Catholic Tea Party Economics
Frank Cocozzelli printable version print page     Bookmark and Share
Sun Aug 15, 2010 at 03:14:36 PM EST
In my last post I discussed how the Catholic Right now seems to be decoupling from the neoconservative philosophy of empire and behind-the-scenes philosopher elites, and hooking up with paleo-conservative elements of the Tea Party movement.

While there are significant philosophical differences between these tendencies, they both believe in a form of laissez-faire capitalism steeped deeply in the neo-platonic notion of knowing one's place in society. This shift reveals what many suspect: That the leadership of the Catholic Right - like much of the Religious Right movement - is using faith as a tool to accomplish a laissez-faire economic agenda.

 While there is a distinct and identifiable trend here, the Tea Party movement defies easy characterizations. Tea Partiers often hold contradictory opinions - for example, wanting to preserve their Social Security benefits while opposing  "big government programs." Their leadership, however, know exactly what they want - laissez-faire, "casino" capitalism - and what they don't want - Keynesian capitalism.

As I previously noted, GOP insider Deal Hudson has gone so far as to call for "a Catholic Tea Party" faction.

With that in mind, I have been reading up on John Maynard Keynes. I am currently working through his Magnum opus, The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, which was published in 1936 during the Great Depression. It is often difficult reading, but it is well worth the effort. And in order to understand how Keynesian economics can be successfully applied to correct today's economic woes I have read and reread both economist Paul Davidson's The Keynes Solution: The Path to Global Economic Prosperity as well as 's Keynes: The Return of the Master.

You may by now be asking yourself why I would dust off these tomes in search of answers to contemporary economic problems.  The answer is simple: Because Keynesian economic principles explain many of the fallacies of laissez-faire capitalism while offering an alternative way to help a market economy to function in a more robust and healthy manner. In short, Keynes proposed an alternate style of capitalism, one instilled with healthy doses of realism, self-discipline and fairness. It is also a potent weapon to blunt Christian Tea Party laissez-faire economics. As we will explore in an upcoming related post, Keynes' belief in "living a reasonable life" strongly echoes Monsignor John A. Ryan's Distributive Justice goals..

But before we can apply Keynes's solutions as "a refudiation" of Tea Party economic policies, we must first understand what is in need of refudiating.

Hayek's Ghost

What most Tea Partiers advocate is a form of Austrian School flavored libertarian economics, epitomized by the life and work of the movement's new hero,, economist F.A. Hayek (1889-1992). Hayek is often remembered for his 1944 book Road to Serfdom, a defense of laissez-faire and dire warning about where New Deal liberalism and British Labour would lead - dictatorship; an outcome already refudiated by history.

But the Austrian-born economist is also known for his theory of spontaneous order, defined by the Online Library of Liberty as "...an order which emerges as result of the voluntary activities of individuals and not one which is created by a government, is a key idea in the classical liberal and free market tradition." As one modern Keynesian put it, "In other words, government economic policy is the problem, the free market is the solution."

This is very much the essence of Classical and its progeny, libertarian economic thought.  Its mantra is that government efforts to jump-start stagnate economies can only throw off the equilibrium or natural order of business. Unlike Keynes who believed that it was government's role to ensure enough demand so that wages - and thus, the standard of living - do not decrease, today's laissez-faire advocates subscribe to Say's Law; the belief that supply creates demand.

"Let the system take care of itself and damn the human consequences." It echoes the harsh advice Secretary of the Treasury Andrew Mellon gave President Hoover at the outset of the Great Depression, "Liquidate labor, liquidate stocks, liquidate the farmers, liquidate real estate." The belief being that when available jobs pay less, workers will be required to take less pay. This "equilibrium" will the supposedly restore boom times. It is in this callous way markets "correct themselves."

