Property Rights: A Dominionist Issue (7th in a series)
Joan Bokaer printable version print page     Bookmark and Share
Wed Oct 04, 2006 at 07:22:32 AM EST
Property rights is a hot topic in this November's midterm elections.
Libertarians and land developers have found populist fodder in a contentious Supreme Court decision from last year that favors eminent domain over private property.
This fall, they are trying to harness anger over the ruling in an effort to pass state initiatives in the West and federal legislation that could unravel a long-standing fabric of state and local land-use regulations. Among other things, the rules control growth, limit sprawl, ensure open space and protect the environment. Washington Post, 10/2/06)

Property rights are also a dominionist issue. From The Texas Republican Party Platform, a blueprint for dominionist policies in government:

"We reaffirm an individual's right to own and use property without government interference." P. 10 #16

"We reaffirm an individual's right to own and use property without government interference." P. 10 #16

"We believe that groundwater is an absolute, vested ownership right of the landowner." P. 10 #6

"We believe that the state should neither make nor enforce any law that abridges or denies the inalienable constitutional rights of the citizens of Texas with regards to minerals, water, or property rights." P. 10 #7

"We oppose conservation easements on our national resources administered by organizations unaccountable to taxpayers and voters." P.10 #9 (This suggests that land trusts would become unconstitutional under a dominionist-influenced court)

"We oppose the Endangered Species Act." P. 10 #17  (The Endangered Species Act has been used to stop development in some areas.)

Biblical Rational for Property Rights

America's Providential History, a textbook that teaches millions of children in Christian schools and the Christian homeschool movement how to view reality through the lens of a Biblical Worldview, explains the biblical rational for property rights.

Let every person be in subjection  to the government authorities: ... For rulers are not a cause of fear for good behavior but for evil...it is a minister of God, an avenger who brings wrath upon the one who practices evil. (Romans 13:1,3,4)
(Supreme Court Justice Scalia agrees with Paul and even cites the same quote for an article he wrote called God's Justice and Ours.)

America's Providential History interprets Paul's statement as an affirmation of property rights:

The purpose of government therefore is to protect the life, liberty AND PROPERTY by punishing evil doers and encouraging the righteous. (p. 20)

Scripture defines God as the source of private property ..
Ecclesiastes 5:19 states, "For every man to whom God has given riches and wealth, He has also empowered him to eat from them..." Also in 1Chronicles 29:12, Both riches and honor come from Thee." (p. 188)

God has created everything, including us, and given us the right to possess property... (p. 272)

Developers and dominionists alike have lost sight of other basic rights such as the right to protect the environment and conserve open space. They have lost sight of the notion of land use for the common good.  

I've devoted many years to teaching about the principles of ecological cities. I started EcoVillage at Ithaca, a thriving environmental community of sixty households where I now reside. I also co-convened the Third International EcoCity Conference in Senegal, West Africa. Yet the future of the Green Cities movement and its enormous implications for the environment could be thwarted by a Roberts Supreme Court if that court embraces a dominionist philosophy of property rights.

America's Providential History teaches the goodness of a "government acting on the Biblical principles:"

The  internal change of heart that Christ brings produces Christian character and self-government which is necessary for an economy to be prosperous. (p. 194)

This belief in a future where, eventually, perhaps over thousands of years, there will be a societal change of heart that Christ brings, is very optimistic. I applaud those who carry such a vision in their hearts.

The problem is that that vision becomes a nightmare when it is used for political power. Consider the issue of property rights. If all property owners were good, honest people who believed in the stewardship of the earth, there might not be a problem.

But real estate magnates such as Howie Rich of  New York who was highlighted on PBS Now for bankrolling property rights campaigns in several Western states this election cycle have the most to gain. They support politicians who campaign on hot-button social issues such as abortion or gay rights, and those same politicians gave the developers the absolute right to plunder and pollute our natural resources.

Previous articles in the series on Dominionism and The Role of The Federal Government

Dominionism and The Constitution in Exile Movement

House Bill Would Eliminate Most Regulatory Functions Of Federal Government

A Culture of Life or Death?

Follow The Votes

Paul Weyrich: The Man Who Framed the Republican Party (How he succeeded in getting a huge constituency to vote against their economic interests)

ALEC: Traditional values discover corporate funding




Display:
can be reframed by a simple line of thought experiment and questioning :

I was debating a relative about the effects of pervasive environmental pollution. I cited studies, facts.

