But here is the deal.

In order to have coherent conversations about the religious right -- just as with any subject -- it helps to have some kind of common set of knowledge, an agreed upon set of terms, and the capacity to develop deeper understandings that can inform our evolving understanding of the dynamics of political life. I have suggested five books that could form the basis for such a conversation. How many people have taken up my suggestion, I have no idea. Maybe it was a bad idea.  Here at  Talk to Action, we are trying to ratchet-up our collective literacy about these things, and even as we are having some remarkable success, we can also see from the comment threads how difficult it can be sometimes. But it is just one place. We need to have more such places in our political lives to have these conversations. One event I have mentioned before that always features at least one discussion of the religious right is the annual reproductive rights conference at Hampshire College in Amherst, Massachusetts.  

I was on the panel this year, when a remarkable thing happened that has informed my thinking since:

There were about sixty-five people in the session; mostly young; almost all women. Some worked for reproductive rights organizations around the country. As always, it was an interesting and informative set of presentations, and a thought provoking question and answer period.

At the end of the program, each of the presenters was asked to take a minute for a final word.

I took my minute to observe that in our workplaces; in our political organizations, be they prochoice, LGBT, Democratic Party; whatever -- there are no spaces where we can speak knowledgeably and coherently about the religious right. As I said this, audible murmurs of agreement rippled through the room, and there was a visible physical reaction among many. I was startled by this: clearly I had surfaced and identified a need people have in their political lives.

At conferences all over America this summer, the  elephant on the table will be the religious right -- and everyone will be talking around it. Few will be so impolite as to ask when we are going to actually talk about it?