Calvinist Libertarianism

But boom times for whom? Keynes pointed out in chapter 19, page 262 of The General Theory:

What will be the effect of this redistribution on the propensity to consume for the community as a whole? The transfer from wage-earners to other factors is likely to diminish the propensity to consume. The effect of the transfer from entrepreneurs to rentiers [a rentier is a person who lives on income from property or investments.] is more open to doubt. But if rentiers represent on the whole the richer section of the community and those whose standard of life is least flexible, then the effect of this also will be unfavourable.

Beyond that, such laissez-faire dogma calls for a world where there are no labor contracts; one where workers must docilely accept lower wages. That is why we hear conservative economists such as Amity Schlaes make the bogus claim that FDR's support for unionization supposedly prolonged the Great Depression.

Laissez-faire is nothing less than an economic form of Calvinism, replete with its belief in predestination. It is a theory that preaches that the past is a shadow of the future and that government has no role in addressing future economic uncertainty. And if government does attempt to address unseen contingencies, it will only aggravate things a delay a return to prosperity? Why? Because laissez-faire advocates believe that economics operates pursuant to an ergodic axiom - that the outcomes are predetermined.

The inherent absurdity of this proposition is not lost on Keynesian economist Paul Davidson:

The assumption that the economy is governed by an ergodic stochastic process means that the future path of the economy is already predetermined and can not be changed by human action today. Astronomers insist that the future path of the planets around the sun and the moon around the earth has been predetermined since the moment of the Big Bang beginning of the universe. Nothing humans can do can change the predetermined path of these heavenly bodies. This "Big Bang" astronomy theory means that the  "hard science" of astronomy relies on the ergodic axiom.  Consequently by using past measurements of the speed and direction of heavenly bodies, astronomical scientists can accurately predict the time (usually within seconds) of when the next solar eclipse will be observable on the earth.

Assuming that this hard science astronomy is applicable to the heavenly bodies of our universe, then it should be obvious that the United States Congress can not pass legislation that will actually prevent future solar eclipses from occurring even if the legislation is designed to obtain more sunshine to improve agriculture crop production. In a similar vein, if, as [Paul] Samuelson claims, economics is a "hard science" based on the ergodic axiom, then Congress can neither pass a law preventing the next eclipse nor pass a law to prevent the preprogrammed next systemic financial crisis. The result is a belief in a laissez-faire non government intervention policy as the only correct policy.

And why is this theory so appealing to advocates of laissez-faire? Again, Paul Davidson explains:

Thus, for example, it is often argued that the government creates unemployment in the private sector when it passes legislation that all workers are entitled to at least  minimum wage that cannot be lowered even if unemployed workers are willing to work for less rather than starve. Similarly if government passes legislation that protects and encourages unionization, the effect will be to push wages up so high that profit opportunities will be ultimately eliminated and unemployment of workers assured. Thus, it follows from classical theory, that  the market, and not the government should decide what wage rate should be the minimum that workers should receive. Consistency therefore would require arguing that government should never constrain the pay of top management but rather should leave it to the market to determine the value of CEOs. Is it not surprising that these CEO's then hire these classical economists as consultants?

This is what Tea Party advocates such as Dick Armey and Matt Kibbe mean when they demand "Give us liberty!". It is liberty for a select, fortunate few; the freedom from having profit distributed based upon merit, contribution or special skills but instead via unchecked power.

Such casino capitalism (Keynes's term) has been at the foundation of GOP politics for the last thirty years. As the editor of the journal U.S. Catholic Bryan Cones  observed of Hudson:

Can we just be honest here? Deal Hudson is a Republican. He thinks everyone should be a Republican, and he thinks if you're a Catholic, you should be a Republican because the only issues you should ever cast a vote on are abortion and gay marriage (as if the GOP is really pure in practice on either of those issues).

Thus, it is a no-brainer for Hudson the GOP insider to serve up über-orthodox Catholic agenda with some hot Tea Party rhetoric.

In the next installment Keynes's principles will be examined as a means to refute the Religious Right.