Recourse to actual scientific data didn't seem persuasive, so I tried another tact :

"So, if environmental pollutation isn't a significant threat, can I come over to your house and sprinkle Lead dust and blobs of Mercury on your kitchen floor and in your kid's bedrooms ? Lead and Mercury keep insects away and are utterly harmless - they won't hurt your kids a bit."

Needless to say, that wasn't going to happen and the question established common ground - yes, we both agreed that environmental pollution was real and worth worrying about.

The next stop in the Socratic journey was this proposition:

"OK, so we agree that Lead and Mercury are bad to have kicking around on the kitchen floor. Now, what about if I build a Lead-smelting factory next door to your house ? I only want to melt down used car batteries to reclaim the Lead, and the fumes really won't be bad at all. In fact, Lead fumes are quite pleasant really - they smell sweet."

In the face of that challenge, the "Biblically mandated, sacred and inviolate nature of property rights" frame comes crashing down because  - when push comes to shove - most parents pay heed to what science has to say about poisons that can effect the health of their children, and most people are very concerned - if they're aware and can avoid it - to not be poisoned.

Tearing down the "sacred property rights" frame is not a difficult proposition in the abstract, and the mass of allegation - that environmentalism is a coded form of socialism or ( satanic ! ) communism can be actually inverted, per my thought experiments above.

So, to those who might attempt to call environmentalists "communist", one can simply respond :

"So, you're calling the American people COMMUNISTS ? ! - How DARE you !  - All Americans are environmentalists because they don't want to be poisoned by Lead and Mercury or locked in a garage and asphyxiated with Carbon Monoxide. All Americans are environmentalists, so that means they're supposed to be communists ? You know, I think it un-American to smear the good name of the American people."

I rest my case.


by Bruce Wilson on Wed Oct 04, 2006 at 07:58:19 AM EST


There is another aspect to this argument- the confiscation of ordinary citizen's property to turn over to developers for profit.

I don't hear the dominionists weighing in on that one!

It's happening fairly often around the country, although not well known.  There are poor neighborhoods here in Lakeland that are being razed (the individuals were FORCED to move) so they can put in condos and fancy apartments.  It is getting so that poor and even middle class people can live in Florida, because of the cost of housing.

In Hillsborough county, you have to make OVER $20 an hour just to afford a two-bedroom apartment.  Yet, Hillsborough County is destroying public housing to gentrify the area.  They are replacing affordable housing with, again, fancy apartments and condos.

We are studying the impact of this on people.  I myself am looking at the impact of the razing of public housing on homelessness.

What about a person's right to have a place to live?  That is declared a need (and I believe a right) in the Bible!!!

They obviously don't care about people, much less the poor.

They ignore what is happening to the poor, yet fuss about profits.  Yet they claim to be Christian.  THEY TURN MY STOMACH!!!!

by ArchaeoBob on Wed Oct 04, 2006 at 10:53:02 AM EST

The misuse of Eminent Domain is a real problem, but the unpopularity of eminent domain is being used by real estate magnates like Howie Rich featured on PBS NOW (see post for link) to bankroll a so-called populist movement whose ultimate goal is to make it impossible for local governments to curb urban sprawl.

by Joan Bokaer on Wed Oct 04, 2006 at 07:44:05 PM EST
Parent

.............when developers yell and scream about "property rights" and then go all the way to the Supreme Court and get a decision in favor of their stomping all over other people's property rights so they can build another shopping mall or a bunch of oversized, overpriced, slapped-together McMansions on top of what used to be other people's homes.

Aside from the unethical nature of both the practice and the Court's decision, there's some serious cluelessness going on here. OK, they "won" this round, but who's to say some bigger fish can't come along in a few years and boot them out? The Supreme Court says it's legal!

As I always understood it, Eminent Domain was intended as a last-resort means of making way for the construction of public works such as highways, airports, and other necessary but non-profit-making infrastructure for the direct benefit of the general public--absolutely not for private gain of any kind. The "increasing public revenue by increasing the tax base" argument--which I suspect was invoked to support the Court's misguided and (IMO) downright cruel decision--is at best highly suspect.

