off the bench.

by trog69 on Sat Apr 02, 2016 at 10:01:07 AM EST
Parent


Glad to find the post. Thank you very much. html color picker

by tadobre on Tue Jun 05, 2018 at 11:43:56 PM EST

I read your post and I found it amazing! thank! flat in Budapest

by arianna on Mon Jan 18, 2021 at 12:05:14 AM EST

Really nice and interesting post. I was looking for this kind of information and enjoyed reading this one. 918kiss

by arianna on Mon Jan 18, 2021 at 10:42:23 PM EST


WWW Talk To Action


Cognitive Dissonance & Dominionism Denial
There is new research on why people are averse to hearing or learning about the views of ideological opponents. Based on evaluation of five......
By Frederick Clarkson (374 comments)
Will the Air Force Do Anything To Rein In Its Dynamic Duo of Gay-Bashing, Misogynistic Bloggers?
"I always get nervous when I see female pastors/chaplains. Here is why everyone should as well: "First, women are not called to be pastors,......
By Chris Rodda (195 comments)
The Legacy of Big Oil
The media is ablaze with the upcoming publication of David Grann's book, Killers of the Flower Moon. The shocking non fiction account of the......
By wilkyjr (110 comments)
Gimme That Old Time Dominionism Denial
Over the years, I have written a great deal here and in other venues about the explicitly theocratic movement called dominionism -- which has......
By Frederick Clarkson (101 comments)
History Advisor to Members of Congress Completely Twists Jefferson's Words to Support Muslim Ban
Pseudo-historian David Barton, best known for his misquoting of our country's founders to promote the notion that America was founded as a Christian nation,......
By Chris Rodda (113 comments)
"Christian Fighter Pilot" Calls First Lesbian Air Force Academy Commandant a Liar
In a new post on his "Christian Fighter Pilot" blog titled "BGen Kristin Goodwin and the USAFA Honor Code," Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Jonathan......
By Chris Rodda (144 comments)
Catholic Right Leader Unapologetic about Call for 'Death to Liberal Professors' -- UPDATED
Today, Donald Trump appointed C-FAM Executive Vice President Lisa Correnti to the US Delegation To UN Commission On Status Of Women. (C-FAM is a......
By Frederick Clarkson (126 comments)
Controlling Information
     Yesterday I listened to Russ Limbaugh.  Rush advised listeners it would be best that they not listen to CNN,MSNBC, ABC, CBS and......
By wilkyjr (118 comments)
Is Bannon Fifth-Columning the Pope?
In December 2016 I wrote about how White House chief strategist Steve Bannon, who likes to flash his Catholic credentials when it comes to......
By Frank Cocozzelli (250 comments)
Ross Douthat's Hackery on the Seemingly Incongruous Alliance of Bannon & Burke
Conservative Catholic writer Ross Douthat has dissembled again. This time, in a February 15, 2017 New York Times op-ed titled The Trump Era's Catholic......
By Frank Cocozzelli (64 comments)
`So-Called Patriots' Attack The Rule Of Law
Every so often, right-wing commentator Pat Buchanan lurches out of the far-right fever swamp where he has resided for the past 50 years to......
By Rob Boston (161 comments)
Bad Faith from Focus on the Family
Here is one from the archives, Feb 12, 2011, that serves as a reminder of how deeply disingenuous people can be. Appeals to seek......
By Frederick Clarkson (176 comments)
The Legacy of George Wallace
"One need not accept any of those views to agree that they had appealed to real concerns of real people, not to mindless, unreasoning......
By wilkyjr (70 comments)
Betsy DeVos's Mudsill View of Public Education
My Talk to Action colleague Rachel Tabachnick has been doing yeoman's work in explaining Betsy DeVos's long-term strategy for decimating universal public education. If......
By Frank Cocozzelli (80 comments)
Prince and DeVos Families at Intersection of Radical Free Market Privatizers and Religious Right
This post from 2011 surfaces important information about President-Elect Trump's nominee for Secretary of Education, Betsy DeVos. -- FC Erik Prince, Brother of Betsy......
By Rachel Tabachnick (218 comments)

Respect for Others? or Political Correctness?
The term "political correctness" as used by Conservatives and Republicans has often puzzled me: what exactly do they mean by it? After reading Chip Berlin's piece here-- http://www.talk2action.org/story/2016/7/21/04356/9417 I thought about what he explained......
MTOLincoln (253 comments)
Fear
What I'm feeling now is fear.  I swear that it seems my nightmares are coming true with this new "president".  I'm also frustrated because so many people are not connecting all the dots! I've......
ArchaeoBob (107 comments)
"America - love it or LEAVE!"
I've been hearing that and similar sentiments fairly frequently in the last few days - far FAR more often than ever before.  Hearing about "consequences for burning the flag (actions) from Trump is chilling!......
ArchaeoBob (211 comments)
"Faked!" Meme
Keep your eyes and ears open for a possible move to try to discredit the people openly opposing Trump and the bigots, especially people who have experienced terrorism from the "Right"  (Christian Terrorism is......
ArchaeoBob (165 comments)
More aggressive proselytizing
My wife told me today of an experience she had this last week, where she was proselytized by a McDonald's employee while in the store. ......
ArchaeoBob (163 comments)
See if you recognize names on this list
This comes from the local newspaper, which was conservative before and took a hard right turn after it was sold. Hint: Sarah Palin's name is on it!  (It's also connected to Trump.) ......
ArchaeoBob (169 comments)
Unions: A Labor Day Discussion
This is a revision of an article which I posted on my personal board and also on Dailykos. I had an interesting discussion on a discussion board concerning Unions. I tried to piece it......
Xulon (156 comments)
Extremely obnoxious protesters at WitchsFest NYC: connected to NAR?
In July of this year, some extremely loud, obnoxious Christian-identified protesters showed up at WitchsFest, an annual Pagan street fair here in NYC.  Here's an account of the protest by Pagan writer Heather Greene......
Diane Vera (130 comments)
Capitalism and the Attack on the Imago Dei
I joined this site today, having been linked here by Crooksandliars' Blog Roundup. I thought I'd put up something I put up previously on my Wordpress blog and also at the DailyKos. As will......
Xulon (329 comments)
History of attitudes towards poverty and the churches.
Jesus is said to have stated that "The Poor will always be with you" and some Christians have used that to refuse to try to help the poor, because "they will always be with......
ArchaeoBob (148 comments)
Alternate economy medical treatment
Dogemperor wrote several times about the alternate economy structure that dominionists have built.  Well, it's actually made the news.  Pretty good article, although it doesn't get into how bad people could be (have been)......
ArchaeoBob (90 comments)
Evidence violence is more common than believed
Think I've been making things up about experiencing Christian Terrorism or exaggerating, or that it was an isolated incident?  I suggest you read this article (linked below in body), which is about our great......
ArchaeoBob (214 comments)

More Diaries...




All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments, posts, stories, and all other content are owned by the authors. Everything else © 2005 Talk to Action, LLC.