Related Posts:
Catholic Right: Are the Neo-Cons Out and the Tea-Partiers In?




Display:
But with that said, we need to be able to discuss what the other side believes.

All too often we name laissez-faire as the culprit for the current state of the economy, but we often fail to explain why. Once we begin to explain that their definition of freedom and of liberty means working folks are supposed to have decreasing incomes, we'll see just how many folks will be willing to join their tea party.

by Frank Cocozzelli on Sun Aug 15, 2010 at 03:24:16 PM EST

... this is why I have been wading through volumes of Rushdoony, including his 800+ page The Institutes of Biblical Law.  For many years I have read excerpts and also Rushdoony's writings at Chalcedon, etc.  I've also read large quantities (but not nearly all) of Gary North's writings including his Lew Rockwell posts. For those who don't know that website, Rockwell is the founder of the Ludwig von Mises Institute which promotes Austrian School economics.

Rushdoony and North's writings explain how theocratic and liberty can be uttered in the same breath.

by Rachel Tabachnick on Sun Aug 15, 2010 at 07:52:05 PM EST
Parent

That explains quite a lot.

Thank you Rachel!

by Frank Cocozzelli on Sun Aug 15, 2010 at 08:34:52 PM EST
Parent


Have you read James Wesley Rawles's book "How to Survive the End of the World?" I mention it as he professes to be a follower of Gary North. I read it, and it is consistent with the "sky is falling" sort of items we see with the Tea Party folks.

by khughes1963 on Sun Aug 15, 2010 at 09:30:10 PM EST
Parent


Great work, as always, Mr. Cocozzelli. And, as a union retiree, I am particularly interested in how to argue against the laissez-faire-style of capitalism favored by those on the right.

Credit where it's deserved, however. What could be a more perfect vehicle for delivering up the people to corporate slavery than to preach that this is how God wants things to be?



by trog69 on Thu Aug 19, 2010 at 04:27:04 PM EST
Parent


The "leadership" in the Church wants us to return to a pre-Vatican II defensive and fearful outlook, and the Catholic theocons want to join the tea partiers. It appears to be part of a single unified and mistaken whole. You have just illustrated precisely what is wrong with this mindset, "liberty" for the few and penury for the many. Not to put too fine a point on it, but I think the tea partiers are espousing a sort of magical thinking of the sort we usually see with the peddlers of the prosperity gospel.

by khughes1963 on Sun Aug 15, 2010 at 09:27:28 PM EST

I sincerely hope Paul Davidson has a better grasp on economics than he does of the "hard" sciences.

Astronomers insist that the future path of the planets around the sun and the moon around the earth has been predetermined since the moment of the Big Bang beginning of the universe.

Ouch! Run that past any working astronomer or cosmologist - but bring along enough money to buy a big lunch, because you're going to be in for a lecture and a half.

Back to the main topic: though I for one don't know much about ties between the Catholic hierarchy and the C Street "Family" (other than the overlap of both with the Republican Party), it should be mentioned that the Family's roots also rise from anti-labor crusades of the Red Scare and the Depression.

As for Keynes, he would be dismissed instantly by teabaggers of all sects simply for having been bisexual. Analyzing the fit of his theories to actual economic factors is strictly an exercise for the reality-based community.

You don't have to be a Marxist to see religion's history as a tool of controlling the majority for the benefit of a small elite. Kudos to Cocozzelli for bringing the details up to date!

by Pierce R Butler on Tue Aug 17, 2010 at 12:54:06 PM EST

I read Invisible Hands, the Businessmen's Crusade against the New Deal, by Kim Phillips-Fein, just prior to my presentation at the Keystone Progress conference, (link to presentation summary).  My presentation was on the current embrace of "Biblical Capitalism" and its impact on economic policy and the book was a good resource.