Eminent Domain property confiscation is always traumatic for those who lose their homes and neighborhoods, even if the owners receive substantially more than "fair market value." That does happen occasionally--as I learned 25 years or so ago from a friend whose job it was to work with the displaced and help them get properly resettled--but the money never makes up for the bomb that goes off under people's lives. (My friend burned out on the job in about 3 years because she couldn't deal with all the pain and suffering any more, and she was one of the toughest people I knew.)

Losing one's home and neighborhood for any reason is bad enough. For people--and it always seems to be the less well-off among us--who get uprooted in favor of yet another pricey housing development, shopping mall, or country club, it has to absolutely galling.

I'm a resident of low-income housing myself, and even though the place is currently "out in the outer burbs," when I see the McMansions going up practically just around the corner I'm not at all sure that my building and the "prime real estate" where it sits won't eventually be swallowed up by someone's land grab.

Excuse me, I have to go to Home Depot and pick up a load of hardware and a tank of propane so I can spit nails, nuts and bolts, doorknobs, and maybe a rebar or two, followed by a few shots of fire...............


by anomalous4 on Thu Oct 05, 2006 at 12:21:52 AM EST
Parent



Making that term merely a synonym for "political stances I disagree with" only cheapens it for when it's really needed.


Abu Ghraib: Hell House of the Religious Right II
by sendtoscott on Thu Oct 05, 2006 at 09:45:41 AM EST
Is there any level of economic controls justified by "Jesus would want it" that would qualify as 'dominionism' from the left, or is this something that, by definition, only your political opponents can do?


Abu Ghraib: Hell House of the Religious Right II
by sendtoscott on Thu Oct 05, 2006 at 09:49:58 AM EST
Parent
Tied her use of "Dominionism" to a rather specific setting - the Texas legislature. The Texas GOP was the first of a string of the state level GOP taken over by the Christian right, and the Texas GOP state party platform has in the past few years a rather concentrated -and quite unabashed -  expression of "Domionism", with explicit statements to the effect that the US is a "Christian nation".

As for your second question, well - of course there could exist a "dominionism" of the left. Hypothetically. But, none exists currently.
 

by Bruce Wilson on Thu Oct 05, 2006 at 10:17:41 AM EST
Parent





WWW Talk To Action


Cognitive Dissonance & Dominionism Denial
There is new research on why people are averse to hearing or learning about the views of ideological opponents. Based on evaluation of five......
By Frederick Clarkson (374 comments)
Will the Air Force Do Anything To Rein In Its Dynamic Duo of Gay-Bashing, Misogynistic Bloggers?
"I always get nervous when I see female pastors/chaplains. Here is why everyone should as well: "First, women are not called to be pastors,......
By Chris Rodda (198 comments)
The Legacy of Big Oil
The media is ablaze with the upcoming publication of David Grann's book, Killers of the Flower Moon. The shocking non fiction account of the......
By wilkyjr (111 comments)
Gimme That Old Time Dominionism Denial
Over the years, I have written a great deal here and in other venues about the explicitly theocratic movement called dominionism -- which has......
By Frederick Clarkson (101 comments)
History Advisor to Members of Congress Completely Twists Jefferson's Words to Support Muslim Ban
Pseudo-historian David Barton, best known for his misquoting of our country's founders to promote the notion that America was founded as a Christian nation,......
By Chris Rodda (113 comments)
"Christian Fighter Pilot" Calls First Lesbian Air Force Academy Commandant a Liar
In a new post on his "Christian Fighter Pilot" blog titled "BGen Kristin Goodwin and the USAFA Honor Code," Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Jonathan......
By Chris Rodda (144 comments)
Catholic Right Leader Unapologetic about Call for 'Death to Liberal Professors' -- UPDATED
Today, Donald Trump appointed C-FAM Executive Vice President Lisa Correnti to the US Delegation To UN Commission On Status Of Women. (C-FAM is a......
By Frederick Clarkson (126 comments)
Controlling Information
     Yesterday I listened to Russ Limbaugh.  Rush advised listeners it would be best that they not listen to CNN,MSNBC, ABC, CBS and......
By wilkyjr (118 comments)
Is Bannon Fifth-Columning the Pope?
In December 2016 I wrote about how White House chief strategist Steve Bannon, who likes to flash his Catholic credentials when it comes to......
By Frank Cocozzelli (250 comments)
Ross Douthat's Hackery on the Seemingly Incongruous Alliance of Bannon & Burke
Conservative Catholic writer Ross Douthat has dissembled again. This time, in a February 15, 2017 New York Times op-ed titled The Trump Era's Catholic......
By Frank Cocozzelli (64 comments)
`So-Called Patriots' Attack The Rule Of Law
Every so often, right-wing commentator Pat Buchanan lurches out of the far-right fever swamp where he has resided for the past 50 years to......
By Rob Boston (161 comments)
Bad Faith from Focus on the Family
Here is one from the archives, Feb 12, 2011, that serves as a reminder of how deeply disingenuous people can be. Appeals to seek......
By Frederick Clarkson (177 comments)
The Legacy of George Wallace
"One need not accept any of those views to agree that they had appealed to real concerns of real people, not to mindless, unreasoning......
By wilkyjr (70 comments)
Betsy DeVos's Mudsill View of Public Education
My Talk to Action colleague Rachel Tabachnick has been doing yeoman's work in explaining Betsy DeVos's long-term strategy for decimating universal public education. If......
By Frank Cocozzelli (80 comments)
Prince and DeVos Families at Intersection of Radical Free Market Privatizers and Religious Right
This post from 2011 surfaces important information about President-Elect Trump's nominee for Secretary of Education, Betsy DeVos. -- FC Erik Prince, Brother of Betsy......
By Rachel Tabachnick (218 comments)