It provides an overview of the efforts of business leaders to enroll fundamentalists to participate in fighting to overturn New Deal legislation.  The author includes a reference to Abraham Vereide who founded The Family, but also organizations like Spiritual Mobilization founded by J. Howard Pew, which worked to promote laissez-faire capitalism among religious leaders.  According to Phillips-Fein, Pew wanted to raise the money to send every minister a copy of Hayek's Road to Serfdom.


by Rachel Tabachnick on Wed Aug 18, 2010 at 03:38:12 PM EST
Parent



I wonder what Pope Leo XIII would have thought of all this. He seemed to have some compassion for  the working man.
Jim of Olym

by rdrjames on Sun Aug 22, 2010 at 07:58:24 PM EST


WWW Talk To Action


Cognitive Dissonance & Dominionism Denial
There is new research on why people are averse to hearing or learning about the views of ideological opponents. Based on evaluation of five......
By Frederick Clarkson (4 comments)
Will the Air Force Do Anything To Rein In Its Dynamic Duo of Gay-Bashing, Misogynistic Bloggers?
"I always get nervous when I see female pastors/chaplains. Here is why everyone should as well: "First, women are not called to be pastors,......
By Chris Rodda (2 comments)
The Legacy of Big Oil
The media is ablaze with the upcoming publication of David Grann's book, Killers of the Flower Moon. The shocking non fiction account of the......
By wilkyjr (0 comments)
Gimme That Old Time Dominionism Denial
Over the years, I have written a great deal here and in other venues about the explicitly theocratic movement called dominionism -- which has......
By Frederick Clarkson (4 comments)
History Advisor to Members of Congress Completely Twists Jefferson's Words to Support Muslim Ban
Pseudo-historian David Barton, best known for his misquoting of our country's founders to promote the notion that America was founded as a Christian nation,......
By Chris Rodda (5 comments)
"Christian Fighter Pilot" Calls First Lesbian Air Force Academy Commandant a Liar
In a new post on his "Christian Fighter Pilot" blog titled "BGen Kristin Goodwin and the USAFA Honor Code," Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Jonathan......
By Chris Rodda (0 comments)
Catholic Right Leader Unapologetic about Call for 'Death to Liberal Professors' -- UPDATED
Today, Donald Trump appointed C-FAM Executive Vice President Lisa Correnti to the US Delegation To UN Commission On Status Of Women. (C-FAM is a......
By Frederick Clarkson (2 comments)
Controlling Information
     Yesterday I listened to Russ Limbaugh.  Rush advised listeners it would be best that they not listen to CNN,MSNBC, ABC, CBS and......
By wilkyjr (4 comments)
Is Bannon Fifth-Columning the Pope?
In December 2016 I wrote about how White House chief strategist Steve Bannon, who likes to flash his Catholic credentials when it comes to......
By Frank Cocozzelli (3 comments)
Ross Douthat's Hackery on the Seemingly Incongruous Alliance of Bannon & Burke
Conservative Catholic writer Ross Douthat has dissembled again. This time, in a February 15, 2017 New York Times op-ed titled The Trump Era's Catholic......
By Frank Cocozzelli (2 comments)
`So-Called Patriots' Attack The Rule Of Law
Every so often, right-wing commentator Pat Buchanan lurches out of the far-right fever swamp where he has resided for the past 50 years to......
By Rob Boston (1 comment)
Bad Faith from Focus on the Family
Here is one from the archives, Feb 12, 2011, that serves as a reminder of how deeply disingenuous people can be. Appeals to seek......
By Frederick Clarkson (6 comments)
The Legacy of George Wallace
"One need not accept any of those views to agree that they had appealed to real concerns of real people, not to mindless, unreasoning......
By wilkyjr (6 comments)
Betsy DeVos's Mudsill View of Public Education
My Talk to Action colleague Rachel Tabachnick has been doing yeoman's work in explaining Betsy DeVos's long-term strategy for decimating universal public education. If......
By Frank Cocozzelli (7 comments)
Prince and DeVos Families at Intersection of Radical Free Market Privatizers and Religious Right
This post from 2011 surfaces important information about President-Elect Trump's nominee for Secretary of Education, Betsy DeVos. -- FC Erik Prince, Brother of Betsy......
By Rachel Tabachnick (21 comments)