Respect for Others? or Political Correctness?
The term "political correctness" as used by Conservatives and Republicans has often puzzled me: what exactly do they mean by it? After reading Chip Berlin's piece here-- http://www.talk2action.org/story/2016/7/21/04356/9417 I thought about what he explained......
MTOLincoln (253 comments)
Fear
What I'm feeling now is fear.  I swear that it seems my nightmares are coming true with this new "president".  I'm also frustrated because so many people are not connecting all the dots! I've......
ArchaeoBob (107 comments)
"America - love it or LEAVE!"
I've been hearing that and similar sentiments fairly frequently in the last few days - far FAR more often than ever before.  Hearing about "consequences for burning the flag (actions) from Trump is chilling!......
ArchaeoBob (211 comments)
"Faked!" Meme
Keep your eyes and ears open for a possible move to try to discredit the people openly opposing Trump and the bigots, especially people who have experienced terrorism from the "Right"  (Christian Terrorism is......
ArchaeoBob (165 comments)
More aggressive proselytizing
My wife told me today of an experience she had this last week, where she was proselytized by a McDonald's employee while in the store. ......
ArchaeoBob (163 comments)
See if you recognize names on this list
This comes from the local newspaper, which was conservative before and took a hard right turn after it was sold. Hint: Sarah Palin's name is on it!  (It's also connected to Trump.) ......
ArchaeoBob (169 comments)
Unions: A Labor Day Discussion
This is a revision of an article which I posted on my personal board and also on Dailykos. I had an interesting discussion on a discussion board concerning Unions. I tried to piece it......
Xulon (172 comments)
Extremely obnoxious protesters at WitchsFest NYC: connected to NAR?
In July of this year, some extremely loud, obnoxious Christian-identified protesters showed up at WitchsFest, an annual Pagan street fair here in NYC.  Here's an account of the protest by Pagan writer Heather Greene......
Diane Vera (130 comments)
Capitalism and the Attack on the Imago Dei
I joined this site today, having been linked here by Crooksandliars' Blog Roundup. I thought I'd put up something I put up previously on my Wordpress blog and also at the DailyKos. As will......
Xulon (331 comments)
History of attitudes towards poverty and the churches.
Jesus is said to have stated that "The Poor will always be with you" and some Christians have used that to refuse to try to help the poor, because "they will always be with......
ArchaeoBob (148 comments)
Alternate economy medical treatment
Dogemperor wrote several times about the alternate economy structure that dominionists have built.  Well, it's actually made the news.  Pretty good article, although it doesn't get into how bad people could be (have been)......
ArchaeoBob (90 comments)
Evidence violence is more common than believed
Think I've been making things up about experiencing Christian Terrorism or exaggerating, or that it was an isolated incident?  I suggest you read this article (linked below in body), which is about our great......
ArchaeoBob (214 comments)

More Diaries...




All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments, posts, stories, and all other content are owned by the authors. Everything else 2005 Talk to Action, LLC.