Respect for Others? or Political Correctness?
The term "political correctness" as used by Conservatives and Republicans has often puzzled me: what exactly do they mean by it? After reading Chip Berlin's piece here-- http://www.talk2action.org/story/2016/7/21/04356/9417 I thought about what he explained......
MTOLincoln (4 comments)
Fear
What I'm feeling now is fear.  I swear that it seems my nightmares are coming true with this new "president".  I'm also frustrated because so many people are not connecting all the dots! I've......
ArchaeoBob (4 comments)
"America - love it or LEAVE!"
I've been hearing that and similar sentiments fairly frequently in the last few days - far FAR more often than ever before.  Hearing about "consequences for burning the flag (actions) from Trump is chilling!......
ArchaeoBob (4 comments)
"Faked!" Meme
Keep your eyes and ears open for a possible move to try to discredit the people openly opposing Trump and the bigots, especially people who have experienced terrorism from the "Right"  (Christian Terrorism is......
ArchaeoBob (6 comments)
More aggressive proselytizing
My wife told me today of an experience she had this last week, where she was proselytized by a McDonald's employee while in the store. ......
ArchaeoBob (5 comments)
See if you recognize names on this list
This comes from the local newspaper, which was conservative before and took a hard right turn after it was sold. Hint: Sarah Palin's name is on it!  (It's also connected to Trump.) ......
ArchaeoBob (3 comments)
Unions: A Labor Day Discussion
This is a revision of an article which I posted on my personal board and also on Dailykos. I had an interesting discussion on a discussion board concerning Unions. I tried to piece it......
Xulon (4 comments)
Extremely obnoxious protesters at WitchsFest NYC: connected to NAR?
In July of this year, some extremely loud, obnoxious Christian-identified protesters showed up at WitchsFest, an annual Pagan street fair here in NYC.  Here's an account of the protest by Pagan writer Heather Greene......
Diane Vera (3 comments)
Capitalism and the Attack on the Imago Dei
I joined this site today, having been linked here by Crooksandliars' Blog Roundup. I thought I'd put up something I put up previously on my Wordpress blog and also at the DailyKos. As will......
Xulon (2 comments)
History of attitudes towards poverty and the churches.
Jesus is said to have stated that "The Poor will always be with you" and some Christians have used that to refuse to try to help the poor, because "they will always be with......
ArchaeoBob (13 comments)
Alternate economy medical treatment
Dogemperor wrote several times about the alternate economy structure that dominionists have built.  Well, it's actually made the news.  Pretty good article, although it doesn't get into how bad people could be (have been)......
ArchaeoBob (5 comments)
Evidence violence is more common than believed
Think I've been making things up about experiencing Christian Terrorism or exaggerating, or that it was an isolated incident?  I suggest you read this article (linked below in body), which is about our great......
ArchaeoBob (7 comments)
Central Florida Sheriff Preached Sermon in Uniform
If anyone has been following the craziness in Polk County Florida, they know that some really strange and troubling things have happened here.  We've had multiple separation of church and state lawsuits going at......
ArchaeoBob (2 comments)
Demon Mammon?
An anthropologist from outer space might be forgiven for concluding that the god of this world is Mammon. (Or, rather, The Market, as depicted by John McMurtry in his book The Cancer Stage of......
daerie (2 comments)
Anti-Sharia Fever in Texas: This is How It Starts
The mayor of a mid-size Texan city has emerged in recent months as the newest face of Islamophobia. Aligning herself with extremists hostile to Islam, Mayor Beth Van Duyne of Irving, Texas has helped......
JSanford (2 comments)

More Diaries...




All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments, posts, stories, and all other content are owned by the authors. Everything else 2005 Talk to Action, LLC.